The Geography and Area Studies Interface from the Second World War to the Cold War

References

• Ackerman, E. A. 1945. Geographic Training, Wartime Research, and Immediate Professional Objectives. Annals of the Association of American Geographer 35: 121–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agnew, J. 1994. The Territorial Trap: the Geographical Assumptions of International Relations Theory. Review of International Political Economy 1: 53–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agnew, J. 2013. Arguing with Regions. Regional Studies 47: 6–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, B. 1998. The Spectre of Comparisons. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Appadurai, A. 1996. Modernity at Large. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Asad, T. 1973. Anthropology and the Colonial Encounter. London: Humanity Books.
   Google Scholar
• Axelrod, J., D. N. Bigelow, and the American Council on Education. 1962. Resources for Language and Area Studies. American Council on Education.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, T. J. 2006. Geographical intelligence: American Geographers and Research and Analysis in the Office of Strategic Services 1941–1945. Journal of Historical Geography 32: 149–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barney, T. 2015. Mapping the Cold War. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barter, S. 2015. Geographical Record: Area Studies, Asian Studies, and the Pacific Basin. Geographical Review 105 (1): 105–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. C. 1947. The Ethnogeographic Board. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections 107(1). Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. C. 1951. Area Studies in American Universities. Social Science Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• Bigelow, D., and L. Legters. 1964. Bulletin: NDEA Language and Area Centers: A Report on the First 5 Years. Washington, D.C.: US Office of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Boas, F. 1887. The Study of Geography. Science 9 (210): 137–141.
   Google Scholar
• Bowman, I. 1934. Geography in Relation to the Social Sciences. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, W. N. 1951. India, Pakistan, Ceylon. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, W. N. 1964. South Asia Studies: A History. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 356 (1): 54–62.
   Google Scholar
• Buttimer, A. 1971. Society and Milieu in the French Geographic Tradition. New York: Rand McNally.
   Google Scholar
• Cahnman, W. 1948. Outline of a Theory of Area Studies. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 38 (4): 233–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chari, S. 2016. Trans‐Area Studies and the Perils of Geographical “World‐Writing”. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow, R. 2006. The Age of the World Target. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohn, B. 1987. An Anthropologist among the Historians. New Delhi. India: Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Crampton, J. 2011. Arthur Robinson and the Creation of America's First Spy Agency. Presentation at the 2011 Meetings of the International Cartographic Association, Paris. [http://icaci.org/files/documents/ICC_proceedings/ICC2011/Oral%20Presentations%20PDF/B4-Maps,%20GIS,%20security%20and%20planning/CO-174.pdf].
   Google Scholar
• Cumings, B. 1997. Boundary Displacement: Area Studies and International Studies during the Cold War. Bureau of Concerned Asian Scholars 29 (1): 6–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, W. M. 1924. Progress of Geography in the United States. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 14 (4): 159–215.
   Google Scholar
• de La Blache, P. V. 1926. Principles of Human Geography. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Dirks, N. 2003. South Asian Studies: Futures Past. In The Politics of Knowledge: Area Studies and the Disciplines, edited by D. Szanton. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engerman, D. 2009. Know Your Enemy: the rise and fall of America's Soviet Experts. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Farish, M. 2005. Archiving Areas: The Ethnogeographic Board and the Second World War. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 95 (3): 663–679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farish, M. 2010. The Contours of America's Cold War. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fenton, W. 1946. Integration of Geography and Anthropology in Army Area Study Curricula. Bulletin of the American Association of University Professors 32 (4): 696–706.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson‐graham, J. K. 2004. Area Studies After Poststructuralism. Environment and Planning A 36 (3):405–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottmann, J. 1952. The Contributions of Anthropo‐Geography and Economic Surveys to Area Studies. UNESCO International Social Science Bulletin. New York: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, R. B. 1935. The Geographic Region: A Résume. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 25 (3): 122–136.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, R. B. 1947. Area Studies: With Special Reference to Their Implications for Research in the Social Sciences. New York: Social Science Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, C. D. 1997. Geographers in the U.S. Government in Washington, D.C., during World War II. The Professional Geographer 49 (2): 245–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, M. 2001. The Rise of Anthropological Theory: A History of Theories of Culture. AltaMira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hartshorne, R. 1939. The Nature of Geography: A Critical Survey of Current Thought in the Light of the Past. Lancaster, Pa.: The Association of American Geographers.
   Google Scholar
• Hartshorne, R. 1946. Lessons from the War‐Time Experience for Improving Graduate Training for Geographic Research. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 36: 195–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harootunian, H. D., and M. Miyoshi. 2002. The Afterlife of Area Studies. In Learning Places: The Afterlives of Area Studies, edited by M. Miyoshi and H. Harootunian, 1–18. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoekveld, G. A. 1990. Regional Geography Must Adjust to New Realities. In Regional Geography: Current Developments and Future Prospects, edited by R. Johnston, J. Hauer and G. A. Hoekveld. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Innis, H. A., and J. O. Broek. 1945. Geography and Nationalism: A Discussion. Geographical Review 35 (2): 301–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaacs, H. R. 1958. Scratches on Our Minds; American Images of China and India. New York: J. Day Co.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, P. 2003. Space, Theory, and Hegemony: The Dual Crises of Asian Area Studies and Cultural Studies. Sojourn: Journal of Social Issues in Southeast. Asia 18 (1): 1–41.
   Google Scholar
• James, P. 1952. Toward a Further Understanding of the Regional Concept. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 42 (3): 195–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jazeel, T. 2015. Between Area and Discipline: Progress, Knowledge Production and the Geographies of Geography. Progress in Human Geography 22: 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, R. J., and J. D. Sidaway. 2004. Geography and Geographers: Anglo‐American Human Geography since 1945. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keefer, L. E. 1988. Scholars in Foxholes: The Story of the Army Specialized Training Program. Jefferson, Mo.: McFarland and Co.
   Google Scholar
• Kimble, G. 1957. The Inadequacy of the Regional Concept. In London Essays in Geography, edited by L. Stamp and S. Woolridge. London: Longmans Green., 151–174.
   Google Scholar
• Klinke, I. 2015. Area Studies, Geography and the Study of Europe's East. The Geographical Journal 181 (4): 423–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, R. D., 1973. Language and Area Studies Review (Vol. 17). American Academy of Political and Social Science.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, M. W. 2000. Global Ignorance. Geographical Review 90 (4):603–628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, M. W., and K. Wigen. 1997. The Myth of Continents: A Critique of Metageography. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, M. W., and K. Wigen. 2000. A Maritime Response to the Crisis in Area Studies. Geographical Review 89 (2): 161–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingstone, D. N. 1993. The Geographical Tradition : Episodes in the History of a Contested Enterprise. Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, G. 2015. Geography and Geographers: Toward Geographical Science. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mignolo, W.M. 2003. Globalization and the Geopolitics of Knowledge: The Role of the Humanities in the Corporate University. Nepantla: Views from the South 4 (1): 97–119.
   Google Scholar
• Mintz, S. 1956. A Sample Survey of Area Programs at American Universities. New Haven, Conn.: Human Relations Area Files Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Mintz, S. 1998. The Localization of Anthropological Practice from Area Studies to Transnationalism. Critique of Anthropology 18 (2): 117–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, T. 1988. Colonising Egypt. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, T. 2003. The Middle East in the Past and Future of Social Science. In The Politics of Knowledge: Area Studies and the disciplines, edited by D. Szanton. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morin, K. 2010. Unpopular Archives. Professional Geographer 62 (4): 534–543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paasi, A. 2002. Place and Region: Regional Words and Worlds. Progress in Human Geography 26 (6): 802–811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paasi, A. 2010. Commentary. Environment and Planning A 42 (10): 2296–2301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons, J. 1996. Carl Sauer's Vision of an Institute for Latin American Studies. Geographical Review 86 (3): 377–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pletsch, C. E. 1981. The Three Worlds, or the division of social‐scientific labor, circa 1950–1975. Comparative Studies in Society and History 23 (4): 565–590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollock, S. 2009. Future Philology? The Fate of a Soft Science in a Hard World. Critical Inquiry 35 (Summer): 931–961.
   Google Scholar
• Prashad, V. 2007. The Darker Nations. New York: New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Price, M. 2010. Reflections on Regional Research in “The Geographical Review”. Geographical Review 100 (4): 458–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pye, L. 1975. The Confrontation Between the Discipline and Area Studies. In Political Science and Area Studies, edited by L. Pye, 3–22. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rafael, V. L. 1994. The Cultures of Area Studies in the United States. Social Text 91–111.
   Google Scholar
• Ratzel, F. 1897. Studies in Political Areas. The Political Territory in Relation to Earth and Continent. The American Journal of Sociology 3 (3): 297–313.
   Google Scholar
• Roosevelt, F. D. R. 1942. 23 Fireside Chat. [http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=16224].
   Google Scholar
• Roosevelt, Kermit. 1976. War Report of the OSS. New York: Walker and Co.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, A. 2015. Who's Afraid of Postcolonial Theory? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Said, E. 1978. Orientalism. New York: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sauer, C. O. 1925. The Survey Method in Geography and its Objectives. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 14 (1): 17–33.
   Google Scholar
• Sauer, C. O. 1941. Foreward to Historical Geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 31 (1): 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Sidaway, J. 2013. Geography and the Problematic of Area Studies. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 103 (4): 984–1002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, N. 1987. “Academic War over the Field of Geography”: the Elimination of Geography at Harvard, 1947–1951. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 77 (2): 155–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, N. 2003. American Empire: Roosevelt's geographer and the prelude to globalization. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, N. 2007. Abysmal Ignorance: The Pre‐Life of Area Studies, 1917–1958. Social Science Research Council, June 14–15. [www.ssrc.org/publications/view/abysmal-ignorance-the-pre-life-of-area-studies-1917-1958/].
   Google Scholar
• Sopher, D. 1972. Toward a Rediscovery of India: Thoughts on Some Neglected Geography. In Geographers Abroad: Essays on the Problems and Prospects of Research in Foreign Areas, edited by M. Mikesell, 110–133. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spivak, G. 2005. Death of a Discipline. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spykman, N. 1944. The Geography of the Peace. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, J. Q., and W. Warntz. 1958. Macrogeography and Social Science. Geographical Review 48 (2): 167–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thrift, N. 1994. Taking Aim at the Heart of the Region. In Human Geography, edited by D. Gregory, R. Martin and G. Smith, 200–231. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tyner, J. 2007. America's Strategy inSoutheast Asia. Lanham, Md.: Roman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Ullman, E. L. 1953. Human geography and area research. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 43: 54–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States Department of State. 1959. Area Studies Programs in American Universities.
   Google Scholar
• Weigert, H. W., V. Stefansson, and R. E. Harrison. 1944. Compass of the World, a Symposium on Political Geography. New York: The Macmillan Company.
   Google Scholar
• Whittlesey, D. 1945. The Horizon of Geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 35 (1): 1–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittlesey, D. 1954. The Regional Concept and the Regional Method. In American Geography: Inventory and Prospect, edited by P. E. James and C. F. Jones, 19–68. Syracuse, N.Y.: Syracuse University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wimmer, A., and N. Glick schiller. 2002. Methodological Nationalism and Beyond: Nation‐State Building, Migration and the Social Sciences. Global Networks 2: 301–334.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, J. K. 1952. Geography in the Making: The American Geographical Society, 1851–1951. New York: American Geographical Society.
   Google Scholar