Gendered spaces of payment for environmental services: A critical look^*

References

• Agarwal, B. 1994. Gender and Command over Property: A Critical Gap in Economic Analysis in South Asia. World Development 22 (10): 1455–1478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal, B. 2000. Conceptualising Environmental Collective Action: Why Gender Matters. Cambridge Journal of Economics 24 (3): 283–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alix‐garcia, J., A. de Janvry, E. Sadoulet, and J. M. Torres. 2005. An Assessment of Mexico's Payment for Environmental Services Program. Rome: United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO).
   Google Scholar
• Arora‐jonsson, S. 2012. Gender, Development and Environmental Governance. Florence, U.K.: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Banana, A., M. Bukenya, E. Arinaitwe, and B. Birabwa. 2012. Gender, Tenure and Community Forests in Uganda. Working Paper No. 87. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR.
   Google Scholar
• Beymer‐farris, B. A., and T. J. Bassett. 2012. The REDD Menace: Resurgent Protectionism in Tanzania's Mangrove Forests. Global Environmental Change 22 (2): 332–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, E. 2002. The Noel Kempff Project in Bolivia: Gender, Power, and Decision‐Making in Climate Mitigation. Gender and Development 10 (2): 70–77.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 1990. Gender Trouble. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Calvet‐mir, L., E. Corbera, A. Martin, J. Fisher, and N.Gross‐camp. 2015. Payments for Ecosystem Services in the Tropics: A Closer Look at Effectiveness and Equity. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 14: 150–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castree, N., and B. Braun (eds.). 2001. Social Nature: Theory, Practice, and Politics. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• CIF [Climate Investment Funds]. 2014. Linkages Between REDD+ Readiness and the Forest Investment Program. Washington, D.C.: Climate Investment Funds. [http://www.climateinvestmentfunds.org/sites/default/files/knowledge-documents/linkages_between_redd_readiness_and_fip_nov2014_0.pdf ].
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, E. A., and E. Mwangi. 2013. Women's Participation in Forest Management: A cross‐country analysis. Global Environmental Change 23 (1): 193–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CONAFOR [Comision Nacional Forestal]. 2008. Readiness Plan Idea Note. Guadalajara, México: Consejo Nacional Forestal.
   Google Scholar
• CONAFOR [Comision Nacional Forestal]. 2011a. Visión de México sobre REDD+. Hacia una estrategia nacional. Guadalajara, México: Consejo Nacional Forestal.
   Google Scholar
• CONAFOR [Comision Nacional Forestal]. 2011b. Lineamientos del Programa Especial Cuencas Costeras en el Estado de Jalisco. Guadalajara, México: Consejo Nacional Forestal.
   Google Scholar
• CONAFOR [Comision Nacional Forestal]. 2012a. Bosques, cambio climático y REDD+ en México. Guía básica. Guadalajara, México: Consejo Nacional Forestal.
   Google Scholar
• CONAFOR [Comision Nacional Forestal]. 2012b. Proyecto: Bosques y Cambio Climático (SIL‐FIP). Marco de procedimientos para restricciones involuntarias de acceso al uso de recursos naturales en Áreas Naturales Protegidas (MPRI). Guadalajara, México: Consejo Nacional Forestal.
   Google Scholar
• CONAFOR [Comision Nacional Forestal]. 2012c. Lineamientos del Programa Especial Cuencas Costeras en el Estado de Jalisco. Guadalajara, México: Consejo Nacional Forestal.
   Google Scholar
• CONAFOR [Comision Nacional Forestal]. 2015a. Linamiento de operación para el Programa Especial de Áreas de Acción Temprana REDD+. Guadalajara, México: Consejo Nacional Forestal.
   Google Scholar
• CONAFOR [Comision Nacional Forestal]. 2015b. Reglas de operación del Progama Nacional Forestal 2015. Guadalajara, México: Consejo Nacional Forestal.
   Google Scholar
• Corbera, E., C. G. Soberanis, and K. Brown. 2009. Institutional Dimensions of Payments for Ecosystem Services: An Analysis of Mexico's Carbon Forestry Program. Ecological Economics 68 (3): 743–761.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbera, E., N. Kosoy, and M. Martínez‐tuna. 2007. Equity Implications of Marketing Ecosystem Services in Protected Areas and Rural Communities: Case Studies from Meso‐America. Global Environmental Change 17 (3–4): 365–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuomo, C. 2011. Climate Change, Vulnerability, and Responsibility. Hypatia 26 (4): 690–714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daw, T., K. Brown, S. Rosendo, and R. Pomeroy. 2011. Applying the Ecosystem Services Concept to Poverty Alleviation: The Need to Disaggregate Human Well‐Being. Environmental Conservation 38: 370–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deere, C. D., and M. León. 2001. Empowering Women: Land and Property Rights in Latin America, Pitt Latin American series. Pittsburgh, Pa.: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elmhirst, R. 2011. Introducing New Feminist Political Ecologies. Geoforum 42 (2): 129–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmhirst, R., and B. P. Resurreccion. 2008. Gender, Environment and Natural Resource Management: New Dimensions, New Debates. In Gender and Natural Resource Management: Livelihoods, Mobility and Interventions, edited by B. P. Resurreccion and R. Elmhirst, 3–22. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• ENAREDD+[Estrategia Nacional para la Redución de Emisiones por Deforestación y Degradación de Bosques y Selvas]. 2015. Estrategia Nacional para La Redución de Emisiones por Deforestación y Degradación de Bosques y Selvas: Síntesis para consulta pública. Guadalajara, México: CONAFOR.
   Google Scholar
• Franco de la peza, R. G. 2013. La gobernanza intermunicipal y la implementación de mecanismos REDD+ al nivel local. Guadalajara, México: CONAFOR.
   Google Scholar
• Gupte, M. 2004. Participation in a Gendered Environment: The Case of Community Forestry in India. Human Ecology 32 (3): 365–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutmann, M. C. 2006. The Meanings of Macho: Being a Man in Mexico City. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, A. 2012. Forests and Climate Change: The Social Dimensions of REDD in Latin America. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, S. 2002. Neoliberalism, Gender, and Property Rights in Rural Mexico. Latin American Research Review: 119–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 1992. The Promise of Monsters: A Regenerative Politics for Inappropriate/d Others. In Cultural Studies, edited by L. Grossberg, C. Nelson and P. Treicher, 275–332. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, L. 2006. Irrigation, Gender, and Social Geographies of the Changing Waterscapes of Southeastern Anatolia. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 24: 187–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, R., and D. Ojeda. 2011. Gender and Environment: Critical Tradition and New Challenges. Environment and Planning D 29 (2): 237–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibarra, J. T., A. Barreau, C. Del campo, C. I. Camacho, G. J. Martin, and S. R. Mccandless. 2011. When Formal and Informal Market‐Based Conservation Mechanisms Disrupt Food Sovereignty: Impacts of Community Conservation and Payments for Environmental Services on an Indigenous Community of Oaxaca. International Forestry Review 13: 318–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• INEGI. 2007. Censo Agrícola, Ganadero, y Forestal. México, DF: Institución Nacional de Estadistica, Geografía e Informática.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, C., and M. Chattopadhyay. 2000. Identities and Livelihoods: Gender, Ethnicity, and Nature in a South Bihar village. Agrarian Environments: Resources, Representations, and Rule in India: 147–169.
   Google Scholar
• Kariuki, J., and R. Birner. 2016. Are Market‐Based Conservation Schemes Gender‐Blind? A Qualitative Study of Three Cases From Kenya. Society and Natural Resources 29 (4): 432–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, J. H., P. H. Herlihy, D. A. Smith, and A. Ramos viera. 2010. Indigenous Territoriality at the End of the Social Property Era in Mexico. Journal of Latin American Geography 9 (3): 161–181.
   Google Scholar
• Klooster, D. 2003. Campesinos and Mexican Forest Policy During the Twentieth Century. Latin American Research Review 38 (2): 94–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lara‐aldave, S., and I. Vizcarra‐bordi. 2008. Políticas ambientales‐forestales y capital social femenino mazahua. Economía, sociedad y territorio 8 (26): 477–515.
   Google Scholar
• Longhurst, R. 2003. Introduction: Placing Subjectivities, Spaces and Places. In Handbook of Cultural Geography, edited by K. Anderson, M. Domosh, S. Pile and N. Thrift, 282–289. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Macgregor, S. 2010. A Stranger Silence Still: The Need for Feminist Social Research on Climate Change. The Sociological Review 57: 124–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcafee, K. 2012. The Contradictory Logic of Global Ecosystem Services Markets. Development and Change 43 (1): 105–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcafee, K., and E. Shapiro. 2010. Payments for Ecosystem Services in Mexico: Nature, Neoliberalism, Social Movements, and the State. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 100 (3): 579–599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcdowell, L. 1999. Gender, Identity and Place: Understanding Feminist Geographies. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mcelwee, P., T. Nghiem, H. Le, H. Vu, and N. Tran. 2014. Payments for Environmental Services and Contested Neoliberalisation in Developing Countries: A Case Study from Vietnam. Journal of Rural Studies 36: 423–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meinzen‐dick, R. S., L. R. Brown, H. S. Feldstein, and A. R. Quisumbing. 1997. Gender. Property and Natural Resources. World Development 25 (8): 1303–1315.
   Google Scholar
• Mohanty, R. 2004. Institutional Dynamics and Participatory paces: The Making and Unmaking of Participation in Local Forest Management in India. IDS Bulletin 35 (2): 26–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molina, S., J. Pérez, and M. Herrera. 2014. Assessment of Environmental Payments on Indigenous Territories: The Case of Cabecar‐Talamanca, Costa Rica. Ecosystem Services 8: 35–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morales, M. C., and L. M. Harris. 2014. Using Subjectivity and Emotion to Reconsider Participatory Natural Resource Management. World Development 64: 703–712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muñoz‐piña, C., A. Guevara, J. M. Torres, and J. Braña. 2008. Paying for the Hydrological Services of Mexico's Forests: Analysis. Negotiations and Results. Ecological Economics 65 (4): 725–736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukasa, C., A. Tibazalika, A. Mango, and H. Muloki. 2012. Gender and Forestry in Uganda: Policy, Legal and Institutional Frameworks. Working Paper 89. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR.
   Google Scholar
• Nightingale, A. 2013. Fishing for Nature: The Politics of Subjectivity and Emotion in Scottish Inshore Fisheries Management. Environment and Planning A 45: 2362–2378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nightingale, A. 2011. Bounding difference. Intersectionality and the material production of gender, caste, class and environment in Nepal. Geoforum 42 (2): 153–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, T. M. 2011. Carbon forestry and agrarian change: access and land control in a Mexican rainforest. Journal of Peasant Studies 38 (4): 859–883.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascual, U., J. Phelps, E. Garmendia, K. Brown, E. Corbera, A. Martin, E. Gomez‐baggethun, and R. Muradian. 2014. Social Equity Matters in Payments for Ecosystem Services. BioScience 64 (11): 1027–1036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Procuraduría Agraria. 2009. Presencia de la mujer en el ejido. Revista de Estudios Agrarios 41: 199–204.
   Google Scholar
• Procuraduría Agraria. 2014. Ley Agraria y glosario de términos jurídicos‐agrarios 2014. México DF: Secretaría de Desarrollo Agrario, Territorial, y Urbano.
   Google Scholar
• Radel, C. 2012. Gendered Livelihoods and the Politics of Socioenvironmental Identity: Women's Participation in Conservation Projects in Calakmul, Mexico. Gender, Place and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography 19 (1): 61–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radel, C. 2005. Women's Community‐Based Organizations, Conservation Projects, and Effective Land Control in Southern Mexico. Journal of Latin American Geography 4 (2): 7–34.
   Google Scholar
• Rankin, K. N. 2001. Governing Development: Neoliberalism, Microcredit, and Rational Economic Woman. Economy and society 30 (1): 18–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, G. 1993. Feminism and Geography: The Limits of Geographical Knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• SEMARNAT [Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales]. 2008. Hacia la igualidad de género y sustentabilidad ambiental 2007–2012. México, DF: Secretaria de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales.
   Google Scholar
• SEMARNAT [Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales]. 2015. Anuario estadístico de la producción forestal 2015. México, DF: Secretaria de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales.
   Google Scholar
• SEMARNAT INECC [Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales y Instituto Nacional de Ecología y Cambio Climático]. 2012. Quinta Comunicación Nacional ante la Convención Marco de las Naciones Unidas sobre el Cambio Climático. México, DF: Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (Semarnat) e Instituto Nacional de Ecología y Cambio Climático (INECC).
   Google Scholar
• Shillington, L. 2008. Being(s) in Relation at Home: Socio‐Natures of “Gardens” in Managua. Nicaragua. Social and Cultural Geography 9 (7): 755–776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sijapati basnett, B. 2008. Gender, Institutions and Development in Natural Resource Management: A Study of Community Forestry in Nepal. PhD diss., London School of Economics and Political Science.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro‐garza, E. 2013. Contesting the Market‐Based Nature of Mexico's National Payments for Ecosystem Services Programs: Four Sites of Articulation and Hybridization. Geoforum 46: 5–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommerville, M., J. P. G. Jones, M. Rahajaharison, and E. J. Milner‐gulland. 2010. The Role of Fairness and Benefit Distribution in Community‐Based Payment for Environmental Services Interventions: A Case Study from Menabe. Madagascar. Ecological Economics 69 (6): 1262–1271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephen, L. 2005. Women's Weaving Cooperatives in Oaxaca an Indigenous Response to Neoliberalism. Critique of anthropology 25 (3): 253–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephen, L. 1996. Too Little, Too Late? The Impact of Article 27 on Women in Oaxaca. In Reforming Mexico's agrarian reform, edited by L. Randall, 289–303. Chicago: ME Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Sultana, F. 2009. Community and Participation in Water Resources Management: Gendering and Naturing Development Debates from Bangladesh. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 34 (3): 346–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunam, R. K., and J. Mccarthy. 2010. Advancing Equity in Community Forestry: Recognition of the Poor Matters. International Forestry Review 12 (4): 370–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundberg, J. 2004. Identities in the Making: Conservation, Gender and Race in the Maya Biosphere Reserve, Guatemala. Gender, Place and Culture 11 (1): 43–66.
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. 1999. Modernity and Hybridity: Nature, Regeneracionismo, and the Production of the Spanish Waterscape, 1890–1930. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 89 (3): 443–465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, P. L., and C. Zabin. 2000. Neoliberal Reform and Sustainable Forest Management in Quintana Roo, Mexico: Rethinking the Institutional Framework of the Forestry Pilot Plan. Agriculture and Human Values 17 (2): 141–156.
   Google Scholar
• Vázquez garcia, V. 2015. Manejo forestal comunitario: Gobernanza y género en Hidalgo. México. Revista Mexicana de Sociologia 77 (4): 611–635.
   Google Scholar
• Vázquez garcia, V. 2002. ¿Quién cosecha lo sembrado? Relaciones de género en un área natural protegida Mexicana. México: Plaza y Valdés, Colegio de Postgraduados en Ciencias Agrícolas.
   Google Scholar
• Westholm, L., and S. Arora‐jonsson. 2015. Defining Solutions, Finding Problems: Deforestation, Gender, and REDD+ in Burkina Faso. Conservation and Society 13 (2): 189–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar