Using the commons to understand the Dutch elm disease epidemic in Syracuse, NY

References

• Berland, A., and G. P. Elliott. 2014. Unexpected Connections between Residential Urban Forest Diversity and Vulnerability to Two Invasive Beetles. Landscape Ecology 29 (1): 141–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bialecki, M. B., R. T. Fahey, and B. Scharenbroch. 2018. Variation in Urban Forest Productivity and Response to Extreme Drought across a Large Metropolitan Region. Urban Ecosystems 21 (1): 157–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buisman, C. J. 1922. “Ceratostomella Ulmi. The Sexual Form of Graphium Ulmi.” In Dutch Elm Disease–The Early Papers: Selected Works of Seven Dutch Women Phytopathologists, 49–49. Translated by F.W. Holmes and H. M. Heybroek. St Paul, Minn.: American Phytopatholigical Society Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bureau of Entomology and Plant Quarantine. 1944. “Report for Week Ending December 2, 1944.” United States Department of Agriculture. Dutch elm disease Weekly Reports and Correspondence. Record Group 007. National Archives and Records Administration—Kansas City, Mo.
   Google Scholar
• Bureau of Entomology and Plant Quarantine. 1947. “What to Do about the Dutch Elm Disease.” United States Department of Agriculture. Central Correspondence, Subject Correspondence Dis‐Fru. Record Group 007. National Archives and Records Administration—Kansas City, Mo.
   Google Scholar
• Campanella, T. 2007. Republic of Shade: New England and the American Elm. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, W. 1956a. Cheaper to Save Trees—Kiwanis to Fight Dutch Elm Disease. Syracuse Post‐Standard, 28 March.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, W. 1956b. The Dutch Elm Disease. Syracuse Post‐Standard, 7 October.
   Google Scholar
• Carson, R. 1962. “And No Birds Sing.” In Silent Spring. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Conway, T. M. 2016. Tending Their Urban Forest: Residents’ Motivations for Tree Planting and Removal. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 17: 23–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coyne, J. R. 1966. Dry Northeast: We Need Months of Rainfall. Syracuse Herald‐American, 16 April.
   Google Scholar
• Cregg, B. M., and M. E. Dix. 2001. Tree Moisture Stress and Insect Damage in Urban Areas in Relation to Heat Island Effects. Journal of Arboriculture 27 (1): 8–17.
   Google Scholar
• Delvin, J. C. 1963. Expert Predicts Doom of U.S. Elm. New York Times, 1 December.
   Google Scholar
• Dwyer, J. F., G. Mcpherson, H. W. Schroeder, and R. A. Rowntree. 1992. Assessing the Benefits and Costs of the Urban Forest. Journal of Arboriculture 18 (5): 227–227.
   Google Scholar
• Fahey, R. T., M. B. Bialecki, and D. R. Carter. 2013. Tree Growth and Resilience to Extreme Drought across an Urban Land‐Use Gradient. Arboriculture and Urban Forestry 39 (6): 279–85.
   Google Scholar
• Fiege, M. 2005. The Weedy West: Mobile Nature, Boundaries, and Common Space in the Montana Landscape. Western Historical Quarterly 36 (1): 22–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganley, J. V. 1962. City Gaining Ground in War on Dutch Elm Tree Disease. Syracuse Herald‐American, 11 March.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, R. 1961. Heat, Lack of Good Rain Bringing Near Drought. Syracuse Post‐Standard, 15 September.
   Google Scholar
• Haggerty, J. H., and W. R. Travis. 2006. Out of Administrative Control: Absentee Owners, Resident Elk and the Shifting Nature of Wildlife Management in Southwestern Montana. Geoforum 37 (5): 816–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herms, D. A., and D. G. Mccullough. 2014. Emerald Ash Borer Invasion of North America: History, Biology, Ecology, Impacts, and Management. Annual Review of Entomology 59 (1): 13–30.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoyt, A. S. 1951. “Letter J. A. Beal, In Charge, Forest Insect Investigations.” DED‐Maryland, Dutch Elm Disease Project File‐ Del. to Wisonsin, Records of the Bureau of Entomology and Plant Quarantine, 1863–1956, Record Group 007. National Archives and Records Administration— Kansas City, Mo.
   Google Scholar
• Kondo, E. S., Y. Hiratsuka, and W. B. G. Denyer. 1981. Proceedings of the Dutch Elm Disease Symposium and Workshop. Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada: Manitoba Deptartment of Natural Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Lamar, C. 1966. Remove Dead Elms. Syracuse Post‐Standard, 30 August.
   Google Scholar
• Lanier, G. N., D. C. Schubert, and P. D. Manion. 1988. Dutch Elm Disease and Elm Yellows in Central New York: Out of the Frying Pan into the Fire. Plant Disease Reporter 72 (3): 189–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, H. C., S. B. Silverborg, and R. J. Campana. 1969. Dutch Elm Disease: Relation of Spread and Intensification to Control by Sanitation in Syracuse. New York. Plant Disease Reporter 53 (7): 551–55.
   Google Scholar
• Nassauer, J. I., Z. Wang, and E. Dayrell. 2009. What Will the Neighbors Think? Cultural Norms and Ecological Design. Landscape and Urban Planning 92 (3–4): 282–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, V. D., L. A. Roman, D. H. Locke, S. K. Mincey, J. R. Sanders, F. Smith, M. Duran‐mitchell, and S. L. Tobing. 2017. Branching Out to Residential Lands: Missions and Strategies of Five Tree Distribution Programs in the U.S. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 22: 24–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onondaga County Office for the Environment. 2014. “Onondaga County Ash Tree Management Strategy.” http://ongov.net/environment/emeraldashborer.html.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, K. 1966. Falling Branches Create a Menace. Syracuse Herald‐American, 16 November.
   Google Scholar
• Pinchot, C. C., C. E. Flower, K. S. Knight, C. Marks, R. Minocha, D. Lesser, and P. G. Schaberg, and others 2017. “Development of New Dutch Elm Disease‐Tolerant Selections for Restoration of the American Elm in Urban and Forested Landscapes.” Banking on the Future, 11.
   Google Scholar
• Power, G. 2009. Regulatory Takings: A Chronicle of the Construction of a Constitutional Concept. BYU Journal of Public Law, 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Raupp, M. J., A. B. Cumming, and E. C. Raupp. 2006. Street Tree Diversity in Eastern North America and Its Potential for Tree Loss to Exotic Borers. Arboriculture and Urban Forestry 32 (6): 297–304.
   Google Scholar
• Roman, L. A., H. Pearsall, T. S. Eisenman, T. M. Conway, R. T. Fahey, S. Landry, J. Vogt, et al. 2018. Human and Biophysical Legacies Shape Contemporary Urban Forests: A Literature Synthesis. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 31 (April): 157–68.
   Google Scholar
• Russo, C. T. 1968. Fight to Save Elms. Syracuse Herald‐American, 7 January.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, R. A. 1984. Some Determinants of Urban Forest Structure. Urban Ecology 8 (1–2): 13–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santamour, F. S. 1990. “Trees for Urban Planting: Diversity, Uniformity and Common Sense.” In Proceedings of the Seventh Conference of the Metropolitan Tree Improvement Alliance, 57–66. Morton Arboretum.
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, W. A., and R. J. Campana. 1978. Dutch Elm Disease: Perspectives after 60 Years. Cornell University Agricultural Experiment Station, New York State College of Agriculture and Life Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Syracuse Herald‐American. 1960. “Dutch Elm Disease‐ City's Program Working,” 4 January, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Syracuse Herald‐American. 1961. “Plan Dutch Elm Disease Experiment,” 14 April, 3.
   Google Scholar
• Syracuse Herald‐American. 1963. “End of Tree Burning? New State Law Prohibits Dump Fires,” 21 November, 2.
   Google Scholar
• Syracuse Herald‐American. 1966. “$665,000 for Tree Campaign‐ 4200 Elms to Be Removed,” 22 December, 4.
   Google Scholar
• Syracuse Herald‐American. 1968. “A Switch on Tree Removal,” 12 February, 5.
   Google Scholar
• Syracuse Herald‐American. 1968. “Threaten Injury Suits over Tree Trimming,” 17 September, 6.
   Google Scholar
• Syracuse Herald‐American. 1969. “Elm Disease Control among the Best ‐Walsh,” 24 September, 7.
   Google Scholar
• Syracuse Herald‐American. 1971. “Deadly as Dutch: New Elm Blight Appears,” 15 September, 8.
   Google Scholar
• Syracuse Post‐Standard. 1951. “Syracusans to See Method of Fighting Dutch Elm Disease,” 24 October, 2.
   Google Scholar
• Syracuse Post‐Standard. 1952. “Spring Care Hits Dutch Elm Disease,” 4 May, 9.
   Google Scholar
• Syracuse Post‐Standard. 1954. “Diseased Elms to Be Destroyed,” 11 May, 3.
   Google Scholar
• Syracuse Post‐Standard. 1954. “Group to Launch Campaign Aimed at Controlling Spread of Dutch Elm Disease in Area,” 31 October, 8.
   Google Scholar
• Syracuse Post‐Standard. 1954. “Fast Action Is Required to Keep ‘City of Trees,’” 22 November, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Syracuse Post‐Standard. 1956. “War on Dutch Elm Disease Necessary to Save Trees,” 4 August, 7.
   Google Scholar
• Syracuse Post‐Standard. 1956. “Our Elms Menaced,” 16 December, 6.
   Google Scholar
• Syracuse Post‐Standard. 1957. “Oak Proposed as Elm Substitute,” 6 January, 4.
   Google Scholar
• Syracuse Post‐Standard. 1957. “Dutch Elm War Fought on Two Fronts,” 13 May, 10.
   Google Scholar
• Syracuse Post‐Standard. 1957. “Local Control of Dutch Elm Disease Urged,” 13 June, 11.
   Google Scholar
• Syracuse Post‐Standard. 1957. “Experts Will Launch War on Dutch Elm Disease,” 9 October, 5.
   Google Scholar
• Syracuse Post‐Standard. 1957. “City Called ‘Unprogressive’ ‐ Coolness to Elm Disease Irks Expert,” 19 October, 12.
   Google Scholar
• Syracuse Post‐Standard. 1959. “City Granted Power to Axe Sick Trees,” 26 April, 14.
   Google Scholar
• Syracuse Post‐Standard. 1960. “Dutch Elm Disease Hits 732 Trees,” 5 January, 16.
   Google Scholar
• Syracuse Post‐Standard. 1961. “600 Diseased Elms Felled in 4 Months,” 4 May, 15.
   Google Scholar
• Syracuse Post‐Standard. 1964. “Third Year in a Row: Survey Reveals CNY Area Severely Hit by Drought,” 7 August, 18.
   Google Scholar
• Syracuse Post‐Standard. 1965a. “Dutch Elm Disease Spreading in City,” 30 July, 19.
   Google Scholar
• Syracuse Post‐Standard. 1965. “Lack of Understanding Cited‐700 City Elms Said Infected by Disease,” 30 July, 13.
   Google Scholar
• Syracuse Post‐Standard. 1966. “Burn, Do Not Store, Diseased Elm,” 20 March, 17.
   Google Scholar
• Syracuse Post‐Standard. 1972. “Tree Removal to End,” 11 February, 20.
   Google Scholar
• Tattar, T. A. 1978. “Wilt Diseases of Trees: Dutch Elm Disease.” In Disease of Shade Trees. New York: Academic Press, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau. 2012. “Metropolitan and Micropolitan Population Change: 2000 to 2010.” 2012. https://www.census.gov/library/publications/2012/dec/c2010sr-01.html.
   Google Scholar
• Worthley, L. H. 1934. “Memo to Avery S. Hoyt.” United States Department of Agriculture, Bureau of Entomology and Plant Quarantine. Dutch elm disease Control Correspondence, Record Group 007. National Archives and Records Administration—Kansas City, Mo.
   Google Scholar
• Worthley, L. H. 1935. “Outline of Dutch Elm Disease Eradication Program.” United States Department of Agriculture, Bureau of Entomology and Plant Quarantine. Dutch elm disease Control Correspondence, Record Group 007. National Archives and Records Administration—Kansas City, Mo.
   Google Scholar