Deep Listening: Practicing Intellectual Humility in Geographic Fieldwork

References

• Alcoff, L. 1991. The Problem of Speaking for Others. Cultural Critique 20: 5–32.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, K., and D. Jack. 1991. Learning to Listen: Interview Techniques and Analyses. In Women’s Words: The Feminist Practice of Oral History, edited by S. B. Gluck and D. Patai, 11–26. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brandt, M. 2017. Delocalization of Fieldwork and (Re)Construction of Place: Doing Ethnography in Wartime Yemen. International Journal of Middle East Studies 49 (3): 506–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coddington, K. 2017. Voice under Scrutiny: Feminist Methods, Anticolonial Responses, and New Methodological Tools. The Professional Geographer 69 (2): 314–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duggan, M. 2017. Questioning “Digital Ethnography” in an Era of Ubiquitous Computing. Geography Compass 11 (5): E12313.
   Google Scholar
• England, K. 1994. Getting Personal: Reflexivity, Positionality, and Feminist Research. The Professional Geographer 46 (1): 80–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faier, L., and L. Rofel. 2014. Ethnographies of Encounter. Annual Review of Anthropology 43 (1): 363–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Financial Times. 2018. Saudi Arabia Signs SoftBank Deal to Invest up to $200bn in Solar. The Financial Times, 28 March. [https://www.ft.com/content/66277e50-324b-11e8-b5bf-23cb17fd 1498].
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 1988. Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspectives. Feminist Studies 14 (3): 575–599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harcourt, W., and I. Nelson. 2015. Practising Feminist Political Ecologies. New York: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hyams, M. 2004. Hearing Girls’ Silences: Thoughts on the Politics and Practices of a Feminist Method of Group Discussion. Gender, Place & Culture 11 (1): 105–119.
   Google Scholar
• Jazeel, T., and C. McFarlane. 2010. The Limits of Responsibility: A Postcolonial Politics of Academic Knowledge Production. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 35 (1): 109–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, N. 2006. Geopolitical Discourses & the Aral Sea Desiccation: A Case Study of Kyzylorda Oblast. Senior Honors Thesis, Department of Geography. Hanover: Dartmouth College.
   Google Scholar
• Koch, N.. 2013. Introduction—Field Methods in ‘Closed Contexts’: Undertaking Research in Authoritarian States and Places. Area 45 (4): 390–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, N.. 2016. Is a “Critical” Area Studies Possible? Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 34 (5): 807–814.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, N.. 2018a. Green Laboratories: University Campuses as Sustainability “Exemplars” in the Arabian Peninsula. Society & Natural Resources 31 (5): 525–540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, N.. 2018b. The Geopolitics of Spectacle: Space, Synecdoche, and the New Capitals of Asia. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Madsen, K. 2015. Research Dissonance. Geoforum 65: 192–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDowell, L. 2010. Interviewing: Fear and Liking in the Field. In The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Methods in Human Geography, edited by D. DeLyser, S. Herbert, S. Aitken, M. Crang, and L. McDowell, 156–171. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Moss, P. 2002. Feminist Geography in Practice: Research and Methods. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, I. 2013. The Allure and Privileging of Danger over Everyday Practice in Field Research. Area 45 (4): 419–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnick, B. 2019. Intellectual Humility: The Importance of Knowing You Might be Wrong. Vox, 4 January. [https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2019/1/4/17989224/intellectual-humility- explained-psychology-replication].
   Google Scholar
• Rose, G. 1997. Situating Knowledges: Positionality, Reflexivities and Other Tactics. Progress in Human Geography 21 (3): 305–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp, J. 2005. Geography and Gender: Feminist Methodologies in Collaboration and in the Field. Progress in Human Geography 29 (3): 304–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidaway, J. 1992. In Other Worlds: On the Politics of Research by ‘First World’ Geographers in the ‘Third World’. Area 24 (4): 403–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spivak, G. 1988. Can the Subaltern Speak? In Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, edited by C. Nelson and L. Grossberg, 271–313. Basingstoke, U.K.: Macmillan Education.
   Google Scholar
• Staeheli, L., E. Kofman, and L. Peake. 2004. Mapping Women, Making Politics: Feminist Perspectives on Political Geography. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, S. 2018. Empathy as a Critical Methodological Tool for Peace Research. In Experiences in Researching Conflict and Violence: Fieldwork Interrupted, edited by A.-M. Rivas and B. Ciaran Browne, 221–237. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar