Metromorphosis: Documenting ChangeFootnote¹

1 The term “metromorphosis” in the title of the article emphasizes the state of change in urban neighborhoods. The word metamorphosis is defined as a change of physical form or substance. As applied here, metamorphosis refers not just to change but change to an advanced state. 
I first used the term Metromorphosis for the title of a 2001 photography exhibition. The exhibit paired black and white photographs documenting changes in the St. Louis built environment— all exterior pictures, including office buildings and theaters, residential buildings, churches, and transportation infrastructure. 
In the pairs of pictures, one typically was of a built subject 75–100 years old, architecturally or design distinct, and the other a contemporary subject typically less than thirty years old and quite indistinct. 
As the photographs documented a very dramatic change in the metropolitan built environment, metromorphosis seemed an appropriate appellation. In the context of this paper, metromorphosis describes two types of change. There is, first of all, a change in the built environment—the development of community gardens. The research reported in this paper used indicators to test the second type of change—community development changes—changes in the people and the environment in which they live.

References

• Ahlbrandt, R. S., Jr., & Cunningham, J. V. (1979). A new public policy for neighborhood preservation. New York: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Aitken, S. C. (1990). Local evaluations of neighborhood change. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 80, 247–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Community Garden Association. (1998). National community garden survey: 1996. Retrieved on March 16, 2001 from http://www.communitygarden.org/links.php#studies.
   Google Scholar
• Bertrand, M., Duflo, E., &Mullainathan, S. (2002). How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Available from http://www.nber.org.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, H. S., & Riccio, J. A. (2002). Using place-based random assignment and comparative interrupted time-series analysis to evaluate the jobs-plus employment program for public housing residents. Paper presented at the Campbell Collaboration conference on place-randomized trials, Rockefeller Foundation, Bellagio, Italy. Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Chaskin, R. J. (1998). Defining neighborhoods. American Planning Association Symposium. Retrieved on February 17, 2005 from http://www.planning.org/casey/1998casey.html.
   Google Scholar
• Center for Urban and Environmental Studies. (1975). How to measure urban decline. Dallas, TX: Southern Methodist University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Center for Urban Policy and the Environment. (2003). Public choices and property values. Indiana University. Retrieved on January 2, 2004 from http://www.indianatrails.org/benefits_files/IUPUI_realestate.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Durkin, M. S., Davidson, L. L., Kuhn, L., O’Conner, P., & Barlow, B. (1994). Low-income neighborhoods and the risk of severe pediatric injury: A small-area analysis in Northern Manhattan. American Journal of Public Health 84, 587–592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galster, G., & Krall, J. (2003). Exploring endogenous neighborhood dynamics. Retrieved on December 4, 2004 from http://www.culma.wayne.edu/pubs/galster/Neigh_Dynamics_4-031.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Galster, G., Temkin, K., Walker, C., & Sawyer, N. (2004). Measuring the impacts of community development initiatives. Evaluation Review 28, 502–538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goetze, R. (1979). Understanding neighborhood change: The role of expectations in urban revitalization. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Gould, J. B., Herrchen, B., Pham, T., Bera, S., & Brindis, C. (1998). Small-area analysis: Targeting high-risk areas for adolescent pregnancy prevention programs. Family Planning Perspectives 30 (2): 173–182.
   Google Scholar
• Gratz, R. B., & Mintz, N. (1998). Cities back from the edge. New York: John Wiley
   Google Scholar
• Grogan, P. S., & Proscio, T. (2000). Comeback cities: A blueprint for urban neighborhood revival. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Helper, H. (1995). Treez in the ‘hood: A look at city parks. American City and County 110, 20–28.
   Google Scholar
• In the arch’s shadow, signs of revival (2005). New York Times, March 30, 2005, C7.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, R.L., (Ed.) (2001). The inner city: A handbook for renewal. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Kromer, J. (2000). Neighborhood recovery. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuo, F. E., & Sullivan, W. C. (2001). Environment and crime in the inner city: Does vegetation reduce crime? Environment and Behavior 33, 343–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe, J. R. (1967). Cities in a race with time: Progress and poverty in America’s renewing cities. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Malakoff, D. (n.d). What good is community greening? American Community Gardening Association. Retrieved on January 16, 2001 from http://www.communitygarden.org/pubs/whatgood.html.
   Google Scholar
• Meehan, E. J. (1980). Urban development: An alternative strategy. In D. B. Rosenthal (Ed.), Urban revitalization (pp. 279–301). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Pack, J. R. (2002). Growth and convergence in metropolitan America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Post, T. (1999). Yes, there is a pulse. Forbes, July 1999, vol. 164, 1, 98–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redburn, F. S., & Buss, T. F. (2000). Public policies for distressed communities. Policy Studies Review 17, 7–13.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, C. M. (1986). The limits of power: Great fires and the process of city growth in America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sawicki, D. S., & Flynn, P. (1996). Neighborhood indicators: A review of the literature and an assessment of conceptual and methodological Issues. Journal of the American Planning Association 62, 165–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schukoske, J. E. (2000). Community development through gardening: State and local policies transforming urban open space. Legislation and Public Policy 3, 351–392.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, A. E., Ellen, I. G., Voicu, I., & Schill, M. H. (2003). Estimating the external effects of subsidized housing investment on property values. Washington, DC: Federal Reserve System Third Community Affairs Research Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, D., & Chavez, G. (2002). Small area analysis on a large scale: The California experience in mapping teenage birth “hot spots” for resource allocation. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice 8, 33–45.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Teaford, J. C. (1990). The rough road to renaissance: Urban revitalization in America 1940–1985. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turnham, J., & Bonjorni, J. (2004). Review of neighborhood revitalization initiatives. Abt Associates. Retrieved on March 11, 2005 from http://www.nw.org/network/pubs/studies/documents/revitalizationReview.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau (2000). Decennial management division glossary. Available from http://www.census.gov.
   Google Scholar
• Von Hoffman, A. (2003). House by house: The rebirth of America’s urban neighborhoods. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, F. W., Joder, T. E., & Mumphrey, A. Jr. (Eds.) (1995). Urban revitalization: Policies and programs. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Weston, J. S. (2001). Rethinking the nation’s urban problems. In R. L. Kemp (Ed.), The inner city: A handbook for renewal (pp. 7–18) Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company Inc.
   Google Scholar
• When preservation equals demolition. (2005). New York Times, March 31, 2005, D1.
   Google Scholar
• Zielenbach, S. (2000). The art of revitalization: Improving conditions in distressed inner-city neighborhoods. New York: Garland Press.
   Google Scholar