Differential diagnosis and management of common dry eye subtypes

References

• de Roetth A. Hypofunction of lacrimal gland and Sjõgren syndrome. Lancet 1945; 65: 423–425.
   Google Scholar
• Farris RL, Gilbard JP, Stuchell RN, Mandel ID. Diagnostic tests in keratoconjunctivitis sicca. Contact Lens Assoc Ophthalmol 1983; 9: 23–28.
   Google Scholar
• Golding TR, Brennan NA. Survey of opto‐metric opinion on dry eye topics. Clin Exp Optom 1992; 75: 98–108.
   Google Scholar
• Mody GM, Hill JC, Meyers DL. Keratoconjunctivitis sicca in rheumatoid arthritis Clin Rheumatol 1988; 7: 237–241.
   Google Scholar
• Horn MM, Martinson JR, Knapp LL, Paugh JR. Prevalence of meibomian gland dysfunction. Optom Vis Sci 1990; 67: 710–712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howitt DA, Goldstein JH. Physiologic lagophthalmos. Am J Ophthalmol 1969; 68: 355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor HR. Studies on the tear film in climatic droplet keratopathy and pterygium. Arch Ophthalmol 1980; 98: 86–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson F. Adverse external ocular effects of topical ophthalmic therapy: an epidemiologic, laboratory, and clinical study. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1983; 81: 854–965.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tseng SCG, Maumenee AE, Stark WJ, Maumenee IH, Jensen AD, Green WR, Kenyon KR. Topical retinoid treatment for various dry‐eye disorders. Ophthalmology 1985; 92: 717–727.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holly FJ, Lemp MA. Tear physiology and dry eyes. Surv Ophthalmol 1977; 22: 69–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golding TR. Evaluation of tear film impairment in dry eye and hydrophilic contact lens wear. PhD thesis, University of Melbourne, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Greiner JV, Kenyon KR, Henriquez AS, Korb DR, Weidman TA, Allansmith MR. Mucus secretory vesicles in conjunctival epithelial cells of wearers of contact lenses. Arch Ophthalmol 1980; 98: 1843–1846.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dilly PN. Contribution of the epithelium to the stability of the tear film. Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK 1985; 104: 381–389.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Versura P., Maltarello MC, Caramazza R., Laschi R. Mucus alteration and eye dryness. A possible relationship. Acta Ophthalmol 1989; 67: 455–464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roat MI, Ohji M., Hunt LE, Thoft RA. Conjunctival epithelial cell hypermitosis and goblet cell hyperplasia in atopic keratoconjunctivitis. Am J Ophthalmol 1993; 116: 456–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemp MA. Tear film: new concepts and implications for the management of the dry eye. In: Binder PS (ed). Cornea, Refractive Surgery, and Contact Lens: Trans New Orleans Acad Ophthalmol. New York : Raven Press, 1987: 53–64.
   Google Scholar
• Connor CG, Broadmann DA. Decrease of goblet cell density in contact lens patients taking oral contraceptives. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci (Suppl) 1990; 3: 548.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence RC, Hochberg MC, Kelsey JL et al. Estimates of the prevalence of selected arthritic and muscoskeletal diseases in the United States. J Rheumatol 1989; 16:427–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcmonnies C. Contact lens‐related tear deficiency. Problems in Optometry 1990; 2: 584–598.
   Google Scholar
• Mcculley JP, Sciallis GF. Meibomian keratoconjunctivitis. Am J. Ophthalmol 1977; 84: 788–793.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommer A., Tarwotjo I., Hussaini G., Susanto D., Soegiharto T. Incidence, prevalence and scale of blinding malnutrition. Lancet 1981; 1:1407–1408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsetio M. Xerophthalmia. In: Shimuzu K., Oosterhuis JA (eds.) Ophthalmology. Proceedings of the XXIII International Congress, Kyoto, 14–20 May, 1978, part 1. Amsterdam : Excerpta Medica, 1979: 287–292.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson B. Differentiating conjunctivitis of diverse origins. Surv Ophthalmol 1993; 38 (Suppl): 91–104.
   Google Scholar
• Mackie IA, Seal DV. The questionably dry eye. Br J Ophthalmol 1981; 65: 2–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcmonnies CW. Key questions in a dry eye history. J Am Optom Assoc 1986; 57: 512–517.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mcmonnies CW, Ho A. Marginal dry eye diagnosis: history versus biomicroscopy. In: Holly FJ (ed). The Preocular Tear Film in Health, Disease, and Contact Lens Wear. Lubbock , Texas : Dry Eye Institute Inc., 1986: 32–40.
   Google Scholar
• Golding TR, Brennan NA. Diagnostic accuracy and inter‐correlation of clinical tests for dry eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1993; 34: 823.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcmonnies CW, Ho A. Responses to a dry eye questionnaire from a normal population. J Am Optom Assoc 1987; 58: 588–591.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Optometrist's Guide to Ocular Surface Diseases: Proceedings of a Roundtable Discussion, Niagara‐on‐the‐Lake, Ontario Canada, July 1992. Toronto , Canada : Remtulla and Associates Inc, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Cho P., Brown B., Chan I., Conway R., Yap M. Reliability of the tear break‐up time technique of assessing tear stability and the locations of the tear break‐up in Hong Kong Chinese. Optom Vis Sci 1993; 69: 879–885.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norn MS. Rose bengal vital staining: staining of cornea by 10% rose bengal, compared with 1%. Acta Ophlhalmol 1970; 48: 546–559.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feenstra RPG, Tseng SCG. Comparison of fluorescein and rose bengal staining. Ophthalmology 1992; 99: 605–617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang SH, Tseng SCG. Interactions between rose bengal (RB) and tear components. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1992; 33: 1286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Bijsterveld OP. Diagnostic tests in sicca syndrome. Arch Ophthalmol 1969; 82: 10–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little SA, Bruce AS. Repeatability of the phenol‐red thread and tear thinning time tests for tear film function. Clin Exp Optom 1994; 77: 64–68.
   Google Scholar
• Sakamoto R., Bennett ES, Henry VE et al The phenol red thread tear test: a crosscultural study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1992; 34: 3510–3514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamano H., Hori M., Hamano T. et al A new method for measuring tears. Contact Lens Assoc Ophthalmol J 1983; 9: 281–289.
   Google Scholar
• Janssen PT, van Bijsterveld OP. A simple test for lacrimal gland function: a tear lactoferrin assay by radial immunodiffusion. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1983; 220: 171–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bron AJ, Benjamin L., Snibson GR. Meibomian gland disease. Classification and grading of lid changes. Eye 1991; 5:395–411.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mcculley JP, Dougherty JM, Deneau DG. Classification of chronic blepharitis. Ophthalmology 1982; 89: 1173–1180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allansmith MR, Ross RN. Ocular allergy. Clinical Allergy 1988; 18: 1–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Friedlaender MH. Conjunctivitis of allergic origin: clinical presentation and differential diagnosis. Surv Ophthalmol 1993; 38 (Suppl): 105–114.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tseng SCG. Staging of conjunctival squamous metaplasia by impression cytology. Ophthalmology 1985; 92: 728–733.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson JD, Havener VR, Cameron JD. Cellulose acetate impressions of the ocular surface. Dry eye states. Arch Ophthalmol 1983; 101:1869–1872.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson JD, Wright JC. Impression cytology of the ocular surface in keratoconjunctivitis sicca. In: Holly FJ (ed). The Preocular Tear Film in Health, Disease, and Contact Lens Wear. Lubbock , Texas : Dry Eye Institute Inc., 1986: 140–156.
   Google Scholar
• Polak BCP. Side effects of drugs and tear secretion. Doc Ophthalmol 1987; 67:115–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox RI, Robinson CA, Curd JG et al. Sjõgren's syndrome: proposed criteria for classification. Arthritis Rheum 1986; 29: 577–585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaden I., Mayers M. Systemic associations of dry‐eye syndrome. Int Ophthalmol Clin 1991; 31: 69–88.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson JD. Impression cytology. Cornea 1988; 7: 71–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petroutsos G., Paschides CA, Karakostas KX, Psilas C. Diagnostic tests for dry eye disease in normals and dry eye patients with and without Sjõgren's syndrome. Ophthal Res 1992; 24:326–331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Bijsterveld OP, Mackor AJ. Sjõgren's syndrome and tear function parameters. Clin Exp Rheumatol 1989; 7: 151–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roncin S., Pennec YL, Katsikis P., Colin J., Youinou P. Ocular surface lesions due to keratoconjunctivitis sicca: in primary Sjõgren's syndrome. Doc Ophthalmol 1992; 79: 277–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams J., Wilcox MJ, Trousdale MD, Chien D., Shimizu RW. Morphological and physiologic effects of artificial tear formulations on corneal epithelial derived cells. Cornea 1992; 11: 234–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gõbbels M., Spitznas M. Influence of artificial tears on the corneal epithelium in dryeye syndrome. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1989; 227: 139–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez bernal D., Ubels JL. Quantitative evaluation of the corneal epithelial barrier: effect of artificial tears and preservatives. Curr Eye Res 1991; 10: 645–656.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez bernal DL, Ubels JL. Artificial tear composition and promotion of recovery of the damaged corneal epithelium. Cornea 1993; 12:115–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farris RL. Staged therapy for dry eye. Contact Lens Assoc Ophthalmol J 1991; 3:207–215.
   Google Scholar
• Grene RB. A two week clinical study evaluating the safety and comfort of CellufreshTM solution compared with Celluvisc* solution in normal volunteers. In: Carboxymethyl‐cellulose Lubricant Ophthalmic Solutions. Allergan Inc, 1993: 8–9.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson JD, Farris RL. Sodium hyaluronate and polyvinyl alcohol artificial tear preparations. A comparison in patients with keratoconjunctivitis sicca. Arch Ophthalmol 1988; 106: 484487.
   Google Scholar
• Grene B., Harrold M., Mordaunt J., Lankston P. A clinical study comparing the efficacy of two ophthalmic lubricating solutions using impression cytology. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sei (Suppl) 1990; 31: 539.
   Google Scholar
• Geeting DG, Bakar SR. In vivo comparison of ocular lubricants in patients having reduced tear film breakup times. J Am Optom Assoc 1980; 51: 757–760.
   Google Scholar
• Lemp MA, Goldberg M., Roddy MR. The effect of tear substitutes on tear film breakup time. Invest Ophthalmol 1975; 14:255–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabbara KF, Frayha RA. Alternate‐day steroid therapy for patients with primary Sjõgren's syndrome. Ann Ophthalmol; 1983; 15: 358–361.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Laibovitz RA, Solch S., Andriano K., O'connell M., Silverman MH. Pilot trial of cyclosporine 1% ophthalmic ointment in the treatment of keratoconjunctivitis sicca. Cornea 1993; 12:315–323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power WJ, Mullaney P., Farrell M., Collum LM. Effect of topical cyclosporin A on conjunctival T cells in patients with secondary Sjõgren's syndrome. Cornea 1993; 12: 507–511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dougherty JM, Mcculley JP. Comparative bacteriology of chronic blepharitis. Br J Ophthalmol 1984; 68: 524–528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin NF, Rubinfield RS, Malley JD, Manzitti V. Giant papillary conjunctivitis and meibomian gland dysfunction blepharitis. Contact Lens Assoc Ophthalmol J 1992; 18: 165–169.
   Google Scholar
• Paugh JR, Knapp LL, Martinson JR, Horn MM. Meibomian therapy in problematic contact lens wear. Optom Vis Sci 1990; 67: 803–806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Udell IJ. Differential diagnosis of ocular allergy. Int Ophthalmol Clin 1989; 29:275–281.
   Google Scholar
• Baudouin C., Haouat N., Brignole F., Bayle J., Gastaud P. Immunopathological findings in conjunctival cells using immunofluorescence staining of impression cytology specimens. Br J Ophthalmol 1992; 76: 545–549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toda I., Sanuki D., Shimazaki J., Tsubota K. Decreased tear break‐up time is associated with allergic conjunctivitis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1993; 24:1470.
   Google Scholar
• Liotet S., van Bijsterveld OP, Kogbe O., Laroche L. A new hypothesis on tear film stability. Ophthalmologica 195:119–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elhers WH, Donshik PC. Allergic ocular disorders: a spectrum of diseases. Contact Lens Assoc Ophthalmol J 1992; 18:117–124.
   Google Scholar
• Felius K., van Bijsterveld OP. Effect of sodium cromoglycate on tear film break‐up time. Ann Ophthalmol 1984; 16: 80–82.
   Google Scholar
• Tsubota K., Nakaraori K. Dry eyes and video display terminals. New Engl J Med 1993; 328: 584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorbara L., Talsky C. Contact lens wear in the dry eye patient: predicting success and achieving it. Can J Optom 198889; 50: 234–241.
   Google Scholar
• Orsborn GN, Zantos SG. Practitioner survey: management of dry‐eye symptoms in soft lens wearers. Contact Lens Spectrum 1989; 4: 23–26.
   Google Scholar
• Catania LJ, Armandi M., Gross V. Cold compress therapy to reduce certain mild to moderate common ocular surface and contact lens complications. Conference abstracts, 9th Asian‐Pacific Optometric Congress, Hong Kong, April 8–12, 1993; 178–184.
   Google Scholar
• Knop E., Brewitt H. Conjunctival cytology in asymptomatic wearers of soft contact lenses. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1992; 230: 340–347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saini JS, Rajwanski A., Dhar S. Clinico‐pathological correlation of hard contact lens related changes in tarsal conjunctiva by impression cytology. Acta Ophthalmol 1990; 68: 65–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar