Invited Review Schematic eyes: history, description and applications

REFERENCES

• Polyak S. The Vertebrate Visual System. Chapter 1. Chicago : University Press, 1957.
   Google Scholar
• Lederer J. History of Optics, Ophthalmology and Optometry. The University of New South Wales: Kensington , 1958.
   Google Scholar
• Duke‐elder S. System of Ophthalmology. Vol 5. Ophthalmic Optics and Refraction. Chapter 1— History of Ophthalmic Optics. London : Henry Kimpton, 1970.
   Google Scholar
• Southall JPC. The beginnings of optical science. Optician Sci Inst Maker 1922; Sept: 29–32.
   Google Scholar
• Born M., Wolf E. Principles of Optics. 6th (Corrected) ed. Oxford : Pergamon Press, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Emsley HH. Visual Optics, Vol. 1. 5th ed. London : Butterworths, 1952.
   Google Scholar
• Smith R. A Compleat System of Optiks. Cambridge : Cornelius Crownfield, 1738: 112.
   Google Scholar
• Young T. On the mechanism of the eye. Phil Trans Roy Soc Land 1801; 91: 23–88.
   Google Scholar
• Le grand Y. Optique Physiologique. Editions de la Revue d'Optique. 1945. Translated, updated and republished by Legrand Y., Hage SG. Physiological Optics. Berlin : Springer‐Verlag, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Listing B. Dioptrik des Auges, in Wagner R. Wagner's Handwörterbuch d. Physiologic Braunschweig. 1851; 4: p 451. (cited by Helmholtz, p91–95).
   Google Scholar
• von Helmholtz H. Handbuch der Physiologischen Optik. 3rd ed. 1909. English translation is published as Helmholtz's Treatise on Physiological Optics Edited by JPC Southall. J Opt Soc Amer 1924; 1.
   Google Scholar
• Tscherning M. Physiologic Optics. 3rd ed. Philadelphia : The Keystone Publishing Company, 1920.
   Google Scholar
• Gullstrand A. Appendix to Vol 1:1. Optical Imagery (cited by Helmholtz11).
   Google Scholar
• Bennett AG, Rabbetts RB. Schematic eyes— Time for a change Optician 1988; 196 (5169): 14–15.
   Google Scholar
• Sorsby A., Benjamin B., Davey JB, Sheridan M., Tanner JM. Emmetropia and its aberrations. Medical Research Council Special Report Series 293. London : HM Stationary Office, 1957.
   Google Scholar
• Swaine W. Geometrical and Ophthalmic Optics VII. Optician Sci Inst Maker 1921; 28 Oct: 133–136.
   Google Scholar
• Cowan A. An Introductory Course in Ophthalmic Optics. Philadelphia : FA Davis and Co, 1928.
   Google Scholar
• Dick GL. Location of conjugate points in an optical system with particular reference to the estimation of aniseikonia in the pseudophakic eye. OphthalPhysiol Opt 1993; 13: 205–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith G. Calculation of the cardinal points of an optical system. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1993; 13: 327–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang CY. Determination of the cardinal positions of a lens system by the ‘step along’ method. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1993; 13: 216–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koomen M., Tousey R., Scolnik R. The spherical aberration of the eye. J Opt Soc Amer 1949; 39: 370–376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanoff A. About the spherical aberration of the eye, J Opt Soc Amer 1956; 46: 901–903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins TCA. Aberrations of the eye and their effects on vision: part 1. Brit J Physiol Opt 1963; 20: 59–61.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schober H., Munker H. Zolleis F. Die aberration des menschlichen auges und ihre messung. Optica Acta 1968; 15: 47–57.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Charman WN, Jennings JA, Whitefoot H. The refraction of the eye in relation to spherical aberration and pupil size. Brit J Physiol Opt 1978; 32: 78–93.
   Google Scholar
• Ferree LE, Rand G., Hardy C. Refraction for the peripheral field of vision. Arch Ophthalmol 1931; 5: 717–731.
   Google Scholar
• Millodot M., Lamont A. Refraction of the periphery of the eye. J Opt Soc Amer 1974; 64:110–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rempt F., Hoogerheide J., Hoogenboom WPH. Peripheral retinoscopy and the skiagram. Ophthalmologica 1971; 162: 1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith G., Millodot M., Mcbrien NA. The effect of accommodation on oblique astigmatism and field curvature of the human eye. Clin Exp Optom 1988; 71: 119–125.
   Google Scholar
• Alexandridis E., Baumann CH. Wirkliche und scheinbare Pupillenweiten des menschlichen Auges. Optica Acta 1967; 14: 311–316.
   Google Scholar
• Smith G. The angular diameter of defocus blur discs. AmerJ Optom Physiol Opt 1982; 59: 885–889.
   Google Scholar
• Smith G. Relation between spherical refractive error and visual acuity. Optom Vision Sci 1991; 68: 591–598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh JS, Temme LA. Optical factors in judgments of size through an aperture. Human Factors 1990; 2: 109–118.
   Google Scholar
• Smith G., Meehan JW, Day RH. The effect of accommodation on retinal image size. Human Factors 1992; 34: 289–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craven PM, Smith G. Schematic eye predictions of relative spectacle magnification in unilateral aphakia. AmerJ Optom Physiol Opt 1986; 63: 881–887.
   Google Scholar
• Snead MP, Hardman LS, Rubinstein MP, Reynolds K., Haworth SM. Determination of the nodal point position in pseudophakic eye. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1991; 11: 105–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker J. The chromatic aberration of the eye between wavelengths 200 nm and 2000 nm: some theoretical considerations. Brit J Physiol Opt 1974; 29: 118–125.
   Google Scholar
• Thibos LN, Ye M., Zhang X., Bradley A. The chromatic eye; a new reduced‐eye model of ocular chromatic aberration in humans. Applied Optics 1992; 31: 3594–3600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsley MG. New knowledge of the corneal contour. Contacto 1970; 14: 38–43.
   Google Scholar
• Mandell RB, St helen R. Mathematical model for the corneal contour. Brit J Physiol Opt 1971; 26: 183–197.
   Google Scholar
• Kiely PM, Smith G., Carney LG. The mean shape of the human cornea. Optica Acta 1982; 29: 1027–1040.
   Google Scholar
• Guillon M., Lydon DPM, Wilson C. Corneal topography: a clinical model. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1986; 6: 47–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker JA. Aspheric optics of the human lens. Can J Ophthalmol 1972; 7: 168–175.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Howcroft MJ, Parker JA. Aspheric curvatures for the human lens. Vision Res 1977; 17: 1217–1223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith G., Pierscionek BK, Atchison DA. The optical modelling of the human lens. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1991; 11: 359–369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kooijman AC. Light distribution on the retina of a wide‐angle theoretical eye. J Opt Soc Amer 1983; 73: 1544–1550.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierscionek BK. The effects of development and ageing on the structure and function of the crystalline lens. PhD thesis, University of Melbourne. 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Nakao S., Ono T., Nagata R., Iwata K. The distribution of refractive indices in the human crystalline lens. Jpn J Clin Ophthalmol (Rinsho-Ganka) 1969; 23: 903–906.
   Google Scholar
• Jagger WS. The refractive structure and optical properties of the isolated crystalline lens of the cat. Vision Res 1990; 30: 723–738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lotmar W. Theoretical eye model with aspherics. J opt soc Amer 1971; 61:1522–1529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raasch T., Lakshminrayanan V. Optical matrices of lenticular polyindicial schematic eyes. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1989; 9: 61–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atchison DA, Smith G. Continuous gradient index and shell models of the human lens. Vision Res 1995; 35: (18): 2529–2538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stine GH. Tables for accurate retinal localization. Amer J Ophthalmol 1934; 17: 314–324.
   Google Scholar
• Charman WN, Jennings JAM. Ametropia and peripheral refraction. Amer J Optom Physiol Opt 1982; 9: 922–923.
   Google Scholar
• Drasdo N., Fowler CW. Non‐linear projection of the retinal image in a wide angle schematic eye. Brit J Ophthalmol 1974; 58: 709–714.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaker JW. Toward an adaptive model of the human eye. J Opt. Soc Amer 1980; 70: 220–223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomeranzeff O., Fish H., Govignon J., Schepens CL. Wide angle optical model of the eye. Ann Ophthalmol 1971; 3: 815–819.
   Google Scholar
• Pomeranzeff O., Fish H., Govignon J., Schepens CL. Wide angle optical model of the eye. Optica Acta 1972; 19: 387–388.
   Google Scholar
• Pomerantzeff O., Dufault P., Goldstein R. Wide‐angle model of the eye. In Advances in Diagnostic Visual Optics. Springer Series in Optical Sciences. In Breinin GM, Siegel IM. eds. Berlin : Springer‐Verlag, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Pomerantzeff O., Pankratov M., Guang‐ji Wang, Dufault P. Wide‐angle optical model of the eye. AmerJ Optom Physiol Opt 1984; 61:166–176.
   Google Scholar
• Navarro R., Santamaria J., Bescos J. Accommodation dependent model of the human eye with aspherics. J Opt Soc Amer (A) 1985; 2:1273–1281.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bonnet R. La Topographie Cornéenne. Paris : Desroches, 1964 (Cited by Lotmar50).
   Google Scholar
• Jay BS. The effective pupillary area at varying perimetricangles. Vision Res 1962; 1:418428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spring KH, Stiles WS. Apparent shape and size of the pupil viewed obliquely. Brit J Ophthalmol 1948; 32: 347–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang G‐J, Pomerantzeff O. Obtaining a high‐quality retinal image with a bi‐convex intraocular lens. Amer J Ophthalmol 1982; 94: 87–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith G., Lu CW. The spherical aberration of intra‐ocular lenses. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1988; 8: 287–294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith G., Lu CW. Peripheral power errors and astigmatism of eyes corrected with intraocular lenses. Optom Vis Sci 1991; 68: 12–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu W., Smith G. Optical performance of the Super‐reversed IOL. Cat Refract Surg 1992; 18: 293–300.
   Google Scholar
• Smith G. Atchison DA, Pierscionek BK. Modelling the power of the aging human eye. J Opt Soc Am A 1992; 9: 2111–2117.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar