Accommodative hysteresis under static and dynamic stimulus conditions

REFERENCES

• Heath GG. The influence of visual acuity on the accommodative response of the eye. Amer J Oplom Arch Amer Acad Opium 1956; 33:513–524.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morgan MW. The resting state of accommodation. Amer J Optom Arch Amer Acad Optom 1957; 21: 183–195.
   Google Scholar
• Leibowitz HW, Owens DA. Night myopia and the intermediate dark focus of accommodation. J Opt Soc Amer 1975; 65: 1 121–1128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leibowitz HW, Owens DA. New evidence for the intermediate dark position of relaxed accommodation. Doc Ophthalmol 1978; 46: 133–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owens DA, Leibowitz HW. The fixation point as a stimulus for accommodation. Vision Res 1975; 15: 1161–1163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller RJ. Temporal stability of the dark focus of accommodation. Amer J Optom Physiol Opt 1978; 55: 447–450.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mershon DH, Amerson TL. Stability of measures of the dark focus of accommodation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1980; 19: 217–221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heron G, Smith AC, Winn B. The influence of method on the stability of the dark focus position of accommodation. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1981; 1: 79–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owens RL, Higgins KE. Long‐term stability of the dark focus of accommodation. Amer J Optom Physiol Opt 1983; 60: 32–38.
   Google Scholar
• Krumholz DM, Fox RS, Ciuffreda KJ. Short‐term changes in tonic accommodation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1986; 27: 552–557.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebenholtz SM. Accommodative hysteresis: A precursor for induced myopia Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1983; 24: 513–515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebenholtz SM. Accommodative hysteresis: Relation to resting focus. Amer J Optom Physiol Opt 1985; 62: 755–762.
   Google Scholar
• Schor CM, Post RB, Johnston DA. Adaptation of tonic accommodation. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1984; 4: 133–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan RKT, O'leary DJ. Stability of the accommodative dark focus after periods of maintained accommodation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1986; 27: 1414–1417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher SK, Ciuffreda KJ, Hammer S. Interocular equality of tonic accommodation and consensuality of accommodative hysteresis. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1987; 7: 17–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher SK, Ciuffreda KJ, Levine S. Tonic accommodation, accommodative hysteresis and refractive error. AmerJ Optom Physiol Opt 1987; 64: 799–809.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher SK, Ciuffreda KJ, Levine S, Wolf‐kelly KS. Tonic adaptation in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects. Amer J Optom Physiol Opt 1987; 64: 333–343.
   Google Scholar
• Gilmartin B, Bullimore MA. Sustained near‐vision augments inhibitory sympathetic in‐nervation of the ciliary muscle. Clin Vis Sci. 1987; 1: 197–208.
   Google Scholar
• Mcbrien NA, Millodot M. The relationship between tonic accommodation and refractive error. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1987; 28: 997–1004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcbrien NA, Millodot M. Differences in adaptation of tonic accommodation with refractive state. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1988; 29: 460–469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owens DA, Wolf‐kelly KS. Near work, visual fatigue, and variations of oculomotor tonus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1987; 28: 743–749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf KS, Ciuffreda KJ, Jacobs SE. Time course and decay of effects of near work on tonic accommodation and tonic vergence. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1987; 7: 131–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebenholtz SM, Zander PAL. Accommodative hysteresis: Influence on closed loop measures of far point and near point. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1987; 28: 1246–1249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher SK, Ciuffreda KJ. The effect of accommodative hysteresis on apparent distance. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1989; 9: 184–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebenholtz SM. Hysteresis effects in the vergence control system: Perceptual implications. In: Fisher DF, Monty RA, Senders JW eds. Eye Movements: Visual Perception and Cognition. Hillsdale NJ : Erlbaum, 1981: 83–94.
   Google Scholar
• Ebenholtz SM, Fisher SK. Distance adaptation depends upon plasticity in the oculomotor control system. Percept Psychophys 1982; 31: 551–560.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher SK, Ciuffreda KJ, Bird JE. The effect of monocular versus binocular fixation on accommodative hysteresis. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1988; 8: 438–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paap KR, Ebenholtz SM. Perceptual consequences of potentiation in the extra‐ocular muscles: An alternative explanation for adaptation to wedge prisms. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1976; 2: 457–468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paap KR, Ebenholtz SM. Concomitant direction and distance aftereffects: A muscle potentiaion explanation for eye‐specific adaptation. Percept Psychophys 1977; 21: 307–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shebilske WL. Visuomotor coordination in visual direction and position constancies. In: Epstein W ed. Stability and Constancy in Visual Perception: Mechanisms and Processes. NY: John Wiley and Sons, 1977: 23–69.
   Google Scholar
• Emsley HH, Swaine W. Ophthalmic Lenses. London : Hatton Press, 1951: 264–265.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett AG, Rabbetts RB. Clinical Visual Optics. Boston : Butterworths, 1984:121–124.
   Google Scholar
• Borish IM. Clinical Refraction. New York : Professional Press, 1970: 843.
   Google Scholar
• Hartinger H. Uber sin neves refracktometer. Deutsch Optisch Gasellschafl 1951; 57:105–108.
   Google Scholar
• Duke‐elder S, Abrams D. System of Ophthalmology, Vol 5: Ophthalmic Optics and Refraction. St. Louis : CV Mosby, 1970: 413–414.
   Google Scholar
• Hung GK, Ciuffreda KJ. Dual‐mode behaviour in the human accommodation system. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1988; 8: 327–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips SR. Ocular neurological control systems: Accommodation and the near response triad; PhD Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Schor CM, Kotulak JC. Mutual interactions between accommodation and convergence are reduced by tonic adaptation. In: Keller EL, Zee DS eds. Adaptive Processes in Visual and Oculomotor Systems. Oxford : Pergamon Press, 1985: 135–142.
   Google Scholar
• Schor CM, Kotulak JC. Dynamic interactions between accommodation and convergence are velocity sensitive. Vision Res 1986; 26:927–942.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schor CM. Imbalanced adaptation of accommodation and vergence produced opposite extremes of the AC/A and CA/C ratios. AmerJ Optom Physiol Opt 1988; 65: 341–348.
   Google Scholar
• Anderberg MR. Cluster Analysis for Applications. New York : Academic Press, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher SK, Ciuffreda KJ, Bird JE. The effect of stimulus duration on adaptation of tonic vergence and tonic accommodation. Optom Vis Sci 1990; 67: 441–449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell FW. The depth of field of the human eye. Optic a Acta 1957; 4: 157–164.
   Google Scholar
• Ogle KN, Schwartz JT. Depth of focus of the human eye. J Opt Soc Amer 1959; 49: 273–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker J, Charman WN. The depth of focus of the human eye for Snellen letters. AmerJ Optom Physiol Opt 1975; 52: 3–21.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ciuffreda KJ, Hokoda SC, Hung, GK, Semmlow JL. Accommodative stimulus/ response function in human amblyopia. Doc Ophthalmol 1984; 56: 303–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell FW, Robson JG, Westheimer G. Fluctuations of accommodation under steady viewing conditions. J Physiol (Lond) 1959; 145: 579–594.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell FW. The accommodation response of the human eye. Brit J Physiol Opt 1960; 16: 188–203.
   Google Scholar
• Denieul P. Effects of stimulus vergence on mean accommodation response, microfluc‐tuations of accommodation and optical quality of the human eye. Vision Res 1982; 22: 561–569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miege C, Denieul P. Mean response and oscillations of accommodation for various. stimulus vergences and feedback control of the accommodative system. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1988; 8:165–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schor CM. A dynamic model of cross‐coupling between accommodation and convergence: Simulations of step and frequency responses. Optom Vis Sci 1992; 69:258–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mccormack G, Fisher SK. The source of disparity vergence innervation determines prism adaptation. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1996; 16:73–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North R, Henson D. Adaptation to prism‐induced heterophoria in subjects with abnormal binocular vision or asthenopia. Amer J Optom Physiol Opt 1981; 58: 746–752.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schor C, Homer D. Adaptive disorders of accommodation and vergence in binocular dysfunction. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1989; 9:264–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar