Visual acuity assessment in infants and young children

REFERENCES

• Wiesel TN. Postnatal development of the visual cortex and the influence of environment (Nobel Lecture). Nature 1982; 299: 583–591.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shatz CJ. The developing brain. Sci Am 1992; September; 35–41.
   Google Scholar
• Birch EE, Swanson, WH, Stager DR, Woody M., Everett M. Outcome after very early treatment of dense congenital unilateral cataract. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1993; 34: 3687–3699.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asper L., Crewther D., Crewther SG. Strabismic amblyopia. Part 1: Psychophysics. Clin Exp Optom 2000; 83: 49–58.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berardi N., Pizzorusso T., Maffei L. Critical periods during sensory development. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2000; 10: 138–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daw NW. Critical periods and amblyopia. Arch Ophthalmol 1998; 116: 502–505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobson V., Quinn GE, Tung B., Palmer EA, Reynolds JD. Comparison of recognition and grating acuities in very‐low‐birth‐weight children with and without retinal residua of retinopathy of prematurity. Cryotherapy for Retinopathy of Prematurity Cooperative Group. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1995; 36: 692–702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rydberg A., Ericson B., Lennerstrand G., Jacobson L., Lindstedt E. Assessment of visual acuity in children aged 114–6 years, with normal and subnormal vision. Strabismus 1999; 7: 1–24.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hered RW, Murphy S., Clancy M. Comparison of the HOTV and Lea symbols charts for preschool vision screening. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strab 1997; 34: 24–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker RH, Hubisch SH, Graf MH, Kaufmann H. Preliminary report: examination of young children with Lea symbols. Strabismus 2000; 8: 209–213.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kastenbaum SM, Kepford KL, Holmstrom ET. Comparison of the STYCAR and Lighthouse acuity tests. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1977; 54: 458–463.
   Google Scholar
• Mcgraw PV, Winn B. Glasgow Acuity Cards: a new test for the measurement of letter acuity in children. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1993; 13:400–404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey IL, Lovie JE. New design principles for visual acuity letter charts. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1976; 53: 740–745.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Flom MC, Weymouth FW, Kahneman D. Visual resolution and contour interaction. J Opt Soc Am A 1963; 53: 1026–1032.
   Google Scholar
• Giaschi DE, Regan D., Kraft SP, Kothe AC. Crowding and contrast in amblyopia. Optom Vis Sci 1993; 70: 192–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmers AJ, Gray LS, Mcgraw PV, Winn B. Contour interaction for high and low contrast optotypes in normal and amblyopic observers. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1999; 19: 253–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart JA, Burian HM. A study of separation difficulty its relationship to visual acuity in normal and amblyopic eyes. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1976; 53: 217–223.
   Google Scholar
• Fantz R. Visual perception from birth as shown by pattern selectivity. Ann New York Acad Sci 1965; 118: 793–814.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson J., Mosley MJ, Fielder AR. Grating acuity cards: spurious resolution and the ‘edge artefact. Clin Vis Sci 1988; 3: 285–288.
   Google Scholar
• Teller DY. The forced‐choice preferential looking procedure: A psychophysical technique for use with human infants. In J Behav Dev 1979; 2: 135–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodhouse JM, Adoh TO, Oduwaiye KA, Batchelor BG, Megji S., Unwin N. et al. New acuity test for toddlers. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1992; 12:249–251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Held R., Gwiazda J., Brill S., Mohindra I., Wolfe J. Infant visual acuity is underestimated because near threshold gratings are not preferentially fixated. Vision Res 1979; 19: 1377–1379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banks MS, Stephens BR, Dannemiller JL. A failure to observe negative preference in infant acuity testing. Vision Res 1982; 22: 1025–1031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He S., Macleod IA. Local luminance nonlinearity and receptor aliasing in the detection of high‐frequency gratings. J Opt Soc Am A. 1996; 13: 1139–1150.
   Google Scholar
• Suttle CM, Banks MS, Candy TR. Does a front‐end nonlinearity confound VEP acuity measures in human infants Vision Res 2000; 40: 3665–3675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teller DY, Mayer DL, Makous WL, Allen JL. Do preferential looking techniques underestimate infant visual acuity Vision Res 1982; 22: 1017–1024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishman GA, Sokol S. Electrophysiologic Testing in Disorders of the Retina, Optic Nerve, and Visual Pathway. San Francisco: American Academy of Ophthalmology, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Drasdo N. Electrophysiology of the human visual system. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1983; 3: 321–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drasdo N. The neural representation of visual space. Nature 1977; 266: 554–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horton JC, Hoyt WF. The representation of the visual field in human striate cortex. Arch Ophthalmol 1991; 109: 816–824.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Norcia AM, Tyler CW. Spatial frequency sweep VEP: Visual acuity during the first year of life. Vision Res 1985; 25: 1399–1408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler CW, Apkarian P., Levi DM, Nakayama K. Rapid assessment of visual function: an electronic sweep technique for the pattern visual evoked potential. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1979; 18: 703–713.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norcia AM, Clarke M., Tyler CW. Digital filtering and robust regression techniques for estimating sensory thresholds from the evoked potential. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 1995; 4: 26–32.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell FW, Maffei L. Electrophysiological evidence for the existence of orientation and size detectors in the human visual system. J Physiol 1970; 207: 635–652.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norcia AM, Tyler CW, Hamer RD. Development of contrast sensitivity in the human infant. Vision Res 1990; 30: 1475–1486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasper HH. The ten‐twenty electrode system of the international federation. Electrophysiol Clin Neurophysiol 1958; 10: 371–375.
   Google Scholar
• Watson JD, Myers R., Frackowiak RS, Hajnal JV, Woods RP, Mazziota JC et al. Area V4 of the human brain: evidence from a combined study of positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Cereb Cortex 1993; 3: 79–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suttle CM, Anderson SJ, Harding GFA. Diminution of chromatic visual evoked responses at 3 months post‐term age in human infants. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1997; 38 Suppl: S62.
   Google Scholar
• Braddick O., Atkinson J., Hood B. Striate cortex, extrastriate cortex and colliculus: some new approaches. In: Vital‐durand F., Atkinson J., Braddick O. eds. Infant Vision. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson J. Development of optokinetic nystagmus in the human infant and monkey infant: an analogue to development in kittens. In: Freeman RD ed. Developmental Neurobiology of Vision. New York: Plenum Press, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann KP, Schoppmann A. Retinal input to the direction‐selective cells of the nucleus tractus opticus of the cat. Brain Res 1975; 99: 359–366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braddick O. Orientation‐ and motion‐selective mechanisms in infants. In: Simons K. ed. Infant Vision: Basic and Clinical Research. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Sokol S., Moskowitz A., Mccormack G. Infant VEP and preferential looking acuity measured with phase alternating gratings. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1992; 33: 3156–3161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis TL, Maurer D., Brent HP. Development of grating acuity in children treated for unilateral and bilateral congenital cataract. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1995; 36: 2080–2095.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riddell PM, Ladenheim B., Mast J., Catalano T., Nobile R., Hainline L. Comparison of measures of visual acuity in infants: Teller acuity cards and sweep visual evoked potentials. Optom Vis Sci 1997; 74: 702–707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orel‐bixler DA, Norcia AM. Differential growth of acuity for steady‐state pattern reversal and transient pattern onset‐offset VEPs. Clin Vis Sci 1987; 2: 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• van Die GC, Collewijn H. Control of human optokinetic nystagmus by the central and peripheral retina: Effects of partial visual field masking, scotopic vision and central retinal scotoma. Brain Res 1986; 383: 185–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard IP, Ohmi M. The efficiency of the central and peripheral retina in driving human optokinetic nystagmus. Vision Res 1986; 24: 969–976.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orel‐bixler D., Haegerstrom‐portnoy G., Hall A. Optotype acuity predicted from VEP grating acuity in multihandicapped patients with optic nerve disorders. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1990; 31 Suppl: 598.
   Google Scholar
• Haegerstrom‐portnoy G. New procedures for evaluating vision functions of special populations. Optom Vis Sci 1993; 70: 306–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banks MS, Dannemiller JL. Infant visual psychophysics In: Salapatek P., Cohen L. eds. Handbook of Infant Perception, Volume 1. New York: Academic Press, 1987.
   Google Scholar