Practitioner guidelines for continuous wear with high Dk silicone hydrogel contact lenses

REFERENCES

• Pallikaris IG, Siganos DS. Excimer laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy for correction of high myopia. J Refract Corneal Surg 1994; 10: 498–510.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Epstein D, Tengroth B, Fagerholm P, Hamberg‐nystrom H. Excimer retreatment of regression after photorefractive keratectomy. Am J Ophthalmol 1994; 117: 456–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson CA, Taylor HR. Excimer laser treatment for high and extreme myopia. The Melbourne Excimer Laser and Research Group. Arch Ophthalmol 1995; 113: 431–436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor HR, Mccarty CA, Aldred GF. Predictability of excimer laser treatment of myopia. Melbourne Excimer Laser Group. Arch Ophthalmol 1996; 114: 248–251.
   Google Scholar
• Zadok D, Maskaleris G, Montes M, Shah S, Garcia V, Chayet A Hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis with the Nidek EC‐5000 excimer laser. Ophthalmology 2000; 107: 1132–1137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Covey M, Sweeney DF, Terry RL, Sankaridurg PR, Holden BA. Hypoxic effects on the anterior eye of high Dk soft contact lens wearers are negligible. Optom Vis Set 2001; 78: 95–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keay L, Sweeney DF, Jalbert I, Skotnitsky C, Holden BA The microcyst response to high Dk/tsilicone hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2000; 77: 582–585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papas EB, Vajdic CM, Austen R, Holden BA. High‐oxygen‐transmissibility soft contact lenses do not induce limbal hyperaemia. Curr Eye Res 1997; 16: 942–948.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skotnitsky C, Sweeney DF, Keay L, Holden BA. Patient responses and attitudes to 30 night continuous wear of high Dk silicone hydrogel lenses and attitudes to refractive surgery [AAO Abstract]. Optom Vis Sci 1999; 76: S214.
   Google Scholar
• Tighe B. Silicone hydrogel materials—how do they work? In: Sweeney, D, ed. Silicone Hydrogels: The Rebirth of Extended Wear Contact Lenses. Oxford : Butterworth‐Heinemann; 2000: 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan P, Efron N. Trends in UK contact lens prescribing 2001. Optician 2001; 221: 38–39.
   Google Scholar
• Woods CA, Morgan PB. Trends in Australian contact lens prescribing. Clin Exp Optom 2000; 83: 323–329.
   Google Scholar
• Schein OD, Glynn RJ, Seddon JM, Kenyon KR. The microbial keratitis study group. The relative risk of ulcerative keratitis among users of daily‐wear and extended‐wear soft contact lenses. New Engl J Med 1989; 321: 773–778.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutter GR, Chalmers RL, Roseman M. The clinical presentation, prevalence and risk factors of focal corneal infiltrates in soft contact lens wearers. CLAO J 1996; 22: 30–37.
   Google Scholar
• Bates AK, Morris RJ, Stapleton F, Minassian DC, Dart JKG. Sterile’ infiltrates in contact lens wearers. Eye 1989; 3: 803–810.
   Google Scholar
• Sweeney DF, Grant T, Chong MS, Fleming C, Wong R, Holden BA. Recurrence and acute inflammatory conditions with hydro‐gel extended wear. [ARVO Abstract]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1993; 34: S1008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox N. Contact lens drop outs. J Br Contact Lens Assoc 1985; 8: 6–10.
   Google Scholar
• Weed KH, Fonn D, Potvin R. Discontinuation from contact lens wear. [AAO Abstract]. Optom Vis Sci 1993; 70: S140.
   Google Scholar
• Fonn D, Pritchard N, Brazeau D, Michaud L. Discontinuation of contact lens wear: the numbers, reasons and patient profiles. [ARVO Abstract]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1995; 36: S312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowden FW, Cohen EJ, Arentsen JJ, Laibson PR. Patterns of lens care practices and lens product contamination in contact lens microbial keratitis. CLAO J 1989; 15: 49–54.
   Google Scholar
• Ky W, Scherick K, Stenson S. Clinical survey of lens care in contact lens patients. CLAO J 1998; 24: 216–219.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gower LA, Stein JM, Turner FD. Compliance: a comparison of three lens care systems. Optom Vis Sci 1994; 71: 629–634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'hare NA, Naduvilath TJ, Sweeney DF, Holden BA A clinical comparison of limbal and paralimbal superior epithelial arcuate lesions (SEALs) in high Dk EW [ARVO Abstract]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001; 42: S595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern J, Skotnitsky C, O'hare N, Tan J, Wong R, Sweeney DF et al. Comparison of the incidence of contact lens papillary conjunctivitis (CLPC) between six and thirty night high Dk soft extended wear schedules [ARVO Abstract]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001; 42: S597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan NA, Chantal Coles M‐L. Where do silicone hydrogels fit into everyday practice? In: Sweeney, DF, ed. Silicone Hydrogels: The Rebirth of Continuous Wear Contact Lenses. Oxford : Butterworth‐Heinemann; 2000: 235–270.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan NA, Chantal Coles M‐L, Jaworski A, Rosario D. Proposed practice guidelines for continuous contact lens wear. Clin Exp Optom 2001; 84: 71–77.
   Google Scholar
• Young G, Holden BA, Cooke G. Influence of soft contact lens design on clinical performance. Optom Vis Sci 1993; 70: 394–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skotnitsky C, Naduvilath T, Sweeney DF, Sankaridurg PR, Holden BA. Contact lens papillary conjunctivitis (CLPC): A case control study. [AAO Abstract]. Optom Vis Sci 2000; 77: S257.
   Google Scholar
• Sweeney DF, Keay L, Jalbert I, Sankaridurg PR, Holden BA, Skotnitsky C et al. Clinical performance of silicone hydrogel lenses. In: Sweeney, DF, ed. Silicone Hydrogels: The Rebirth of Continuous Wear Contact Lenses. Oxford : Butterworth‐Heinemann; 2000: 90–149.
   Google Scholar
• Tan J, Keay L, Jalbert I, Holden BA. Tear microspheres (TMSS) with high Dk lenses. [AAO Abstract]. Optom Vis Sci 1999; 76: S226.
   Google Scholar
• Tan J, Keay L, Sweeney DF, Jalbert I, Holden BA. Mucin balls and high Dk soft lenses. Contact Lens Spectrum 2000; July: 42–44.
   Google Scholar
• Dumbleton K, Jones L, Chalmers R, Williams‐lyn D, Donn D. Clinical characterization of spherical post‐lens debris associated with lotrafilcon high‐Dk silicone lenses. CLAO J 2000; 26: 186–192.
   Google Scholar
• Rivera RK, Poise KA. Corneal response to different oxygen levels during extended wear. CALO J 1991; 17: 96–101.
   Google Scholar
• Holden BA, Grant T, Kotow M, Schnider C, Sweeney DF. Epithelial microcysts with daily and extended wear of hydrogel and rigid gas permeable contact lenses. [ARVO Abstract]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1987; 28: S372.
   Google Scholar
• Kenyon E, Poise KA, Seger RG. Influence of wearing schedule on extended‐wear complications. Ophthalmology 1986; 93: 231–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terry RL, Schnider CM, Holden BA, Cornish R, Grant T, Sweeney DF et al. CCLRU standard for success of daily and extended wear contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 1993; 70: 234–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zantos SG. Cystic formations in the corneal epithelium during extended wear of contact lenses. ICLC 1983; 10: 128–146.
   Google Scholar
• Keay L, Jalbert I, Sweeney DF, Holden BA. Microcysts: clinical significance and differential diagnosis. Optometry 2001; 72: 452–560.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dumbleton KA, Chalmers RL, Richter DB, Fonn D. Vascular response to extended wear of hydrogel lenses with high and low oxygen permeability. Optom Vis Sci 2001; 78: 147–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller JP, Coon LJ, Meier RF. Extended wear of Hydrocurve II soft contact lenses. J Am Optom Assoc 1980; 51: 225–233.
   Google Scholar
• Dumbleton KA, Chalmers RL, Richter DB, Fonn D. Changes in myopic refractive error in nine months' extended wear of hydrogel lenses with high and low oxygen permeability. Optom Vis Sci 1999; 76: 845–849.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar