Orthokeratology review and update

REFERENCES

• Mountford J. Orthokeratology—Principles and Practice. London: Butterworth‐Heinemann, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Ruston D, Dave T. Accelerated orthokeratology—an introduction. Optom Today 1997; 37(20): 28–34.
   Google Scholar
• Caroline PJ. Contemporary orthokeratology. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2001; 24: 41–46.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson RM. Kalt, keratoconus and the contact lens. Optom Vis Sci 1989; 66: 643–646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison RJ. Contact lenses and the progression of myopia. J Am Optom Assoc 1957; 28: 711–713.
   Google Scholar
• Jessen GN. Orthofocus techniques. Contacto 1962; 6(7): 200–204.
   Google Scholar
• Jessen GN. Contact lenses as a therapeutic device. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1964; 41: 429–435.
   Google Scholar
• Nolan J. Orthokeratology with steep lenses. Contacto 1972; 16(9): 31–37.
   Google Scholar
• Kerns RL. Research in orthokeratology. Part III: results and observations. J Am Optom Assoc 1976; 47: 1505–1515.
   Google Scholar
• Binder PS, May CH, Grant SC. An evaluation of orthokeratology. Ophthalmology 1980; 87: 729–744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polse KA, Brand RJ, Schwalbe JS, Vastine DW, Keener RJ. The Berkeley Orthokeratology Study, Part II: Efficacy and duration. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1983; 60: 187–198.
   Google Scholar
• Polse KA, Brand RJ, Keener RJ, Schwalbe JS, Vastine DW. The Berkeley Orthokeratology Study, part III: safety. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1983; 60: 321–328.
   Google Scholar
• Coon LJ. Orthokeratology. Part II: Evaluating the Tabb method. J Am Optom Assoc 1984; 55: 409–418.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mackeen DL, Sachdev M, Ballou V, Cavanagh HD. A prospective multicenter clinical trial to assess safety and efficacy of Menicon SF‐P RGP lenses for extended wear. CLAO J 1992; 18: 183–186.
   Google Scholar
• Fontana AA. Orthokeratology using the one piece bifocal. Contacto 1972; 16(6): 45–47.
   Google Scholar
• Wlodyga RJ, Bryla C. Corneal molding: the easy way. Contact Lens Spectrum 1989; 4(8): 58–65.
   Google Scholar
• Harris DH, Stoyan N. A new approach to orthokeratology. Contact Lens Spectrum 1992; 7(4): 37–39.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson J. Orthokeratology: the global perspective. Paper presented at the Global Orthokeratology Symposium, Chicago, July 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Sicari J. Orthokeratology: the US perspective. Paper presented at the Global Orthokeratology Symposium, Chicago, July 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Watt K, Boneham G, Swarbrick HA. MK in OK: the Australian experience. Paper presented at the Global Orthokeratology Symposium, Chicago, July 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Lui WO, Edwards MH. Orthokeratology in low myopia. Part 1: efficacy and predictability. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2000; 23(3): 77–89.
   Google Scholar
• Swarbrick HA, Wong G, O'leary DJ. Corneal response to orthokeratology. Optom Vis Sci 1998; 75: 791–799.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan L, Jun J, Jia Q, Wangqing J, Xinjie M, Yi S. Clinical study of orthokeratology in young myopic adolescents. Int Contact Lens Clin 1999; 26: 113–116.
   Google Scholar
• Mountford J. An analysis of the changes in corneal shape and refractive error induced by accelerated orthokeratology. Int Contact Lens Clin 1997; 24: 128–143.
   Google Scholar
• Nichols JJ, Marsich MM, Nguyen M, Barr JT, Bullimore MA. Overnight orthokeratology. Optom Vis Sci 2000; 77: 252–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rah MJ, Jackson JM, Jones LA, Marsden HJ, Bailey MD, Barr JT. Overnight orthokeratology: preliminary results from the Lenses and Overnight Orthokeratology (LOOK) study. Optom Vis Sci 2002; 79: 598–605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tahhan N, Du toit R, Papas E, Chung H, Lahood D, Holden BA. Comparison of reverse‐geometry lens designs for overnight orthokeratology. Optom Vis Sci 2003; 80: 796–804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soni PS, Nguyen TT, Bonanno JA. Overnight orthokeratology: visual and corneal changes. Eye Contact Lens 2003; 29: 137–145.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cho P, Cheung SW, Edwards MH, Fung J. An assessment of consecutively presenting orthokeratology patients in a Hong Kong based private practice. Clin Exp Optom 2003; 86: 331–338.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alharbi A, Swarbrick HA. The effects of overnight orthokeratology lens wear on corneal thickness. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003; 44: 2518–2523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joslin CE, Wu SM, Mcmahon TT, Shahidi M. Higher‐order wavefront aberrations in corneal refractive therapy. Optom Vis Sci 2003; 80: 805–811.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owens H, Garner LF, Craig JP, Gamble G. Posterior corneal changes with orthokeratology. Optom Vis Sci 2004; 81: 421–426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiraoka T, Furuya A, Matsumoto Y, Okamoto F, Kakita T, Oshika T. Influence of overnight orthokeratology on corneal endothelium. Cornea 2004; 23: S82–S86.
   Google Scholar
• Maldonado‐codina C, Efron S, Morgan P, Haugh T, Efron N. Empirical versus trial set fitting systems for accelerated orthokeratology. Eye Contact Lens 2005; 31: 137–147.
   Google Scholar
• Sorbara L, Fonn D, Simpson T, Lu F, Kort R. Reduction of myopia from corneal refractive therapy. Optom Vis Sci 2005; 82: 512–518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berntsen DA, Barr JT, Mitchell GL. The effect of overnight contact lens corneal reshaping on higher‐order aberrations and best‐corrected visual acuity. Optom Vis Sci 2005; 82: 490–497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tung Hc. Xtreme Contour (XC) orthokeratology for high myopia reduction. Paper presented at the Global Orthokeratology Symposium, Toronto, August 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Woo PT. High myopia orthokeratology treatment for children. Paper presented at the Global Orthokeratology Symposium, Toronto, July 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Cho P, Cheung SW, Edwards MH. Practice of orthokeratology by a group of contact lens practitioners in Hong Kong. Part 2: Orthokeratology lenses. Clin Exp Optom 2003; 86: 42–46.
   Google Scholar
• Lin LL, Shih YF, Tsai CB, Chen CJ, Lee LA, Hung PT, Hou PK. Epidemiological study of ocular refraction among schoolchildren in Taiwan in 1995. Optom Vis Sci 1999; 76: 275–281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards MH. The development of myopia in Hong Kong children between the ages of 7 and 12 years: a five‐year longitudinal study. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1999; 19: 286–294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rah MJ, Bailey MD, Hayes J, Kwok A, Zadnik K. Comparison of NEI RQL‐42 scores in LASIK vs. CRT patients. ARVO abstract. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004; 45: E‐Abstract 1578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchey ER, Barr JT, Mitchell GL. The Comparison of Overnight Lens Modalities (COLM) study. Eye Contact Lens 2005; 31: 70–75.
   Google Scholar
• Lipson MJ, Sugar A, Musch DC. Overnight corneal reshaping versus soft disposable contact lenses: vision‐related quality‐of‐life differences from a randomized clinical trial. Optom Vis Sci 2005; 82: 886–891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murugappa S, Swarbrick H. Quality of life in orthokeratology patients. Paper presented at the Global Orthokeratology Symposium, Toronto, July 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Sridharan R, Swarbrick HA. Corneal response to short‐term orthokeratology lens wear. Optom Vis Sci 2003; 80: 200–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tahhan N, Papas E, Du toit R, Stern J, Kalliris A, Wong R, Holden B. Corneal topographic change after short periods of reverse geometry rigid gas permeable lens wear. ARVO abstract. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002; 43: E‐Abstract 972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson JM, Bildstein T, Anderson J, Leak B, Buresh K. Short‐term corneal changes with corneal refractive therapy (CRT). ARVO abstract. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004; 45: E‐Abstract 1547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamei Y, Cassar K, Shen J, Soni PS. Short‐term corneal changes in closed eye condition with orthokeratology lenses. ARVO abstract. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005; 46: E‐Abstract 2060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mountford J. Retention and regression of orthokeratology with time. Int Contact Lens Clin 1998; 25: 59–64.
   Google Scholar
• Barr JT, Rah MJ, Meyers W, Legerton J. Recovery of refractive error after corneal refractive therapy. Eye Contact Lens 2004; 30: 247–251.
   Google Scholar
• Soni PS, Nguyen TT, Bonanno JA. Overnight orthokeratology: refractive and corneal recovery after discontinuation of reverse‐geometry lenses. Eye Contact Lens 2004; 30: 254–262.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sridharan R. Response and regression of the cornea with short‐term OK lens wear. MSc thesis, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson P, Thorn F. Does refractive error change twice as fast as corneal power in orthokeratology? Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1977; 54: 581–587.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson TC. Orthokeratology: changes to the corneal curvature and the effect on refractive power due to the sagittal length change. J Am Optom Assoc 1975; 46: 719–729.
   Google Scholar
• Alharbi AA. Corneal response to overnight orthokeratology. PhD thesis, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Yang X, Gong XM, Dai ZY, Wei L, Li SX. [Topographical evaluation on decentration of orthokeratology lenses.] in Chinese. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi 2003; 39: 335–338.
   Google Scholar
• Lu FH, Simpson T, Sorbara L, Fonn D, Jones L. The relationship between the treatment zone diameter and visual, optical and subjective performance in CRT lens wearers. ARVO abstract. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004; 45: E‐Abstract 1576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swarbrick HA. The e’s, p's and Q's of corneal shape. Refractive Eyecare for Ophthalmologists 2004; 8(12): 5–8.
   Google Scholar
• Kulkarni P. Determining the shape of the cornea after orthokeratology lens wear: a mathematical model. MOptom research report, University of New South Wales, Sydney, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson JM, Rah MJ, Jones LA, Bailey MD, Barr JT. Analysis of refractive error changes in overnight orthokeratology using power vectors. Poster presented at the American Academy of Optometry annual meeting, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Mountford J, Pesudovs K. An analysis of the astigmatic changes induced by accelerated orthokeratology. Clin Exp Optom 2002; 85: 284–293.
   Google Scholar
• Hiraoko T, Furuya A, Matsumoto Y, Okamoto F, Sakata N, Hiratsuka K, Kakira T, Oshika J. Quantitative evaluation of regular and irregular corneal astigmatism in patients having overnight orthokeratology. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004; 30: 1425–1429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiraoka T, Matsumoto Y, Okamoto F, Yamagushi T, Hirohara Y, Mihashi T, Oshika T. Corneal higher‐order aberrations induced by overnight orthokeratology. Am J Ophthalmol 2005; 139: 429–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayashi T, Fatt I. Forces retaining a contact lens on the eye between blinks. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1980; 57: 485–507.
   Google Scholar
• Allaire PE, Flack RD. Squeeze forces in contact lenses with a steep base curve radius. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1980; 57: 219–227.
   Google Scholar
• Coon LJ. Orthokeratology, Part 1: Historical perspective. J Am Optom Assoc 1982; 53: 187–195.
   Google Scholar
• Mountford J, Noack D. A mathematical model for corneal shape changes associated with ortho‐k. Contact Lens Spectrum 1998; 13: 39–45.
   Google Scholar
• Munnerlyn K, Koons CR, Marshall SJ. Photorefractive keratectomy: a technique for laser refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 1988; 14: 46–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haque S, Fonn D, Simpson T, Jones L. Corneal and epithelial thickness changes after 4 weeks of overnight corneal refractive therapy lens wear, measured with optical coherence tomography. Eye Contact Lens 2004; 30: 189–193.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Choo JD, Caroline PJ, Harlin DD, Meyers W. Morphological changes in cat epithelium following overnight lens wear with the Paragon CRT lens for corneal reshaping. ARVO abstract. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004; 45: E‐Abstract 1552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsubara M, Kamei Y, Takeda S, Mukai K, Ishii Y, Ito S. Histologic and histochemical changes in rabbit cornea produced by an orthokeratology lens. Eye Contact Lens 2004; 30: 198–204.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Choo J, Caroline P, Harlin D, Meyers W. Morphologic changes in cat stroma following 14 days continuous wear of Paragon CRT lenses. Poster presented at the American Academy of Optometry annual meeting, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Holden BA, Sweeney DF, Collin HB. The effects of RGP and silicone elastomer lens binding on corneal structure. ARVO abstract. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1989; 30 (suppl): 481.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg MH, Hill RM. The physiology of contact lens imprints. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1973; 50: 699–702.
   Google Scholar
• Shin YJ, Kim MK, Wee WR, Lee JH, Shin DB, Lee JL, Xu YG, Choi SW. Change in proliferation rate of corneal epithelium in the rabbit with orthokeratology lens. Ophthalmic Res 2005; 37: 94–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alharbi A, La hood D, Swarbrick HA. Overnight orthokeratology lens wear can inhibit the central stromal edema response. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005; 46: 2334–2340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Fonn D, Simpson TL, Sorbara L, Kort R, Jones L. Topographical thickness of the epithelium and total cornea after overnight wear of reverse‐geometry rigid contact lenses for myopia reduction. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003; 44: 4742–4746.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swarbrick HA, Jayakumar J, Co W, He D, Siu C, Yau B. Overnight corneal edema can modulate the short‐term clinical response to orthokeratology lens wear. ARVO abstract. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005; 46: E‐abstract 2056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joslin CE, Wu SM, Mcmahon TT, Shahidi M. Is ‘whole eye’ wavefront analysis helpful to corneal refractive therapy? Eye Contact Lens 2004; 30: 186–188.
   Google Scholar
• Perez‐gomez I, Maldonado‐codina C, Efron S, Efron N, Morgan P. Confocal microscopic evaluation of corneal changes after orthokeratology. Poster presented at the American Academy of Optometry meeting, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Levy B. Permanent corneal damage in a patient undergoing orthokeratology. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1982; 59: 697–699.
   Google Scholar
• Dart JKG, Stapleton F, Minassian D. Contact lenses and other risk factors in microbial keratitis. Lancet 1991; 338: 650–653.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schein OD, Glynn RJ, Poggio EC, Seddon JM, Kenyan KR. The relative risk of ulcerative keratitis among users of daily‐wear and extended‐wear soft contact lenses. New Engl J Med 1989; 321: 773–778.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stapleton F. Contact lens‐related microbial keratitis: what can epidemiologic studies tell us? Eye Contact Lens 2003; 29 (suppl): S85–S89.
   Google Scholar
• Ladage PM, Yamamoto N, Robertson DM, Jester JV, Petroll WM, Cavanagh HD. Pseudomonas aeruginosa corneal binding after 24‐hour orthokeratology lens wear. Eye Contact Lens 2004; 30: 173–178.
   Google Scholar
• Watt K, Swarbrick HA. Microbial keratitis in overnight orthokeratology: review of the first 50 cases. Eye Contact Lens 2005; 31: 201–208.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dewoolfson BH. Orthokeratology lens‐related ulcers in children—letter to the editor. Ophthalmology 2005; 112: 167.
   Google Scholar
• Lam DSC, Houang E, Fan DSP, Lyon D, Seal D, Wong E, Hong Kong Microbial Keratitis Study Group. Incidence and risk factors for microbial keratitis in Hong Kong: comparison with Europe and North America. Eye 2002; 16: 608–618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin MC, Graham AD, Fusaro RE, Polse KA. Impact of rigid gas‐permeable contact lens extended wear on corneal epithelial barrier function. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002; 43: 1019–1024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng KH, Leung SL, Hoekman HW, Beekhuis WH, Mulder PG, Geerards AJ, Kijlstra A. Incidence of contact lens associated microbial keratitis and its related morbidity. Lancet 1999; 354: 179–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stehr‐green JK, Bailey TM, Visvesvara GS. The epidemiology of Acanthamoeba keratitis in the United States. Am J Ophthalmol 1989; 107: 331–336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seal DV, Kirkness CM, Bennett HGB, Peterson M, Keratitis Study group. Acanthamoeba keratitis in Scotland: risk factors for contact lens wearers. Contact Lens Ant Eye 1999; 22: 58–68.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Walline JJ, Holden BA, Bullimore MA, Rah MJ, Asbell BA, Barr JT, Caroline PJ, Cavanagh HD, Despoditis N, Desmond F, Koffler BH, Reeder K, Swarbrick HA, Wohl LG. The current state of corneal reshaping. Eye Contact Lens 2005; 31: 209–214.
   Google Scholar
• Boost MV, Cho P. Microbial flora of tears of orthokeratology patients, and microbial contamination of contact lenses and contact lens accessories. Optom Vis Sci 2005; 82: 451–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramachandran L, Sharma S, Sankaridurg PR, Vajdic CM, Chuck JA, Holden BA, Sweeney DF, Rao N. Examination of the conjunctival microbiota after 8 hours of eye closure. CLAO J 1995; 21: 195–199.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kwok LS, Pierscionek BK, Bullimore M, Swarbrick HA, Mountford J, Sutton G. Orthokeratology for myopic children: wolf in sheep's clothing? Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2005; 33: 343–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reim TR, Lund M, Wu R. Orthokeratology and adolescent myopia control. Contact Lens Spectrum 2003; 18(3): 40–42.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung SW, Cho P, Fan D. Asymmetrical increase in axial length in the two eyes of a monocular orthokeratology patient. Optom Vis Sci 2004; 81: 653–656.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho P, Cheung SW, Edwards M. The longitudinal orthokeratology research in children (LORIC) in Hong Kong: a pilot study on refractive changes and myopia control. Curr Eye Res 2005; 30: 71–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyss M. Correction of higher amounts of astigmatism during orthokeratology. Paper presented at the Global Orthokeratology Symposium, Toronto, July 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Baertschi M. Correction of high astigmatism with orthokeratology. Paper presented at the Global Orthokeratology Symposium, Chicago, July 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Swarbrick HA, Hiew R, Kee AV, Peterson S, Tahhan N. Apical clearance rigid contact lenses induce corneal steepening. Optom Vis Sci 2004; 81: 427–435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorbara L, Lu F, Fonn D, Simpson T. Topographic keratometric effects of corneal refractive therapy for hyperopia after one night of lens wear. ARVO abstract. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005; 46: E‐Abstract 2061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeder K. Correction of hyperopia with orthokeratology. Paper presented at the Global Orthokeratology Symposium, Chicago, July 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Swarbrick HA, Katalinic P, Corti D. Induction and recovery of corneal topographic changes with apical touch and apical clearance rigid contact lenses. ARVO abstract. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999; 40 (suppl): S908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connon CJ, Meek KM, Newton RH, Kenney MC, Alba SA, Karageozian H. Hyaluronidase treatment, collagen fibril packing, and normal transparency in rabbit corneas. J Refract Surg 2000; 16: 448–455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar