98
Views
23
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Reviews

Measuring mobility performance: experience gained in designing a mobility course

, BSc PhD & , MSc (Optom) PhD
Pages 215-228 | Received 12 Oct 2005, Accepted 09 Mar 2006, Published online: 15 Apr 2021

REFERENCES

  • Nowakowski RW. Primary Low Vision Care. Norwalk, CT: Appleton and Lange, 1994.
  • Long RG, Rieser JJ, Hill EW. Mobility in individuals with moderate visual impairments. J Vis Impair Blind 1990; 84: 111–118.
  • Lowe J, Drasdo N. Patients’ responses to retinitis pigmentosa. Optom Vis Sci 1992; 69: 182–185.
  • Turano K, Herdman SJ, Dagnelie G. Visual stabilization of posture in retinitis pigmentosa and in artificially restricted visual fields. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1993; 34: 3004–3010.
  • Black A, Lovie‐kitchin JE, Woods RL, Arnold N, Byrnes J, Murrish J. Mobility performance in retinitis pigmentosa. Clin Exp Optom 1997; 80: 1–12.
  • Kuyk T, Elliott JL, Fuhr PS. Visual correlates of mobility in real world settings in older adults with low vision. Optom Vis Sci 1998; 75: 538–547.
  • Faye EE. Clinical Low Vision. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1976.
  • Marron JA, Bailey IL. Visual factors and orientation‐mobility performance. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1982; 59: 413–426.
  • Lovie‐kitchin J, Mainstone J, Robinson J, Brown B. What areas of the visual field are most important for mobility in low vision patients? Vision Res 1990; 5: 249–263.
  • Rubin GS, Bandeen‐roche K, Huang GH, Munoz B, Schein OD, Fried LP, West SK. The association of multiple visual impairments with self‐reported visual disability: SEE project. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001; 42: 64–72.
  • Turano KA, Rubin GS, Quigley HA. Mobility performance in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999; 40: 2803–2809.
  • Turano KA, Geruschat DR, Stahl JW, Massof RW. Perceived visual ability for independent mobility in persons with retinitis pigmentosa. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999; 40: 865–877.
  • Brown B, Brabyn L, Welch L, Haegerstrom‐portnoy G, Colenbrander A. Contribution of vision variables to mobility in age‐related maculopathy patients. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1986; 63: 733–739.
  • Kuyk T, Elliott JL. Visual factors and mobility in persons with age‐related macular degeneration. J Rehabil Res Dev 1999; 36: 303–312.
  • Hassan SE, Lovie‐kitchin JE, Woods RL. Vision and mobility performance of subjects with age‐related macular degeneration. Optom Vis Sci 2002; 79: 697–707.
  • West SK, Rubin GS, Broman AT, Munoz B, Bandeen‐roche K, Turano K. How does visual impairment affect performance on tasks of everyday life? The SEE project. Salisbury Eye Evaluation. Arch Ophthalmol 2002; 120: 774–780.
  • Haymes S, Guest D, Heyes A, Johnston A. Mobility of people with retinitis pigmentosa as a function of vision and psychological variables. Optom Vis Sci 1996; 73: 621–637.
  • Geruschat DR, Turano KA, Stahl JW. Traditional measures of mobility performance and retinitis pigmentosa. Optom Vis Sci 1998; 75: 525–537.
  • Soong GP, Lovie‐kitchin JE, Brown B. Does mobility performance of visually impaired adults improve immediately after orientation and mobility training? Optom Vis Sci 2001; 78: 657–666.
  • Clark‐carter DD, Heyes AD, Howarth CI. The efficiency and walking speed of visually impaired people. Ergonomics 1986; 29: 779–789.
  • Goodrich GL, Ludt R. Assessing visual detection ability for mobility in individuals with low vision. Vis Impair Res 2003; 5: 57–71.
  • Wilcox DT, Burdett R. Contrast sensitivity function and mobility in elderly patients with macular degeneration. J Am Optom Assoc 1989; 60: 504–507.
  • Turano KA, Massof RW, Quigley HA. A self‐assessment instrument designed for measuring independent mobility in RP patients: Generalizability to glaucoma patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002; 43: 2874–2881.
  • Leat SJ, Lovie‐kitchin JE. Visual impairment and the useful field of view. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. In press.
  • Pelli DG, Robson JG, Wilkins AJ. The design of a new letter chart for measuring contrast sensitivity. Clin Vis Sci 1988; 2: 187–199.
  • Woods RL, Wood JM. The role of contrast sensitivity charts and contrast letters charts in clinical practice. Clin Exp Optom 1995; 78: 43–57.
  • Soong GP‐Y, Lovie‐kitchin JE, Brown B. Preferred walking speed for assessment of mobility performance: sighted guide versus non‐sighted guide techniques. Clin Exp Optom 2000; 83: 279–282.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.