Monocular and binocular thresholds for abruptly and gradually presented illusory contours

REFERENCES

• Barnard N, Crewther SG, Crewther DP. Development of a magnocellular function in good and poor primary school‐ age readers. Optom Vis Sci 1998; 75: 62–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramachandran V, Rogers‐ramachandran D. Phantom contours: A new class of visual patterns that selectively activates the magnocellular pathway in man. Bull Psychonom Soc 1991; 29: 391–394.
   Google Scholar
• Sperling AJ, Lu Z, Manis FR, Seidenberg MS. Selective magnocellular deficits in dyslexia: a ‘phantom contour’ study. Neuropsychologia 2003; 41: 1422–1429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callaway E. Structure and function of parallel pathways in the primate early visual system. J Physiol 2005; 566: 13–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin P. Colour through the thalamus. Clin Exp Optom 2004; 87: 249–257.
   Google Scholar
• Legge GE. Binocular contrast summation. I. Detection and discrimination. Vision Res 1984; 24: 373–383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frisen L, Lindblom B. Binocular summation in humans: evidence for a hierarchic model. J Physiol 1988; 402: 773–782.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banton T, Levi DM. Binocular summation in vernier acuity. J Opt Soc Am A 1991; 8: 673–680.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Birch EE, Swanson WH. Probability summation of acuity in the human infant. Vision Res 1992; 32: 1999–2003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cagenello R, Arditi A, Halpern DL. Binocular enhancement of visual acuity. J Opt Soc Am A 1993; 10: 1841–1848.
   Google Scholar
• Bearse MA, Freeman RD. Binocular summation in orientation discrimination depends on stimulus contrast and duration. Vision Res 1994; 34: 19–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wakayama A, Matsumoto C, Ohmure K, Matsumoto F, Shimomura Y. Properties of receptive field on binocular fusion stimulation in the central visual field. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2002; 240: 743–747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wehrhahn C, Westheimer G, Abulencia A. Binocular summation in temporal‐order detection. J Opt Soc Am A 1990; 7: 731–732.
   Google Scholar
• Legge GE. Binocular contrast summation. II. Quadratic summation. Vision Res 1984; 24: 385–394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pardhan S. A comparison of binocular summation in young and older patients. Curr Eye Res 1996; 15: 315–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers‐ramachandran DC, Ramachandran VS. Psychophysical evidence for boundary and surface systems in human vision. Vision Res 1998; 38: 71–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klistorner AI, Graham SL. Early magnocellular loss in glaucoma demonstrated using the pseudorandomly stimulated flash visual evoked potential. J Glaucoma 1999; 8: 140–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson RS, O’brien C. Psychophysical evidence for a selective loss of M ganglion cells in glaucoma. Vision Res 1997; 37: 1079–1083.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckingham T, Watkins R, Bansal P, Bamford K. Hyperacuity thresholds for oscillatory movement are abnormal in strabismic and anisometropic amblyopes. Optom Vis Sci 1991; 68: 351–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubova Z, Kuba M, Juran J, Blakemore C. Is the motion system relatively spared in amblyopia? Evidence from cortical evoked responses. Vision Res 1996; 36: 181–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shan Y, Moster ML, Roemer RA, Siegfried JB. Abnormal function of the parvocellular visual system in anisometropic amblyopia. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 2000; 37: 73–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demirci H, Gezer A, Sezen F, Ovali T, Demiralp T, Isoglu‐alkoc U. Evaluation of the functions of the parvocellular and magnocellular pathways in strabismic amblyopia. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 2002; 39: 215–221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crewther DP, Kiely PM, Crewther SG. Threshold recognition of phantom contour objects requires constant contrast velocity. J Vision 2002; 2: 357, http://journalofvision.org/2/7/357/, DOI 10.1167/2.7.357.
   Google Scholar
• Braddick OJ, O’brien JM, Wattam‐bell J, Atkinson J, Turner R. Form and motion coherence activate independent, but not dorsal/ventral segregated, networks in the human brain. Curr Biol 2000; 10: 731–734.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witton C, Talcott JB, Hansen PC, Richardson AJ, Griffiths TD, Rees A, Stein JF, Green GG. Sensitivity to dynamic auditory and visual stimuli predicts nonword reading ability in both dyslexic and normal readers. Curr Biol 1998; 8: 791–797.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cestnick L, Coltheart M. The relationship between language‐processing and visual‐processing deficits in developmental dyslexia. Cognition 1999; 71: 231–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben‐yehudah G, Sackett E, Malchi‐ginzberg L, Ahissar M. Impaired temporal contrast sensitivity in dyslexics is specific to retain‐and‐compare paradigms. Brain 2001; 124: 1381–1395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber AJ, Chen H, Hubbard WC, Kaufman PL. Experimental glaucoma and cell size, density, and number in the primate lateral geniculate nucleus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000; 41: 1370–1379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yucel YH, Zhang Q, Weinreb RN, Kaufman PL, Gupta N. Atrophy of relay neurons in magno‐ and parvocellular layers in the lateral geniculate nucleus in experimental glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001; 42: 3216–3222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anzai A, Bearse MA Jr, Freeman RD, Cai D. Contrast coding by cells in the cat’s striate cortex: monocular vs. binocular detection. Vis Neurosci 1995; 12: 77–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar