The visual attentional blink reflects constraints on temporal visual processing, not just a lapse of visual memory

REFERENCES

• Raymond JE, Shapiro KL, Arnell KM. Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink? J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1992; 18: 849–860.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broadbent DE, Broadbent MH. From detection to identification: Response to multiple targets on rapid serial visual presentation. Percept Psychophys 1987; 42: 105–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro KL. The attentional blink: The brain’s ‘eyeblink’. Curr Direct Psychol Sci 1994; 3: 86–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun MM, Potter MC. A two‐stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1995; 21: 109–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun MM. Processing deficits in RSVP: The attentional blink and repetition blindness. Diss Abst Intern: Section B: Sci Engineer 1995; 56: 1133.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro KL, Arnell KM, Raymond JE. The attentional blink. Trends Cogn Sci 1997; 1: 291–296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro KL, Raymond JE, Arnell KM. Attention to visual pattern information produces the attentional blink in rapid serial visual presentation. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1994; 20: 357–371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel EK, Luck SJ, Shapiro KL. Electrophysiological evidence for a postperceptual locus of suppression during the attentional blink. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1998; 24: 1656–1674.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seiffert AE, Di lollo V. Low‐level masking in the attentional blink. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1997; 23: 1061–1073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnell KM. Cross‐modal interactions in dual‐task paradigms. In: Shapiro K, ed. The Limits Of Attention: Temporal Constraints In Human Information Processing. London: Oxford University Press, 2001. p 141–177.
   Google Scholar
• Arnell KM, Jolicoeur P. The attentional blink across stimulus modalities: Evidence for central processing limitations. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1999; 25: 630–648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolicoeur P, Dell’acqua R. Selective influence of second target exposure duration and task‐sub‐1 load effects in the attentional blink phenomenon. Psychon Bull Rev 2000; 7: 472–479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolicoeur P. Restricted attentional capacity between sensory modalities. Psychon Bull Rev 1999; 6: 87–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuvic SM, Visser TAW, Di lollo V. Direct estimates of processing delays in the attentional blink. Psychol Res 2000; 63: 192–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun MM, Potter MC. The attentional blink and task switching within and across modalities. In: Shapiro K, ed. U Wales; Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience (2001). The Limits Of Attention: Temporal Constraints In Human Information Processing. London: Oxford University Press, 2001. p 20–35.
   Google Scholar
• Nieuwenstein MR, Chun MM, Van der lubbe RH, Hooge IT. Delayed attentional engagement in the attentional blink. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2005; 31: 1463–1475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman‐rakic PS. Working memory and the mind. Sci Amer 1992; September: 73–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baddeley AD. Is working memory still working? Eur Psychol 2002; 7: 85–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baddeley AD, Hitch G. Working memory. In: Bower G, ed. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation. New York: Academic Press, 1974. p 47–89.
   Google Scholar
• Koch C, Crick F. Some thoughts on consciousness and neuroscience. In: Gazzaniga MS, ed. The New Cognitive Neurosciences. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Moroni C, Boucart M, Fery P, Claes T, Belin C. Is the attentional blink effect located in short‐term memory? Brain Cogn 2002; 48: 475–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hari R, Valta M, Uutela K. Prolonged attentional dwell time in dyslexic adults. Neurosci Lett 1999; 271: 202–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacroix GL, Constantinescu I, Cousineau D, De almeida RG, Segalowitz N, Grunau M. Attentional blink differences between adolescent dyslexic and normal readers. Brain Cogn 2005; 57: 115–119.
   Google Scholar
• Lum JA, Conti‐ramsden G, Lindell AK. The attentional blink reveals sluggish attentional shifting in adolescents with specific language impairment. Brain Cogn 2006; Nov 20; [Epub ahead of print.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visser TA, Boden C, Giaschi DE. Children with dyslexia: evidence for visual attention deficits in perception of rapid sequences of objects. Vision Res 2004; 44: 2521–2535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillstrom AP, Husain M, Shapiro KL, Rorden C. Spatiotemporal dynamics of attention in visual neglect: a case study. Cortex 2004; 40: 433–440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husain M, Shapiro K, Martin J, Kennard C. Abnormal temporal dynamics of visual attention in spatial neglect patients [see comments. Nature 1997; 385 (6612): 154–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van vleet TM, Robertson LC. Cross‐modal interactions in time and space: auditory influence on visual attention in hemispatial neglect. J Cogn Neurosci 2006; 18: 1368–1379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weschler D. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, 3rd ed. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Crowe SF, Barclay L, Brennan S, Farkas L, Gould E, Katchmarsky S, Vayda S. The cognitive determinants of performance on the Austin Maze. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 1999; 5: 1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malec JF, Ivnik RJ, Hinkeldey NS. Visual Spatial Learning Test. J Consult Clin Psychol 1991; 3: 82–88.
   Google Scholar
• Pind J, Gunnarsdottir EK, Johannesson HS. Raven’s Standard Progressive Matrices: New school age norms and a study of the test validity. Personal Indiv Diff 2003; 34: 375–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun MM. Temporal binding errors are redistributed by the attentional blink. Percept Psychophys 1997; 59: 1191–1199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymond JE, Shapiro KL, Arnell KM. Similarity determines the attentional blink. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1995; 21: 653–662.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson ML, Crewther DP, Duke CC, Henry L, Kiely PM, West SJ, Crewther DP. Attentional blink in global versus local attentional modes. Aust NZ Ophthalmol 1998; 26 (Suppl): S88–S90.
   Google Scholar
• Maki WS, Couture T, Frigen K, Lien D. Sources of the attentional blink during rapid serial visual presentation: Perceptual interference and retrieval competition. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1997; 23: 1393–1411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolicoeur P. Concurrent response‐selection demands modulate the attentional blink. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1999; 25: 1097–1113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolicoeur P, Dell’acqua R, Crebolder JM. The attentional blink bottleneck. In: Shapiro K, ed. U Wales; Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience. (2001). The Limits Of Attention: Temporal Constraints In Human Information Processing. London: Oxford University Press, 2001. p 82–99.
   Google Scholar
• Potter MC, Chun MM, Banks BS, Muckenhoupt M. Two attentional deficits in serial target search: The visual attentional blink and an amodal task‐switch deficit. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 1998; 24: 979–992.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro K, Terry K. The attentional blink: The eyes have it (but so does the brain). In: Wright RD, ed. Visual Attention. Vancouver Studies In Cognitive Science. London: Oxford University Press, 1996. p 306–329.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro K, Driver J, Ward R, Sorensen RE. Priming from the attentional blink: A failure to extract visual tokens but not visual types. Psychol Sci 1997; 8: 95–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan JJ, Paolo AM. Exploratory factor analysis of the WAIS‐III in a mixed patient sample. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 2001; 16: 151–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banken JA. Clinical utility of considering digits forwards and digits backwards as seperate components of the Weschler Adult Intelligence Scale—Revised. J Clinical Psychol 1985; 41: 686–691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar