Advanced search
Publication Cover
Clinical and Experimental Optometry Volume 90, 2007 - Issue 5
Submit an article Journal homepage
21
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Papers

Grading static versus dynamic images of contact lens complications

Nathan EfronInstitute of Health and Biomedical Innovation and School of Optometry, Queensland University of Technology, Queensland, AustraliaCorrespondence[email protected]
, PhD DSc &
Aysha ChaudryFaculty of Life Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
E‐mail: [email protected]
, BSc (Hons)
Pages 361-366 | Received 11 Jan 2007, Accepted 24 Mar 2007, Published online: 15 Apr 2021

REFERENCES

  • Efron N. Grading scales for contact lens complications. In: Efron N, ed. Contact Lens Complications. Edinburgh: Butterworth‐Heinemann 2004. p 239–243.
  • Phillips AJ, Speedwell L. Contact Lenses. Edinburgh: Butterworth‐Heinemann 2007. p 627–631.
  • Efron N. Slit‐lamp biomicroscopy. In: Efron N, ed. Contact Lens Complications. Edinburgh: Butterworth‐Heinemann 2004. p 2–9.
  • Løfstrom T, Anderson JS, Kruse A. Tarsal abnormalities: a new grading system. CLAO J 1998; 24: 210–215.
  • Efron N. Grading Scales for contact lens complications. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1998; 18: 182–186.
  • Papas EB. Key factors in the subjective and objective assessment of conjunctival erythema. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000; 41: 687–691.
  • Efron N, Morgan PB, Katsara SS. Validation of grading scales for contact lens complications. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2001; 21: 17–29.
  • Mcmonnies CW, Chapman‐davies A. Assessment of conjunctival hyperemia in contact lens wearers. Part 1. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1987; 64: 246–250.
  • Mcmonnies CW, Chapman‐davies A. Assessment of conjunctival hyperemia in contact lens wearers. Part 2. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1987; 64: 251–255.
  • Berntsen DA, Mitchell GL, Nichols JJ. Reliability of grading lissamine green conjunctival staining. Cornea 2006; 25: 695–700.
  • Dundas M, Walker A, Woods RL. Clinical grading of corneal staining of non‐contact lens wearers. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2001; 21: 30–35.
  • Mackinven J, Mcguinness CL, Pascal E, Woods RL. Clinical grading of the upper palpebral conjunctiva of non‐contact lens wearers. Optom Vis Sci 2001; 78: 13–18.
  • Murphy PJ, Lau JS, Sim MM, Woods RL. How red is a white eye? Clinical grading of normal conjunctival hyperaemia. Eye 2007; 21: 633–638.
  • Efron N, Morgan PB, Jagpal R. Validation of computer morphs for grading contact lens complications. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2002; 22: 341–349.
  • Chong E, Simpson T, Fonn D. The repeatability of discrete and continuous anterior segment grading scales. Optom Vis Sci 2000; 77: 244–251.
  • Efron N, Morgan PB, Jagpal R. The combined influence of knowledge, training and experience when grading contact lens complications. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2003; 23: 79–85.
  • Efron N, Morgan PB, Farmer C, Furuborg J, Struk R, Carney LG. Experience and training as determinants of grading reliability when assessing the severity of contact lens complications. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2003; 23: 119–124.
  • Efron N. Contact lens Complications. Edinburgh: Butterworth‐Heinemann 2004.
  • Lenth RV. Java applets for power and sample size [Computer software]. Retrieved January 5, 2007, from http://www.stat.uiowa.edu/~rlenth/Power .
  • Bailey IL, Bullimore MA, Raasch TW, Taylor HR. Clinical grading and the effects of scaling. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1991; 32: 422–432.
  • Barr JT, Schechtman KB, Fink BA, Pierce GE, Pensyl CD, Zadnik K, Gordon MO. Corneal scarring in the Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study: baseline prevalence and repeatability of detection. Cornea 1999; 18: 34–46.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.