Synthetic corneal inlays

REFERENCES

• International Centre for Eyecare Education data, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics
   Google Scholar
• CIBA Educators Meeting, March 2001, South Carolina.
   Google Scholar
• Sandoval HP, Fernandez De castro LE, Vroman DT, Solomon KD. Refractive surgery survey 2004. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005; 31: 221–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie RZ, Stretton S, Sweeney DF. Artificial cornea: Towards a synthetic onlay for correction of refractive error. Biosciences reports 2001; 21: 513–536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans MDM, Mclean KM, Hughes TC, Sweeney DF. A review of the development of a synthetic corneal onlay for refractive correction. Biomaterials 2001; 22: 3319–3328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamaguchi T, Koenig SB, Kimura T, Werblin TP, Mcdonald MB, Kaufman HE. Histological study of epikeratophakia in primates. Ophthalmic Surg 1984; 15: 230–235.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rao GN, Ganti S, Aquavella JV. Specular microscopy of corneal epithelium after epikeratophakia. Am J Ophthalmol 1987; 103: 392–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lass JH, Stocker EG, Fritz ME, Collie DM. Epikeratoplasty: the surgical correction of aphakia, myopia and keratoconus. Ophthalmology 1987; 94: 912–925.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcdonald MB. The future direction of refractive surgery. J Refract Surg 1988; 4: 158–168.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigues M, Nirankari V, Rajagopalan S, Jones K, Funderburgh J. Clinical and histopathologic changes in the host cornea after epikeratophakia for keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol 1992; 114: 161–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson KP, Hanna KD, Gipson IK, Gravagna P, Waring GO 3rd, Johnson‐wint B. Synthetic epikeratoplasty in rhesus monkeys with human type IV collagen. Cornea 1993; 12: 35–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornmehl EW, Bredvik BK, Kelman CD, Raizman MB, Devore DP. In vivo evaluation of collagen corneal allograft derived from rabbit dermis. J Refract Surg 1995; 11: 502–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barraquer JI. Queratoplastia refractiva: estudios e informaciones oftalmológicas. 1949; 2: 10–30.
   Google Scholar
• Schanzlin DJ, Abbott RL, Asbell PA, Assil KK, Burris TE, Durrie DS, Fouraker BD, Lindstrom RL, Mcdonlad JE II, Verity SM, Waring GO 3rd. Two‐year outcomes of intrastromal corneal ring segments for the correction of myopia. Ophthalmology 2001; 108: 1688–1694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapuano CJ, Sugar A, Koch, DD, Agapitos PJ, Culbertson WW, De luise VP, Huang D, Varley GA. Intrastromal corneal ring segments for low myopia. Ophthalmology 2001; 108; 1922–1928.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colin J, Malet FJ. Intacs for the correction of keratoconus: Two‐year follow‐up. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007; 33: 69–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güell JL. Are intracorneal rings still useful in refractive surgery? Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2005; 16: 260–265.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peyman GA, Beyer CF, Bezerra Y, Vincent JM, Arosemena A, Friedlander MH, Hoffman L, Kangeler J, Rossau D. Photoablative inlay laser in situ keratomileusis (PAI‐LASIK) in the rabbit model. J Cataract Ref Surg 2005; 31: 289–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petroll WM, Goldberg D, Lidsey SS, Kelley PS, Cavanagh HD, Bowman RW, Parmar DN, Verity SM, Mcculley JP. Confocal assessment of the corneal response to intracorneal lens insertion and laser in situ keratomileusis with flap creation using IntraLase. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006; 32: 1119–1128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barraquer JI. Modification of refraction by means of intracorneal inclusions. Int Ophthalmol Clin 1966: 6: 53–79.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hicks CR, Fitton JH, Chirila TV, Crawford GJ, Constable IJ. Keratoprostheses: advancing toward true artificial cornea. Surv Ophthalmol 1997; 42: 175–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chirila TV, Hicks CR, Dalton PD, Vijayasekaran S, Lou X, Hong Y, Clayton AB, Ziegelaar BW, Fitton JH, Platten S, Crawford GJ, Constable IJ. Artificial cornea. Prog Polym Sci 1998; 23: 447–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson KP, Hanna K, Waring GO 3rd, Gipson I, Liu Y, Gailitis RP, Johnson‐wint B, Green K. Current status of synthetic epikeratoplasty. Refract Corneal Surg 1991; 7: 240–248.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dupont D, Gravagna P, Albinet P, Tayot JL, Romanet JP, Mouillon M, Eloy R. Biocompatibility of human collagen type IV intracorneal implants. Cornea 1989; 8: 251–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werblin TP, Peiffer RL, Binder PS, Mccarey BE, Patel AS. Eight years experience with Permalens intracorneal lenses in nonhuman primates. Refract Corneal Surg 1992; 8: 12–22.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Werblin TP, Patel AS, Barraquer JI. Initial human experience with Permalens myopic hydrogel intracorneal lens implants. Refract Corneal Surg 1992; 8: 23–26.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mcdonald MB, Mccarey BE, Storie B, Beuerman RW, Salmeron B, Van rij G, Knight PM. Assessment of the long‐term corneal response to hydrogel intrastromal lenses implanted in monkey eyes for up to five years. J Cataract Refract Surg 1993; 19: 213–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linebarger EJ, Song D, Ruckhofer J. Intacs: the intrastromal corneal ring. Int Ophthalmol Clin Refract Surg 2000; 40: 199–208.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ruckhofer J, Bohnke M, Alzner E, Grabner G. Confocal microscopy after implantation of intrastromal corneal ring segments. Ophthalmology 2000; 107: 2144–2151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruckhofer J, Stoiber J, Alzner E, Grabner G. One year results of European multicenter study of intrastromal corneal ring segments. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001; 27: 287–296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choyce DP. Semi‐rigid corneal inlays in the management of albinism, aniridia and ametropia. In: Henkind P, ed. Proceedings of the 24th International Congress of Ophthalmology. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott; 1982. p 1230.
   Google Scholar
• Beekhuis WH, Mccarey BE, Waring GO, Van rij G. Hydrogel keratophakia: a microkeratome dissection in the monkey model. Br J Ophthalmol 1986; 70: 192–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beekhuis WH, Mccarey BE, Van rij G, Waring GO. Complications of hydrogel intracorneal lens in monkeys. Arch Ophthalmol 1987; 105: 116–122.
   Google Scholar
• Mccarey BE, Lane SS, Lindstrom RL. Alloplastic corneal lenses. Int Ophthalmol Clin 1988; 28: 155–163.
   Google Scholar
• Ismail MM. Correction of hyperopia with intracorneal implants. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002; 28: 527–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman HE. An intracorneal lens for hyperopia and presbyopia. Presented in part at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Ophthalmology, New Orleans, LA, October 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Knorz MC. Corneal stromal implants. Presented in part at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Ophthalmology, New Orleans, LA, October 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Alio JL, Mulet EM, Zapata LF, Vidal MT, De rojas V, Javaloy J. Intracorneal inlay complicated by intrastromal epithelial opacification. Arch Ophthalmol 2004; 122: 1441–1446.
   Google Scholar
• Michieletto P, Ligabue E, Balestrazzi A, Balestrazzi A, Giglio S. Perma Vision intracorneal lens for the correction of hyperopia. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004; 30: 2152–2157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fengfu L, Carlsson D, Lohmann C, Suuronen E, Vascotto S, Kobuch K, Sheardown H, Munger R, Nakamura M, Griffith M. Cellular and nerve regeneration within a biosynthetic extracellular matrix for corneal transplantation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003; 100: 15346–15351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaouk H, Meijs GF, Laycock BG. Process for manufacture of porous polymer by use of poragen. Patent W097/35905. 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Chaouk H, Meijs GF, Laycock BG. Process for manufacture of porous polymer from mixture. US patent 6,015,609. January 18, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Myung D, Koh W, Ko J, Noolandi J, Carrasco M, Smith A, Frank CW, Ta CN. Characterization of poly(ethylene glycol) and poly(acrylic acid) double networks for corneal implant applications. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005; 46: E‐Abstract 5003.
   Google Scholar
• Myung D, Koh W, Bakri A, Zhang F, Marshall A, Ko J, Noolandi J, Carrasco M, Cochran JR, Frank CW, Ta CN. Design and fabrication of an artificial cornea based on a photolithographically patterned hydrogel construct. Biomedical Microdevices, 2007; DOI:10.1007/s10544‐006‐9040‐4.
   Google Scholar
• Duan X, Mclaughlin C, Griffith M, Sheardown H. Biofunctionalization of collagen for improved biological response: scaffolds for corneal tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2007; 28: 78–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duan X, Sheardown H. Dendrimer crosslinked collagen as a corneal tissue engineering scaffold: mechanical properties and corneal epithelial cell interactions. Biomaterials 2006; 27: 4608–4617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mccarey BE, Andrews DM. Refractive keratoplasty with intrastromal hydrogel lenticular implants. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1981; 21: 107–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mccarey BE. Refractive keratoplasty with synthetic lens implants. Refract Surg 1991; 31: 87–99.
   Google Scholar
• Mcdonald MB, Mccarey BE, Storie B, Beuerman RW, Salmeron B, Van rij G, Knight PM. Assessment of the longterm corneal response to hydrogel intrastromal lenses implanted in monkey eyes for up to five years. J Cataract Refract Surg 1993; 19: 213–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane SL, Lindstrom RL. Polysulphone intracorneal lenses. Int Ophthalmol Clin 1991; 31: 37–46.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sweeney DF, Xie RZ, O’leary DJ, Vannas A, Odell R, Schindhelm K, Cheng HY, Steele JG, Holden BA. Nutritional requirements of the corneal epithelium and anterior stroma: clinical findings. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1998; 39: 284–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delong K, LivermoreL. National Laboratory Inhouse report: Effect of pores on the optical performance of contact lenses. 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Fitton JH, Dalton BA, Beumer G, Johnson G, Griesser HJ, Steele JG. Surface topography can interfere with epithelial tissue migration. Biomed Mater Res 1998; 42: 245–257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrams GA, Goodman SL, Nealey PF, Franco M, Murphy CJ. Nanoscale topography of the basement membrane underlying the corneal epithelium of the rhesus macaque. Cell Tissue Res 2000; 299: 39–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrams GA, Schaus SS, Goodman SL, Nealey PF, Murphy CJ. Nanoscale topography of the corneal epithelial basement membrane and Desçemet’s membrane of the human. Cornea 2000; 19: 57–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton BA, Evans MDM, Mcfarland GA, Steele GJ. Modulation of epithelial stratification by polymer surface topography. J Biomed Mater Res 1999; 45: 384–394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans MDM, Dalton BA, Steele JG. Persistent adhesion of epithelial tissue is sensitive to polymer topography. J Biomed Mater Res 1999; 45: 485–493.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes TC, Chan GYN. Design principles of synthetic corneal inlays and onlays. Materials Forum 2001; 25: 216–245.
   Google Scholar
• Rice DE, Ihlenfeld JV. 1989. US Patent 4,818,801, Ophthalmic device comprising a polymer of telechelic perfluoropolyether.
   Google Scholar
• Legeais J‐M, Renard G, Parel j‐m, Ing E‐G, Savoldelli M, Pouliquen Y. Keratoprosthesis with biocolonizable microporous fluorocarbon haptic. Arch Ophthalmol 1995; 113: 757–763.
   Google Scholar
• Legeais J‐M, Renard G. A second generation of artificial cornea (Biokpro II). Biomaterials 1998; 19: 1517–1522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legeais JM, Renard G, Parel JM, Simon G, Poulinquen Y. Cellular ingrowth and transparency of an expanded polytetra‐fluoroethylene. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng 1992; 1644: 108–114.
   Google Scholar
• Renard G, Cetinel B, Legeais JM, Savoldelli M, Durand J, Poulinquen Y. Incorporation of a fluorocarbon polymer implanted at the posterior surface of the rabbit cornea. J Biomed Mater Res 1996; 31: 193–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel S, Marshall J, Fitzke FW. Refractive index of the human corneal epithelium and stroma. J Refract Surg 1995; 11: 100–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan C, Wilkie JS, Meijs, GF, Cheng HY. New porous perfluoropolyether membranes. J Appl Polymer Sci 2001; 80: 1756–1763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes TC, Chan GY, inventors. Biomedical device WO 03/097711, Publication date: 27 November, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Chan GYN, Hughes TC, Mclean KM, Mcfarland G, Nguyen XN, Wilkie JS, Johnson G. Approaches to improving the biocompatibility of porous perfluoropolyethers. Biomaterials 2006: 27; 1287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson G, Meijs GF, Laycock BG, Griffith MG, Chaouk H, Steele JG. Cell interactions with perfluoropolyether‐based network copolymers. J Biomater Sci Polymer Edn 1999; 10: 217–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISO 10993‐5: Biological evaluation of medical devices—Part 5: Tests for in vitro cytotoxicity.
   Google Scholar
• Evans MDM, Xie RZ, Fabbri M, Madigan MC, Chaouk H, Beumer GJ, Meijs GF, Griesser H, Steele JG, Sweeney DF. Epithelialization of a novel polymer in the feline cornea—A preliminary study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000; 41: 1674–1680.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie RZ, Evans MDM, Borjaski B, Hughes TC, Chan GY, Nyguen X, Wilkie JS, Mclean KM, Vannas A, Sweeney DF. Two‐year preclinical testing of perfluoropolyether polymer as a corneal inlay. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006; 47: 574–581.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweeney DF, Xie RZ, Evans MDM, Bojarski B, Vannas A, Hughes TC, Chan GY, Nguyen X, Mclean KM. Long‐term corneal biocompatibility to PFPE polymers—histological findings. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004; 45: E‐abstract 3761.
   Google Scholar
• Sweeney DF, Sridhar MS, Vannas A, Pravin VK, Kala R, Hughes TC, Evans MDM, Mclean KM, Xie RZ. Corneal inlays: Results of a 6 month phase 1 clinical trial. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005; 46: E‐abstract 4372.
   Google Scholar
• Sweeney DF, Pravin VK, Kala R, Sridhar MS, Vannas A, Hughes TC, Evans MDM, Mclean KM, Xie RZ. Corneal inlays: Results of an 18 month Phase 1 clinical trial. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006; 47: E‐abstract 4335.
   Google Scholar
• Mester U, Roth K, Dardenne MU. Versvchemit 2‐hydroxyaethylmethycrylatlinsen als keratophakiematerial. Ber Ophthalmol Ges 1972; 72: 326.
   Google Scholar
• Lekskul M, Burrows R, Kublin CL, Cintron C. CxGELSIX: a novel preparation of type VI collagen with possible use as a biomaterial. Cornea 2000; 19: 194–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh’eineachin R. New synthetic lenticule produces good results in hyperopic patients. Euro Times 2000; September: 53.
   Google Scholar