31
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Papers

Repeatability of near visual acuity measurement at high and low contrast

, , &
Pages 447-452 | Received 28 Jun 2007, Accepted 19 Sep 2007, Published online: 15 Apr 2021

REFERENCES

  • Berntsen DA, Barr JT, Mitchell GL. The effect of overnight contact lens corneal reshaping on higher‐order aberrations and best‐corrected visual acuity. Optom Vis Sci 2005; 82: 490–497.
  • Bailey MD, Olson MD, Bullimore MA, Jones L, Maloney RK. The effect of LASIK on best‐corrected high‐ and low‐contrast visual acuity. Optom Vis Sci 2004; 81: 362–368.
  • Richdale K, Mitchell GL, Zadnik K. Comparison of multifocal and monovision soft contact lens corrections in patients with low‐astigmatic presbyopia. Optom Vis Sci 2006; 83: 266–273.
  • Brown B, Lovie‐kitchin JE. High and low contrast acuity and clinical contrast sensitivity tested in a normal population. Optom Vis Sci 1989; 66: 467–473.
  • Lovie‐kitchin JE, Brown B. Repeatability and intercorrelations of standard vision tests as a function of age. Optom Vis Sci 2000; 77: 412–420.
  • Cho P, Woo GC. Repeatability of the Waterloo four‐contrast logMAR visual acuity chart and near vision test card on a group of normal young adults. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2004; 24: 427–435.
  • Cheng D, Woo GC. Validity of the University of Waterloo's near visual acuity charts. Pract Optom 2001; 12: 54–61.
  • Pesudovs K, Marsack JD, Donnelly WJ 3rd, Thibos LN, Applegate RA. Measuring visual acuity—mesopic or photopic conditions, and high or low contrast letters? J Refract Surg 2004; 20: S508–S514.
  • Hess RF, Dakin SC, Tewfik M, Brown B. Contour interaction in amblyopia: scale selection. Vision Res 2001; 41: 2285–2296.
  • Simmers AJ, Gray LS, Mcgraw PV, Winn B. Contour interaction for high and low contrast optotypes in normal and amblyopic observers. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1999; 19: 253–260.
  • Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1 (8476): 307–310.
  • Mcclenaghan N, Kimura A, Stark L. An evaluation of the M&S Technologies Smart System II for visual acuity measurement in young visually‐normal adults. Optom Vis Sci 2007; 84: 218–223.
  • Hazel CA, Elliott DB. The dependency of logMAR visual acuity measurements on chart design and scoring rule. Optom Vis Sci 2002; 79: 788–792.
  • Leguire LE, Suh S, Rogers GL, Bremer DL. SKILL card results in amblyopic children. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1994; 31: 256–261.
  • Haegerstrom‐portnoy G, Brabyn J, Schneck ME, Jampolsky A. The SKILL card. An acuity test of reduced luminance and contrast. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1997; 38: 207–218.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.