Progress in the spectacle correction of presbyopia. Part 2: Modern progressive lens technologies

REFERENCES

• Fowler C. Recent trends in progressive power lenses. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1998; 18: 234–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukaiyama H, Kato K. Progressive Multifocal Lens and Manufacturing Method of Eyeglass Lens and Progressive Multifocal Lens. US Patent 6,019,470, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Meister D. Free‐form surfacing technology makes possible new levels of optical sophistication for spectacles. Refract Eyecare Ophthalmol 2005; 9: 29–32.
   Google Scholar
• Hof A, Hanssen A. Spectacle Lens with Spherical Front Side and Multifocal Back Side and Process for Its Production. US Patent 6,089,713, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Kelch G, Lahres H, Wietschorke H. Spectacle Lens. US Patent 5,444,503, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Fry G. Choosing the base curve for an ophthalmic lens. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1978; 55: 238–248.
   Google Scholar
• Von rohr M. Toric Spectacle Glass. US Patent 989,645, 1911.
   Google Scholar
• Keating M. Oblique central refraction in spherocylindrical corrections with both faceform and pantoscopic tilt. Optom Vis Sci 1995; 72: 258–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramamoorthy P, Sheedy J, Hayes J. Visual needs predict PAL preference. Optom Vis Sci 2006; 83: E‐abstract 060079.
   Google Scholar
• Sheedy J. Progressive addition lenses: matching the specific lens to patient needs. Optometry 2004; 75: 83–102.
   Google Scholar
• Afanador A. The range of eye movements through progressive multifocals. Optom Mon 1982; 73: 82–87.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller J. Head movement propensity. Exp Brain Res 1992; 92: 152–164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchings N, Irving E, Jung N, Dowling L, Wells K. Eye and head movement alterations in naïve progressive addition lens wearers. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2007; 27: 142–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han Y, Ciuffreda K, Selenow A, Bauer E, Ali S, Spencer W. Static aspects of eye and head movements during reading in a simulated computer‐based environment with single‐vision and progressive lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003; 44: 145–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukaiyama H, Kato K, Komatsu A, Kaga T. Multifocal Lens for Eyeglass and Eyeglass Lens. US Patent 5,926,250, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• American National Standards. American National Standard for Ophthalmics—Methods for reporting optical aberrations of eyes. ANSI Z80.28–2004.
   Google Scholar
• Atchison D. Recent advances in measurement of monochromatic aberrations of human eyes. Clin Exp Optom 2005; 88: 5–27.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Atchison D. Recent advances in representation of monochromatic aberrations of human eyes. Clin Exp Optom 2004; 87: 138–148.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sheedy J, Campbell C, King‐smith E, Hayes J. Progressive powered lenses: the Minkwitz theorem. Optom Vis Sci 2005; 82: 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blendowske R, Villegas E, Artal P. An analytical model describing aberrations in the progression corridor of progressive addition lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2006; 83: 666–671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wehner E, Welk A, Haimerl W, Altheimer H, Esser G. Spectacle Lens with Small Higher Order Aberrations. US Patent 7,063,421, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Villegas E, Artal P. Comparison of aberrations in different types of progressive power lenses. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2004; 24: 419–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villegas E, Artal P. spatially resolved wavefront aberrations of ophthalmic progressive‐powered lenses in normal viewing conditions. Optom Vis Sci 2003; 80: 109–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villegas E, Artal P. Visual acuity and optical parameters in progressive‐power lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2006; 83: 672–681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warden L, Dreher A, Ferro J, Jethmalani J, Lai S. System for manufacturing an optical lens. US Patent 7,234,810, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Guirao A, Williams D, Cox I. Effect of rotation and translation on the expected benefit of an ideal method to correct the eye's higher order aberrations. J Opt Soc Am A 2001; 18: 1003–1015.
   Google Scholar
• Thibos N, Hong X, Bradley A, Applegate R. Accuracy and precision of objective refraction from wavefront aberrations. J Vision 2004; 4: 329–351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar