Optical quality and intraocular scattering in a healthy young population

REFERENCES

• Schallhorn SC, Farjo AA, Huang D, Boxer wachler BS. Trattler WB, Tanzer DJ, Majmuder PA et al. Wavefront‐guided LASIK for the correction of primary myopia and astigmatism. Ophthalmology 2008; 115: 1249–1261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dougherty PJ, Bains HS. A retrospective comparison of LASIK outcomes for myopia and myopic astigmatism with conventional NIDEK versus wavefront‐guided VISX and Alcon platforms. J Refract Surg 2008; 24: 891–896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prieto PM, Vargas‐martín F, Goelz S, Artal P. Analysis of the performance of the Hartmann‐Shack sensor in the human eye. J Opt Soc Am A 2000; 17: 1388–1398.
   Google Scholar
• Liang J, Grimm B, Goelz S, Bille JF. Objective measurement of wave aberrations of the human eye with the use of a Hartmann‐Shack sensor. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 1994; 11: 1949–1957.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santamaría J, Artal P, Bescos J. Determination of the point‐spread function of human eyes using a hybrid optical‐digital method. J Opt Soc Am A 1987; 4: 1109–1114.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Williams DR, Brainard DH, Mcmahon MJ, Navarro R. Double‐pass and interferometric measures of the optical quality of the eye. J Opt Soc Am A 1994; 11: 3123–3135.
   Google Scholar
• Logean E, Dalimier E, Dainty C. Measured double‐pass intensity point‐spread function after adaptive optics correction of ocular aberrations. Opt Express 2008; 27: 17348–17357.
   Google Scholar
• Díaz‐doutón F, Benito A, Pujol J, Arjona M, Güell JL, Artal P. Comparison of the retinal image quality obtained with a Hartmann‐Shack sensor and a double‐pass instrument. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006; 47: 1710–1716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güell JL, Pujol J, Arjona M, Díaz‐doutón F, Artal P. Optical quality analysis system: instrument for objective clinical evaluation of ocular optical quality. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004; 30: 1598–1599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artal P, Iglesias I, López N, Green DG. Double‐pass measurements of the retinal image quality with unequal entrance and exit pupil sizes and the reversibility of the eye's optical system. J Opt Soc Am A 1995; 12: 2358–2366.
   Google Scholar
• Vilaseca M, Padilla A, Pujol J, Ondategui JC, Artal P, Güell JL. Optical quality one month after Verisyse and Veriflex phakic IOP implantation and Zeiss MEL 80 LASIK for myopia from 5.00 to 16.50 diopters. J Refract Surg 2009; 25: 689–698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alió JL, Schimchak P, Montés‐micó R, Galal A. Retinal image quality after microincision intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005; 31: 1557–1560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández‐vega L, Madrid‐costa D, Alfonso JF, Montés‐micó R, Poo‐lópez A. Optical and visual performance of diffractive intraocular lens implantation after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2009; 35: 825–832.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiménez JR, Ortiz C, Pérez‐ocón F, Jiménez R. Optical image quality and visual performance for patients with keratitis. Cornea 2009; 28: 783–788
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artola A, Patel S, Schimchak P, Ayala MJ, Ruiz‐moreno JM, Alió JL. Evidence for delayed presbyopia after photorefractive keratectomy for myopia. Ophthalmology 2006; 113: 735–741.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vilaseca M, Arjona M, Pujol J, Issolio L, Güell JL. Optical quality of foldable monofocal intraocular lenses before and after injection. Comparative evaluation using a double‐pass system. J Cataract Refract Surg 2009; 35: 1415–1423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saad A, Saab M, Gatinel D. Repeatability of measurements with a double‐pass system. J Cataract Refract Surg 2010; 36: 28–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thibos LN, Hong X, Bradley A, Cheng X. Statistical variation of aberration structure and image quality in a normal population of healthy eyes. J Opt Soc Am A 2002; 19: 2329–2348.
   Google Scholar
• Porter J, Guirao A, Cox IG, Williams DR. Monochromatic aberrations of the human eye in a large population. J Opt Soc Am A 2001; 18: 1793–1803.
   Google Scholar
• Castejón‐mochón JF, López‐gil N, Benito A, Artal P. Ocular wave‐front aberration statistics in a normal young population. Vision Res 2002; 42: 1611–1617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artal P, Ferro M, Miranda I, Navarro R. Effects of aging in retinal image quality. J Opt Soc Am A 1993; 10: 1656–1662.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guirao A, González C, Redondo M, Geraghty E, Norrby S, Artal P. Average optical performance of the human eye as a function of age in a normal population. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999; 40: 203–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wachler BS, Krueger RR. Normalized contrast sensitivity values. J Refract Surg 1998; 14: 463–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López N, Artal P. Comparison of double‐pass estimates of the retinal image quality obtained with green and near‐infrared light. J Opt Soc Am A 1997; 14: 961–971.
   Google Scholar
• Born M, Wolf E. Principles of Optics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1999. p1–952.
   Google Scholar
• Thibos LN, Hong X, Bradley A, Applegate RA. Accuracy and precision of objective refraction from wavefront aberrations. J Vis 2004; 4: 329–351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarro R, Artal P, Williams DR. Modulation transfer of the human eye as a function of retinal eccentricity. J Opt Soc Am A 1993; 10: 201–212.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alcón E, Benito A, Pérez GM, De casas A, Abenza S, Luque S, Pujol J et al. Quantifying intraocular scattering in cataract patients. ARVO Abstract 3822/B560; 2007 May 6–10; Fort Lauderdale, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Benito A, Alcon E, Perez GM, Abenza S, De casas A, Luque S, Pujol J et al. An objective classification scheme for cataracts. ARVO Abstract 3823/B561; 2007 May 6–10; Fort Lauderdale, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Pujol J, Vilaseca M, Salvador A, Romero MJ, Pérez GM, Issolio L, Artal P. Cataract evaluation with an objective scattering index based on double‐pass image analysis. ARVO Abstract 6127/D868; 2009 May 3–7; Fort Lauderdale, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Wollstein G, Garway‐heath DF, Hitchings RA. Identification of early glaucoma cases with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Ophthalmology 1998; 105: 1557–1563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott DB, Yang KCH, Whitaker D. Visual acuity changes throughout adulthood in normal, healthy eyes: seeing beyond 6/6. Optom Vis Sci 1995; 72: 186–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arditi A, Cagenello R. On the statistical reliability of letter‐chart visual acuity measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1993; 34: 120–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stonecipher KG, Kezirian GM. Wavefront‐optimized versus wavefront‐guided LASIK for myopic astigmatism with the ALLEGRETTO WAVE: three‐month results of a prospective FDA trial. J Refract Surg 2008; 24: 424–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz SH. Visual Perception. A Clinical Orientation. New York: MacGraw Hill, 1999. p1–433.
   Google Scholar
• Calver RI, Cox MJ, Elliott DB. Effect of aging on the monochromatic aberrations of the human eye. J Opt Soc Am A 1999; 16: 2069–2078.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell FW, Green DG. Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution. J Physiol 1965; 181: 576–593.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dressler M, Rassow B. Neural contrast sensitivity measurements with a laser interference system for clinical and screening application. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1981; 21: 737–744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michael R, Guevara O, De la paz M, Alvarez de toledo J, Barraquer RI. Neural contrast sensitivity calculated from measured total contrast sensitivity and modulation transfer function. Acta Ophthalmol Scand2009 Nov 11. [Epub ahead of print]
   Google Scholar