Advanced search
Publication Cover
Clinical and Experimental Optometry Volume 94, 2011 - Issue 2
Submit an article Journal homepage
89
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Papers

A survey of the use of grading scales for contact lens complications in optometric practice

Nathan EfronInstitute of Health and Biomedical Innovation and School of Optometry, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia E‐mail: [email protected]
, BScOptom PhD DSc,
Nicola PritchardInstitute of Health and Biomedical Innovation and School of Optometry, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia E‐mail: [email protected]
, BAppSc Optom,
Kady BrandonInstitute of Health and Biomedical Innovation and School of Optometry, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia E‐mail: [email protected]
, BAppSc Optom,
Joanne CopelandInstitute of Health and Biomedical Innovation and School of Optometry, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia E‐mail: [email protected]
, BAppSc Optom,
Roslyn GodfreyInstitute of Health and Biomedical Innovation and School of Optometry, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia E‐mail: [email protected]
, BAppSc Optom,
Benjamin HamlynInstitute of Health and Biomedical Innovation and School of Optometry, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia E‐mail: [email protected]
, BAppSc Optom &
Vanessa VrbancicInstitute of Health and Biomedical Innovation and School of Optometry, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia E‐mail: [email protected]
, BAppSc Optom show all
Pages 193-199 | Received 08 Jun 2010, Accepted 28 Aug 2010, Published online: 15 Apr 2021

REFERENCES

  • Efron N, Morgan P, Katsara S. Validation of grading scales for contact lens complications. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2001; 2: 17–29.
  • Frost N, Sparrow J. The assessment of lens opacities in clinical practice: results of a national survey. Br J Ophthalmol 2001; 85: 319–321.
  • Troutbeck R, Hirst L. Review of treatment of pterygium in Queensland: 10 years after a primary survey. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2001; 29: 286–290.
  • Efron N. Efron grading scales for contact lens complications (Appendix K). In: Efron N, ed.Contact Lens Practice, 2nded.Oxford: Butterworth‐Heinemann–Elsevier, 2010. p459–461.
  • Institute for Eye Research grading scales (Appendix B). In: Phillips A, Speedwell L, eds.Contact Lenses, 5thed.Oxford: Butterworth‐Heinemann–Elsevier, 2007. p627–631.
  • Golding T, Brennan N. Survey of optometric opinion on dry eye topics. Clin Exp Optom 1992; 75: 98–108.
  • Schmid K, Schmid L, Swann P, Hartley L. A survey of ocular therapeutic pharmaceutical agents in optometric practice. Clin Exp Optom 2000; 83: 16–31.
  • Woods C, Morgan P. Contact lens prescribing in the Australian states and territories 2001. Clin Exp Optom 2002; 85: 279–283.
  • Graduate certificate in ocular therapeutics (OP43) at the Queensland University of Technology—Course details. [Cited 2010 Jun 4.] Available from: http://www.courses.qut.edu.au/cgi‐bin/WebObjects/Courses.woa/wa/selectMajorFromMain?pres=sf&courseID=10161.
  • Terry R, Schnider C, Holden B, Cornish R, Grant T, Sweeney D, La hood D et al. CCLRU Standards for success of daily and extended wear contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 1993; 70: 234–243.
  • Brennan N, Coles M‐L, Jaworski A, Rosario D. Proposed practice guidelines for continuous contact lens wear. Clin Exp Optom 2001; 84: 71–77.
  • Chhabra M, Prausnitz JM, Radke CJ. Modeling corneal metabolism and oxygen transport during contact lens wear. Optom Vis Sci 2009; 86: 454–66.
  • Bailey I, Bullimore M, Raasch T, Taylor H. Clinical grading and the effects of scaling. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1991; 32: 422–432.
  • Efron N. Contact Lens Complications, 2nded.Oxford: Butterworth‐Heinemann–Elsevier, 2004.
  • Mackinven J, Mcguinness C, Pascal E, Woods R. Clinical grading of the upper palpebral conjunctiva of non‐contact lens wearers. Optom Vis Sci 2001; 78: 13–18.
  • Chong T, Simpson T, Fonn D. The repeatability of discrete and continuous anterior segment grading scales. Optom Vis Sci 2000; 77: 244–251.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.