Reading with low vision: the impact of research on clinical management*

REFERENCES

• Goodrich GL, Arditi A, Rubin G, Keeffe J, Legge GE. The low vision timeline: An interactive history. Vis Impair Res 2008; 10: 67–75.
   Google Scholar
• Lederer J. A new development in aids for sub‐normal vision. Nature 1954; 174: 977–978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raasch TW, Leat SJ, Kleinstein RN, Bullimore MA, Cutter GR. Evaluating the value of low‐vision services. J Am Optom Assoc 1997; 68: 287–295.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harper R, Koorduyn K, Reeves B, Slater L. Evaluating the outcomes of low vision rehabilitation. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1999; 19: 3–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La grow SJ. The effectiveness of comprehensive low vision services for older persons with visual impairments in New Zealand. J Vis Impair Blindness 2004; 98: 679–692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeves BC, Harper RA, Russell WB. Enhanced low vision rehabilitation for people with age related macular degeneration: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Ophthalmol 2004; 88: 1443–1449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stelmack JA, Tang XC, Reda DJ, Rinne S, Mancil RM, Massof RW. Outcomes of the Veterans Affairs Low Vision Intervention Trial (LOVIT). Arch Ophthalmol 2008; 126: 608–617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green J. Notes on the clinical determination of the acuteness of vision, including the construction and gradation of optotypes, and on systems of notation. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1905; 10: 644–654.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett AG. Ophthalmic test types. Brit J Physiol Opt 1965; 22: 238–271.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey IL, Lovie JE. New design principles for visual acuity letter charts. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1976; 53: 740–745.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lovie–kitchin J, Bailey IL. Visual acuity measurement: 20-years on from the Bailey–Lovie chart. In: Vision '96, Book 1, Proceedings of the International Conference on Low Vision 1996. Madrid: Organización Nacional de Ciegos Españoles, 1998. p45–49.
   Google Scholar
• Westheimer G. Scaling of visual acuity measurements. Arch Ophthalmol 1979; 97: 327–330.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ferris FL, Kassoff A, Bresnick GH, Bailey I. New visual acuity charts for clinical research. Am J Ophthalmol 1982; 94: 91–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• British Standards Institution. British standard specification for test charts for determining distance visual acuity. London: British Standards Institution, 1968. p4–14.
   Google Scholar
• Sloan LL. New test charts for the measurement of visual acuity at far and near distances. Am J Ophthalmol 1959; 48: 807–813.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carkeet A. Modeling logMAR visual acuity scores: Effects of termination rules and alternative forced‐choice options. Optom Vis Sci 2001; 78: 529–538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey IL, Bullimore MA, Raasch TW, Taylor HR. Clinical grading and the effects of scaling. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1991; 32: 422–432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcmonnies CW, Ho A. Letter legibility and chart equivalence. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2000; 20: 142–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown B, Lovie–kitchin JE. Repeated visual acuity measurement: Establishing the patient's own criterion for change. Optom Vis Sci 1993; 70: 45–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown B, Yap MKH. Differences in visual acuity between the eyes: Determination of normal limits in a clinical population. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1995; 15: 163–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faye EE. Clinical Low Vision. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Lovie–kitchin JE, Bowman KJ. Senile Macular Degeneration—Management and Rehabilitation. Boston: Butterworths, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Lovie–kitchin J. Low Vision. In: Rosenfield M, Logan N, Edwards K, eds.Optometry: Science, Techniques and Clinical Management. New York: Elsevier, 2009. p475–497.
   Google Scholar
• Law FW. Reading types. Br J Ophthalmol 1952; 36: 689–690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lebensohn JE. Visual acuity tests for near: Implications and correlations. Am J Ophthalmol 1958; 45: 127–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lebensohn JE. Visual charts. Int Ophthalmol Clin 1965; 5: 347–367.
   Google Scholar
• Keeler CH. Helping the Partially Sighted—Manual, 3rded.London: Keeler Optical Products, 1958. p1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Sloan LL, Brown DJ. Reading cards for selection of optical aids for the partially sighted. Am J Ophthalmol 1963; 55: 1187–1199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey IL, Lovie JE. The design and use of a new near‐vision chart. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1980; 57: 378–387.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Legge GE, Ross JA, Luebker A. Psychophysics of reading—VIII. The Minnesota low vision reading test. Optom Vis Sci 1989; 66: 843–853.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansfield JS, Ahn SJ, Legge GE, Luebker A. A new reading‐acuity chart for normal and low vision. Non‐invasive Assessment of the Visual System. OSA Technical Digest 1993; 3: 232–235.
   Google Scholar
• Ahn SJ, Legge GE, Luebker A. Printed cards for measuring low‐vision reading speed. Vision Res 1995; 35: 1939–1944.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchin JE, Bailey IL. Task complexity and visual acuity in senile macular degeneration. Aust J Optom 1981; 64: 235–242.
   Google Scholar
• Lovie–kitchin J. Reading performance of adults with low vision. PhD thesis. Brisbane, Australia: Queensland University of Technology, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Lovie–kitchin J, Brown B. Repeatability and intercorrelations of standard vision tests as a function of age. Optom Vis Sci 2000; 77: 412–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacho I, Dickinson C, Smith H, Harper R. Clinical impairment measures and reading performance in a large age‐related macular degeneration group. Optom Vis Sci 2010; 87: 344–349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovie–kitchin J, Devereaux J, Wells S, Sculpher K‐A. Multi‐disciplinary low vision care. Clin Exp Optom 2001; 84: 165–170.
   Google Scholar
• Mehr EB, Freid AN. Low Vision Care. Chicago: Professional Press Incorporated, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Fonda G. Management of Low Vision. New York: Thieme‐Stratton, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Jose RT. Understanding Low Vision. New York: American Foundation for the Blind, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Flom RE, Raasch TW, Braudway SM, Rubin GS, Massof RW. A test of Kestenbaum's rule for prescribing low vision reading devices. Optom Vis Sci 1993; 70: 128.
   Google Scholar
• Cole RG. Predicting the low vision reading add. J Am Optom Assoc 1993; 64: 19–27.
   Google Scholar
• Flom MC. New concepts on visual acuity. Optometric Weekly 1966; 57: 63–68.
   Google Scholar
• Legge GE, Pelli DG, Rubin GS, Schleske MM. Psychophysics of reading—I. Normal vision. Vision Res 1985; 25: 239–252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legge GE, Rubin GS, Pelli DG, Schleske MM. Psychophysics of reading—II. Low vision. Vision Res 1985; 25: 253–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovie–kitchin JE, Woo GC. Effect of magnification and field of view on reading speed using a CCTV. In: Woo G, ed.Low Vision: Principles and Applications. New York: Springer‐Verlag, 1987. p308–322.
   Google Scholar
• Legge GE, Rubin GS, Pelli DG, Schleske MM, Luebker A, Ross JA. Understanding low vision reading. J Vis Impairment Blindness 1988; 82: 54–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legge GE, Glenn A. Fry award lecture 1990: Three perspectives on low vision reading. Optom Vis Sci 1991; 68: 763–769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittaker SG, Lovie–kitchin JE. Visual requirements for reading. Optom Vis Sci 1993; 70: 54–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston AW. Technical note: The relationship between magnification and field of view of simple magnifiers. Aust J Optom 1982; 65: 74–77.
   Google Scholar
• Blommaert FJJ, Neve JJ. Reading fields of magnifying loupes. J Opt Soc Am A 1987; 4: 1820–1830.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bailey IL, Bullimore MA, Greer RX. Low vision magnifiers—Their optical parameters and methods for prescribing. Optom Vis Sci 1994; 71: 689–698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovie–kitchin J, Whittaker S. Interaction between acuity reserve and window size for scrolled reading rates in adults with normal and low vision. (ARVO Abstract). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999; 40: S34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovie–kitchin JE, Whittaker SG. Prescribing near magnification for low vision patients. Clin Exp Optom 1999; 82: 214–224.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rubin GS, Turano K. Low vision reading with sequential word presentation. Vision Res 1994; 34: 1723–1733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovie–kitchin JE, Oliver NJ, Bruce A, Leighton MS, Leighton WK. The effect of print size on reading rate for adults and children. Clin Exp Optom 1994; 77: 2–7.
   Google Scholar
• Bevan J, Lovie–kitchin J, Hein B. Contrast sensitivity and reading performance in students with a vision impairment. In: Vision '96: Proceedings of the International Conference on Low Vision 1996. Madrid: Organizacion Nacional de Ciegos Espanoles, 1998. p36–42.
   Google Scholar
• Lovie–kitchin J, Bowers A, Woods R. Oral and silent reading performance with macular degeneration. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2000; 20: 360–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovie–kitchin J, Whittaker S. Prescribing magnification for reading with low vision: What are the criteria?In: Stuen C, Arditi A, Horowitz A, Lang M, Rosenthal B, Seidman K, eds.Vision Rehabilitation—Assessment, Intervention and Outcomes. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger, 2000. p314–318.
   Google Scholar
• Cheong AM, Lovie–kitchin JE, Bowers AR. Fixed versus individualised acuity reserve methods for determining magnification for low vision reading. Clin Exp Optom 2002; 85: 229–237.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rubin GS, Legge GE. Psychophysics of reading. VI—The role of contrast in low vision. Vision Res 1989; 29: 79–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leat SJ, Woodhouse JM. Reading performance with low vision aids: Relationship with contrast sensitivity. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1993; 13: 9–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal BP. The structured low vision evaluation. In: Rosenthal BP, Cole RG, eds.Problems in Optometry: A Structured Approach to Low Vison Care. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott, 1991. p385–393.
   Google Scholar
• Brilliant RL. Essentials of Low Vision Practice. Boston: Butterworth‐Heinemann, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Whittaker SG, Lovie–kitchin JE. The assessment of contrast sensitivity and contrast reserve for reading rehabilitation. In: Kooijman AC, Looijestijn PL, Welling JA, Vanderwildt GJ, eds.Low Vision—Research and New Development in Rehabilitation. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 1994. p88–92.
   Google Scholar
• Timberlake GT, Mainster MA, Peli E, Augliere RA, Essock E, Arend LE. Reading with a macular scotoma: I. Retinal location of scotoma and fixation area. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1986; 27: 1137–1147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummings RW, Whittaker SG, Watson GR, Budds JM. Scanning characters and reading with a central scotoma. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1985; 62: 833–843.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher DC, Schuchard RA, Watson G. Relative locations of macular scotomas near the PRL: effect on low vision reading. J Rehab Res Development 1999; 36: 356–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ergun E, Maár N, Radner W, Barbazetto I, Schmidt‐erfurth U, Stur M. Scotoma size and reading speed in patients with subfoveal occult choroidal neovascularization in age‐related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology 2003; 110: 65–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher DC, Schuchard RA. Preferred retinal loci relationship to macular scotomas in a low‐vision population. Ophthalmology 1997; 104: 632–638.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson GR, Schuchard RA, De l'aune WR, Watkins E. Effects of preferred retinal locus placement on text navigation and development of advantageous trained retinal locus. J Rehab Res Development 2006; 43: 761–770.
   Google Scholar
• Lovie–kitchin JE, Whittaker SG. Low vision assessment for reading rehabilitation: Indications for visual field assessment.In: Vision '96, Proceedings of the International Conference on Low Vision 1996. Madrid: Organizacion Nacional de Ciegos Espanoles, 1998. p268–275.
   Google Scholar
• Fine EM, Rubin GS. Reading with simulated scotomas: attending to the right is better than attending to the left. Vision Res 1999; 39: 1039–1048.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowakowski RW. Primary Low Vision Care. Connecticut: Appleton & Lange, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Dickinson C. Low Vision: Principles and Practice. Boston: Butterworth–Heinemann, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Lovie–kitchin JE, Whittaker SG. Relative‐size magnification versus relative‐distance magnification: Effect on the reading performance of adults with normal and low vision. J Vis Impairment Blindness 1998; 92: 433–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey IL. Low Vision Yellow Pages: YP2Technical_data.xls. University of California, Berkeley, 2006. Available from: http://optometry.berkeley.edu/class/[accessed on 23 February 2010]
   Google Scholar
• Virgili G, Acosta R. Reading aids for adults with low vision. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006; Issue4, DOI: 10.1002/14651858. CD14003303; pub 14651852.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson AJ, Wolffsohn JS. Low Vision Manual. Edinburgh: Butterworth Heinemann/Elsevier, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Lovie–kitchin JE, Bowman KJ, Farmer EJ. Technical note: Domestic lighting requirements for elderly patients. Aust J Optom 1983; 66: 93–97.
   Google Scholar
• Eldred KB. Optimal illumination for reading in patients with age‐related maculopathy. Optom Vis Sci 1992; 69: 46–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowers A, Meek C, Stewart N. Illumination and reading performance in age‐related macular degeneration. Clin Exp Optom 2001; 84: 139–147.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sloan LL. Variation of acuity with luminance in ocular diseases and anomalies. Doc Ophthalmol 1969; 26: 384–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sloan LL, Habel A, Feiock K. High illuminations as an auxiliary reading aid in diseases of the macula. Am J Ophthalmol 1973; 76: 745–757.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bullimore MA, Bailey IL. Reading and eye movements in age‐related maculopathy. Optom Vis Sci 1995; 72: 125–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei H, Schuchard RA. Using two preferred retinal loci for different lighting conditions in patients with central scotomas. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1997; 38: 1812–1818.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson GR, Wright V, De l'aune W. The efficacy of comprehension training and reading practice for print readers with macular loss. J Vis Impairment Blindness 1992; 86: 37–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson GR, Wright V, Long S, Del'aune W. A low vision reading comprehension test. J Vis Impairment Blindness 1996; 90: 486–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodrich GL, Mehr EB, Quillman RD, Shaw HK, Wiley JK. Training and practice effects in performance with low‐vision aids: A preliminary study. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1977; 54: 312–318.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nilsson UL, Nilsson SEG. Educational training in the use of aids and residual vision is essential in rehabilitation of patients with severe age‐related macular degeneration. II. Results of a prospective study. In: Kooijman AC, Looijestijn PL, Welling JA, Vanderwildt GJ, eds.Low Vision—Research and New Developments in Rehabilitation. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 1994; 151–154.
   Google Scholar
• Goodrich GL, Kirby J, Keswick C, Oros T, Wagstaff P, Donald B, Hazan MA et al. Training the patient with low vision to read: Does it significantly improve function? In: Stuen C, Arditi A, Horowitz A, Lang MA, Rosenthal B, Seidman KR, eds.Vision Rehabilitation. New York: Swets & Zeitlinger, 2000. p230–236.
   Google Scholar
• Goodrich GL, Mehr EB. Eccentric viewing training and low vision aids: Current practice and implications of peripheral retinal research. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1986; 63: 119–126.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Freeman PB, Jose RT. The Art and Practice of Low Vision, 2nd ed. Boston: Butterworth‐Heinemann, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson UL. Visual rehabilitation with and without educational training in the use of optical aids and residual vision. A prospective study of patients with advanced age‐related macular degeneration. Clin Vis Sci 1990; 6: 3–10.
   Google Scholar
• Cheong A, Lovie–kitchin J, Bowers A, Brown B. Short‐term reading practice improves reading performance with stand magnifiers for people with AMD. Optom Vis Sci 2005; 82: 114–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckmann PJ, Legge GE. Psychophysics of reading—XIV. The page navigation problem in using magnifiers. Vision Res 1996; 36: 3723–3733.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowers AR, Cheong AMY, Lovie–kitchin JE. Reading with optical magnifiers: Page navigation strategies and difficulties. Optom Vis Sci 2007; 84: 9–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickinson C, Shim M. The influence of manual dexterity on reading speed with a hand‐held magnifier. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007; 48: 4368–4374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crossland MD, Culham LE, Kabanarou SA, Rubin GS. Preferred retinal locus development in patients with macular disease. Ophthalmology 2005; 112: 1579–1585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stelmack JA, Massof RW, Stelmack TR. Is there a standard of care for eccentric viewing training? J Rehab Res Development 2004; 41: 729–738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer S, Logan D, Nabili S, Dutton GN. Effective rehabilitation of reading by training in the technique of eccentric viewing: Evaluation of a 4‐year programme of service delivery. Br J Ophthalmol 2010; 94: 494–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansfield JS, Legge GE, Cunningham K, Luebker A. The effect of font on reading‐speed and reading‐acuity in normal and low‐vision. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1994; 35: 1554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar