Influence of corneal astigmatism, corneal curvature and meridional differences on corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor

REFERENCES

• Förster W, Kasprzak H, Von bally G. Measurement of elastic modulus of the central bovine cornea by means of holographic interferometry. Part II. Results. Optom Vis Sci 1994; 71: 27–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjortdal JØ. Extensibility of the normo‐hydrated human cornea. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1995; 73: 12–17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zeng Y, Yang J, Huang K, Lee Z, Lee X. A comparison of biomechanical properties between human and porcine cornea. J Biomech 2001; 34: 533–537.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buzard KA. Introduction to biomechanics of the cornea. Refract Corneal Surg 1992; 8: 127–138.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carnell PH, Vito RP. A model for estimating corneal stiffness using an indenter. J Biomech Eng 1992; 114: 549–552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spörl E, Terai N, Haustein M, Böhm AG, Raiskup‐wolf F, Pillunat LE. [Biomechanical condition of the cornea as a new indicator for pathological and structural changes.] Ophthalmologe 2009; 106: 512–520 (in German with English abstract).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abitbol O, Bouden J, Doan S, Hoang‐xuan T, Gatinel D. Corneal hysteresis measured with the ocular response analyzer in normal and glaucomatous eyes. Acta Ophthalmol 2010; 88: 116–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweitzer C, Roberts CJ, Mahmoud AM, Colin J, Maurice‐tison S, Kerautret J. Screening of forme fruste keratoconus with the ocular response analyzer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010; 51: 2403–2410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pepose JS, Feigenbaum SK, Qazi MA, Sanderson JP, Roberts CJ. Changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure following LASIK using static, dynamic, and noncontact tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol 2007; 143: 39–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen MC, Lee N, Bourla N, Hamilton DR. Corneal biomechanical measurements before and after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008; 34: 1886–1891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah S, Laiquzzaman M, Yeung I, Pan X, Roberts C. The use of the ocular response analyser to determine corneal hysteresis in eyes before and after excimer laser refractive surgery. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2009; 32: 123–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, Roberts CJ. Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurement: quantitative analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005; 31: 146–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hager A, Schroeder B, Sadeghi M, Grossherr M, Wiegand W. [The influence of corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor on the measurement of intraocular pressure.] Ophthalmologe 2007; 104: 484–489 (in German with English abstract).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luce DA. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005; 31: 156–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam A, Chen D, Chiu R, Chui WS. Comparison of IOP measurements between ORA and GAT in normal Chinese. Optom Vis Sci 2007; 84: 909–914.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotecha A. What biomechanical properties of the cornea are relevant for the clinician? Surv Ophthalmol 2007; 52: S109–S114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mark HH, Mark TL. Corneal astigmatism in applanation tonometry. Eye 2003; 17: 617–618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rask G, Behndig A. Effects of corneal thickness, curvature, astigmatism and direction of gaze on Goldmann applanation tonometry readings. Ophthalmic Res 2006; 38: 49–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broman AT, Congdon NG, Bandeen‐roche K, Quigley HA. Influence of corneal structure, corneal responsiveness and other ocular parameters on tonometric measurement of intraocular pressure. J Glaucoma 2007; 16: 581–588.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tejedor J, Murube J. Choosing the location of corneal incision based on preexisting astigmatism in phacoemulsification. Am J Ophthalmol 2005; 139: 767–776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franco S, Lira M. Biomechanical properties of the cornea measured by the ocular response analyzer and their association with intraocular pressure and the central corneal curvature. Clin Exp Optom 2009; 92: 469–475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang PY, Chang SW, Wang JY. Assessment of corneal biomechanical properties and intraocular pressure with the ocular response analyzer in childhood myopia. Br J Ophthalmol 2010; 94: 877–881.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho P, Lam AK, Mountford J, Ng L. The performance of four different corneal topographers on normal human corneas and its impact on orthokeratology lens fitting. Optom Vis Sci 2002; 79: 175–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thibos LN, Wheeler W, Horner D. Power vectors: an application of Fourier analysis to the description and statistical analysis of refractive error. Optom Vis Sci 1997; 74: 367–375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam AK, Chen D, Tse J. The usefulness of waveform score from the ocular response analyzer. Optom Vis Sci 2010; 87: 195–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu F, Xu S, Qu J, Shen M, Wang X, Fang H, Wang J. Central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis during corneal swelling induced by contact lens wear with eye closure. Am J Ophthalmol 2007; 143: 616–622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam AK, Chen D. Effect of ocular massage on intraocular pressure and corneal biomechanics. Eye 2007; 21: 1245–1246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah S, Laiquzzaman M, Cunliffe I, Mantry S. The use of the Reichert ocular response analyser to establish the relationship between ocular hysteresis, corneal resistance factor and central corneal thickness in normal eyes. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2006; 29: 257–262.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lim L, Cheung N, Gazzard G, Chan YH, Wong TY, Saw SM. Corneal biomechanical properties and retinal vascular caliber in children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009; 50: 121–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagishima M, Kamiya K, Fujimura F, Morita T, Shoji N, Shimizu K. Effect of corneal astigmatism on intraocular pressure measurement using ocular response analyzer and Goldmann applanation tonometer. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2010; 248: 257–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam CSY, Loran DFC. Designing contact lenses for oriental eyes. J Br Contact Lens Assoc 1991; 14: 109–114.
   Google Scholar
• Kopito R, Gaujoux T, Montard R, Touzeau O, Allouch C, Borderie V, Laroche L. Reproducibility of viscoelastic property and intraocular pressure measurements obtained with the ocular response analyzer. Acta Ophthalmol. 2010. doi: 10.1111/j.1755768.2010.01957.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson G, Bell C, Chatoi S. The effect of lifting the lids on corneal astigmatism. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1982; 59: 670–674.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lieberman DM, Grierson JW. The lids influence on corneal shape. Cornea 2000; 19: 336–342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortiz D, Piñero D, Shabayek MH, Arnalich‐montiel F, Alió JL. Corneal biomechanical properties in normal, post‐laser in situ keratomileusis, and keratoconic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007; 33: 1371–1375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton DR, Johnson RD, Lee N, Bourla N. Differences in the corneal biomechanical effects of surface ablation compared with laser in situ keratomileusis using a microkeratome or femtosecond laser. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008; 34: 2049–2056.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam AKC, Chung E, Kho J, Wong S. Digital measurement of torsional eye movement due to postural change and its effect on reading performance. Curr Eye Res 2000; 21: 763–766.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moses RA, Lurie P, Wette R. Horizontal gaze position effect on intraocular pressure. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1982; 22: 551–553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitacre MM, Stein R. Sources of error with use of Goldmann‐type tonometers. Surv Ophthalmol 1993; 38: 1–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herzog D, Hoffmann R, Schmidtmann I, Pfeiffer N, Preussner PR, Pitz S. Is gaze‐dependent tonometry a useful tool in the differential diagnosis of Graves' ophthalmopathy? Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2008; 246: 1737–1741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nardi M, Bartolomei MP, Romani A, Barca L. Intraocular pressure changes in secondary positions of gaze in normal subjects and in restrictive ocular motility disorders. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1988; 226: 8–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar