Visual performance with simultaneous vision multifocal contact lenses

REFERENCES

• Hofstetter HW. A longitudinal study of amplitude changes in presbyopia. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1965; 42: 3–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ramsdale C, Charman WN. A longitudinal study of the changes in the static accommodation response. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1989; 9: 255–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauthier CA, Holden BA, Grant T, Chong MS. Interest of presbyopes in contact lens correction and their success with monovision. Optom Vis Sci 1992; 69: 858–862.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghormley NR. New bifocal designs in hyper‐oxygen materials. Eye Contact Lens 2003; 29: S180–S181.
   Google Scholar
• Peyre C, Fumery L, Gatinel D. [Comparison of high‐order optical aberrations induced by different multifocal contact lens geometries]. J Fr Ophtalmol 2005; 28: 599–604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher K, Bauman E, Schwallie J. Evaluation of two new soft contact lenses for correction of presbyopia: the Focus Progressives multifocal and the Acuvue Bifocal. Int Contact Lens Clin 2000; 26: 92–103.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta N, Naroo SA, Wolffsohn JS. Visual comparison of multifocal contact lens to monovision. Optom Vis Sci 2009; 86: E98–E105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrer‐blasco T, Madrid‐costa D. Stereoacuity with simultaneous vision multifocal contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2010; 87: E663–E668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrer‐blasco T, Montés‐micó R, Cerviño A, Alfonso JF, Fernández‐vega L. Contrast sensitivity after refractive lens exchange with diffractive multifocal intraocular lens implantation in hyperopic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008; 34: 2043–2048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanislo S, Wicker D, Green DG. Contrast sensitivity measurements with the Echelon diffractive bifocal contact lens as compared to bifocal spectacles. CLAO J 1992; 18: 161–164.
   Google Scholar
• Cromerford J. Evaluation using contrast sensitivity functions. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1983; 60: 394–398.
   Google Scholar
• Rajagopalan AS, Bennett ES, Lakshminarayanan V. Contrast sensitivity with presbyopic contact lenses. J Mod Opt 2007; 54: 1325–1332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montés‐micó R, Alió JL. Distance and near contrast sensitivity function after multifocal intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003; 29: 703–711.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Situ P, Du TR, Fonn D, Simpson T. Successful monovision contact lens wearers refitted with bifocal contact lenses. Eye Contact Lens 2003; 29: 181–184.
   Google Scholar
• Soni PS, Patel R, Carlson RS. Is binocular contrast sensitivity at distance compromised with multifocal soft contact lenses used to correct presbyopia? Optom Vis Sci 2003; 80: 505–514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajagopalan AS, Bennett ES, Lakshminarayanan V. Visual performance of subjects wearing presbyopic contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2006; 83: 611–615.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durrie DS. The effect of different monovision contact lens powers on the visual function of emmetropic presbyopic patients (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis). Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 2006; 104: 366–401.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman MH, Charman WN. An exploration of modified monovision with diffractive bifocal contact lenses. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2007; 30: 189–196.
   Google Scholar
• Richdale K, Mitchell GL, Zadnik K. Comparison of multifocal and monovision soft contact lens corrections in patients with low‐astigmatic presbyopia. Optom Vis Sci 2006; 83: 266–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen AL. Diffractive bifocal lens designs. Optom Vis Sci 1993; 70: 461–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley A, Abdul RH, Soni PS, Zhang X. Effects of target distance and pupil size on letter contrast sensitivity with simultaneous vision bifocal contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 1993; 70: 476–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chateau N, De brabander J, Bouchard F, Molenaar H. Infrared pupillometry in presbyopes fitted with soft contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 1996; 73: 733–741.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson P, Robboy M. Performance characteristics of a hydrophilic concentric bifocal contact lens. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1985; 62: 702–708.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson P, Robboy M, Apollonio A, Jones WF. Optical design considerations for contact lens bifocals. J Am Optom Assoc 1988; 59: 198–202.
   Google Scholar
• Borish IM. Pupil dependency of bifocal contact lenses. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1988; 65: 417–423.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guillon M, Maissa C, Cooper P, Girard‐claudon K, Poling TR. Visual performance of a multi‐zone bifocal and a progressive multifocal contact lens. CLAO J 2002; 28: 88–93.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher K. Presbyopic visual performance with modified monovision using multifocal soft contact lenses. Int Contact Lens Clin 1997; 24: 91–98.
   Google Scholar
• Cerviño A, Hosking SL, Montés‐micó R, Alió JL. Retinal straylight in patients with monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008; 34: 441–446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zandvoort SW, Kok JH, Molenaar H. Good subjective presbyopic correction with newly designed aspheric multifocal contact lens. Int Ophthalmol 1993; 17: 305–311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins MJ, Brown B, Bowman KJ. Contrast sensitivity with contact lens corrections for presbyopia. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1989; 9: 133–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar