Putting vital stains in context

References

• Efron N. Contact Lens Complications. Edinburgh, UK: Elsevier, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Pflüger E. Zur Ernährung der Cornea. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1882; 20: 69–81.
   Google Scholar
• Norn MS. Lissamine green. Vital staining of cornea and conjunctiva. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1973; 51: 483–491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norn MS. Rose bengal vital staining. Staining of cornea and conjunctiva by 10 per cent rose bengal, compared with 1 percent. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1970; 48: 546–559.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth H‐W. Contact Lens Complications: Etiology, Pathogenesis, Prevention, Therapy. New York, NY: Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Smolin G, Foster CS, Azar DT, Dohlman CH. Smolin and Thoft's The Cornea: Scientific Foundations and Clinical Practice. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Steinemann TL, Ehlers W, Suchecki JK. Contact lens‐related complications. In: Yanoff M, Duker JS, eds. Ophthalmology, 3rd ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Mosby Inc, 2008. p 330–339.
   Google Scholar
• Efron N, Morgan PB. Can subtypes of contact lens‐associated corneal infiltrative events be clinically differentiated? Cornea 2006; 25: 540–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouchard CS. Non‐infectious keratitis. In: Yanoff M, Duker JS, eds. Ophthalmology, 3rd ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Mosby Inc, 2008. p 289–298.
   Google Scholar
• Malinovsky V, Pole JJ, Pence NA, Howard D. Epithelial splits of the superior cornea in hydrogel contact lens patients. Int Contact Lens Clin 1989; 16: 252–255.
   Google Scholar
• Dart JK. Disease and risks associated with contact lenses. Br J Ophthalmol 1993; 77: 49–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder C. Solution interaction with the ocular surface: the significance in making the grade. Clin Refract Optom 2005; 16: 135–140.
   Google Scholar
• Korb DR, Herman JP, Finnemore VM, Exford JM, Blackie CA. An evaluation of the efficacy of fluorescein, rose bengal, lissamine green, and a new dye mixture for ocular surface staining. Eye Contact Lens 2008; 34: 61–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabery HM. Dual appearance of fluorescein staining in vivo of diseased human corneal epithelium. A non‐contact photomicrographic study. Br J Ophthalmol 1992; 76: 43–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokhtarzadeh M, Casey R, Glasgow BJ. Fluorescein punctate staining traced to superficial corneal epithelial cells by impression cytology and confocal microscopy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011; 52: 2127–2135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machado LM, Castro RS, Fontes BM. Staining patterns in dry eye syndrome: rose bengal versus lissamine green. Cornea 2009; 28: 732–734.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feenstra RP, Tseng SC. Comparison of fluorescein and rose bengal staining. Ophthalmology 1992; 99: 605–617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feenstra RP, Tseng SC. What is actually stained by rose bengal? Arch Ophthalmol 1992; 110: 984–993.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies DM, Moozyckine AU. Kinetics and mechanism of the bleaching of a triarylmethane dye by hydrogen peroxide and water: evidence for intramolecular base catalysis. J Chem Soc, Perkin Trans 2000; 2: 1495–1503.
   Google Scholar
• Courtney RC, Lee JM. Predicting ocular intolerance of a contact lens solution by use of a filter system enhancing fluorescein staining detection. Int Contact Lens Clin 1982; 9: 302–310.
   Google Scholar
• Chodosh J, Dix RD, Howell RC, Stroop WG, Tseng SC. Staining characteristics and antiviral activity of sulforhodamine B and lissamine green B. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1994; 35: 1046–1058.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakkar M, Maldonado‐codina C, Morgan PB, Dobson C. Development of an in‐vitro model of solution induced corneal staining. Optom Vis Sci 2010; 87: E‐Abstract 100959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batistela VR, da Costa cedran J, Moisés de oliveira HP, Scarminio IS, Ueno LT, Eduardo da hora machado A, Hioka N. Protolytic fluorescein species evaluated using chemometry and DFT studies. Dyes Pigments 2010; 86: 15–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batistela VR, Pellosi DS, de Souza FD, da Costa WF, de Oliveira santin SM, de Souza VR, Caetano W et al. pKa determinations of xanthene derivates in aqueous solutions by multivariate analysis applied to UV‐Vis spectrophotometric data. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 2011; 79: 889–897.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bright FV, Kraut ND, Horner IJ, Merchea MM, Maziarz P, Liu XM. Quantitative association between multi‐purpose solution preservative agents and ophthalmic dyes. Optom Vis Sci 2011; 88: E‐Abstract 115779.
   Google Scholar
• Bron AJ. The Doyne Lecture. Reflections on the tears. Eye (Lond) 1997; 11: 583–602.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bron AJ, Evans VE, Smith JA. Grading of corneal and conjunctival staining in the context of other dry eye tests. Cornea 2003; 22: 640–650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmart EW. Observations on the absorption spectra of fluorescein, fluorescein derivatives and conjugates. Arch Biochem Biophys 1958; 73: 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin MM, Lindqvist L. The pH dependence of fluorescein fluorescence. J Luminescence 1975; 10: 381–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjöback R, Nygren J, Kubista M. Absorption and fluorescence properties of fluorescein. Spectrochim Acta Part A: Mol Biomol Spectroscopy 1995; 51: L7–L21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang C‐C, Yang Y‐T, Yang J‐C, Wu H‐D, Tsai T. Absorption and emission spectral shifts of rose bengal associated with DMPC liposomes. Dyes Pigments 2008; 79: 170–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauf MA, Graham JP, Bukallah SB, Al‐saedi MA. Solvatochromic behavior on the absorption and fluorescence spectra of Rose Bengal dye in various solvents. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 2009; 72: 133–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu D, Neckers DC. Aggregation of rose bengal molecules in solution. J Photochem Photobiol A: Chem 1987; 40: 361–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez‐izquierdo ME, Durand‐alegria JS, Cabrera‐martin A, Gallego‐andreu R. Spectrophotometric and spectrofluorimetric study of Rose Bengal B and its reaction with platinum (IV). Analyst 1984; 109: 377–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseng SC, Feenstra RP, Watson BD. Characterization of photodynamic actions of rose bengal on cultured cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1994; 35: 3295–3307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan‐lim D, Berry M. Still confused about rose bengal? Curr Eye Res 2004; 29: 311–317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim J. The use of vital dyes in corneal disease. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2000; 11: 241–247.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Methodologies to diagnose and monitor dry eye disease: report of the Diagnostic Methodology Subcommittee of the International Dry Eye WorkShop (2007). Ocul Surf 2007; 5: 108–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones L, Macdougall N, Sorbara LG. Asymptomatic corneal staining associated with the use of balafilcon silicone‐hydrogel contact lenses disinfected with a polyaminopropyl biguanide‐preserved care regimen. Optom Vis Sci 2002; 79: 753–761.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szczotka‐flynn L, Lass JH, Sethi A, Debanne S, Benetz BA, Albright M, Gillespie B et al. Risk factors for corneal infiltrative events during continuous wear of silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010; 51: 5421–5430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norn MS. Micropunctate fluorescein vital staining of the cornea. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1970; 48: 108–118.
   Google Scholar
• Andrasko G, Ryen K. Corneal staining and comfort observed with traditional and silicone hydrogel lenses and multipurpose solution combinations. Optometry 2008; 79: 444–454.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Garofalo RJ, Dassanayake N, Carey C, Stein J, Stone R, David R. Corneal staining and subjective symptoms with multipurpose solutions as a function of time. Eye Contact Lens 2005; 31: 166–174.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bandamwar KL, Garrett Q, Cheung D, Huang J, Lee L, Ng C, Papas EB. Onset time course of solution induced corneal staining. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2010; 33: 199–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett RP, Mowery‐mckee M, Hazlett LD. Punctate fluorescein corneal staining observed using polyhexamethylene biguanide containing disinfecting solution not indicative of corneal surface damage. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005; 46: E‐Abstract 5732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavet ME, Harrington KL, Vandermeid KR, Ward KW, Zhang JZ. In vitro biocompatibility assessment of multipurpose contact lens solutions: Effects on human corneal epithelial viability and barrier function. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2012; 35:163–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bright FV, Merchea MM, Kraut ND, Maziarz EP, Liu XM, Awasthi AK. A preservative‐and‐fluorescein interaction model for benign multipurpose solution‐associated transient corneal hyperfluorescence. Cornea 2012 Mar 9. [Epub ahead of print].
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan PB, Maldonado‐codina C. Corneal staining: do we really understand what we are seeing? Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2009; 32: 48–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kikkawa Y. Normal corneal staining with fluorescein. Exp Eye Res 1972; 14: 13–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thinda S, Sikh PK, Hopp LM, Glasgow BJ. Polycarbonate membrane impression cytology: evidence for fluorescein staining in normal and dry eye corneas. Br J Ophthalmol 2010; 94: 406–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo J, Albright M, Szczotka‐flynn L. Is there an association between corneal staining and other clinical slit lamp variables during 30-day soft lens continuous wear? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008; 49: E‐Abstract 4832.
   Google Scholar
• Nichols JJ, Sinnott LT. Tear film, contact lens, and patient factors associated with corneal staining. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011; 52: 1127–1137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alarcon I, Tam C, Mun JJ, Ledue J, Evans DJ, Fleiszig SM. Factors impacting corneal epithelial barrier function against Pseudomonas aeruginosa traversal. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011; 52: 1368–1377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tam C, Mun JJ, Evans DJ, Fleiszig SM. The impact of inoculation parameters on the pathogenesis of contact lens‐related infectious keratitis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010; 51: 3100–3106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols KK, Mitchell GL, Simon KM, Chivers DA, Edrington TB. Corneal staining in hydrogel lens wearers. Optom Vis Sci 2002; 79: 20–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alila S, Boufi S, Belgacem MN, Beneventi D. Adsorption of a cationic surfactant onto cellulosic fibers I. Surface charge effects. Langmuir 2005; 21: 8106–8113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen MJ, Morby AP, White GF. Cooperativity in the binding of the cationic biocide polyhexamethylene biguanide to nucleic acids. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2004; 318: 397–404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duench S, Simpson T, Jones L, Fonn D. Corneal staining is not correlated with limbal or bulbar redness in subjects using daily wear silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006; 47: E‐Abstract 87.
   Google Scholar
• Kislan T. An evaluation of corneal staining with 2 multipurpose solutions. Optometry 2008; 79: 330.
   Google Scholar
• Levy B. Superficial corneal ‘staining'—clinical observation and risk assessment. Eye Contact Lens 2007; 33: 165–166.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Merchea MM, Reindel W, Snyder C, White M, China P, Lafrance M, Fullard R. Inflammatory mediators associated with transient, contact lens solution‐induced corneal staining. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008; 49: E‐Abstract 4851.
   Google Scholar
• Sorbara L, Peterson R, Woods C, Fonn D. Multipurpose disinfecting solutions and their interactions with a silicone hydrogel lens. Eye Contact Lens 2009; 35: 92–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilia DB, Weng R, Thomas V, Willcox M, Holden BA. Evaluation of solution induced corneal staining impact on comfort during short term contact lens wear. Optom Vis Sci 2009; 86: E‐Abstract 95509.
   Google Scholar
• Powell CH, Lally JM, Hoong LD, Huth SW. Lipophilic versus hydrodynamic modes of uptake and release by contact lenses of active entities used in multipurpose solutions. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2010; 33: 9–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willcox MD, Phillips B, Ozkan J, Jalbert I, Meagher L, Gengenbach T, Holden B et al. Interactions of lens care with silicone hydrogel lenses and effect on comfort. Optom Vis Sci 2010; 87: 839–846.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berginc K, Zakelj S, Levstik L, Ursic D, Kristl A. Fluorescein transport properties across artificial lipid membranes, Caco‐2 cell monolayers and rat jejunum. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2007; 66: 281–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konishi Y, Kubo K, Shimizu M. Structural effects of phenolic acids on the transepithelial transport of fluorescein in caco‐2 cell monolayers. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 2003; 67: 2014–2017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muya L, Mowrey‐mckee MF, Minno G, Meadows F. Determination of binding of PHMB to mucin. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008; 49: E‐Abstract 4869.
   Google Scholar
• Carnt NA, Evans VE, Naduvilath TJ, Willcox MD, Papas EB, Frick KD, Holden BA. Contact lens‐related adverse events and the silicone hydrogel lenses and daily wear care system used. Arch Ophthalmol 2009; 127: 1616–1623.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Willcox M. Ophthalmic Devices Panel Meeting. Washington, DC; June 10, 2008. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/DOCKETS/ac/08/slides/2008‐4363oph1‐08‐WILLCOX.pdf. October 12, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Pult H, Purslow C, Berry M, Murphy PJ. Clinical tests for successful contact lens wear: relationship and predictive potential. Optom Vis Sci 2008; 85: E924–E929.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couto SR, Sanromán MÁ. Coconut flesh: a novel raw material for laccase production by Trametes hirsuta under solid‐state conditions.: Application to Lissamine Green B decolourization. J Food Eng 2005; 71: 208–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westcott SL, Zhang J, Shelton RK, Bruce NM, Gupta S, Keen SL, Tillman JW et al. Broadband optical absorbance spectroscopy using a whispering gallery mode microsphere resonator. Rev Sci Instrum 2008; 79: 033106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuehni RG. Color: An Introduction to Practice and Principles, 2nd ed. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz SH. Visual Perception: A Clinical Orientation, 4th ed. New York, New York: McGraw‐Hill Professional Publishing, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Mcdonnell C. Lissamine Green. Optician [serial on the Internet]. February 2010; 239 (6238): 26,27,30. Available from: http://www.opticianonline.net/assets/getAsset.aspx?ItemID=3921.
   Google Scholar
• Albani JR. Principles and Applications of Fluorescence Spectroscopy. Chichester, UK: Wiley, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Sauer M, Hofkens J, Enderlein J. Basic Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy. Handbook of Fluorescence Spectroscopy and Imaging. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley‐VCH, 2011. p 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Williams RT, Bridges JW. Fluorescence of solutions: a review. J Clin Pathol 1964; 17: 371–394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vodolazkaya NA, Gurina YA, Salamanova NV, Mchedlov‐petrossyan NO. Spectroscopic study of acid–base ionization and tautomerism of fluorescein dyes in direct microemulsions at high bulk ionic strength. J Mol Liq 2009; 145: 188–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schubert EF. Human eye sensitivity and photometric quantities. In: Schubert EF ed. Light‐Emitting Diodes, 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2006. p 275–291.
   Google Scholar
• Vogt A. Lehrbuch und Atlas der Spaltlampenmikroskopie des Lebenden Auges. Berlin, Germany: Julius Springer, 1930.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson G, Ren H, Laurent J. Corneal epithelial fluorescein staining. J Am Optom Assoc 1995; 66: 435–441.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Foulks GN. Challenges and pitfalls in clinical trials of treatments for dry eye. Ocul Surf 2003; 1: 20–30.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alberts B, Johnson A, Lewis J, Raff M, Roberts K, Walter P. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 4th ed. New York, New York: Garland Science, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Committee to Review the National Nanotechnology I, National Research C. Matter of Size: Triennial Review of the National Nanotechnology Initiative. Washington, DC, USA: National Academies Press; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson RC, Gorbet M, Cira D, Amos C, Woods CA, Fonn D. Non‐invasive collection and examination of human corneal epithelial cells. Optom Vis Sci 2011; 88: 1317–1325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efron N, Perez‐gomez I, Mutalib HA, Hollingsworth J. Confocal microscopy of the normal human cornea. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2001; 24: 16–24.
   Google Scholar
• Eliason JA, Maurice DM. Staining of the conjunctiva and conjunctival tear film. Br J Ophthalmol 1990; 74: 519–522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brautaset RL, Nilsson M, Leach N, Miller WL, Gire A, Quintero S, Bergmanson JP. Corneal and conjunctival epithelial staining in hydrogel contact lens wearers. Eye Contact Lens 2008; 34: 312–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Worp E, de Brabander J, Swarbrick HA, Hendrikse F. Evaluation of signs and symptoms in 3‐ and 9‐o'clock staining. Optom Vis Sci 2009; 86: 260–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young G, Port M. Rigid gas‐permeable extended wear: a comparative clinical study. Optom Vis Sci 1992; 69: 214–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnider CM, Terry RL, Holden BA. Effect of patient and lens performance characteristics on peripheral corneal desiccation. J Am Optom Assoc 1996; 67: 144–150.
   Google Scholar
• Tseng SC, Zhang SH. Interaction between rose bengal and different protein components. Cornea 1995; 14: 427–435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khurana AK, Chaudhary R, Ahluwalia BK, Gupta S. Tear film profile in dry eye. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1991; 69: 79–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim J, Foulks GN. Evaluation of the effect of lissamine green and rose bengal on human corneal epithelial cells. Cornea 1999; 18: 328– 332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X, Traganos F, Melamed MR, Darzynkiewicz Z. Single‐step procedure for labeling DNA strand breaks with fluorescein‐ or BODIPY‐conjugated deoxynucleotides: detection of apoptosis and bromodeoxyuridine incorporation. Cytometry 1995; 20: 172–180.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lin K, Nagy JA, Xu H, Shockley TR, Yarmush ML, Dvorak HF. Compartmental distribution of tumor‐specific monoclonal antibodies in human melanoma xenografts. Cancer Res 1994; 54: 2269–2277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawai H, Nagamura T. Inverse photochromism of substituted triphenylmethane dyes in poly(vinyl alcohol) films. J Photochem Photobiol A: Chem 1995; 92: 105–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song L, Hennink EJ, Young IT, Tanke HJ. Photobleaching kinetics of fluorescein in quantitative fluorescence microscopy. Biophys J 1995; 68: 2588–2600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonogai Y, Ito Y, Iwaida M, Tati M, Ose Y, Sato T. Studies on the toxicity of coal‐tar dyes. I. Photodecomposed products of four xanthene dyes and their acute toxicity to fish. J Toxicol Sci 1979; 4: 115–125.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Doughty MJ. pH dependent spectral properties of sodium fluorescein ophthalmic solutions revisited. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2010; 30: 167–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruce AS, Little SA. Soft lens design, fitting, and physiological response. In: Hom MM, Bruce AS, eds. Manual of Contact Lens Prescribing and Fitting, 3rd ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier, 2006. p 277–312.
   Google Scholar
• Sowka JW, Gurwood AS, Kabat AG. Keratitis sicca/dry eye syndrome. In: Handbook of Ocular Disease Management, 5th ed [book on the Internet]: Revview of Optometry, 2004. Available from: http://cms.revoptom.com/handbook/sect3a.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Glasson MJ, Stapleton F, Keay L, Sweeney D, Willcox MD. Differences in clinical parameters and tear film of tolerant and intolerant contact lens wearers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003; 44: 5116–5124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tu EY, Rheinstrom S. Dry eye. In: Yanoff M, Duker JS, eds. Ophthalmology, 3rd ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Mosby Inc, 2008. p 324–329.
   Google Scholar
• Korb DR, Herman JP. Corneal staining subsequent to sequential fluorescein instillations. J Am Optom Assoc 1979; 50: 361–367.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan PB, Efron N, Maldonado‐codina C, Efron S. Adverse events and discontinuations with rigid and soft hyper Dk contact lenses used for continuous wear. Optom Vis Sci 2005; 82: 528–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline LN, Deluca TJ, Fishberg GM. Corneal staining relating to contact lens wear. J Am Optom Assoc 1979; 50: 353–357.
   Google Scholar
• Mcmonnies CW. Incomplete blinking: exposure keratopathy, lid wiper epitheliopathy, dry eye, refractive surgery, and dry contact lenses. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2007; 30: 37–51.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ventocilla M, Wicker D. Contact lens complications. Medscape Reference [serial on the Internet]. 2011. Available from: http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1196459‐overview#aw2aab6b6.
   Google Scholar
• Buckley R, Lawrenson J, Macalister G, Morgan G, Smith L. Conjunctivitis medicamentosa. Clinical Management Guidelines [serial on the Internet]. 2008. Available from: http://www.med‐support.org.uk/IntegratedCRD.nsf/c4834b9475c148f38025774c00520c48/0af9cf91679fafe3802577750056f766?OpenDocument.
   Google Scholar
• Sweeney DF, Jalbert I, Covey M, Sankaridurg PR, Vajdic C, Holden BA, Sharma S et al. Clinical characterization of corneal infiltrative events observed with soft contact lens wear. Cornea 2003; 22: 435–442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shovlin J, Eiden SB, Hom MM, Cunningham D, Myers JA, Sacco AJ, Stiegemeier MJ. Infiltrative keratitis in daily lens wearers: do you see what I see? Contact Lens Spectrum [serial on the Internet]. April 2011; 26(suppl). Available from: http://www.clspectrum.com/article.aspx?article=105461.
   Google Scholar
• Stenson S. Superior limbic keratoconjunctivitis associated with soft contact lens wear. Arch Ophthalmol 1983; 101: 402–404.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dua HS, Azuara‐blanco A. Autologous limbal transplantation in patients with unilateral corneal stem cell deficiency. Br J Ophthalmol 2000; 84: 273–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sowka JW, Gurwood AS, Kabat AG. Bacterial Keratitis. In: Handbook of Ocular Disease Management, 11th ed [book on the Internet]: Review of Optometry; 2009. pp 24A–26A. Available from: http://www.revoptom.com/cmsdocuments/2009/9/ro0409_handbook.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Rubenstein JB, Virasch V. Conjunctivitis: infectious and non‐infectious. In: Yanoff M, Duker JS, eds. Ophthalmology, 3rd ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Mosby Inc, 2008. pp 227–236.
   Google Scholar
• Jones LW, Jones DA. Non‐inflammatory corneal complications of contact lens wear. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2001; 24: 73–79.
   Google Scholar
• Lansche RK, Lee RC. Acute complications from present day corneal contact lenses: a report of fourteen new cases. Arch Ophthalmol 1960; 64: 275–285.
   Google Scholar
• Weissman BA, Barr JT, Harris MG, Mcmahon TT, Rah MJ, Secor GB, Sonsino J. Optometric Clinical Practice Guidelines. Care of the Contact Lens Patient. St. Louis, Missouri: American Optometric Association; 2006. Available from: http://www.aoa.org/documents/CPG‐19.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett ES, Henry VA. Clinical Manual of Contact Lenses. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Matheson A. The use of stains in dry eye assessment. Optician [serial on the Internet]. February 2007; 233(6091): 26–31. Available from: http://www.opticianonline.net/assets/getAsset.aspx?ItemID=3366.
   Google Scholar
• Sindt SJ. Incomplete blinking and idiopathic nocturnal lagophthalmos, the overlooked dry eye components. Clin Eye Vis Care 1999; 11: 25–31.
   Google Scholar
• van der Worp E, De brabander J, Swarbrick H, Nuijts R, Hendrikse F. Corneal desiccation in rigid contact lens wear: 3‐ and 9‐o'clock staining. Optom Vis Sci 2003; 80: 280–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uchiyama E, Aronowicz JD, Butovich IA, Mcculley JP. Pattern of vital staining and its correlation with aqueous tear deficiency and meibomian gland dropout. Eye Contact Lens 2007; 33: 177–179.
   Google Scholar
• Sowka JW, Gurwood AS, Kabat AG. Thygeson's superficial punctate keratopathy. In: Handbook of Ocular Disease Management [book on the Internet]. 2010. pp 26A–27A. Available from: http://legacy.revoptom.com/handbook/sect3j.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Sacco AJ. Contact lens‐associated infiltrative keratitis and multipurpose solutions. Contact Lens Spectrum [serial on the Internet]. 2011; 26: 40–45. Available from: http://www.clspectrum.com/articleViewer.aspx?articleID=105455.
   Google Scholar
• Sowka JW, Gurwood AS, Kabat AG. Viral conjunctivitis. In: Handbook of Ocular Disease Management [book on the Internet]. 2008. p 14–16.
   Google Scholar
• Sacco A, ed. Silicone hydrogel contact lenses, lens care and sterile infiltrates: Is there a connection? The Annual Global Specialty Lens Symposium; 2011 January 27–30; Las Vegas, NV.
   Google Scholar
• Duszak RS. Thygeson superficial punctate keratitis. In: Medscape Reference [book on the Internet]: Medscape; 2010. Available from: http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1197335‐clinical#showall.
   Google Scholar
• Kislan TP, Hom MM. Corneal infiltrates with multipurpose solutions and contact lens combinations. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010; 51: E‐Abstract 3424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aoki K, Kaneko H, Kitaichi N, Ohguchi T, Tagawa Y, Ohno S. Clinical features of adenoviral conjunctivitis at the early stage of infection. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2011; 55: 11–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macmillan DW, Ferguson JG, Roper BE, Chandler DA, Magovern M, Price ME, Wiesinger H et al. Treatment of conjunctival and eyelid infections. Ophthalmology Update [serial on the Internet]. October 1999; (4): 3. Available from: http://www.richmondeye.com/newsletter/Ophthalmology_Update_04_oct99.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Schwallie JD, Mckenney CD, Long WD, Jr, Mcneil A. Corneal staining patterns in normal non‐contact lens wearers. Optom Vis Sci 1997; 74: 92–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dundas M, Walker A, Woods RL. Clinical grading of corneal staining of non‐contact lens wearers. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2001; 21: 30–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumbleton K, Jones L, Chalmers R, Williams‐lyn D, Fonn D. Mucin ball post‐lens debris in high Dk silicone hydrogel wearers. CLAO J 2000; 26: 186–192.
   Google Scholar
• Soni PS, Horner DG, Ross J. Ocular response to lens care systems in adolescent soft contact lens wearers. Optom Vis Sci 1996; 73: 70–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Josephson JE, Caffery BE. Corneal staining characteristics after sequential instillations of fluorescein. Optom Vis Sci 1992; 69: 570–573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korb DR, Korb JM. Corneal staining prior to contact lens wearing. J Am Optom Assoc 1970; 41: 228–232.
   Google Scholar
• Begley CG, Barr JT, Edrington TB, Long WD, Mckenney CD, Chalmers RL. Characteristics of corneal staining in hydrogel contact lens wearers. Optom Vis Sci 1996; 73: 193–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jalbert I, Sweeney DF, Holden BA. The characteristics of corneal staining in successful daily and extended disposable contact lens wearers. Clin Exp Optom 1999; 82: 4–10.
   Google Scholar
• Aakre BM, Ystenaes AE, Doughty MJ, Austrheim O, Westerfjell B, Lie MT. A 6‐month follow‐up of successful refits from daily disposable soft contact lenses to continuous wear of high‐Dk silicone‐hydrogel lenses. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2004; 24: 130–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakkis C, Brennan NA. Bulbar conjunctival fluorescein staining in hydrogel contact lens wearers. CLAO J 1996; 22: 189–194.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• du Toit R, Situ P, Simpson T, Fonn D. The effects of six months of contact lens wear on the tear film, ocular surfaces, and symptoms of presbyopes. Optom Vis Sci 2001; 78: 455–462.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szczotka‐flynn LB. The Longitudinal Analysis of Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lens Study. Cleveland, Ohio: Case Western Reserve University; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Guillon M, Maissa C, Garofalo R, Cockshott N, Wong S, Hanna B. Contact lens induced conjunctival staining objective scale. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010; 51: E‐Abstract 1522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maissa CA, Guillon M, Wong S. Differential distribution of corneal and conjunctival staining in contact lens wearers and non wearers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011; 52: E‐Abstract 6476.
   Google Scholar
• Villani E, Galimberti D, Viola F, Ratiglia R. In vivo confocal microscopy of the ocular surface. Am J Ophthalmol 2010; 149: 689–690; author reply 690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward SK, Dogru M, Wakamatsu T, Ibrahim O, Matsumoto Y, Kojima T, Sato EA et al. Passive cigarette smoke exposure and soft contact lens wear. Optom Vis Sci 2010; 87: 367–372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu KP, Yagi Y, Tsubota K. Decrease in corneal sensitivity and change in tear function in dry eye. Cornea 1996; 15: 235–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pflugfelder SC, Tseng SC, Sanabria O, Kell H, Garcia CG, Felix C, Feuer W et al. Evaluation of subjective assessments and objective diagnostic tests for diagnosing tear‐film disorders known to cause ocular irritation. Cornea 1998; 17: 38–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efron N, Morgan PB, Katsara SS. Validation of grading scales for contact lens complications. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2001; 21: 17–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albright MB, Kuo J, Szczotka‐flynn L. An evaluation of global corneal staining scales in soft contact lens wear. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008; 49: E‐Abstract 4838.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson T, Schulze MM, Stolee P. Rasch analysis of clinical grading of corneal staining. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011; 52: E‐Abstract 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Wolffsohn JS. Incremental nature of anterior eye grading scales determined by objective image analysis. Br J Ophthalmol 2004; 88: 1434–1438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der worp E, De brabander J, Swarbrick H, Hendrikse F. Eyeblink frequency and type in relation to 3‐ and 9‐o'clock staining and gas permeable contact lens variables. Optom Vis Sci 2008; 85: E857–E866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efron N, Pritchard N, Brandon K, Copeland J, Godfrey R, Hamlyn B, Vrbancic V. A survey of the use of grading scales for contact lens complications in optometric practice. Clin Exp Optom 2011; 94: 193–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols KK, Mitchell GL, Zadnik K. The repeatability of clinical measurements of dry eye. Cornea 2004; 23: 272–285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berntsen DA, Mitchell GL, Nichols JJ. Reliability of grading lissamine green conjunctival staining. Cornea 2006; 25: 695–700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamrah P, Alipour F, Jiang S, Sohn JH, Foulks GN. Optimizing evaluation of lissamine green parameters for ocular surface staining. Eye (Lond) 2011; 25: 1429–1434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dua HS, Forrester JV. Clinical patterns of corneal epithelial wound healing. Am J Ophthalmol 1987; 104: 481–489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr JT, Wilson BS, Gordon MO, Rah MJ, Riley C, Kollbaum PS, Zadnik K. Estimation of the incidence and factors predictive of corneal scarring in the Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study. Cornea 2006; 25: 16–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ousler GWI, Kellerman D, Durham T, Brazzell K, Kennedy K, Abelson M. A correlation between central corneal staining and dry eye symptomatology. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006; 47: E‐Abstract 281.
   Google Scholar
• Mack C, Schafer J. Managing contact lens complications: case histories help illustrate how to diagnose and treat soft contact lens complications. Contact Lens Spectrum [serial on the Internet]. 2004; 19(12). Available from: http://www.clspectrum.com/article.aspx?article=12724.
   Google Scholar
• Lipener C. A randomized clinical comparison of OPTI‐FREE EXPRESS and ReNu MultiPLUS multipurpose lens care solutions. Adv Ther 2009; 26: 435–446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin R, Sanchez I, de la Rosa C, de Juan V, Rodriguez G, de Paz I, Zalama M. Differences in the daily symptoms associated with the silicone hydrogel contact lens wear. Eye Contact Lens 2010; 36: 49–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols JJ, Sinnott LT. Tear film, contact lens, and patient‐related factors associated with contact lens‐related dry eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006; 47: 1319–1328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paugh JR, Marsden HJ, Edrington TB, Deland PN, Simmons PA, Vehige JG. A pre‐application drop containing carboxymethylcellulose can reduce multipurpose solution‐induced corneal staining. Optom Vis Sci 2007; 84: 65–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritchard N, Young G, Coleman S, Hunt C. Subjective and objective measures of corneal staining related to multipurpose care systems. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2003; 26: 3–9.
   Google Scholar
• Viso E, Gude F, Rodriguez‐ares MT. The association of meibomian gland dysfunction and other common ocular diseases with dry eye: a population‐based study in Spain. Cornea 2011; 30: 1–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones LW, Keir N, Situ P, Fonn D. The impact of post‐insertion time on corneal staining and comfort with group II hydrogel materials disinfected with various lens care regimens. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005; 46: E‐Abstract 917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le sage N, Verreault R, Rochette L. Efficacy of eye patching for traumatic corneal abrasions: A controlled clinical trial. Ann Emerg Med 2001; 38: 129–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luntz MH, Maccallum FO. Treatment of herpes simplex keratitis with 5‐Iodo‐2′‐Deoxyuridine. Br J Ophthalmol 1963; 47: 449–456.
   Google Scholar
• Hom MM. Complete Easy Rub vs. Optifree Replenish: evaluation of staining, tear break‐up time, and pre‐lens tear thinning time. Optom Vis Sci 2008; 85: E‐Abstract 85059.
   Google Scholar
• Dassanayake NL, Garofalo R, Carey R, David R, Meadows DL, Stone RP. Correlating biocide uptake and release profiles with corneal staining and subjective symptoms. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005; 46: E‐Abstract 915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sentell KB, Beaullieu E. Comparison of preservative uptake and release profiles of PHMB from soft contact lens care products by silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004; 45: E‐Abstract 1573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrasko G, Ryen K. A series of evaluations of MPS and silicone hydrogel lens combinations. Rev Cornea Contact Lenses [serial on the Internet]. March 2007; 143: 36–42. Available from: http://www.staininggrid.com/docs/Andrasko_staininggrid_ROCCL.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ikeda T, Ledwith A, Bamford CH, Hann RA. Interaction of a polymeric biguanide biocide with phospholipid membranes. Biochim Biophys Acta 1984; 769: 57–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikeda T, Tazuke S, Watanabe M. Interaction of biologically active molecules with phospholipid membranes. I. Fluorescence depolarization studies on the effect of polymeric biocide bearing biguanide groups in the main chain. Biochim Biophys Acta 1983; 735: 380–386.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bright FV, Maziarz P, Liu XM, Zhang JZ, Merchea MM. Using a liposome cell membrane model to evaluate corneal surface integrity with high dosage polyaminopropyl biguanide (PHMB) exposure. The Annual Global Specialty Lens Symposium; 2010 January 27–30; Las Vegas, Nevada.
   Google Scholar
• Ghosh S, Bell R. Liposomes. Applications in protein‐lipid interaction studies. Mol Cell Biochem 2002; 199: 49–60.
   Google Scholar
• Merchant TE, Lass JH, Roat MI, Skelnik DL, Glonek T. P‐31 NMR analysis of phospholipids from cultured human corneal epithelial, fibroblast and endothelial cells. Curr Eye Res 1990; 9: 1167–1176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bright FV, Maziarz P, Liu XM, Zhang JZ, Merchea MM. PHMB and PQ‐1 impact on a liposome corneal surface membrane model. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011; 52: E‐Abstract 6491.
   Google Scholar
• Blackburn RS, Harvey A, Kettle LL, Payne JD, Russell SJ. Sorption of poly(hexamethylenebiguanide) on cellulose: mechanism of binding and molecular recognition. Langmuir 2006; 22: 5636–5644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehlers N. Electron microscopic examination of the superficial epithelial cells. Acta Ophthalmol 1965; 43: 60–66.
   Google Scholar
• Vellonen KS, Hakli M, Merezhinskaya N, Tervo T, Honkakoski P, Urtti A. Monocarboxylate transport in human corneal epithelium and cell lines. Eur J Pharm Sci 2010; 39: 241–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner E, Fernandez‐prini R, Turyn D. Change of apparent acidity constant of indicators in polyelectrolyte solutions. J Chem Soc, Faraday Trans 1 1974; 70: 1518–1526.
   Google Scholar
• Gipson IK, Argueso P. Role of mucins in the function of the corneal and conjunctival epithelia. Int Rev Cytol 2003; 231: 1–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linden SK, Mcguckin MA. Microbes at the host surface. In: Mendez‐vilas A ed. Current Research, Technology and Education Topics in Applied Microbiology and Microbial Biotechnology, 2nd ed. Badajoz, Spain: Formatex Research Center, 2010. p 591–596.
   Google Scholar
• Chang DC, Grant GB, O'donnell K, Wannemuehler KA, Noble‐wang J, Rao CY, Jacobson LM et al. Multistate outbreak of Fusarium keratitis associated with use of a contact lens solution. JAMA 2006; 296: 953–963.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seal DV, Kirkness CM, Bennett HG, Peterson M. Acanthamoeba keratitis in Scotland: risk factors for contact lens wearers. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 1999; 22: 58–68.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bantseev V, Mccanna DJ, Driot JY, Ward KW, Sivak JG. Biocompatibility of contact lens solutions using confocal laser scanning microscopy and the in vitro bovine cornea. Eye Contact Lens 2007; 33: 308–316.
   Google Scholar
• Cavet ME, Harrington KL, Vandermeid KR, Ward KW, Zhang JZ. Comparison of the effect of multipurpose contact lens solutions on the viability of cultured corneal epithelial cells. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2009; 32: 171–175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavet ME, Vandermeid KR, Harrington KL, Tchao R, Ward KW, Zhang JZ. Effect of a novel multipurpose contact lens solution on human corneal epithelial barrier function. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2010; 33 Suppl 1: S18–S23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choy CK, Cho P, Boost MV, Benzie IF. Do multipurpose solutions damage porcine corneal epithelial cells? Optom Vis Sci 2009; 86: E447–E453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mccanna DJ, Harrington KL, Driot JY, Ward KW, Tchao R. Use of a human corneal epithelial cell line for screening the safety of contact lens care solutions in vitro. Eye Contact Lens 2008; 34: 6–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon A, Kracher GP. Corneal infiltrates and extended‐wear contact lenses. J Am Optom Assoc 1985; 56: 198–201.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kanno Y, Loewenstein WR. Intercellular diffusion. Science 1964; 143: 959–960.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanna C, O'brien JE. Cell production and migration in the epithelial layer of the cornea. Arch Ophthalmol 1960; 64: 536–539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlin RD, Oliver JM, Walter RJ. Surface functions during mitosis I: phagocytosis, pinocytosis and mobility of surface‐bound Con A. Cell 1978; 15: 327–341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein LS, Stein DW, Echols J, Burghardt RC. Concomitant alterations of desmosomes, adhesiveness, and diffusion through gap junction channels in a rat ovarian transformation model system. Exp Cell Res 1993; 207: 19–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weed KH, Macewen CJ, Mcghee CN. The Dundee University Scottish Keratoconus Study II: a prospective study of optical and surgical correction. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2007; 27: 561–567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillon M, Maissa C. Bulbar conjunctival staining in contact lens wearers and non lens wearers and its association with symptomatology. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2005; 28: 67–73.
   Google Scholar
• Yokoi N, Kinoshita S. Importance of conjunctival epithelial evaluation in the diagnostic differentiation of dry eye from drug‐induced epithelial keratopathy. Adv Exp Med Biol 1998; 438: 827–830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols KK, Nichols JJ, Mitchell GL. The lack of association between signs and symptoms in patients with dry eye disease. Cornea 2004; 23: 762–770.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begley CG, Edrington TB, Chalmers RL. Effect of lens care systems on corneal fluorescein staining and subjective comfort in hydrogel lens wearers. Int Contact Lens Clin 1994; 21: 7–13.
   Google Scholar
• Santodomingo‐rubido J, Barrado‐navascues E, Rubido‐crespo MJ, Sugimoto K, Sawano T. Compatibility of two new silicone hydrogel contact lenses with three soft contact lens multipurpose solutions. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2008; 28: 373–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santodomingo‐rubido J, Barrado‐navascues E, Rubido‐crespo MJ. Ocular surface comfort during the day assessed by instant reporting in different types of contact and non‐contact lens wearers. Eye Contact Lens 2010; 36: 96–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zigler L, Cedrone R, Evans D, Helbert‐green C, Shah T. Clinical evaluation of silicone hydrogel lens wear with a new multipurpose disinfection care product. Eye Contact Lens 2007; 33: 236– 243.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Young G, Keir N, Hunt C, Woods CA. Clinical evaluation of long‐term users of two contact lens care preservative systems. Eye Contact Lens 2009; 35: 50–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaud L, Giasson CJ. Overwear of contact lenses: increased severity of clinical signs as a function of protein adsorption. Optom Vis Sci 2002; 79: 184–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maldonado‐codina C, Morgan PB, Schnider CM, Efron N. Short‐term physiologic response in neophyte subjects fitted with hydrogel and silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2004; 81: 911–921.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Situ P, Simpson T, Fonn D. Clinical measures do not discriminate symptomatic and asymptomatic contact lens wearers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999; 40: s909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadows DL, Ramsey A, Garofalo R, Ketelson H, Desousa R, Baker J. The effect of contact lenses and care solutions on conjunctival staining and lens parameters. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009; 50: E‐Abstract 5652.
   Google Scholar
• Situ P, Simpson TL, Jones LW, Fonn D. Effects of silicone hydrogel contact lens wear on ocular surface sensitivity to tactile, pneumatic mechanical, and chemical stimulation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010; 51: 6111–6117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnt N, Willcox MD, Evans V, Naduvilath TJ, Tilia D, Papas EB, Sweeney DF et al. Corneal staining: The IER Matrix Study. Contact Lens Spectrum [serial on the Internet]. 2007; 22: 38–43. Available from: http://www.clspectrum.com/articleViewer.aspx?articleID=100843.
   Google Scholar
• Adatia FA, Michaeli‐cohen A, Naor J, Caffery B, Bookman A, Slomovic A. Correlation between corneal sensitivity, subjective dry eye symptoms and corneal staining in Sjogren's syndrome. Can J Ophthalmol 2004; 39: 767–771.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pult H, Murphy PJ, Purslow C. A novel method to predict the dry eye symptoms in new contact lens wearers. Optom Vis Sci 2009; 86: E1042–E1050.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnt NA, Keay L, Naduvilath T, Holden B, Willcox M. Risk factors associated with corneal inflammation in soft contact lens daily wear. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007; 48: E‐Abstract 4326.
   Google Scholar
• Ward KW. Superficial punctate fluorescein staining of the ocular surface. Optom Vis Sci 2008; 85: 8–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnt N, Jalbert I, Stretton S, Naduvilath T, Papas E. Solution toxicity in soft contact lens daily wear is associated with corneal inflammation. Optom Vis Sci 2007; 84: 309–315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qazi Y, Cruzat A, Baniasadi N, Zheng L, Witkin D, Critser DB, Watts A et al. Early effects of contact lens wear on immune cell density of the ocular surface: preliminary results of a laser in vivo confocal microscopy study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011; 52: E‐Abstract 6551.
   Google Scholar
• Ibrahim OM, Matsumoto Y, Dogru M, Adan ES, Wakamatsu TH, Goto T, Negishi K et al. The efficacy, sensitivity, and specificity of in vivo laser confocal microscopy in the diagnosis of meibomian gland dysfunction. Ophthalmology 2010; 117: 665–672.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Summary Minutes of the Medical Devices Advisory Committee, Ophthalmic Devices Panel. Washington, DC. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/08/minutes/2008‐4363m1.pdf. October 12, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Andrasko G, Ryen K. The Staining Grid. 2011 [updated 2011; cited 2011 October 25]; Available from: http://www.staininggrid.com/.
   Google Scholar