Geospatial Information Technology, Rural Resource Development, and Future Geographies

References

• Armstrong, M. P., 2002. Geographic information technologies and their potentially erosive effects on personal privacy, Studies in the Social Sciences 27 ((1)) (2002), pp. 19–28, 10.1016/S0165-4896(01)00085-3/.
   Google Scholar
• Beesley, K., Millward, H., Ilbery, B., and Harrington, L., 2003. The new countryside: Geographic perspectives on rural change. Halifax, Canada: Brandon University and Saint Mary's University; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer Commission on Education Undergraduates in the Research University, 2001. Reinventing undergraduate education: The years after the Boyer Report. Stony Brook, NY: SUNY-Stony Brook; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Craig, W., Harris, T., and Weiner, D., 2002. Community participation and geographic information systems. London and New York: Taylor and Francis; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Crang, M., Crang, P., and May, J., 1999. Virtual geographies. London and New York: Routledge; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Crews-Meyer, K., 2002. "Challenges for GIScience: Assessment of policy relevant human–environmental interactions". In: Walsh, S., and Crews-Meyer, K., eds. Linking people, place, and policy: A GIScience approach. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Estes, J., and Jensen, J., 1998. "Development of remote sensing digital image processing systems and raster GIS". In: Foresman, T., ed. The history of geographic information systems. New York: Longman; 1998. p. 80.
   Google Scholar
• 1999. Goodchild, M. F., Egenhofer, M. J., Fegeas, R., and Kottman, C. A., eds. Interoperating geographic information systems. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Giordano, M., 2003. The geography of the commons: The role of scale and space, Annals of the Association of American Geographers 93 (2003), pp. 365–75, 10.1111/1467-8306.9302007/.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe, N., and Strauss, W., 2000. Millennials risingThe next generation. New York: Vintage Books; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Kasperson, J., Kasperson, R., and Turner, B. L., 1995. Regions at risk: Consequences of threatened environments. Tokyo: United Nations University Press; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Kellerman, A., 2002. The Internet on Earth: A geography of information. Chichester, England: Wiley; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• 1992. Kromm, D., and White, S., eds. Groundwater exploitation in the high plains. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• 1998. Liverman, D., Moran, E., Rindfuss, R., and Stern, P., eds. People and pixels: Linking remote sensing to social science. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Longino, H., 2002. The fate of knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Lulla, K., Warner, T., Nellis, M. D., and Stow, D., 2004. Remote sensing, geospatial analysis, and geographers at the centennial of the Association of American Geographers, Geocarto International 19 (2004), pp. 5–12.
   Google Scholar
• MacFadden, C., 1949. Some preliminary notes on the use of the light airplane and 35mm camera in geographic field research, Annals of the Association of American Geographers 39 (1949), pp. 188–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, G. P., 1864/1965. Lowenthal, David, ed. Man and nature, or physical geography as modified by human action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1864/1965.
   Google Scholar
• Merry, C., Wright, D., Wentz, E., Anderson, S., Budge, A., and Hepner, G., 2002. "Remotely acquired data and information in GIScience". In: UCGIS Research Initiative. 2002, http://www.ucgis.org/priorities/research/2002researchagenda).
   Google Scholar
• Mondello, C., Hepner, G., and Williamson, R., 2004. 10-year industry forecast. Bethesda, MD: American Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council, 2002. Down to Earth: Geographic information for sustainable development in Africa. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• National Science Board, 2000. Environmental science and engineering for the 21st century: The role of the National Science Foundation. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• National Science Foundation Advisory Committee for Environmental Research and Education, 2003. Complex environmental systems: Synthesis for Earth, life, and society in the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Nellis, M. D., 2003. Geography, gamma teta upsolin, and the millennials in the new millennium, The Geographical Bulletin 45 ((2)) (2003), pp. 81–85.
   Google Scholar
• Nellis, M. D., Warner, T., Landenberger, R., McGraw, J., Kite, J. S., and Wang, F., 2000. The Chestnut Ridge Anticline: The first ridge of the Appalachian Mountains, Geocarto International 15 (2000), pp. 73–78.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson, M., Reeve, K., and Page, D., 2003. Integrating geographic information systems into the secondary curricula, Journal of Geography 102 ((6)) (2003), pp. 275–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, Z., and Tsou, M., 2003. Internet GIS: Distributed geographic information services for the Internet and wireless network. New York: Wiley; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, D., and Popper, F., 1987. The Great Plains: From dust to dust, Planning 53 ((12)) (1987), pp. 12–18.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, D., and Popper, F., 2004. "The Great Plains and the Buffalo Commons". In: Janelle, D. G., Warf, B., and Hansen, K., eds. Worldminds: Geographical perspectives on 100 problems. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publications; 2004. p. 49.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, D., 2001. Creating a central place for geography in society and the university: An historic opportunity, Papers and Proceedings of the Applied Geography Conferences 24 (2001), pp. 311–15.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, D., and Solis, P., 2004. Confronted by insurmountable opportunities: Geography in society at the AAG's centennial, The Professional Geographer 56 (2004), pp. 4–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, J., Lulla, K., Kashiwagi, M., Suzuki, M., Nellis, M. D., Bussing, C., Lee Long, W., and McKenzie, L., 2001. Conservation applications of astronaut photographs of Earth: Tidal flat loss (Japan), elephant impact on vegetation (Botswana), and seagrass and mangrove monitoring (Australia), Conservation Biology 15 ((4)) (2001), pp. 876–84, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.015004876.x/.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sui, D., 2004. GIS, cartography, and the “third culture”: Geographic imaginations in the computer Age, The Professional Geographer 56 (2004), pp. 62–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, B. L., 2002. Contested identities: Human–environment geography and disciplinary implications in restructuring the academy, Annals of the Association of American Geographers 92 (2002), pp. 52–74, 10.1111/1467-8306.00279/.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Labor, 2003. Career voyages. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor; 2003, http://www.careervoyages.gov/watshot.cfm.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, S., Evans, T., and Turner, B. L., 2003. "Population-environmental interactions with emphasis on LULC dynamics and the role of technology". In: Brunn, S., Cutter, S., and Harrinton, J. W., eds. Geography and technology. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2003. p. 520.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, F., 2002. Design and Implementation of Web-based BIS for forest fragmentation analysis. Master's thesis. Morgantown, WV: West Virginia University; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Warner, T., Brandtberg, T., McGraw, J., Nellis, M. D., and Gardner, J., 2003. The potential of virtual reality technology for analysis of remotely sensed data: A LIDAR case study, Geocarto International 18 ((1)) (2003), pp. 25–32.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, J., Ransom, M., Nellis, M. D., Seyler, H., and Kluitenberg, G., 2002. Assessing and managing the conservation reserve with GIS for Finney County, Kansas, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 68 ((7)) (2002), pp. 735–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar