Positive Growth: Developments in the Philosophy of Science Education

References

• Aikenhead, G. (1980). Science in social issues: Implications for teaching. Ottawa, ON: Science Council of Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Aikenhead, G. (1993). Teaching science today, relevant to 2001 A.D. Teacher Education, 23, 58–75.
   Google Scholar
• Aikenhead, G. (2002). Whose scientific knowledge? The colonizer and the colonized. In W.-M. Roth & J. Désautels (Eds.), Science education as/for sociopolitical action (pp. 151–166). New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, A., & Osborne, M. (2002). Marginalized discourses and pedagogies: Constructively confronting science for all in classroom practice. In A. Barton & M. Osborne (Eds.), Teaching science in diverse settings (pp. 7–32). New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Beardsley, T. (1992). Teaching real science. Scientific American, 267(4), 98–108.
   Google Scholar
• Bianchini, J., & Cavazos, L. (2001). Promoting inclusive science education through professional development: Challenges faced in transforming content and pedagogy. In A. Barton & M. Osborne (Eds.), Teaching science in diverse settings (pp. 259–294). New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Blades, D. (1997). Procedures of power & curriculum change. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Blades, D. (2001). The simulacra of science education. In J. Weaver, M. Morris, & P. Appelbaum (Eds.), (Post) modern science (education) (pp. 57–94). New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers, A. (1982). What is this thing called science? Queensland, Australia: University of Queensland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Corrigan, D., Dillon, J., & Gunstone, R. (Eds.). (2007). The re-emergence of values in science education. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Désautels, J., Fleury, S., & Garrison, J. (2002). The enactment of epistemological practice as subversive social action, the provocation of power, and anti-modernism. In W.-M. Roth & J. Désautels (Eds.), Science education as/for sociopolitical action (pp. 237–269). New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Duschl, R. (1988). Abandoning the scientistic legacy of science education. Science Education, 72(1), 51–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duschl, R. (1990). Restructuring science education. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, P., & Pap, A. (Eds.). (1965). A modern introduction to philosophy. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge (C. Gordon, Ed.; C. Gordon, L. Marshall, J. Mepham, & K. Soper, Trans.). New York: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Giroux, H. (1992). Border crossings: Cultural workers and the politics of education. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hodson, D. (1998). Teaching and learning science. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hurd, P. (1975). Science, technology and society: New goals for interdisciplinary teaching. Science Teacher, 42(2), 27–30.
   Google Scholar
• Hurd, P. (1994). New minds for a new age: Prologue to modernizing the science curriculum. Science Education, 78(1), 103–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyotard, J.-F. (1989). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, S. (1962). The improvement of science education and the administrator. In S. Marshall (Ed.), The new school science (pp. 2–12). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, M. (2000). Time for science education. New York: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Mitton, J., & Grant, M. (1996). Genetic variation and the natural history of quaking aspen. Bioscience, 46(1), 25–31.
   Google Scholar
• Monk, M., & Osborne, J. (1997). Placing the history and philosophy of science on the curriculum: A model for the development of pedagogy. Science Education, 81(4), 405–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadeau, R., & Désautels, J. (1984). Epistemology and the teaching of science. Ottawa, ON: Science Council of Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Nietzsche, F. (1966). Beyond good and evil (W. Kaufmann, Trans.). New York: Random House. (Originally published 1886)
   Google Scholar
• Reiss, M. (2007). What should be the aim(s) of school science education? In D. Corrigan, J. Dillon, & R. Gunstone (Eds.), The re-emergence of values in science education (pp. 13–28). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, W.-M., & Bowen, M. (2002). From science to epistemology and back again. In W.-M. Roth & J. Désautels (Eds.), Science education as/for sociopolitical action (pp. 271–304). New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, W.-M., & Désautels, J. (2002). Science education as/for sociopolitical action. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, W.-M., & Lee, S. (2002). Breaking the spell: Science education in a free society. In W.-M. Roth & J. Désautels (Eds.), Science education as/for sociopolitical action (pp. 37–66). New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Stenhouse, D. (1985). Active philosophy in education and science. London: George Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Weaver, J. (2001). (Post) modern science (education): Propositions and alternative paths. In J. Weaver, M. Morris, & P. Appelbaum (Eds.), (Post) modern science (education) (pp. 1–22). New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Weaver, J., Morris, M., & Appelbaum, P. (Eds.). (2001). (Post) modern science (education). New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Zembylas, M. (2007). Introduction. Educational philosophy and theory, 38(5), 585–587.
   Google Scholar