A Critical Perspective on Managing Curriculum

References

• Ball, D., & Cohen, D. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as a learning profession (pp. 3–32). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (1994). Education reform—a critical and post-structural approach. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J., & Bowe, R. (1992). Subject departments and the “implementation” of National Curriculum policy: An overview of the issues. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 24(2), 97–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J., Bowe, R., & Gold, A. (1992). Reforming education & changing school: Case studies in policy sociology. London/New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barber, B. (2001). Large scale reform in England. Paper prepared for the School Development Conference, Tartu University, Estonia.
   Google Scholar
• Bedard, K., Brown, W. O., & Helland, E. (1999). School size and the distribution of test scores. Claremont Colleges Working Paper. Retrieved April 22, 2007, from http://econ.claremontmckenna.edu/papers/1999-11.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Berends, M., Bodilly, S., & Kirby, S. (2002a). Facing the challenges of whole-school reform: New American schools after a decade. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
   Google Scholar
• Berends, M., Bodilly, S., & Kirby, S. (2002b). Looking back over a decade of whole-school reform: The experience of new American schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 84(2), 168–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borman, G. D., Hewes, G. M., Overman, L. T., & Brown, S. (2003). Comprehensive school reform and achievement: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 73(2), 125–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (2002). The inheritance of inequality. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(3), 3–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braddock, J. H., II, & Dawkins, M. P. (1993). Ability grouping, aspirations, and attainment: Evidence from the National Educational Longitudinal Study of 1988. Journal of Negro Education, 62, 324–336.
   Google Scholar
• Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development. (1989). Turning points: Preparing American youth for the 21^st century. New York: Carnegie Corporation of New York.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, J. G. (1981). An analysis of school size under a voucher system. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 3, 29–40.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, D. K., & Ball, D. (1990). Relations between policy and practice: A commentary. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12(3), 249–256.
   Google Scholar
• Conger, D. (2005). Within-school segregation in an urban school district. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 27(3), 225–244.
   Google Scholar
• Crowder, N. A. (1959). Automatic tutoring by means of intrinsic programming. In E. H. Galanter (Ed.), Automatic teaching: The state of the art (pp. 109–115). New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Datnow, A. (2002). Can we transplant educational reforms, and does it last? The Journal of Educational Change, 3(3–4), 215–239.
   Google Scholar
• Datnow, A., & Kemper, E. (2003, April). Connections between federal, state and local levels in the implementation of comprehensive school reform. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Diaz-Bilello, E., Welner, K., Howe, K., & Wiley, E. (2005, April). The integrative and segregative effects of public school choice. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Fine, M. (1991). Framing dropouts. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. (2001). The new meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M., Hill, P., & Crévola, C. (2006). Breakthrough. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Goodson, I., & Marsh, C. J. (1996). Studying school subjects—a guide. London: Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Grissom, J. B., & Shepard, L. A. (1989). Repeating and dropping out of school. In L. A. Shepard & M. L. Smith (Eds.), Flunking grades: Research and policies on retention (pp. 34–63). Philadelphia: Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Grundy, S. (1994). Which way toward the year 2000? Contrasting policy discourse in two education systems. Curriculum Inquiry, 24(3), 327–347.
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. (1979). Organizational scale and school success. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1(1), 17–27.
   Google Scholar
• Heubert, J. P., & Hauser, R. M. (Eds.). (1999). High stakes: Testing for tracking, promotion, and graduation. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, V. E., & Bryk, A. S. (1989). A multilevel model of the social distribution of high school achievement. Sociology of Education, 62, 172–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, V. E., Bryk, A. S., & Smith, J. B. (1993). The organization of effective high schools. In L. Darling-Hammond (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 19, pp. 171–267). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Lopes, A. C., Macedo, E., & Paiva, E. (2006). Mapping researches on curriculum in Brazil. Journal of the American Association for the Advancement of the Curriculum, 2(1), 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, S. R. (1999). Tracking inequality: Stratification and mobility in American high schools. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Michleson, S. (1972). Equal school resource allocation. Journal of Human Resources, 7, 283–306.
   Google Scholar
• Monk, D. H. (1987). Secondary school enrollment and curricular comprehensiveness. Economics of Education Review, 6(2), 137–150.
   Google Scholar
• Monk, D. H., & Haller, E. J. (1993). Predictors of high school academic course offerings: The role of school size. American Educational Research Journal, 30(1), 3–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nathan, J., & Febey, K. (2001). Smaller, safer, saner, successful schools. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Educational Facilities. Retrieved April 19, 2007, from http://www.edfacilities.org/pubs/saneschools.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Governors Association. (1993). Ability grouping and tracking: Current issues and concerns. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Oakes, J. (1990). Multiplying inequalities: The effects of race, class, and tracking on opportunities to learn math and science. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
   Google Scholar
• Oakes, J. (1992). Can tracking research inform practice? Technical, normative, and political considerations. Educational Researcher, 21(4), 12–21.
   Google Scholar
• Oakes, J. (2005). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality (2nd ed.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oakes, J., Quartz, K. H., Ryan, S., & Lipton, M. (1999). Becoming good American schools: The struggle for civic virtue in school reform. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Pinar, W. F. (2006). The synoptic text today and other essays. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Pinar, W.F., Reynolds, W., Slattery, P., & Taubman, P. (1996). Understanding curriculum. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Raywid, M. A. (1999). Current literature on small schools. ERIC Digest (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED425049).
   Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. (2004). Standards deviation: How schools misunderstand education policy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stigler, J., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Useem, E. L. (1992). Getting on the fast track in mathematics: School organizational influences on math track assignment. American Journal of Education, 100, 3325–3353.
   Google Scholar
• Wasley, P. A., & Lear, R. J. (2001). Small schools, real gains. Educational Leadership, 5(6), 22–27.
   Google Scholar
• Wasley, P., Fine, M., Gladden, M., Holland, N.E., King, S.P., Mosak, E., et al. (2000). Small schools, great strides: A study of new small schools in Chicago (Report No. 142). New York: Bank Street College of Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED465474)
   Google Scholar
• Welner, K. G. (2001). Tracking in an era of standards: Low-expectation classes meet high-expectation laws. Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly, 28(3), 699–738.
   Google Scholar
• Welner, K. G., & Howe, K. R. (2005). Steering toward separation: The policy and legal implications of “counselling” special education students away from choice schools. In J. Scott (Ed.), School choice and student diversity: What the evidence says (pp. 93–107). New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar