References
- Apple, M. (1990). Ideology and curriculum. New York: Routledge.
- Berlin, I. (1953). The hedgehog and the fox. New York: Simon & Schuster.
- Connelly, F. M., He, M. F., & Phillion, J. A. (2008). Handbook of curriculum and instruction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Giroux, H., Penna, A., & Pinar, W. F. (1981). Curriculum and instruction: Alternatives in education. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
- Gould, S. (2003). The hedgehog, the fox, and the magister’s pox. Mending the gap between science and the humanities. New York: Harmony Books.
- Greenfield, T. (1985). Trial by what is contrary: II. Curriculum Inquiry, 15(2), 113–119.
- Hlebowitsh, P. (1999a). The burdens of the new curricularist. Curriculum Inquiry, 29(3), 343–354.
- Hlebowitsh, P. (1999b). More on “The burdens of the new curricularist.” Curriculum Inquiry, 29(3), 369–373.
- Hlebowitsh, P. (2005a). Generational ideas in curriculum: A historical triangulation. Curriculum Inquiry, 35(1), 73–87.
- Hlebowitsh, P. (2005b). More on “Generational ideas” (A rejoinder to Ian Westbury and Handel Kashope Wright). Curriculum Inquiry, 35(1), 119–122.
- Jahanbegloo, R. (1992). Conversations with Isaiah Berlin. London: Peter Halban.
- Kridel, C. (2010). Encyclopedia of curriculum studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Malewski, E. (Ed.). (2010a). Curriculum studies handbook: The next moment. New York: Routledge.
- Malewski, E. (2010b). Preface. In E. Malewski (Ed.), Curriculum studies handbook: The next moment (pp. xi–xv). New York: Routledge.
- Malewski, E. (2010c). Introduction: Proliferating curriculum. In E. Malewski (Ed.), Curriculum studies handbook: The next moment (pp. 1–39). New York: Routledge.
- Malewski, E. (2010d). The unknown: A way of knowing in the future of curriculum studies. In E. Malewski (Ed.), Curriculum studies handbook: The next moment (pp. 534–539). New York: Routledge.
- Pinar, W. F. (1999). Not burdens—breakthroughs. Curriculum Inquiry, 29(3), 365–367.
- Pinar, W. F. (2007). Intellectual advancement through disciplinarity: Verticality and horizontality in curriculum studies. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense.
- Simon, R. (1981). Dialogue as a scholarly activity: Editorial. Curriculum Inquiry, 11(3), 201–203.
- Snaza, N. (2010). Thirteen theses on the question of state in curriculum studies. In E. Malewski (Ed.), Curriculum studies handbook: The next moment (pp. 43–56). New York: Routledge.
- Westbury, I. (1999). The burdens and the excitement of the “new” curriculum research: A response to Hlebowitsh’s “The burdens of the new curricularist.” Curriculum Inquiry, 29(3), 355–364.
- Westbury, I. (2005). Reconsidering Schwab’s “Practicals”: A response to Peter Hlebowitsh’s “Generational ideas in curriculum: A historical triangulation.” Curriculum Inquiry, 35(1), 89–101.
- Wright, H. K. (2005). Does Hlebowitsh improve on curriculum history? Reading a rereading for its political purpose and implications. Curriculum Inquiry, 35(1), 103–117.