Proliferation as More and Other to Mutuality and Synthesis Within Curriculum Studies: A Response to Hlebowitsh

References

• Adorno, T. (1974). Notes to literature, vol. 1. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, B. (1999). The dangerous and the good? Developmentalism, progress, and public schooling. American Educational Research Journal, 36(4), 797–834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britzman, D. (2002). The death of curriculum. In W. E. Doll & N. Gough (Eds.), Curriculum visions (pp. 92–101). New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Cadieux, R. D. (1995). Dialectics and the economy of différance. Dialectical Anthropology, 20, 319–340.
   Google Scholar
• Caputo, J. D. (1997). The prayers and tears of Jacques Derrida: Religion without religion. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cixous, H. (1999). The third body (K. Cohen, Trans.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Connelly, M. F., He, M. F., & Phillion, J. (Eds.). (2008). The Sage handbook of curriculum and instruction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, J. (1983). Dissemination (B. Johnson, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, J. (1992). Force of law: The “mystical foundation of authority.”In D. Cornell (Ed.), Deconstruction and the possibility of justice (pp. 3–67). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, J. (2007a). A certain impossible possibility of saying the event. In W. J. T Mitchell & A. I. Davidson (Eds.), The late Derrida (pp. 223–243). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, J. (2007b). Psyche: Inventions of the other, vol. I. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edgerton, S. (1996). Translating the curriculum: Multiculturalism into cultural studies. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Ellsworth, E. (1989). Why doesn't this feel empowering?: Working through the repressive myths of critical pedagogy. Harvard Educational Review, 59(3), 297–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellsworth, E. (1997). Teaching positions: Difference, pedagogy, and the power of address. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). New York: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2002). Archeology of knowledge (2nded.). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gaztambide-Fernández, R. (2009). Representing curriculum. Curriculum Inquiry, 39(1), 235–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillory, N. (2009). (A) troubling curriculum: Public pedagogies of Black women rappers. In E. Malewski (Ed.), Curriculum studies handbook: The next moment (pp. 209–222). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. J. (1990). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Helfenbein, R. (2008). Unsettling beliefs: A cultural studies approach to teacher education. In J. Diem & R. Helfenbein (Eds.), Unsettling beliefs: Teaching social theory to teachers (pp. 1–14). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hlebowitsh, P. S. (1993). Radical curriculum theory reconsidered: A historical approach. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hlebowitsh, P. S. (1999a). The burdens of the new curricularist. Curriculum Inquiry, 29(3), 343–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hlebowitsh, P. S. (1999b). More on “The burdens of the new curricularist.” Curriculum Inquiry, 29(3), 369–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, A. (2007). Learning privilege: Lessons of power and identity in affluent schooling. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lather, P. (1998). Critical pedagogy and its complicities: A praxis of stuck places. Educational Theory, 48(4), 487–497.
   Google Scholar
• Lather, P. (2001). Ten years later, yet again: Critical pedagogy and its complicities. In K. Weiler (Ed.), Feminist engagements: Reading, resisting, and revisioning male theorists in education and cultural studies (pp. 183–196). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lather, P. (2004). This is your father’s paradigm: Government intrusion and the case of qualitative research in education. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(1), 15–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lather, P. (2006). Paradigm proliferation as a good thing to think with: Teaching research in education as wild profusion. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19(1), 35–57.
   Google Scholar
• Lather, P. (2009). The double trouble of passing on in curriculum studies. In E. Malewski (Ed.), Curriculum studies handbook: The next moment (pp. 73–77). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lyotard, J.-F. (1993). Libidinal economy (I. H. Grant, Trans.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malewski, E. (2009a). Proliferating curriculum. In E. Malewski (Ed.), Curriculum studies handbook: The next moment (pp. 1–40). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Malewski, E. (2009b). The unknown: A way of knowing in the future of curriculum studies. In E. Malewski (Ed.), Curriculum studies handbook: The next moment (pp. 534–540). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McKnight, M. (2009). Critical pedagogy and despair: A move toward Kierkegaard’s passionate inwardness (pp. 500–516). In E. Malewski (Ed.), Curriculum studies handbook: The next moment (pp. 101–117). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, K. (2004). The poverty of curriculum theory: A critique of Wraga and Hlebowitsh. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(4), 487–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, M. (1991). Canon: New testament to Derrida. College Literature, 18(2), 5–21.
   Google Scholar
• Pinar, W. F. (1988). Contemporary curriculum discourses. Scottsdale, AZ: Gorsuch Scarisbrick.
   Google Scholar
• Pinar, W. F. (1999a). Not burdens—breakthroughs. Curriculum Inquiry, 29(3), 365–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinar, W. F. (1999b). Response: Gracious submission. Educational Researcher, 28(1), 14–15.
   Google Scholar
• Pinar, W. F. (2000). Curriculum studies: The reconceptionalization. Troy, NY: Educator’s International Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pinar, W. F. (2004). What is curriculum theory? Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, M. (2009). “No room in the inn”? The question of hospitality in the post(partum)-labors of curriculum studies. In E. Malewski (Ed.), Curriculum studies handbook: The next moment (pp. 101–117). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, W. M. (2003). Debate, nostalgia, and ressentiment. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 35(4), 445–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, A. J. (2009). How the politics of domestication contribute to the self-deintellectualization of teachers. In E. Malewski (Ed.), Curriculum studies handbook: The next moment (pp. 447–459). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rolleston, J. (1996). The truth of unemployment: Walter Benjamin reads his own times. South Atlantic Review, 61(2), 27–49.
   Google Scholar
• Schubert, W. H. (2009). Love in ethical commitment: A neglected reading. In E. Malewski (Ed.), Curriculum studies handbook: The next moment (pp. 57–62). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sears, J. T. (1992). The second wave of curriculum theorizing: Labyrinths, orthodoxies, and other legacies of the glass bead game. Theory Into Practice, 31(3), 210–218.
   Google Scholar
• Snaza, N. (2009). Thirteen theses on the question of the state in curriculum studies. In E. Malewski (Ed.), Curriculum studies handbook: The next moment (pp. 43–56). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Spivak, G. C. (1994). Responsibility. Boundary 2, 21(3), 19–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spivak, G. C. (2004). Righting wrongs. South Atlantic Quarterly, 103(2–3), 523–581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westbury, I. (1999). The burdens and the excitement of the “new” curriculum research: A response to Hlebowitsh’s “The burdens of the new curricularist.” Curriculum Inquiry, 29(3), 355–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitlock, U. (2009). Jesus died for NASCAR fans: The significance of rural formations of queerness to curriculum studies. In E. Malewski (Ed.), Curriculum studies handbook: The next moment (pp. 265–280). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wraga, W. G. (1999a). “Extracting sun-beams out of cucumbers”: The retreat from practice in reconceptualized curriculum studies. Educational Researcher, 28(1), 4–13.
   Google Scholar
• Wraga, W. G. (1999b). The continuing arrogation of the curriculum field: A rejoinder to Pinar. Educational Researcher, 28(1), 16.
   Google Scholar
• Wraga, W. G., & Hlebowitsh, P. S. (2003). Toward a renaissance in curriculum theory and development in the USA. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 35(4), 425–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, H. K. (2000). Nailing Jell-O to the wall: Pinpointing aspects of state-of-the-art curriculum theorizing. Educational Researcher, 29(5), 4–13.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, H. K. (2005). Does Hlebowitsh improve on curriculum history? Reading a rereading for its political purpose and implications. Curriculum Inquiry, 35(1), 103–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar