Towards Transformation of Knowledge and Subjectivity in Curriculum Inquiry: Insights From Chen Kuan‐Hsing’s “Asia as Method”

References

• Apple, M. W. (1999). Power, meaning, and identity: Essays in critical educational studies. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Benedict, R. (1934). Patterns of culture. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Canagarajah, A. C. (1999). Resisting linguistic imperialism in English teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chakrabarty, D. (1992). Provincializing Europe: Postcoloniality and the critique of history. Cultural Studies, 6(3), 337–357.
   Google Scholar
• (2006) , 12, [Chen, K.-H. (2006). De-imperialization—Asia as method. Taipei, Taiwan: A Radical Quarterly in Social Studies Book series no. 12 (in Chinese)].
   Google Scholar
• Chen, K.-H. (Ed.). (2009). Neo-liberal conditions of knowledge. Special Issue, Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 10(2), 179–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, K.-H. (2010). Asia as method: Toward deimperialization. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dirlik, A. (1997, July). Eurocentrism, the fatal distraction? Globalism, postcolonialism and the disavowal of history. Paper presented at the Colonialism and Its Discontents Conference, Academica Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.
   Google Scholar
• Fanon, F. (1952). Peau noire, masques blancs. Paris: Editions du Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• Felski, R. (1995). The gender of modernity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. (1973). Education for critical consciousness. New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Fromm, E., & Maccoby, M. (1970). Social character in a Mexican village. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, C. (2002). Civilizing subjects: Metropole and colony in the English imagination 1830–1867. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S. (1992). The West and the rest: Discourse and power. In S. Hall & B. Gieben (Eds.), Formations of modernity (pp. 275–332). Cambridge, UK: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Kachru, B. (1986). The alchemy of English: The spread, functions and models of non-native Englishes. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kachru, B. (1992). Teaching world Englishes. In B. Kachru (Ed.), The other tongue. English across cultures (2nd ed, pp. 355–366). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, A. M. Y. (1997). Analysing the “language problem” discourses in Hong Kong: How official, academic and media discourses construct and perpetuate dominant models of language, learning and education. Journal of Pragmatics, 28, 427–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, A. M. Y. (1999). Doing-English-lessons in the reproduction or transformation of social worlds? TESOL Quarterly, 33(3), 393–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, A. M. Y. (2009). Local interpretation of global management discourses in higher education in Hong Kong: Potential impact on academic culture. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 10(2), 260–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, A. M. Y., & Man, E. M. F. (2009). Bilingual education: Southeast Asian perspectives. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, A. M. Y., & Tong, A. (2009). Constructing cultural self and other in the Internet discussion of a Korean historical drama: A discourse analysis of weblog messages of Hong Kong viewers of Dae Jang Geum. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 19(2), 289–312.
   Google Scholar
• Luk, J. C. M. (2001). Exploring the sociocultural implications of the Native English-speaker Teacher Scheme in Hong Kong through the eyes of the students. Asia-Pacific Journal of Language in Education, 4(2), 19–50.
   Google Scholar
• Luk, J. C. M., & Lin, A. M. Y. (2006). Uncovering the sociopolitical situatedness of accents in World Englishes paradigm. In R. Hughes (Ed.), Spoken English, applied linguistics and TESOL: Challenges for theory and practice (pp. 3–22). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Luke, A. (1996). Genres of power? Literacy education and the production of capital. In R. Hasan & G. Williams (Eds.), Literacy in society (pp. 308–338). London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, B. L. (1994). Engendering modernity: Feminism, social theory, and social change. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morley, D., & Chen, K.-H. (1996). Stuart Hall: Critical dialogues in cultural studies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ouyang, H. (2000). One way ticket: A story of an innovative teacher in Mainland China. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 31(4), 397–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennycook, A. (1998). English and the discourses of colonialism. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pennycook, A. (2001). Critical applied linguistics: A critical introduction. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Said, E. (1979). Orientalism. New York: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sakai, N. (1988). Modernity and its critique: The problem of universalism and particularism. The South Atlantic Quarterly, 87(3), 475–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, C. (2006). The imaginary. Anthropological Theory, 6(3), 322–344.
   Google Scholar
• Takeuchi, Y. (2005). “Asia as method.” What is modernity? In R. F. Calichman (Ed. & Trans.), Writings of Takeuchi Yoshimi (pp. 149–165). New York: Columbia University Press. (Original work published 1960)
   Google Scholar
• Tavares, H. (1996). Classroom management and subjectivity: A genealogy of educational identities. Educational Theory, 46(2), 189–201.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R. (1965). The long revolution. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
   Google Scholar