Neuroscience and Education: Issues and Challenges for Curriculum

References

• Alferink, L. A., & Farmer-Dougan, V. (2010). Brain-(not) based education: Dangers of misunderstanding and misapplication of neuroscience research. Exceptionality: A Special Education Journal, 18, 42–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, M., & Reid, C. (2009). Don't forget about levels of explanation. Cortex, 45, 560–561.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansari, D., & Coch, D. (2006). Bridges over troubled waters: Education and cognitive neuroscience. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 146–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansari, D., Coch, D., & De Smedt, B. (2011). Connecting education and cognitive neuroscience: Where will the journey take us? Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43, 37–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassett, D. S., & Gazzaniga, M. S. (2011). Understanding complexity in the human brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 200–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32, 513–531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brothers, L. (2001). Mistaken identity: The mind-brain problem reconsidered. New York: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bruer, J. T. (1997). Education and the brain: A bridge too far. Educational Researcher, 26, 4–16.
   Google Scholar
• Bruer, J. T. (1998). Let’s put brain science on the back burner. National Association of Secondary School Principals. NASSP Bulletin, 82, 9–19.
   Google Scholar
• Bruer, J. T. (1999). In search of…brain-based education. Phi Delta Kappan, 80, 648–657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruer, J. T. (2002). Avoiding the pediatrician’s error: How neuroscientists can help educators (and themselves). Nature Neuroscience, 5, 1031–1033.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bruer, J. T. (2006). Points of view: On the implications of neuroscience research for science teaching and learning: Are there any? A skeptical theme and variations: The primacy of psychology in the science of learning. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 5, 104–110.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bruer, J. T. (2008). Building bridges in neuroeducation. In A. M. Battro, K. W. Fischer, & P. J. Lébna (Eds.), The educated brain : Essays in neuroeducation (pp. 43–58). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bunge, M. (2010). Matter and mind: A philosophical inquiry. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Butterworth, B., & Laurillard, D. (2010). Low numeracy and dyscalculia: Identification and intervention. ZDM, 42, 527–539.
   Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., Berntson, G. G., & Decety, J. (2010). Social neuroscience and its relationship to social psychology. Social Cognition, 28, 675–685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, S. R. (2011). Educational neuroscience: Motivations, methodology, and implications. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43, 7–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, D. (2010). Personal and professional values in teaching. In T. Lovat, R. Toomey, & N. Clement (Eds.), International research handbook on values education and student wellbeing (pp. 63–74). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cherniss, C., Extein, M., Goleman, D., & Weissberg, R. P. (2006). Emotional intelligence: What does the research really indicate? Educational Psychologist, 41, 239–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christodoulou, J. A., Daley, S. G., & Katzir, T. (2009). Researching the practice, practicing the research, and promoting responsible policy: Usable knowledge in mind, brain, and education. [Editorial]. Mind, Brain, and Education, 3, 65–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coch, D., & Ansari, D. (2009). Thinking about mechanisms is crucial to connecting neuroscience and education. Cortex, 45, 546–547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, R. P., & Shallice, T. (2010). Cognitive neuroscience: The troubled marriage of cognitive science and neuroscience. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2, 398–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cubelli, R. (2009). Theories on mind, not on brain, are relevant for education. Cortex, 45, 562–564.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, A. (2004). The credentials of brain-based learning. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 38, 21–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, T. L., Fischer, K. W., & Stein, Z. (2006). Reconsidering qualitative and quantitative research approaches: A cognitive developmental perspective. New Ideas in Psychology, 24, 229–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Smedt, B., Ansari, D., Grabner, R. H., Hannula, M. M., Schneider, M., & Verschaffel, L. (2010). Cognitive neuroscience meets mathematics education. Educational Research Review, 5, 97–105.
   Google Scholar
• De Smedt, B., Ansari, D., Grabner, R. H., Hannula-Sormunen, M., Schneider, M., & Verschaffel, L. (2011). Cognitive neuroscience meets mathematics education: It takes two to tango. Educational Research Review, 6, 232–237.
   Google Scholar
• Deakin Crick, R., McCombs, B., Haddon, A., Broadfoot, P., & Tew, M. (2007). The ecology of learning: Factors contributing to learner-centred classroom cultures. Research Papers in Education, 22, 267–307.
   Google Scholar
• Della Chiesa, B., Christoph, V., & Hinton, C. (2009). How many brains does it take to build a new light: Knowledge management challenges of a transdisciplinary project. Mind, Brain, and Education, 3, 17–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond, A. (2007). Interrelated and interdependent. Developmental Science, 10, 152–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doige, N. (2008). The brain that changes itself: Stories of personal triumph from the frontiers of brain science. Melbourne, Australia: Scribe.
   Google Scholar
• Dommett, E. J., Devonshire, I. M., Plateau, C. R., Westwell, M. S., & Greenfield, S. A. (2011). From scientific theory to classroom practice. The Neuroscientist, 17, 382–388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubinsky, J. M. (2010). Neuroscience education for prekindergarten–12 teachers. Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 8057–8060.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman Barrett, L. (2009). The future of psychology: Connecting mind to brain. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 326–339.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, K. W. (2008). Dynamic cycles of cognitive and brain development: Measuring growth in mind, brain and education. In A. M. Battro, K. W. Fischer, & P. J. Lébna (Eds.), The educated brain : Essays in neuroeducation (pp. 127–150). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, K. W. (2009). Mind, brain, and education: Building a scientific groundwork for learning and teaching. Mind, Brain, and Education, 3, 3–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, K. W., Goswami, U. C., Geake, J. G., & the Task Force on the Future of Educational Neuroscience. (2010). The future of educational neuroscience. Mind, Brain, and Education, 4, 68–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franks, D. D. (2010). Neurosociology: The nexus between neuroscience and social psychology. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Galison, P. L. (1997). Image and logic: A material culture of microphysics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, H. (2009). An education grounded in biology: Interdisciplinary and ethical considerations. Mind, Brain, and Education, 3, 68–73.
   Google Scholar
• Gazzaniga, M. S. (2000). Life with George: The birth of cognitive neuroscience. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), Cognitive neuroscience: A reader (pp. 4–13). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Gazzaniga, M. S. (2010). Neuroscience and the correct level of explanation for understanding mind: An extraterrestrial roams through some neuroscience laboratories and concludes earthlings are not grasping how best to understand the mind-brain interface. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 291–292.
   Google Scholar
• Geake, J. (2008). Neuromythologies in education. Educational Research, 50, 123–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geake, J. (2009). The brain at school: Educational neuroscience in the classroom. Maidenhead, UK: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Geake, J. (2011). Position statement on motivations, methodologies, and practical implications of educational neuroscience research: fMRI studies of the neural correlates of creative intelligence. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43, 43–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gernsbacher, M. A., & Kaschak, M. P. (2003). Neuroimaging studies of language production and comprehension. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 91–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence. New York: Bantam.
   Google Scholar
• Goswami, U. C. (2004). Neuroscience and education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goswami, U. C. (2006). Neuroscience and education: From research to practice? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7, 406–413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goswami, U. C. (2008). Principles of learning, implications for teaching: A cognitive neuroscience perspective. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 42, 381–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goswami, U. C., & Szűcs, D. (2011). Educational neuroscience: Developmental mechanisms: Towards a conceptual framework. NeuroImage, 57, 651–658.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimmett, P. P., & MacKinnon, A. M. (1992). Craft knowledge and the education of teachers. Review of Research in Education, 18, 385–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grotzer, T. A. (2011). Public understanding of cognitive neuroscience research findings: Trying to peer beyond enchanted glass. Mind, Brain, and Education, 5, 108–114.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1990). Moral consciousness and communicative action (C. Lenhardt & S. W. Nicholsen, Trans.). Cambridge, UK: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (2003). The future of human nature. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Hackett, C., & Lavery, S. (2010). Formation of quality pre-service teachers through leadership, service and pastoral care. In R. Toomey, T. Lovat, N. Clement, & K. Dally (Eds.), Teacher education and values pedagogy: A student wellbeing approach (pp. 96–107). Terrigal, Australia: David Barlow.
   Google Scholar
• Hardiman, M. M., Rinne, L., Gregory, E., & Yarmolinskaya, J. (2011). Neuroethics, neuroeducation, and classroom teaching: Where the brain sciences meet pedagogy. Neuroethics. Retrieved June 22, 2011, from http://www.springerlink.com/content/m63uu7q5m5501608/
   Google Scholar
• Hille, K. (2011). Bringing research into educational practice: Lessons learned. Mind, Brain, and Education, 5, 63–70.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Bruer, J. T. (2007). The brain/education barrier. Science, 317, 1293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollis, W. A. (1918). Education and brain development: A psychological problem. British Medical Journal, 2, 179–182.
   Google Scholar
• Howard-Jones, P. A. (2008). Philosophical challenges for researchers at the interface between neuroscience and education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 42, 361–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard-Jones, P. A. (2009). Scepticism is not enough. Cortex, 45, 550–551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard-Jones, P. A. (2011). A multiperspective approach to neuroeducational research. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43, 24–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard-Jones, P. A., & Fenton, K. (2011). The need for interdisciplinary dialogue in developing ethical approaches to neuroeducational research. Neuroethics. Retrieved March 4, 2011, from http://www.springerlink.com/content/765023q40q7jp739/
   Google Scholar
• Howard-Jones, P. A., Winfield, M., & Crimmins, G. (2008). Co-constructing an understanding of creativity in drama education that draws on neuropsychological concepts. Educational Research, 50, 187–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hruby, G. G. (2011). Minding the brain. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 54, 316–321.
   Google Scholar
• Hruby, G. G., & Goswami, U. (2011). Neuroscience and reading: A review for reading education resarchers. Reading Research Quarterly, 46, 156–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Immordino-Yang, M. H., & Damasio, A. R. (2007). We feel, therefore we learn: The relevance of affect and social neuroscience to education. Mind, Brain, and Education, 1, 3–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, W. (1899). Talks to teachers on psychology—and to students on some of life’s ideals. Retrieved November 16, 2011, from http://0-ovidsp.ovid.com
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, E. (2008). A fresh look at brain-based education. Phi Delta Kappan, 89, 409–417.
   Google Scholar
• Jörg, T., Davis, B., & Nickmans, G. (2007). Towards a new, complexity science of learning and education. Educational Research Review, 2, 145–156.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, A. E. (2011). Can cognitive neuroscience ground a science of learning? Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43, 17–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khoshbin, L. S., & Khoshbin, S. (2007). Imaging the mind, minding the image: An historical introduction to brain imaging and the law. American Journal of Law & Medicine, 33, 171–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kihlstrom, J. F. (2010). Social neuroscience: The footprints of Phineas Gage. Social Cognition, 28, 757–783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagemann, E. C. (2002). A report of the president: Lessons learned. The Spencer Foundation: Annual Report April 1, 2001–March 31, 2002, 6–10.
   Google Scholar
• Lagemann, E. C. (2008). Comments on Bulterman-Bos: Education research as a distributed activity across universities. Educational Researcher, 37, 424–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindell, A. K., & Kidd, E. (2011). Why right-brain teaching is half-witted: A critique of the misapplication of neuroscience to education. Mind, Brain, and Education, 5, 121–127.
   Google Scholar
• Lovat, T. (2008). Towards a new complexity science of learning and education. [Invited Response]. Educational Research Review, 3, 79–81.
   Google Scholar
• Lovat, T., Dally, K., Clement, N., & Toomey, R. (2011). Values pedagogy and student achievement: Contemporary research evidence. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lovat, T., & Smith, D. (2003). Curriculum: Action on reflection (4th ed.). Melbourne, Australia: Thomson.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, R. D., Lovett, M. W., Wolf, M., Sevcik, R. A., Steinbach, K. A., Frijters, J. C., et al. (2010). Multiple-component remediation for developmental reading disabilities: IQ, socioeconomic status, and race as factors in remedial outcome. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45, 99–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Northoff, G. (2010). Humans, brains, and their environment: Marriage between neuroscience and anthropology? Neuron, 65, 748–751.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2002). Understanding the brain: Towards a new learning science. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, D. (2009). On grandmother neurons and grandfather clocks. Mind, Brain, and Education, 3, 170–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, S., & Howard-Jones, P. (2007). Educators' views on the role of neuroscience in education: Findings from a study of UK and international perspectives. Mind, Brain, and Education, 1, 109–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purdy, N. (2008). Neuroscience and education: How best to filter out the neurononsense from our classrooms? Irish Educational Studies, 27, 197–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purdy, N., & Morrison, H. (2009). Cognitive neuroscience and education: Unravelling the confusion. Oxford Review of Education, 35, 99–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raichle, M. E. (2009). A brief history of human brain mapping. Trends in Neurosciences, 32, 118–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, D., & Dalton, B. (2009). Learning to read in the digital age. Mind, Brain, and Education, 3, 74–83.
   Google Scholar
• Samuels, B. M. (2009). Can the differences between education and neuroscience be overcome by mind, brain, and education? Mind, Brain, and Education, 3, 45–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrag, F. (2011). Does neuroscience matter for education? Educational Theory, 61, 221–237.
   Google Scholar
• Schumacher, R. (2007). The brain is not enough: Potentials and limits in integrating neuroscience and pedagogy. Analyse und Kritik, 29, 38–47.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, M., & Gerlach, J. (2011). The birth of a field and the rebirth of the laboratory school. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43, 67–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaywitz, S. E., Shaywitz, B. A., Pugh, K. R., Fulbright, R. K., Constable, R. T., Mencl, W. E., et al. (1998). Functional disruption in the organization of the brain for reading in dyslexia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 95, 2636–2641.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman, J. W. (2010). Social neuroscience and its contribution to social psychological theory: Introduction to the special issue. Social Cognition, 28, 663–666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shűppel, J. (1996). Wissensmanagement: Organisationales Lernen im Spannungsfeld von Wissen- und Lerntheorie. Wiesbaden, Germany: Deutscher Universitäs Verlag/Gabler.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Snider, V. E., & Roehl, R. (2007). Teachers' beliefs about pedagogy and related issues. Psychology in the Schools, 44, 873–886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sousa, D. A. (Ed.). (2010). Mind, brain, and education: Neuroscience implications for the classroom. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer Foundation. (2002). Usable knowledge. The Spencer Foundation: Annual Report April 1, 2001–March 31, 2002, 11.
   Google Scholar
• Sperry, R. W. (1993). The impact and promise of the cognitive revolution. American Psychologist, 48, 878–885.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein, Z., Connell, M., & Gardner, H. (2008). Exercising quality control in interdisciplinary education: Toward an epistemologically responsible approach. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 42, 401–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein, Z., & Fischer, K. W. (2011). Directions for mind, brain, and education: Methods, models, and morality. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43, 56–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson, J. (2009). Best practice? Advice provided to teachers about the use of Brain Gym® in Australian schools. Australian Journal of Education, 53, 109–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sylvan, L. J., & Christodoulou, J. A. (2010). Understanding the role of neuroscience in brain based products: A guide for educators and consumers. Mind, Brain, and Education, 4, 1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szűcs, D., & Goswami, U. C. (2007). Educational neuroscience: Defining a new discipline for the study of mental representations. Mind, Brain, and Education, 1, 114–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, H. (2006). Dispositions in action: Do dispositions make a difference in practice? Teacher Education Quarterly, 33, 53–68.
   Google Scholar
• Tokuhama-Espinosa, T. (2008). The scientifically substantiated art of teaching: A study in the development of standards in the new academic field of neuroeducation (mind, brain, and education science) (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Capella University, Minneapolis, MN.
   Google Scholar
• Tommerdahl, J. (2010). A model for bridging the gap between neuroscience and education. Oxford Review of Education, 36, 97–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, D. A. (2011). Which part of “two way street” did you not understand? Redressing the balance of neuroscience and education. Educational Research Review, 6, 223–231.
   Google Scholar
• Van Geert, P., & Steenbeek, H. (2008). Understanding mind, brain, and education as a dynamic developing system: Measurement, modeling and research. In A. M. Battro, K. W. Fischer, & P. J. Lébna (Eds.), The educated brain : Essays in neuroeducation (pp. 71–94). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Varma, S., McCandliss, B., & Schwartz, D. (2008). Scientific and pragmatic challenges for bridging education and neuroscience. Educational Researcher, 37, 140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds. and Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waterhouse, L. (2006a). Inadequate evidence for multiple intelligences, Mozart effect, and emotional intelligence theories. Educational Psychologist, 41, 247–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waterhouse, L. (2006b). Multiple intelligences, the Mozart effect, and emotional intelligence: A critical review. Educational Psychologist, 41, 207–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisberg, D. S., Keil, F. C., Goodstein, J., Rawson, E., & Gray, J. R. (2008). The seductive allure of neuroscience explanations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 470–477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willingham, D. T. (2008). When and how neuroscience applies to education. Phi Delta Kappan, 89, 421–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willingham, D. T. (2009). Three problems in the marriage of neuroscience and education. Cortex, 45, 544–545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willingham, D. T., & Lloyd, J. W. (2007). How educational theories can use neuroscientific data. Mind, Brain, and Education, 1, 140–149.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, J. (2008). Building a bridge from neuroscience to the classroom. Phi Delta Kappan, 89, 424–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, M. (2008). A triptych of the reading brain: Evolution, development, pathology, and its intervention. In A. M. Battro, K. W. Fischer, & P. J. Lébna (Eds.), The educated brain: Essays in neuroeducation (pp. 183–197). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, M., Barzillai, M., Gottwald, S., Miller, L., Spencer, K., Norton, E., et al. (2009). The RAVE-O intervention: Connecting neuroscience to the classroom. Mind, Brain, and Education, 3, 84–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar