Linking Implementation and Evaluation through Program Monitoring

REFERENCES

• Barnekov, T., Boyle, R., & Rich, D. (1989). Privatism and urban policy in Britain and the United States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bartunek, J. (1984). Changing interpretive schemes and organizational restructuring. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 355–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendick, M., & Rasmussen, D. W. (1986). Enterprise zones and inner-city revitalization. In G. E. Peterson & C. W. Lewis (Eds.), Reagan and the cities. Washington, D.C.: Urban Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blakely, E. J. (1989). Planning local economic development: Theory and practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Brintnall, M., & Green, R. E. (1988). Comparative state enterprise zone programs: Variations in structure and coverage. Economic Development Quarterly, 2, 50–68.
   Google Scholar
• Bromley, R. D. F., & Morgan, R. H. (1985). The effects of enterprise zone policy: Evidence from Swansea. Regional Studies, 19, 403–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burchell, R., & Listokin, D. (1981). The fiscal impact of economic-development programs. In G. Sternlieb & D. Listokin (Eds.), New tools for economic development. Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chelimsky, E. (1987a). What have we learned about the politics of program evaluation? Evaluation Practice, 8, 5–21.
   Google Scholar
• Chelimsky, E. (1987b). Linking program evaluation to user needs. In D. J. Palumbo (Ed.), The politics of program evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Council for Urban Economic Development (CUED). (1985). Marketing and managing local enterprise zones. Washington, D.C.: CUED.
   Google Scholar
• Council for Urban Economic Development (CUED). (1987). Developing strategies for economic stability and growth. Washington, D.C.: CUED.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Environment. (1987). An evaluation of the enterprise zone experiment. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Dodge, W. (1988). The emergence of intercommunity partnerships in the 1980s. Public Management, 70(July), 2–7.
   Google Scholar
• Eisinger, P. K. (1988). The rise of the entrepreneurial state. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Funkhouser, R., & Lorenz, E. (1987). Fiscal and employment impacts of enterprise zones. Atlantic Economic Journal, 15, 62–76.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, B. & Bougon, M., & Donnellon, A. (1985). Organizations as constructions and destructions of meaning. Journal of Management, 11, 83–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, R. E., & Brintnall, M. (1987). Reconnoitering state-administred enterprise zones: What’s in a name? Journal of Urban Affairs, 9, 159–170.
   Google Scholar
• Hatry, H. P., et al. (1977). How effective are your community services?: Procedures for monitoring the effectiveness of municipal services. Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute and the International City Management Association.
   Google Scholar
• Hemenway, D. (1985). Monitoring and compliance: The political economy of inspection. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, S., Marshall, A., & Weisbrod, G. (1985). Business impacts of state enterprise zones. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge Systematics (for the U.S. Small Business Administration).
   Google Scholar
• Jones, S., & Weisbrod, G. (1986). Urban enterprise zones: How have the panaceas panned out? National Council for Urban Economic Development Commentary, 10, 16–21.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, G. (1984). Enterprise zones in the U.K. and the U.S.A.: Ideologically acceptable job creation? In J. J. Richardson & R. Henning (Eds.), Unemployment. Beverly Hills: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, G., & Reilly, G. (1981). Enterprise Zones—The Clydebank EZ and policy substitution. In H.M.&N. L. Drucker (Eds.), The Scottish government yearbook 1982. Edinburgh: Paul Harris.
   Google Scholar
• Katzmann, R. (1980). Regulatory bureaucracy. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kieschnick, M. (1981). Taxes and growth: business incentives and economic development. Washington, D.C.: Council of State Planning Agencies.
   Google Scholar
• Kilmann, R., Saxton, M., & Serpa, R. (1985). Gaining control of the corporate culture. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Kingdon, J. (1984). Agendas, alternatives and public policies. Boston: Little Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Linder, S. H., & Peters, B. G. (1987). A design perspective on policy implementation: The fallacy of misplaced prescription. Policy Studies Review, 6, 459–475.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, M. G., & Botham, R. W. (1985). The ideology and implementation of enterprise zones in Britain. Urban Law and Policy, 7, 33–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucy, W. (1988). Equity planning for infrastructure. In J. Stein (Ed.), Public infrastructure and management. Beverly Hills: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Marchand, D. (1989). Managing information resources: New directions in state government. City & State (October 9), 24.
   Google Scholar
• Meir, R. & Gelzer, S. (1982). State enterprise zones: The new frontier? Urban Affairs Quarterly, 18, 53–71.
   Google Scholar
• Millar, A., Hatry, H., & Koss, M. (1977). Monitoring the outcomes of social services. Washington, D.C.: Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Milward, H. B., & Newman, H. H. (1989). State incentive packages and the industrial location decision. Economic Development Quarterly, 3, 203–222.
   Google Scholar
• Mohr, L. (1988). Impact analysis for program evaluation. Chicago: Dorsey.
   Google Scholar
• Nakamura, R. (1987). Textbook policy process and implementation research. Policy Studies Review, 7 (Autumn), 142–154.
   Google Scholar
• National Association of State Development agencies (NASDA) (1988). NASDA state enterprise zone roundup. Washington, D.C.: NASDA.
   Google Scholar
• Noyelle, T. J. (1984). The service era: Focusing public policy on people and places. Economic Development Commentary, 8, 12–17.
   Google Scholar
• Papke, J. (1988). The Indiana enterprise zone experiment: Concepts, issues and impact. Indianapolis: Indiana Department of Commerce.
   Google Scholar
• Pelissero, J. R., & Fasenfest, D. (1989). A typology of suburban economic development policy orientations. Economic Development Quarterly, 3, 301–311.
   Google Scholar
• Poister, T. H. (1982). Performance monitoring in the evaluation process. Evaluation Review, 6, 601–623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poister, T. H. (1983). Performance monitoring. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Rehfuss, J. (1989). Contracting out in government. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, M. (1988). Factors impacting the adoption decision of enterprise zones. Paper presented at the Southeastern Conference on Public Administration, Birmingham, Alabama.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, P. H., & Freeman, H. E. (1985). Evaluation: A systematic approach, (3rd ed.). Beverly Hills: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schmenner, R. (1982). Making business location decisions. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Steiss, A. (1982). Management control in government. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, L. (1983). The politics of economic development. Urban Resources, 1, 33–40.
   Google Scholar
• Tischler, P. (1988). Analyzing the fiscal impact of development. Washington, D.C.: International City Management Association.
   Google Scholar
• Tym, R. & Partners (1984). Monitoring enterprise zones: Year three report. London: Department of the Environment.
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (1986). State designated enterprise zones: Ten case studies. Washington, D.C.: U.S. HUD.
   Google Scholar
• United States General Accounting Office (1988). Enterprise zones: Lessons from the Maryland experience. Washington, D.C.: U.S. GAO.
   Google Scholar
• Urban Institute (1983). Director of incentives for business investment and development in the United States: A state by state guide. Washington, D.C.: Urban Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wasylenko, M. (1981). The location of firms: The role of taxes and financial incentives. In R. Bahl (Ed.), Urban government finance. Beverly Hills: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler, B., & Backoff, R. (1987). The dynamics of strategy in public organizations. Journal of the American Planning Association, 53, 34–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, C. H. (1987). Where politics and evaluation research meet. In D. J. Palumbo (Ed.), The politics of program evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, J. (1988). Enterprise zones are just part of the answer for reviving an urban economy. Governing, 1(11), 57–63.
   Google Scholar
• Wholey, J. S. (1979). Evaluation: Promise and performance. Washington, D.C.: Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Wilder, M. G., & Rubin, B. M. (1988). Targeted redevelopment through urban enterprise zones. Journal of Urban Affairs, 10, 1–17.
   Google Scholar