Institutions, Agency, and Microscale Gentrification: A Tale of Two Neighborhoods

REFERENCES

• Bassett, K., & Short, J. (1980). Housing and residential structure. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Beauregard, R. (1986). The chaos and complexity of gentrification. In N. Smith & P. Williams (Eds.), Gentrification and the city. London: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Checkoway, B. (1980). Large builders, federal housing programmes, and postwar suburbanization. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 4, 21–44.
   Google Scholar
• Checkoway, B. (1985). Revitalizing an urban neighborhood: A St. Louis case study. In B. Checkoway & C. Patton (Eds.), The metropolitan midwest. Urbana: University of Illinois.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, K., & Mair, A. (1988). Locality and community in the politics of local economic development. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 78, 307–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cybriwsky, R., Ley, D., & Western, J. (1986). Gentrification in society hill and false creek. In N. Smith & P. Williams (Eds.), Gentrification and the city. London: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Feagin, J. (1985). The social costs of Houston’s growth: A sunbelt boomtown re-examined. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 8(2), 164–185.
   Google Scholar
• Fincher, R. (1981). Analysis of the local level capitalist state. Antipode, 13, 25–30.
   Google Scholar
• Gale, D. (1984). Neighborhood revitalization and the postindustrial city. Lexington, KY: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, D., & Urry, J. (1985). Social relations and spatial structures. New York: St. Martins.
   Google Scholar
• Hamnett, C. (1984). Gentrification and residential location theory: A review and assessment. In D. Herbert & R. Johnston (Eds.), Geography and the urban environment: Vol. 6-Progress in research and applications. New York: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (1985). Consciousness and the urban experience. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University.
   Google Scholar
• Holcomb, B. (1983). Geographical perspectives on urban revitalization by public private partnerships. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association of American Geographers, Middle States Division, October 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Hopper, L., & Hamburg, J. (1985). The making of America’s homeless: From skid row to new poor. In R. Bratt, C. Hartman & A. Meyerson (Eds.), Critical perspectives on housing. Philadelphia: Temple University.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, P. (1987). Social geography: Social struggles and spatial strategies. Progress in Human Geography, 3, 263–269.
   Google Scholar
• James, F. (1980). The revitalization of older urban housing and neighborhoods. In A. Solomon (Ed.), The prospective city. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. (1983). The role of community action in neighborhood revitalization. Urban Geography, 4, 16–40.
   Google Scholar
• Kirby, A. (1987). State, local state, context and spatiality: A reappraisal of state theory. Paper presented at the Sixth Conference of Europeanists, Washington, D.C., November.
   Google Scholar
• Lauria, M., & Knopp, L. (1985). Toward an analysis of the role of gay communities in the urban renaissance. Urban Geography, 6, 152–169.
   Google Scholar
• Leitner, H. (1987). Urban geography: Undercurrents of change. Progress in Human Geography, 11, 115–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ley, D. (1986). Alternative explanations for inner city gentrification: A Canadian assessment. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 76, 521–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maher, T., Haas, A., Levine, B., & Liell, J. (1985). Whose neighborhood: the role of established residents in historic preservation areas. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 20, 267–281.
   Google Scholar
• Maher, T. (1988). Cities in search of meaning. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Sociology, Indiana University, Indianapolis.
   Google Scholar
• Marcuse, P. (1986). Abandonment, gentrification, and displacement: The linkages in New York City. In N. Smith & P. Williams (Eds.), Gentrification of the city. London: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Markuson, A. (1981). City spatial structure, women’s household work, and national urban policy. In C. Stimpson, E. Dixler, M. Nelson & A. Yatrakus (Eds.), Women and the city. Chicago: University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, C. (1988). Interpreting gentrification in postmodern culture. Presentation at the Annual Meeting, Association of American Geographers, Phoenix, Arizona, April.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, C., & Willburn, Y. (1985). Governing metropolitan Indianapolis: The politics of unigov. Berkeley: University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Perrow, C. (1979). Demystifying organizations. In K. Sari & Y. Hasenfeld (Eds.), The management of human services. New York: Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, D. (1984). Rethinking gentrification: Beyond the uneven development of Marxist urban theory. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 3, 41–74.
   Google Scholar
• Salaman, G., & Thomspon, K. (Eds.) (1980). Control and ideology in organizations. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sayer, A. (1984). Method in social science. London: Hutchinson.
   Google Scholar
• Schaffer, R., & Smith, N. (1986). The gentrification of Harlem? Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 76, 347–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schill, M., & Nathan, R. (1983). Revitalizing America’s cities: Neighborhood reinvestment and displacement. Albany: SUNY.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, N. (1982). Gentrification and uneven development. Economic Geography, 58, 164–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, N., & Williams, P. (1986). Gentrification of the city. London: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Wallis, V., Maher, T., & Haas, A., (1981). Indianapolis: Downtown development for whom? Research report prepared for the Indiana Christian Leadership Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Warf, B. (1988). Regional transformation, everyday life, and Pacific Northwest lumber production. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 78, 326–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Western, J., & Cybriwsky, R. (1982). Center city Philadelphia: Public planning for private revitalization. Presentation at Annual Meeting, Association of American Geographers, San Antonio, Texas, April.
   Google Scholar
• Williams. P. (1976). The role of institutions in the inner London housing market: The case of Islington. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 6, 72–82.
   Google Scholar
• Williams. P. (1982). Restructuring urban managerialism: Towards a political economy of urban allocation. Environment and Planning, A, 14, 95–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams. P. (1986). Class constitution through spatial reconstruction? A reevaluation of gentrification in Australia, Britain, and the United States. In N. Smith & P. Williams (Eds.), Gentrification of the city. London: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, D. (1987a). Institutions and urban revitalization: The case of Chelsea in New York City. Urban Geography, 8, 129–145.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, D. (1987b). Urban revitalization on the Upper West Side of Manhattan: An urban managerialist assessment. Economic Geography, 63, 35–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, D. (1989a). Local state dynamics and gentrification in Indianapolis, Indiana. Urban Geography, 10(1), 19–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, D. (1989b). Toward a revised urban managerialism: Local managers and community development block grants. Political Geography Quarterly, 8(1), 21–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zukin, S. (1982). Loft living: Culture and capital in urban change. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins.
   Google Scholar