The Rise and Fall of Eastside Community Investments, Inc.: The Life of an Extraordinary Community Development Corporation

References

• Bielefeld, W. 1994. What affects nonprofit survival? Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 5 (1), 19–36. pmid/10140447
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bratt, R. G. 1997. CDCs contributions outweigh contradictions: A reply to Randy Stoecker. Journal of Urban Affairs, 19 (1), 23–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, C. F. (with Tuckman, H. P). 1991. Financial vulnerability and attrition as measures of nonprofit performance. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 62 (4), 655–672.
   Google Scholar
• Cowan, S., M., Rohe, W., & Esmail, B. 1999. Factors influencing the performance of community development corporations. Journal of Urban Affairs, 21 (3), 325–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberg, P. 1999, May 20. The courage to profit from failure. The Chronicle of Philanthropy.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenberg, P. 2000, MarchApril. Time to remove the rose-colored glasses. Shelterforce. Available: http://www.nhi.org/online/issues/110/eisenberg.html[August 2003].
   Google Scholar
• Glickman, N., J., & Servon, L. J. 1998. More than bricks and sticks: Five components of community development corporation capacity. Housing Policy Debate, 9 (3), 497–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goetz, E. 1992. Local government support for nonprofit housing: A survey of U.S. cities. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 27 (3), 421–435.
   Google Scholar
• Hager, M. A. 2000. Explaining demise among nonprofit organizations. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• Heikens, N. 1998, May 4. ECI collapse leaves scars: Tangled legacy unfolds at community development group. Indianapolis Business Journal, 19 (7), 1A(5).
   Google Scholar
• Higgs, J. 1998, September. Case study of Eastside Community Investments. Prepared for CDCs in Crisis, a Local Initiative Support Corporation Conference. Glen Cove, Long Island.
   Google Scholar
• Keating, W. D. 1997. The CDC model of urban development: A reply to Randy Stoecker, Journal of Urban Affairs, 19 (1), 29–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keating, W. D., Krumholz, N., & Star, P. (Eds.). 1996. Revitalizing urban neighborhoods. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keyes, L. C., Schwartz, A., Vidal, A., & Bratt, R. G. 1996. Networks and nonprofit: opportunities and challenges in an era of federal devolution. Housing Policy Debate, 7 (2), 202–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingsley, G. T., McNeely, J. B., & Gibson, J. O. 1997. Community building: Coming of age. Washington, DC: Development Training Institute and the Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Klacik, D., & Perry, J. L. 1999. Interim report 1: A preliminary evaluation of the capacity building program. Center for Urban Policy and the Environment, Indiana University, School of Public and Environmental Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Kordesh, R. 1986. Democracy from above and below: The reorganization of neighborhood politics. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Indiana University.
   Google Scholar
• Liou, Y. T., & Stroh, R. C. 1998. Community development intermediary systems in the United States: Origins, evolution, and functions. Housing Policy Debate, 9 (3), 575–594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClure, K. 2000. The low-income housing tax credit as an aid to housing finance: How well has it worked? Housing Policy Debate, 11 (1), 91–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milward, H. B., & Provan, K. 1993. The hollow state: Private provision of public services. InH. Ingram & S. R. Smith (Eds.), Public policy for democracy, (222–237). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Housing and Economic Development Law Project. 1974. A lawyers’ manual on community-based economic development. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Regan, K. M., & Quigley, J. M. 2000. Federal policy and the rise of nonprofit housing providers. Journal of Housing Research, 11 (2), 297–317.
   Google Scholar
• Rothman, D. 2000, July. Project impact with Indianapolis CDCs: Increasing management performance and capacity through training and technical assistance. Baltimore, MD: The Development Training Institute, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Salamon, L. M. 1995. Partners in public service: Government-nonprofit relations in the modern welfare state. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, A., Bratt, R. G., Vidal, A. C., & Keyes, L. C. 1996. Nonprofit housing organizations and institutional support: The management challenge. Journal of Urban Affairs, 18 (4), 389–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, J., Tucker, D., & House, R. 1986. Organizational legitimacy and the liability of newness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 171–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, S., & Lipsky, M. 1995. Nonprofit for hire: The welfare state in the age of contracting. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steinbach, C. 1999, MarchApril. Dennis West on ECI’s rise and fall. Shelterforce. Available: http://www.nhi.org/online/issues/104/west.html[August 2003].
   Google Scholar
• Stoecker, R. 1997a. The CDC model of urban redevelopment: A critique and an alternative. Journal of Urban Affairs, 19 (1), 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoecker, R. 1997b. Should we … could we … change the CDC model? A rejoinder. Journal of Urban Affairs, 19 (1), 35–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoutland, S. E. 1999. Community development corporations: Mission, strategy, and accomplishments. InR. F. Ferguson & W. T. Dickens (Eds.), Urban problems and community development. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (HUD). 1995. Status and prospects of the nonprofit housing sector. HUD Report 6758. Washington, DC: Office of Policy Development and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Vidal, A. 1992. Rebuilding communities: A national study of urban community development corporations. Community Development Research Center. New School for Social Research. New York: New York.
   Google Scholar
• Wedig, G. 1994. Risk, leverage, donations and dividends-in-kind: A theory of nonprofit financial behavior. International Review of Economics and Finance, 3 (3), 257–278.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, J. S. 1998. The community development industry system: A case study of politics and institutions in Cleveland, 1967–1997. Journal of Urban Affairs, 20 (2), 137–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zdenek, R. 1998. Leadership is not enough: The importance of organizational capacity and social networks for community development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Southern California.
   Google Scholar