513
Views
47
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Case Studies in Urban Development

The Meds and Eds in Urban Economic Development

Pages 571-588 | Published online: 02 Dec 2016

References

  • Act 35: More care left unpaid, Pennsylvania House of Representatives, Health and Human Services Committee1997 (testimony of Andrew Wigglesworth).
  • Association of Independent Colleges and Universities of Pennsylvania. (AICUP). 1999 October. The economic and community impact of independent higher education in Pennsylvania. Harrisburg: Author.
  • Beck, R., Elliot, D., Meisel, J., & Wagner, J. 1995. Economic impact studies of regional public colleges and universities. Growth and Change, 26, 245–260.
  • Bluestone, B. 1993. UMass/Boston: An economic impact analysis. Boston, MA: John W. McCormack Institute of Public Affairs University of Massachusetts at Boston.
  • Bovbjerg, R. & Marstellar, J. 1999. Health care market competition in six states: Implications for the poor. The Urban Institute. Available: http://www.urban.org/Template.cfm?NavMenuID=24&template=/TaggedContent/ViewPublication.cfm&PublicationID=5955 [September 2003].
  • Bowman, W. 2002. Impact fees: An alternative to PILOTs. InE. Brody(Ed.), Property-tax exemption for charities: Mapping the battlefield (pp. 301–319). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
  • Brody, E. 2002. Introduction. InE. Brody(Ed.), Property tax exemption for charities: Mapping the battlefield(pp. ix–xxv). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
  • Campus Visit Philadelphia. 2001, June 4. Philadelphia Pennsylvania enrollment statistics. Philadelphia: Author.
  • Carbone, N. R., & Brody, E. 2002. PILOTS: Hartford and Connecticut. InE. Brody(Ed.), Property tax exemption for charities: Mapping the battlefield(pp. 233–252). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
  • Clarke, S., & Gaile, G. 1998. The work of cities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Community College of Philadelphia. 2000. Economic Impact. Philadelphia: Author.
  • Eisinger, P. 1988. The rise of the entrepreneurial state: State and local economic development policy in the U.S. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
  • Emerson College v. City of Boston, 391 Mass. 415, 462 N.E.2d 10981984.
  • Felsenstein, D. 1996. The university in the metropolitan arena: Impacts and public policy implications. Urban Studies, 33 (9), 1565–1580.
  • Ferman, B. 1996. Challenging the growth machine: Neighborhood politics in Chicago and Pittsburgh. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
  • Florax, R., & Folmer, H. 1992. Knowledge impacts of universities on industry: An aggregate simultaneous investment model. Journal of Regional Science, 32 (4), 437–466.
  • Glancey, D. 2002. PILOTs: Philadelphia and Pennsylvania. InBrody, E.(Ed.), Property-tax exemption for charities: Mapping the battlefield (pp. 211–232). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
  • Goddard, J. B., & Chatterton, P. 1999. Regional development agencies and the knowledge economy: Harnessing the potential of universities. Government and Policy, 17, 685–699.
  • Greater Philadelphia First. 1995. Gaining the lead in the global economy: An economic development strategy for the greater Philadelphia region. Philadelphia: Author.
  • Hangley, B., & Mooney, E. 1997, March. Health care and welfare. Philadelphia: 21st Century League.
  • Harkavy, I., & Zuckerman, H. 1999, August. Eds and meds: Cities’ hidden assets. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Survey Series.
  • Hauptman, A. 2000. Vouchers and American higher education. InC. E. Steuerle, V. D. Ooms, G. Peterson, & R. D. Reischauer (Eds.), Vouchers and the provision of public services(pp. 336–367). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
  • Hauptman, A. 2001. Reforming the ways in which states finance higher education. InD. Heller(Ed.), The states and public higher education policy(pp. 64–80). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Hill, E. W., & Lendel, I. 2002, March. The impact of the reputation of bio-life science and engineering doctoral programs on regional economic development. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Urban Affairs Association, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Jezierski, L. 1990. Neighborhoods and public-private partnerships in Pittsburgh. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 26 (2), 217–249.
  • Katz, B., & Dobelle, E. 1999, February 14. Higher education: Cities’ hidden asset. Philadelphia Daily News. Available: http://www.brook.edu/Views/Op-Ed/Katz/19990214.htm[August 2003].
  • LaSalle University. 2000. An economic and social impact report. Philadelphia: LaSalle University.
  • Luger, M., & Goldstein, H. 1997. What is the role of public universities in regional economic development? InR. Bingham & R. Mier (Eds.), Dilemmas of urban economic development(pp. 104–134). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Malecki, E. 1987. The R&D location decision of the firm and “creative” regions. Technovation, 6, 205–222.
  • National Center for Charitable Statistics. 2002. Reporting public charities in Pennsylvania, by county, 1999. Washington, DC: Urban Institute. Available: http://www.nccs.urban.org[August 2003].
  • Noorbakhsh, A., & Culp, D. 2002. The demand for higher education: Pennsylvania’s nonresident tuition experience. Economics of Education Review, 21, 277–286.
  • Office of the City Controller. 1999. Philadelphia: A new urban direction. Philadelphia: St. Joseph’s University Press.
  • Pennsylvania Department of Labor and Industry. 2002. Pennsylvania Labor Market Information Database System. Center for Workforce Information and Analysis, Available: http://www.palmids.state.pa.us[September 2003].
  • Pennsylvania Economy League. 1996, February. Greater Philadelphia’s challenge: Capitalizing on change in the regional health care economy. PEL report No. 683. Available: http://www.peleast.org/images/Health_Care.pdf[September 2003]. Philadelphia: Author.
  • Pennsylvania Economy League. 2000, Fall. Greater Philadelphia’s knowledge industry: Leveraging the region’s colleges and universities in the new economy. Philadelphia: Author.
  • Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council. 1995. Hospital financial analysis. Harrisburg, PA: Author.
  • Philadelphia International Medicine. (n.d.). Available: http://www.philadelphiamedicine.com[August 2003].
  • Postsecondary Education OPPORTUNITY. 2002. The rise and fall of state investment effort in higher education, FY1962-FY2002. The Mortenson Research Seminar on Public Policy Analysis of Opportunity for Post Secondary Education. Oskaloosa, IA: Author.
  • Rethinking Higher Education in the Philadelphia Region. 1998, September 29. Philadelphia Daily News Supplement, pp. R1–R7.
  • Rittel, H. W. J., & Weber, M. M. 1973. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155–169.
  • Salisbury, S. 1995, July 24. Rendell says city giving nonprofits one taxing time. Philadelphia Inquirer, p. B1.
  • Sbragia, A. 1990. Pittsburgh’s third way: The nonprofit sector as a key to urban regeneration. InD. Judd & M. Parkinson (Eds.), Leadership and urban regeneration(pp. 51–68). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Schackner, B. 1997, June 27. For-profit schools can grant degrees. Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, D1.
  • Scott, A. 1992. The collective order of flexible production agglomerations. Economic Geography, 68, 219–233.
  • Smith, D. B., & Aaronson, W. 2002. A quantitative assessment of the Delaware Valley life sciences workforce needs for the 21st century. Philadelphia: Delaware Valley Healthcare Council and Temple University.
  • SRI International. 1995, May. Gaining the lead in the global economy, Vol. II. Philadelphia: Greater Philadelphia First.
  • Standard & Poor’s, Inc. 2001.
  • Stull, W., & Madden, J. 1990. Post industrial Philadelphia: Structural changes in the metropolitan economy. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
  • Temple University Center for Public Policy. 1998, June. What Temple means to southeastern Pennsylvania and the state. Philadelphia: Temple University.
  • Thompson, W. 1999. Policy-based analysis for local economic development. InJ. Blair & L. Reese (Eds.), Approaches to economic development(pp. 3–13). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Varga, A. 2000. Local academic knowledge transfers and the concentration of economic activity. Journal of Regional Science, 40 (2), 289–309.
  • Weisbrod, B.(Ed.). 1998. To profit or not to profit: The commercial transformation of the nonprofit sector. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wigglesworth, A., & Abrahams, E. 2000, July 15. Health sciences could be the pill for boosting Philadelphia area’s future. Philadelphia Inquirer, p. B9.
  • Wolpert, J., Naphtali, Z., & Seley, J. 2001. The locations of nonprofit facilities in urban areas. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy Working Paper.
  • Young, D., & Salamon, L. 2002. Commercialization and social ventures. InL. Salamon(Ed.). The state of nonprofit America(pp. 423–446). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution Press.
  • Youngman, J. 2002. The politics of the property tax debate: Political issues. InE. Brody(Ed.), Property-tax exemption for charities: Mapping the battlefield (pp. 23–46). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.