New Estimates of the Demand for Urban Green Space: Implications for Valuing the Environmental Benefits of Boston’s Big Dig Project

References

• Altshuler, A. A., & Luberoff, D. 2003. Mega-projects: The changing politics of urban public investment. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• At the statehouse—vision for big dig park unveiled. 2000, December 15. The Providence Journal, p. 5C.
   Google Scholar
• City of Boston. 2000. Property parcel data. (CD-ROM version). Boston, MA: City of Boston, Assessing Department.
   Google Scholar
• DiPasquale, D., & Kahn, M. E. 1999. Measuring neighborhood investments: An examination of community choice. Real Estate Economics, 27 (3), 389–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiPasquale, D., & Wheaton, W. 1996. Urban economics and real estate markets. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Dwyer, J. F., Peterson, G. L., & Darragh, A. J. 1983. Estimating the value of urban forests using the travel cost method. Journal of Arboriculture, 9 (7), 183–185.
   Google Scholar
• Fader, S. 1997. Embarcadero promenade. InA. Garvin & G. Berens (Eds.), Urban parks and open space(pp. 90–95). Washington DC: Urban Land Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Fuguitt, D., & Wilcox, S. J. 1999. Cost-benefit analysis for public sector decision makers. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
   Google Scholar
• Garvin, A. 1997. Enhancing the public realm. InA. Garvin & G. Berens (Eds.), Urban parks and open space(pp. 25–42). Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Geoghegan, J. 2002. The value of open spaces in residential land use. Land Use Policy, 19, 91–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaeser, E. L., Kahn, M. E., & Rappaport, J. 2000. Why do the poor live in cities? National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper No. w7636. Available: http:papers.nber.orgpapersW7636[September 2003]. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Glaeser, E. L., Kolko, J., & Saiz, A. 2001. Consumer city. Journal of Economic Geography, 1, 27–50.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, C. 2000, December 21. Boston’s digging produces a green jewel. The New York Times, p. A22.
   Google Scholar
• Hammer, T. R., Coughlin, R. E., & Horn, E. T., IV. 1974. The effect of a large urban park on real estate value. Journal of American Institute of Planners, 40, 274–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanley, N., & Spash, C. L. 1993. Cost-benefit analysis and the environment. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Hendon, W. S. 1973. Property values, schools, and park-school combinations. Land Economics, 49 (2), 216–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. 1961. The death and life of great American cities. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, M. E. 2000. The environmental impact of suburbanization. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 19, 569–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiel, K. A., & McClain, K. T. 1995. House price during siting decision stages: The case of an incinerator from rumor through operation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 28, 241–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohlhase, J. E. 1991. The impact of toxic waste sites on housing values. Journal of Urban Economics, 30, 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krieger, A. 1999. Experiencing Boston: Encounters with the places on the maps. InA. Krieger, D. Cobb, & A. Turner (Eds.), Mapping Boston(pp. 146–172). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leichenko, R. M., Coulson, N. E., & Listokin, D. 2001. Historic preservation and residential property values: An analysis on Texas cities. Urban Studies, 38, 1973–1988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leinberger, C. B., & Berens, G. 1997. Executive summary: Creating better urban parks and open space. InA. Garvin & G. Berens (Eds.), Urban Parks and Open Space(pp. 25–42). Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, K. 1960. Image of the city. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Margulis, H. L. 2002. Suburban housing resale prices and housing market restructuring. Journal of Urban Affairs, 24, 461–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massachusetts Turnpike Authority. 2003, October. Central artery/tunnel project: Finance plan. Available: http:www.bigdig.comthtmlpdffin_100103.pdf[October, 2003].
   Google Scholar
• Michaels, R. G., & Smith, V. K. 1990. Market segmentation and valuing amenities with hedonic models: The case of hazardous waste sites. Journal of Urban Economics, 28, 223–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• More, T. A., Stevens, T., & Allen, P. G. 1988. Valuation of urban parks. Landscape and Urban Planning, 15, 139–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sieg, H., Smith, V. K., Banzhaf, H. S., & Walsh, R. 2000. Estimating the general equilibrium benefits of large policy changes: The clean air act revisited. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper No. w7744. Available: http:papers.nber.orgpapersW7744[September 2003]. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Steinacker, A. 2003. Infill development and affordable housing patterns from 1996 to 2000. Urban Affairs Review, 38, 492–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trust for Public Land. 1999. The economic benefits of parks and open space. Available: http:www.tpl.orgtier3_cdl.cfmcontent_item_id1145&folder_id727[February 2002].
   Google Scholar
• Tsipis, Y. 2001. Boston’s central artery. Charleston, SC: Arcadia Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Tyrvainen, L. 1997. The amenity value of the urban forest: An application of the hedonic pricing method. Landscape and Urban Planning, 37, 211–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyrvainen, L. 2000. Property prices and urban forest amenities. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 39, 205–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, M., & Hefetz, A. 2002. The uneven distribution of market solutions for public goods. Journal of Urban Affairs, 24, 445–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar