124
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Places and Participation: Comparing Resident Participation in Post-Wwii Neighborhoods in Northwest, Central and Southern Europe

&
Pages 63-86 | Published online: 30 Nov 2016

REFERENCES

  • Aalbers, M., Van Beckhoven, E., Van Kempen, R., Musterd, S., & Ostendorf, W. (2004). Large housing estates in the Netherlands: Policies and practices. Utrecht: Urban and Regional Research Centre Utrecht (URU).
  • Aalbers, M., Musterd, S., & Ostendorf, W. (2005). Large housing estates in Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Opinions of residents on recent developments. Utrecht: Urban and Regional Research Centre Utrecht (URU).
  • Almond, G. A., & Verba, S. (1989 [1963]). The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Andersson, R., Öresjö, E., Petterson, L., Holmqvist, E., Siwertsson, C., & Solid, D. (2005). Large housing estates in Stockholm and Jönköping, Sweden: Opinions of residents on recent developments. Utrecht: Urban and Regional Research Centre Utrecht (URU).
  • Belmessous, F., Chemin, C., Chignier-Riboulon, F., Commercon, N., Triguero, M., & Zepf, M. (2004). Large housing estates in France: Policies and practice. Utrecht: Urban and Regional Research Centre Utrecht (URU).
  • Belmessous, F., Chemin, C., Chignier-Riboulon, F., Commerçon, N., Trigueiro, M., & Zepf, M. (2005). Large housing estates in Lyon, France: Opinions of residents on recent developments. Utrecht: Urban and Regional Research Centre Utrecht (URU).
  • Berry, J. M. (2005). Nonprofits and civic engagement. Public Administration Review, 65(5), 568–578.
  • Body-Gendrot, S., & Martiniello, M. (2002). Minorities in European cities: The dynamics of social integration and social exclusion at neighborhood level. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK: Macmillan Press.
  • Campbell, K., & Lee, B. (1992). Sources of personal neighbor networks: Social integration, need, or time Social Forces, 70, 1077–1100.
  • Cars, G. (2000). Social exclusion in European neighborhoods—Processes, experiences and responses. Bruxelles: European Commission.
  • Černič Mali, B., Sendi, R., Boškić, R., Filipović, M., & Goršič, N. (2005). Large housing estates in Ljubljana and Koper, Slovenia: Opinions of residents on recent developments. Utrecht: Urban and Regional Research Centre Utrecht (URU).
  • Curtis, J. E., Baer, D. E., & Grabb, E. G. (2001). Nations of joiners: Explaining voluntary association membership in democratic societies. American Sociological Review, 66(6), 783–805.
  • De Tocqueville, A. (1967 [1935]). De la Démocratie en Amérique. Paris: Gallimard.
  • Dekker, K. (2007). Social capital, neighborhood attachment and participation in distressed urban areas. Housing Studies, 22(3), 359–383.
  • Dekker, K., & Van Kempen, R. (2005). Large housing estates in Europe: A contemporary overview. InR. Van Kempen, K. Dekker, S. Hall, & I. Tosics (Eds.), Restructuring large housing estates in European cities. Bristol: Policy Press.
  • Díaz Orueta, F. (2007). Madrid: Urban regeneration projects and social mobilization. Cities, 24(3), 183–193.
  • Docherty, I., Goodlad, R., & Paddison, R. (2001). Civic culture, community & citizen participation in contrasting neighborhoods. Urban Studies, 38(12), 2225–2250.
  • Evans, R. (1998). Tackling deprivation on social housing estates in England: An assessment of the housing plus approach. Housing Studies, 13(5), 713–126.
  • Feins, J. D., & Shroder, M. D. (2005). Moving to opportunity: The demonstration’s design and its effects on mobility. Urban Studies, 42(8), 1275–1299.
  • Fischer, C. S. (1982). To Dwell among friends: Personal networks in town and city. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Fitzpatrick, S., Hastings, A., & Kintrea, K. (2000). Youth involvement in urban regeneration: Hard lessons, future directions. Policy & Politics, 28(4), 493–509.
  • Flap, H., & Völker, B. (2003). Communist societies, the velvet revolution, and weak ties: The case of East Germany. InG. Badescu & E. Uslaner (Eds.), Social capital and the transition to democracy (pp. 28–45). London and New York: Routledge.
  • Gerson, K., Stueve, C. A., & Fischer, C. S. (1977). Attachment to place. InC. S. Fischer, R. M. Jackson, K. Gerson, L. Mc Callister Jones, & M. Baldasarre (Eds.), Networks and places: Social relations in the urban setting (pp. 139–161). New York: The Free Press.
  • Guest, A., & Wierzbicki, S. (1999). Social ties at the neighborhood level: Two decades of GSS evidence. Urban Affairs Review, 35, 92–111.
  • Hall, P. (1997) Regeneration policies for peripheral housing estates: Inward- and outward-looking approaches. Urban Studies, 34(65), 873–890.
  • Hall, S., Murie, A., Rowlands, R., & Sankey, S. (2004). Large housing estates in the United Kingdom: Policies and practices. Utrecht: Urban and Regional Research Centre Utrecht (URU).
  • Hall, S., Murie, A., Rowlands, R., & Sankey, S. (2005). Large housing estates in London and Birmingham, United Kingdom: Opinions of residents on recent developments. Utrecht: Urban and Regional Research Centre Utrecht (URU).
  • Hart, H. T., Boeije, H., & Hox, J. (2005). Onderzoeksmethoden. Amsterdam: Boom Onderwijs.
  • Inglehart, R., & Baker, W. E. (2000). Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 65, 19–51.
  • Jepperson, R. (2002). Political modernities: Disentangling two underlying dimensions of institutional differentiation, Sociological Theory, 20(1), 61–85.
  • Kang, N., & Kwak, N. (2003). A multilevel approach to civic participation: Individual length of residence, neighborhood residential stability, and their interactive effects with media use. Communication Research, 30(1), 80–106.
  • Knorr-Siedow, T., & Droste, C. (2005). Large housing estates in Berlin, Germany: Opinions of residents on recent developments. Utrecht: Urban and Regional Research Centre Utrecht (URU).
  • Lelieveldt, H. (2004). Helping citizens help themselves: Neighbourhood improvement programs and the impact of social networks, trust, and norms on neighbourhood oriented forms of participation. Urban Affairs Review, 39(5), 531–551.
  • Lipset, S. M. (1994). The social requisites of democracy revisited. Americal Sociological Review, 59, 1–22.
  • Manzi, T., & Smith-Bowers, B. (2005). Gated communities as club goods: Segregation or social cohesion. Housing Studies, 20( 2), 345–359.
  • Marschall, M. J. (2001). Does the shoe fit? Testing models of participation for African-American and Latino involvement in local politics. Urban Affairs Review, 37(2), 227–248.
  • Mayer, M. (2000). Social movement in European cities: Transitions from the 1970s to the 1990s. InCities in Contemporary Europe, A. Bagnasco and P. Le Galès (Eds.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Murie, A., Knorr-Siedow, T., & Van Kempen, R. (2003). Large housing estates in Europe: General developments and theoretical backgrounds. Utrecht: Urban and Regional Research Centre Utrecht (URU).
  • Murie, A., Tosics, I., Aalbers, M., Sendi, R., & Černič Mali, B. (2005). Privatisation and after. InR. Van Kempen, K. Dekker, S. Hall, & I. Tosics (Eds.), Restructuring large housing estates in European cities. Utrecht: Urban and Regional Research Centre Utrecht (URU).
  • Musterd, S., Priemus, H., & Van Kempen, R. (1999). Towards undivided cities: The potential of economic revitalisation and housing redifferentiation. Housing Studies, 14, 573–584.
  • Musterd, S., & Van Kempen, R. (2005). Large-scale housing estates in European cities: Opinions and prospects of inhabitants. Utrecht: Urban and Regional Research Centre Utrecht (URU).
  • Olsen, M. E. (1972). Social participation and voting turnout: A multivariate analysis. American Sociological Review, 37, 317–33.
  • Öresjö, E., Andersson, R., Holmqvist, E., Petterson, L., & Siwertsson, C. (2004). Large housing estates in Sweden: Policies and practices. Utrecht: Urban and Regional Research Centre Utrecht (URU).
  • Pareja Eastaway, M, Tapada Berteli, T., Van Boxmeer, B. & Garcia Ferrando, L. (2004). Large housing estates in Spain: Policies and practices. Utrecht: Urban and Regional Research Centre Utrecht (URU).
  • Pareja Eastaway, M., Tapada Berteli, T., Van Boxmeer, B., Garcia Ferrando, L., & Simó Solsona, M. (2005). Large housing estates in Madrid and Barcelona, Spain: Opinions of residents on recent developments. Utrecht: Urban and Regional Research Centre Utrecht (URU).
  • Peleman, K. (2002). The impact of residential segregation on participation in associations: The case of Moroccan women in Belgium. Urban Studies, 39(4), 727–747.
  • Perkins D. D., & Zimmerman, M. A. (1995). Empowerment theory, research, and applications: An introduction to a special issue. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23, 569–579.
  • Peterson, N. A., Lowe, J. B., Aquilino, M. L., & Schneider, J. E. (2005). Linking social cohesion and gender to intrapersonal and interactional empowerment: Support and new implications for theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 33(2), 233–244.
  • Pickvance, C. G. (2001). Four varieties of comparative analysis. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 16, 7–28.
  • Ploštajner, Z., Černič Mali, B., & Sendi, R. (2004). Large Housing estates in Slovenia: Policies and practices. Utrecht: Urban and Regional Research Centre Utrecht (URU).
  • Power, A. (1997). Estates on the edge: The social consequences of mass housing in Europe. London: Macmillan.
  • Prak, N. L., & Priemus, H. (1985). A model for the analysis of the decline of postwar housing. The International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 10, 1–7.
  • Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American Community. New York: Touchstone.
  • Robertson, A., & Minkler, M. (1994). New health promotion movement: A critical examination. Health Education Quarterly, 21, 295–312.
  • Ross, C. E., Mirowsky, J., & Pribesh, S. (2001). Powerlessness and the amplification of threat: Neighborhood disadvantage, disorder, and mistrust. American Sociological Review, 66(4), 568–591.
  • Sampson, R. J., & Groves, W. B. (1989). Community structure and crime: Testing social-disorganization theory. American Journal of Sociology, 94(4), 774–802.
  • Schofer, E., & Fourcade-Gourinchas, M. (2001). The structural context of civic engagement: Voluntary association membership in comparative perspective. American Sociological Review, 66(6), 806–828.
  • Schutjens, V. A. J. M., Van Kempen, R., & Van Weesep, J. (2002). The changing tenant profile of Dutch social rented housing. Urban Studies, 39(4), 643–664.
  • Skifter Andersen, H. (2003). Urban sores: On the interaction between segregation, urban decay and deprived neighborhoods. Aldershot, UK, and Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
  • Skogan, W. G. (1988). Community organizations and crime. InM. Tonry & N. Morris (Eds.), Crime and justice: A review of research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Social Exclusion Unit (1998). Neighborhood renewal. London: Cabinet Office.
  • Staeheli, L. A., & Clarke, S. E. (2003). The new politics of citizenship: Structuring participation by household, work and identity. Urban Geography, 24(2), 103–126.
  • Szemzö, H., & Tosics, I. (2004). Large housing estates in Hungary: Policies and practices. Utrecht: Urban and Regional Research Centre Utrecht.
  • Taylor, M. (1998). Combating the social exclusion of housing estates. Housing Studies, 13(6), 819–832.
  • Tosics, I., Geröházi, E., & Szemzö, H. (2005). Large housing estates in Budapest and Nyíregyháza, Hungary: Opinions of residents on recent developments. Utrecht: Urban and Regional Research Centre Utrecht (URU).
  • Turkington, R., Van Kempen, R., & Wassenberg, F. (Eds.) (2004). High-rise housing in Europe: Current trends and future prospects. Delft: Delftse Universitaire Pers.
  • Uslaner, E., & Badescu, G. (2003). Legacies and conflicts: The challenges to social capital in the democratic transition. InG. Badescu & E. Uslaner (Eds.), Social capital and the transition to democracy (pp. 219–232). London and New York: Routledge.
  • Van Beckhoven, E., Van Boxmeer, B., & Garcia Ferrando, L. (2005). Local participation in Spain and the Netherlands. InR. Van Kempen, K. Dekker, S. Hall, & I. Tosics (Eds.), Restructuring large housing estates in Europe. Bristol: The Policy Press.
  • Van Beckhoven, E., & Van Kempen, R. (2005). Large housing estates in Utrecht, the Netherlands: Opinions of residents on recent developments. Utrecht: Urban and Regional Research Centre Utrecht (URU).
  • Varady, D. P., & Walker, C. C. (2003). Housing vouchers and residential mobility. Journal of Planning Literature, 18(1), 17–30.
  • Verba, S., & Nie, N. H. (1972). Community mobilization and institutional change: The influence of the community action program in large cities. Social Science Quarterly, 32, 287–294.
  • Völker, B. (1995). Should auld acquaintance be forgot? Institutions of communism, the transition to capitalism and personal networks: The case of East Germany. Interuniversity center for social science theory and methodology. Utrecht University, PhD thesis.
  • Wacquant, L. J. D. (1996). The rise of advanced marginality: Notes on its nature and implications. Acta Sociologica, 39, 121–139.
  • Warren, M. E. (2001). Democracy and association. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Wěcławowicz, G., Guszcza, A., & Kozłowski, S. (2004). Large housing estates in Poland: Policies and practices. Utrecht: Urban and Regional Research Centre Utrecht (URU).
  • Wěcławowicz, G., Guszcza, A., Kozłowski, S., Bielewska, A., Adamiak, A., Krasowska, M., Fader, A., & Bierzyński, A. (2005). Large housing estates in Warsaw, Poland: Opinions of residents on recent developments. Utrecht: Urban and Regional Research Centre Utrecht (URU).
  • Zajczyk, F., Mugnano, S., Borlini, B., Memo, F., & Mezetti, P. (2004). Large housing estates in Italy: Policies and practices. Utrecht: Urban and Regional Research Centre Utrecht (URU).
  • Zajzcyk, F., Mugnano, S., & Palvarini, P. (2005). Large housing estates in Milan, Italy: Opinions of residents on recent developments. Utrecht: Urban and Regional Research Centre Utrecht (URU).
  • Zimmerman, M. A. (1990). Toward a theory of learned hopefulness: A structural model analysis of participation and empowerment. Journal of Research in Personality, 24, 71–86.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.