“[U]Nited and Actuated by Some Common Impulse of Passion”Footnote¹

1 Title taken, with all apologies to Mr. Madison, from the famous passage in Federalist #10 which reads: “By a faction I understand a number of citizens, whether amounting to a majority or minority of the whole, who are united and actuated by some common impulse of passion, or of interest, adverse to the rights of other citizens, or to the permanent and aggregate interests of the community.”

: Challenging the Dispersal Consensus in American Housing Policy Research

REFERENCES

• Bartik, T. (1991). Who benefits from state and local economic development policies? Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Basgal, O., & Villarreal, J. (2001). Comment on Bruce Katz and Margery Turner’s ‘Who should run the housing voucher program?’ Housing Policy Debate, 12(2), 263–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basolo, V., & Nguyen, M. T. (2005). Does mobility matter? The neighborhood conditions of housing voucher holders by race and ethnicity. Housing Policy Debate, 16(3/4), 297–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, L., & Reed, A. Jr. (1999). The new face of urban renewal: The near north redevelopment initiative and the cabrini-green neighborhood. InA. Reed, Jr. (Ed.), Without justice for all: The new liberalism and our retreat from racial equality (pp. 175–211). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, L., Smith, J. L., & Wright, P. (Eds.) (2006). Where are poor people to live Transforming public housing communities. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Berube, A. (2006). Overcoming barriers to mobility. InS. Delorenzi (Ed.), Going places: Neighbourhood, ethnicity and social mobility (pp. 1–28). London: Institute for Public Policy Research.
   Google Scholar
• Berube, A., & Katz, B. (2005). Katrina’s window: Confronting concentrated poverty across America. Special analysis in metropolitan policy. Washington, DC: The Brooking Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Bobrow, D. B., & Dryzek, J. S. (1987). Policy analysis by design. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bratt, R. (2006). Community development corporations. InR. G. Bratt (Ed.) A Right to Housing (pp. 340–359). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, X. de Souza (1997a). Moving up vs. moving out. Housing Policy Debate, 8(1), 195–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briggs, X. de Souza (1997b). Comment on Sandra J. Newman and Ann B. Schnare’s ‘And a suitable living environment’: The failure of housing programs to deliver on neighborhood quality. Housing Policy Debate, 8(4), 743–753.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, X. de Souzaet al. (2005). Moving to opportunity in the wake of hurricane Katrina. Online petition, September 15. Available at http://www.newvisioninstitute.org/MovingOpportunityScholarsPetition.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, X. de Souza (Ed.) (2005). The geography of opportunity. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, X. de Souza (2005a). Politics and policy: Changing the geography of opportunity. InX. de Souza Briggs (Ed.), The geography of opportunity (pp. 310–339). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, X. de Souza (2005b). Introduction. InX. de Souza Briggs (Ed.), The geography of opportunity (pp. 1–16). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, X. de Souza (2005c). Conclusion: Desegregating the city. InD. P. Varady (Ed.), Desegregating the city (pp. 233–257). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, G. L. (1983). Interregional migration, national policy, and social justice. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allanheld.
   Google Scholar
• Crump, J. (2002). Deconcentration by demolition: Public housing, poverty, and urban policy. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 20, 581–596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crump, J. (2003). Rejoinder. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 27(1), 193–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeFilippis, J. (2004). Unmaking goliath: Community control in the face of global capital. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• DeLuca, S., & Rosenbaum, J. E. (2003). If low-income blacks are given a chance to live in white neighborhoods, will they stay? Housing Policy Debate, 14(3), 305–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs, A. (1973). Opening up the suburbs: An urban strategy for America. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, A. (1994). New visions for metropolitan America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dreier, P. et al. (2004). Place matters: Metropolitics for the twenty-first century. 2nd ed., Revised. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• Elkin, S. L. (1982). Market and politics in liberal democracy. Ethics, 92, 720–732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, D. S.et al. (2006). Good kids from bad neighborhoods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fiss, O. (2003). What should be done for those who have been left behind? InJ. Cohen, J. Decker, and J. Rogers (Eds.), A way out: America’s ghettos and the legacy of racism (pp. 3–43). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frug, G. E. (1999). City making: Building communities without walls. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Galster, G. C. (2005). Consequences from the redistribution of urban poverty during the 1990s: A cautionary tale. Economic Development Quarterly, 19(2), 119–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galster, G., & Zobel, A. (1998). Will dispersed housing programmes reduce social problems in the U.S.? Housing Studies, 13(5), 605–622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gans, H. J. (1995). The war against the poor. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gavanta, J. (1980). Power and powerlessness. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geronimus, A. T., & Thompson, J. P. (2004). To denigrate, ignore, or disrupt: Racial inequality in health and the impact of a policy-induced breakdown of African-American communities. The Du Bois Review, 1(2), 247–279.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, K. J. (2007). The relocation of the Columbia Villa community: Views from residents. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 27, 5–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goering, J. (2003). Comments on future research and housing policy. InJ. Goering & J. D. Feins (Eds.), Choosing a better life: Evaluating the Moving to Opportunity social experiment (pp. 383–407). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goering, J., & Feins, J. D. (Eds.) (2003). Choosing a better life: Evaluating the Moving to Opportunity social experiment. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goering, J., Feins, J. D., & Richardson, T. M. (2003). What have we learned about housing mobility and poverty deconcentration? InJ. Goering, & J. D. Feins (Eds.), Choosing a better life: Evaluating the Moving to Opportunity social experiment (pp. 3–36). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goetz, E. G. (2000). The new slum clearance: Redevelopment of public housing and the deconcentration of poverty. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Urban Affairs Association, Los Angeles, CA, May 3–7, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Goetz, E. G. (2003). Clearing the way. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hartman, C. (1984). The Right to Stay Put. InC. C. Geisler & F. J. Popper (Eds.), Land reform, American style (pp. 302–318). Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allanheld.
   Google Scholar
• Herzog, D. (1989). Happy slaves: A critique of consent theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hochschild, J. (2003). Creating options. InJ. Cohen et al. (Eds.), A way out: America’s ghettos and the legacy of racism (pp. 68–73). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, M. A. (1987). Moving up and moving out: Confusing ends and means about ghetto dispersal. Urban Studies, 24, 503–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husock, H. (2003). America’s trillion dollar housing mistake: The failure of American housing policy. Chicago: Ivan R. Doe.
   Google Scholar
• Imbroscio, D. L. (2004a). Can we grant a right to place? Politics and Society, 32, 575–609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imbroscio, D. L. (2004b). Fighting poverty with mobility: A normative policy analysis. Review of Policy Research, 21(3), 447–461.
   Google Scholar
• Imbroscio, D. L. (2006). Shaming the inside game: A critique of the liberal expansionist approach to addressing urban problems. Urban Affairs Review, 42(2), 224–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imbroscio, D. L. (2008). The freedom of place: Expanding residential choice in America. Unpublished draft manuscript in preparation.
   Google Scholar
• Jargowsky, P. (2002). Review of Place matters. Urban Affairs Review, 37(3), 442–451.
   Google Scholar
• Jencks, C., & Mayer, S. (1990). The social consequences of growing up in a poor neighborhood. InL. E. Lynn & M. G. H. McGeary (Eds.), Inner-city poverty in the United States (pp. 111–186). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Judd, D. R., & Swanstrom, T. (1994). City politics: Private power and public policy. New York: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Kain, J. F., & Persky, J. (1969). Alternatives to the gilded ghetto. The Public Interest, 14 (Winter), 74–87.
   Google Scholar
• Kasarda, J. (1992). Urban employment change and minority skills mismatch. InD. Judd & P. Kantor (Eds.), Enduring Tensions in Urban Politics (pp. 616–632). New York: Macmillian.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, B., & Turner, M. (2001). Who should run the housing voucher program? Housing Policy Debate, 12(2), 239–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingsley, G. T., & Pettit, K. L. S. (2005). Comment on George C. Galster’s ‘Consequences from the redistribution of urban poverty.’ Economic Development Quarterly, 19(2), 126–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleit, R. G., & Manzo, L. C. (2006). To move or not to move: Relationships to place and relocation choices in HOPE VI. Housing Policy Debate, 17(2), 271–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kling, J. R. (2004). Moving to opportunity and tranquility. Princeton IRS Working Paper 481. October.
   Google Scholar
• Kling, J. R., et al. (2006). Experimental analysis of neighborhood effects. Econometrica, 75(1), 83–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasch, C. (1991). The true and only heaven. New York: W.W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Lemann, N. (1991). The promised land: The great black migration and how it changed America. New York: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Lemann, N. (1994). The myth of community development. New York Times Magazine, January 9. 27–31; 50; 54; 60.
   Google Scholar
• McClure, K. (2005). Comment on Victoria Basolo and Mai Thi Nguyen’s ‘Does mobility matter?’ Housing Policy Debate, 16(3/4), 347–359.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, H. (1997). Comment on Sandra J. Newman and Ann B. Schnare’s ‘And a suitable living environment’: The failure of housing programs to deliver on neighborhood quality. Housing Policy Debate, 8(4), 755–762.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, D. S., & Denton, N. A. (1993). American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Metzger, J. T. (2000). Planned abandonment: The neighborhood life-cycle theory and national urban policy. Housing Policy Debate, 11(1), 7–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, S. J., & Schnare, A. B. (1997). ‘And a suitable living environment’: The failure of housing programs to deliver on neighborhood quality. Housing Policy Debate, 8(4), 703–741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor, A. (1999). Swimming against the tide: A brief history of federal policy in poor communities. InR. F. Ferguson & W. T. Dickens (Eds.), Urban problems and community development (pp. 77–137). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Orfield, M. (1998). American metropolitics. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Orfield, M. (2002). American metropolitics. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2000). The danger of self-evident truths. PS: Political Science & Politics, 33 (1), 33–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, G. E., & Williams, K. (1995). Housing mobility: What has it accomplished and what is its promise? InA. Polikoff (Ed.), Housing mobility: Promise or illusion? (pp. 7–101). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polikoff, A. (1995). Introduction. InA. Polikoff (Ed.), Housing mobility: Promise or illusion? (pp. 1–5). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polikoff, A. (2006). Waiting for Gautreaux. Chicago: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polsby, N. W. (1980). Community power and political theory, 2nd ed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polsky, A. (1991). The rise of the therapeutic state. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Popkin, S. J.et al. (2000). The Gautreaux legacy. Housing Policy Debate, 11(4), 911–942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popkin, S. J.et al. (2004). A decade of HOPE VI: Research findings and policy challenges. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• President’s Commission for a National Agenda for the Eighties (1980). Urban America in the eighties. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, A., & Steinberg, S. (2006). “Liberal bad faith in the wake of hurricane Katrina.” The Black Commentator, 182 (May 4), 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Rockwell, L. H. (1994). The ghost of Gautreaux. The National Review, 7, 57–59.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, J. E. (1991). Black pioneers: Do their moves to the suburbs increase economic opportunity for mothers and children? Housing Policy Debate, 2, 1179–1213.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, J. E. (1995). Housing mobility strategies for changing the geography of opportunity. Housing Policy Debate, 6, 231–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, J. E., & Popkin, S. J. (1991). Employment and earning of low-income blacks who move to middle-class suburbs. InC. Jencks & P. Peterson (Eds.), The urban underclass (pp. 342–356). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, J. E., Popkin, S., Kaufman, J., & Rusin, J. (1991). Social integration of low-income black adults in middle-class white suburbs. Social Problems, 38, 448–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubinowitz, L. S., & Rosenbaum, J. E. (2000). Crossing the class and color lines. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rusk, D. (1999). Inside game/outside game: Winning strategies for saving urban America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Squires, G. D., & Kubrin, C. E. (2005). Privileged places: Race, uneven development and the geography of opportunity in urban America. Urban Studies, 42(1), 47–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, J. P. (1998). Universalism and deconcentration: Why race still matters in poverty and economic development. Politics and Society, 26(2), 181–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, J. P. (2003). Beyond Moralizing. InJ. Cohen et al. (Eds.), A way out: America’s ghettos and the legacy of racism (pp. 60–67). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, M. A. (1998). Moving out of poverty: Expanding mobility and choice through tenant-based housing assistance. Housing Policy Debate, 9(2), 373–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turney, K., et al. (2006). Neighborhood effects on barriers to employment. Princeton IRS Working Paper #511. April.
   Google Scholar
• Turnham, J., & Khadduri, J. (2001). Issues and options for HUD’s tenant-based assistance program. Report Prepared for the Millennial Housing Commission’s Consumer Based Assistance Task Force, Contract # MHC-2001-20. Bethesda, MD: Abt Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Vale, L. J. (2006). Comment on Mark Joseph’s ‘Is mixed-income development an antidote to urban poverty?’ Housing Policy Debate, 17(2), 259–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varady, D. P., & Walker, C. C. (2003). Using housing vouchers to move to the suburbs. Housing Policy Debate, 14(3), 347–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varady, D. P. (2005). Preface. In D. P. Varady (Ed.), Desegregating the City (pp. vii–xix). Albany: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wacquant, L. (1997). Three pernicious premises in the study of the American ghetto. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 20, 341–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, S. K. (1987). Toward a critical political science. InT. W. Ball (Ed.), Idioms of inquiry: Critique and renewal in political science (pp. 113–136). Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, S.L. (2003). From HOPE VI to HOPE Sick? Dollars and Sense, 248 (July/August), 32–45.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, Thad et al. (2002). Making a place for community: Local democracy in a global era. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wyly, E., & Pearce, T. (2006). He got game. Urban Affairs Review, 42(2), 258–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaterman, S.et al. (2001). Comment on Bruce Katz and Margery Turner’s ‘Who should run the housing voucher program?’ Housing Policy Debate, 12(2), 283–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar