“Good” Neighborhoods in Portland, Oregon: Focus on Both Social and Physical Environments

REFERENCES

• 1000 Friends of Oregon (1991). Managing growth to promote affordable housing: Revisiting Oregon’s goal 10. Portland, OR: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Abbott, C. (1997). The Portland region: Where city and suburbs talk to each other—and often agree. Housing Policy Debate, 8(1), 11–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Planning Association (1998). The principles of smart development (PAS report #479). Chicago: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Benfield, F. K., Raimi, M. D., & Chen, D. D. (1999). Once there were greenfields: How urban sprawl is undermining America’s environment, economy and social fabric. New York: Natural Resources Defense Council.
   Google Scholar
• Berke (2002). Does sustainable development offer a new direction for planning? Challenges for the twenty-first century. Journal of Planning Literature, 17, 21–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman, M. A. (1996). The transportation effects of neo-traditional development. Journal of Planning Literature, 10(4), 347–363.
   Google Scholar
• Berube, A., & Tiffany, T. (2005). The shape of the curve: Household income distributions in U.S. cities, 1979–99. InA. Berube, B. Katz, & R. E. Lang (Eds.), Redefining urban & suburban America: Evidence from Census 2000, volume II (pp. 195–243). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blasius, J., Friedrichs, J., & Galster, G. (2007). Introduction: Frontiers of quantifying neighbourhood effects. Housing Studies, 22(5), 627–636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks-Gunn, J., Duncan, G. J., Klebanov, P. K., & Sealand, N. (1993). Do neighborhoods influence child and adolescent development? American Journal of Sociology, 99(2), 353–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, P., & Richman, H. A. (1997). Neighborhood effects and state and local policy. InJ. Brooks-Gunn, G. J. Duncan, & J. L. Aber (Eds.), Neighborhood poverty, Vol. II: Policy implications in studying neighborhoods (pp. 164–181). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Calthorpe, P. (1993). The next American metropolis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2005). Active Community Environments. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dnpa/aces.htm, 2005 [cited November 16 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Cervero, R., & Gorham, R. (1995). Commuting in transit versus automobile neighborhoods. Journal of the American Planning Association, 61, 210–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervero, R., & Radisch, C. (1996). Travel choices in pedestrian versus automobile oriented neighborhoods. Transport Policy, 3, 127–141.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, D. A., Inagami, S., & Finch, B. (2008). The built environment and collective efficacy. Health and Place, 14(2), 198–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Congress for the New Urbanism (2000). New urban projects on a neighborhood scale in the United States. Ithaca, NY: New Urban News.
   Google Scholar
• Crane, R., & Crepeau, R. (1998). Does neighborhood design influence travel? A behavioral analysis of travel diary and GIS data. Transportation Research D, 3(4), 225–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Souza Briggs, X. (1997). Moving up versus moving out: Neighborhood effects in housing mobility programs. Housing Policy Debate, 8(1), 195–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Souza Briggs, X. (Ed.). (2005). The geography of opportunity. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dreier, P., Mollenkopf, J., & Swanstrom, T. (2004). Place matters. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• Duany, A., & Plater-Zyberk, E. (1992). The second coming of the American small town. Plan Canada, 6–13.
   Google Scholar
• ECO Northwest, D. J. Newton & Associates, & MLP Associates (1991). Urban growth management study: Case studies report. Salem, OR: Department of Land Conservation and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Ellen, I. G., Mijanovich, T., & Dillman, K. (2001). Neighborhood effects on health: Exploring the links and assessing the evidence. Journal of Urban Affairs, 23(3/4), 391–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filion, P., & Hammond, K. (2003). Neighborhood land use and performance: The evolution of neighborhood morphology over the 20th century. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 30, 271–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, B., Gordon, S., & Peers, J. (1994). Effects of neo-traditional neighborhood design on travel characteristics. Transportation Research Record, 1466, 63–70.
   Google Scholar
• Handy, S. L. (1996). Urban form and pedestrian choices: Study of Austin neighborhoods. Transportation Research Record, 1552, 135–144.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. (1984). Cities and the wealth of nations: Principles of economic life. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Jargowsky, P. A. (2005). Stunning progress, hidden problems: The dramatic decline of concentrated poverty in the 1990s, InA. Berube, B. Katz, & R. Lang (Eds.), Redefining urban and suburban America: Evidence from Census 2000, Volume Two (pp. 137–171). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jargowsky, P. A., & Yang, R. (2006). The ‘underclass’ revisited: A social problem in decline. Journal of Urban Affairs, 28(1), 55–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph, M. L., Chaskin, R. J., & Webber, H. S. (2007). The theoretical basis for addressing poverty through mixed-income development. Urban Affairs Review, 42(3), 369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearns, A. (2001). The significance of neighbourhood, Urban Studies, 38(12), 2103–2110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kostof, S. (1992). The city assembled: The elements of urban form through history. Boston: Bulfinch Press.
   Google Scholar
• Land, K. C., McCall, P. L., & Cohen, L. E. (1990). Structural covariates of homicide rates: Are there any invariances across time and social space? American Journal of Sociology, 95(4), 922–963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lecessee, M., & McCormick, K. (Eds.) (1999). Charter of the new urbanism. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S., & Leigh, N. G. (2007). Intra-metropolitan spatial differentiation and decline of inner-ring suburbs: A comparison of four U.S. metropolitan areas. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 27(2), 146–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, K. (1981). A theory of good city form. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, D. S., and Denton, N. A. (1993). American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, D. S., & Eggers, M. L. (1990). The ecology of inequality: Minorities and the concentration of poverty, 1970–1980. American Journal of Sociology, 95(5), 1153–1188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles-Doan, R. (1998). Violence between spouses and intimates: Does neighborhood context matter? Social Forces, 77(2): 623–645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• New Urbanism (2002). Creating livable neighborhoods. Retrieved from http://www.newurbanism.org.
   Google Scholar
• Orshansky, M. (1963). Children of the poor. Social Security Bulletin, 26(7), 3–13.
   Google Scholar
• Orshansky, M. (1965). Counting the poor: Another look at the poverty profile. Social Security Bulletin, 28(1), 3–29.
   Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S. W. (2003). The quantitative assessment of neighborhood social environments, InI. Kawachi & L. F. Berkman (Eds.), Neighborhoods and health (pp. 112–131). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sampson, R. J., Morenoff, J. D., & Earls, F. (1999). Beyond social capital: Spatial dynamics of collective efficacy for children. American Sociological Review, 64(5), 633–660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson, R. J., Morenoff, J. D., & Gannon-Rowley, T. (2002). Assessing ‘neighborhood effects’: Social processes and new directions in research. Annual Review of Sociology, 443–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. (1997) Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277(5328), 918–924.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skogan, W. (1986). Fear of crime and neighborhood change. Crime and Justice, 8, 203–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skogan, W. G. (1990). Disorder and decline. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smart Growth America (2007). What is Smart Growth? Available at http://www.smartgrowthamerica.org/whatissg.html, accessed December 13, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Song, Y. (2005). Smart growth and urban development pattern: A comparative study. International Regional Science Review, 28(2), 239–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, Y., & Knaap, G. J. (2004). Measuring urban form: Is Portland winning the war on sprawl? Journal of the American Planning Association, 70(2), 210–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, Y., & Knaap, G. J. (2007) Quantitative classification of neighbourhoods: The neighbourhoods of new single-family homes in the Portland metropolitan area. Journal of Urban Design, 12(1), 1357–4809.
   Google Scholar
• Southworth, M. (1997). Walkable suburbs? An evaluation of neo-traditional communities at the urban edge. Journal of the American Planning Association, 63, 28–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivasan, S. (2002). Quantifying spatial characteristics of cities. Urban Studies, 39(11), 2005–2028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steuteville, R. (Ed.) (2001). New urbanism: Comprehensive report and best practices guide. 2nd ed. Ithaca, NY: New Urban Publications.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau (2003). Poverty 1999. Census policy brief. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Wheeler, S. M. (2003). The evolution of urban form in Portland and Toronto: Implications for sustainability planning. Local Environment, 8(3), 317–336.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, W. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, W. J. (1996). When work disappears. Political Science Quarterly, 111(4), 567–595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolcock, M. (1998). Social capital and economic development: Toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theory and Society, 27, 151–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar