Friends and Neighbors: Homeownership and Social Capital among Low- to Moderate-Income Families

REFERENCES

• Aaronson, D. (2000). A note on the benefits of homeownership. Journal of Urban Economics, 47, 356–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boehm, T. P. (1981). Tenure choice and expected mobility: A synthesis. Journal of Urban Economics, 10, 375–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks-Gunn, J., Duncan, G. J., & Aber, J. L. (Eds.) (1997). Neighborhood poverty: Vol. I: Context and consequences for children. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, B., Perkins, D. D., & Brown, G. (2003). Place attachment in a revitalizing neighborhood: Individual and block levels of analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 259–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burt, R., Cook, K. C. & Lin, N. (2001). Social capital: Theory and research. New York: Aldine Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Coffe, H. (2009). Social capital and community heterogeneity. Social Indicators Research, 91, 155–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coffe, H., & Geys, B. (2006). Community heterogeneity: A burden for the creation of social capital? Social Science Quarterly, 87, 1053–1072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denton, N. A. (2001). Housing as a means of asset accumulation: A good strategy for the poor? InT. M. Shapiro & Edward N. Wolff. (Eds.), Assets for the poor: The benefits of spreading asset ownership (pp. 232–266). New York: Russell Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dietz, R. D. (2002). The estimation of neighborhood effects in the social sciences: An interdisciplinary approach. Social Science Research, 31, 539–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz, R., & Haurin, D. R. (2003). The social and private micro-level consequences of homeownership. Journal of Urban Economics, 54, 401–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, K. A., Zhao, Y., & Borman, K. (2004). Social capital and the diffusion of innovations within organizations: The case of computer technology in schools. Sociology of Education, 77, 148–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Froot, K. A. (1989). Consistent covariance matrix estimation with cross-sectional dependence and heteroskedasticity in financial data. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 24, 333–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaeser, E. L. (2001). The formation of social capital. InJ. F. Helliwell (Ed.), The contribution of human and social capital to sustained economic growth and well-being: International symposium report (pp. 381–393). Quebec: Human Resources Development Center.
   Google Scholar
• Glaeser, E. L., Laibson, D., & Sacerdote, B. (2002). An economic approach to social capital. The Economic Journal, 112, F437–F458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaeser, E. L., & Sacerdote, B. (2000). The social consequences of housing. Journal of Housing Economics, 9, 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, R., & White, M. (1997). Measuring the benefits of homeowning: Effects on children. Journal of Urban Economics, 41, 441–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haurin, D. R., Dietz, R. D., & Weinberg, B. A. (2002). The impact of neighborhood homeownership rates: A review of the theoretical and empirical literature. Retrieved from SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=303398 on August 14, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, J. V., & Ioannides, Y. M. (1989). Dynamic aspects of consumer decisions in housing markets. Journal of Urban Economics, 26, 212–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herbert, C., & Belsky, E. (2006). The homeownership experience of low-income and minority families: A review and synthesis of the literature. Research report. Washington. DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, B. A., Oropesa, R. S., & Kanan, J. W. (1994). Neighborhood context and residential mobility. Demography, 31, 249–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, N. (1999). Social networks and status attainment. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 467–487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, N., & Dumin, M. (1986). Access to occupations through social ties. Social Networks, 8, 365–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lui, M., Robles, B., Leondar-Wright, B., Brewer, R., & Adamson, R. (2006). The color of wealth: The story behind the U.S. racial wealth divide, New York: The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manturuk, K. R., Lindblad, M., & Quercia, R. (2009). Homeownership and local voting in disadvantaged urban neighborhoods. Cityscape, 11, 105–122.
   Google Scholar
• Messner, S. F., Baumer, E. P., & Rosenfeld, R. (2004). Dimensions of social capital and rates of criminal homicide. American Sociological Review, 69, 882–903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morenoff, J. D., Sampson, R. J., & Raudenbush, S. W. (2001). Neighborhood inequality, collective efficacy, and the spatial dynamics of homicide. Criminology, 39(3), 517–560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parcel, T. L., & Dufur, M. J. (2001). Capital at home and at school: Effects on child social adjustment. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 32–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearl, J. (2000). Causality: Models, reasoning, and inference. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Portes, A. (2000). The two meanings of social capital. Sociological Forum, 15, 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. (2001). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Retsinas, N. P., & Belsky, E. S. (2002). Low-income homeownership: Examining the unexamined goal. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Riley, S., & Ru, H. Y. (2009). Community advantage panel survey technical sampling report: Owners 2003–2007. University of North Carolina Center for Community Capital, Available at http://www.ccc.unc.edu/research.php, accessed August 10, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Rohe, W., & Stewart, L. (1996). Homeownership and neighborhood stability. Housing Policy Debate, 7, 37–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohe, W., Van Zandt, S., & McCarthy, G. (2000). The social benefits and costs of homeownership: A critical assessment of the research. Working Paper 00-01. Washington, DC: Research Institute for Housing America.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, P. (1996). The social benefits of homeownership: Empirical evidence from national surveys. Housing Policy Debate, 7, 1–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson, R. J., Morenoff, J. D., & Gannon-Rowley, T. (2002). Assessing “neighborhood effects”: Social processes and new directions in research. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 443–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seibert, S. E., Kraimer, M. L., & Liden, R. C. (2001). A social capital theory of career success. The Academy of Management Journal, 44, 219–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Son, J., & Lin, N. (2008). Social capital and civic action: A network-based approach. Social Science Research, 37, 330–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stack, C. (1983). All our kin: Strategies for survival in a black community. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend, N. (2002). Package deal: Marriage, work and fatherhood in men’s lives. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van De Bunt, G. (1999). Friends by choice: An actor-oriented statistical network model for friendship networks through time. Thela Thesis (Ph.D. thesis), University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Van Der Gaag, M., & Snijders, T. A. B. (2004). Proposals for the measurement of individual social capital. InH. Flap & B. Völker (Eds.), Creation and returns of social capital (pp. 199–218). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Van Der Gaag, M., & Snijders, T. A. B. (2005). The resource generator: Social capital quantification with concrete items. Social Networks, 27, 1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vella, F., & Verbeek, M. (1999). Estimating and interpreting models with endogenous treatment effects. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 17, 473–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, W. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Woldoff, R. A. (2002). The effects of local stressors on neighborhood attachment. Social Forces, 81, 87–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar