276
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Civic Engagement in Urban Neighborhoods: Does the Network of Civic Organizations Influence Participation in Neighborhood Projects?

, , &
Pages 609-632 | Published online: 30 Nov 2016

REFERENCES

  • Almond, G. A., & Verba, S. (1989 1963). The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Arrow, K. J. (2000). Observations on social capital. InP. Dasgupta & I. Serageldin (Eds.), Social capital: A multifaceted perspective (pp. 3–5). Washington, DC: World Bank.
  • Belmessous, F., Chemin, C., Chignier-Riboulon, F., Commercon, N., Triguero, M., & Zepf, M. (2004). Large housing estates in France: Policies and practice. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Urban and Regional Research Centre Utrecht (URU).
  • Berry, J. M. (2005). Nonprofits and civic engagement. Public Administration Review, 65(5), 568–578.
  • Blau, J. R., & Rabrenovic, G. (1991). Interorganizational relations of nonprofit organizations: An exploratory study. Sociological Forum, 6(2), 327–347.
  • Blau, P. M. (1992). Exchange and power in social life (3rd ed.). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
  • Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). Ucinet for Windows: Software for social network analysis. Retrieved from http://www.analytictech.com/downloaduc6.htm.
  • Bueno de Mesquita, B., & Stokman, F. N. (1994). European community decision making: Models, applications, and comparisons. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Burt, R. S. (1982). Toward a structural theory of action. New York: Academic Press.
  • Capraro, J. F. (2004). Community organising + community development = Community transformation. Journal of Urban Affairs, 26(2), 151–161.
  • Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundation of social theory. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  • Conway, B. P., & Hachen, D. S. J. (2005). Attachment, grievance, resources, and efficacy: The determinants of tenant association participation among public housing tenants. Journal of Urban Affairs, 27(1), 25–52.
  • Dekker, K. (2007). Social capital, neighbourhood attachment and participation in distressed urban areas. Housing Studies, 22(3), 359–383.
  • Dekker, K., & Lelieveldt, H. (2006). Het middenveld in de wijk. The Hague, The Netherlands: Nicis.
  • Dekker, K., & Van Kempen, R. (2004). Urban governance within the big cities policy. Cities, 21(2), 109–117.
  • Dekker, K., & Van Kempen, R. (2008). Places and participation: Comparing resident participation in Post-WWII neighborhoods in Northwest, Central and Southern Europe. Journal of Urban Affairs, 30(1), 63–86.
  • Dekker, K., & Van Kempen, R. (2009). Participation, social cohesion and the challenges in the governance process: An analysis of a post-World War II neighbourhood in the Netherlands. European Planning Studies, 17(1), 109–130.
  • Docherty, I., Goodlad, R., & Paddison, R. (2001). Civic culture, community and citizen participation in contrasting neighbourhoods. Urban Studies, 38(12), 2225–2250.
  • Dowding, K., Dunleavy, P., King, D., & Margetts, H. (1995). Rational choice and community power structures. Political Studies, 43, 265–277.
  • Droste, C., & Knorr-Siedow, T. (2004). Large housing estates in Germany: Policies and practices. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Urban and Regional Research Centre Utrecht (URU).
  • Dunleavy, P. (1991). Democracy, bureaucracy and public choice. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
  • Elander, I., & Blanc, M. (2001). Partnerships and democracy: A happy couple in urban governance? InH. T. Andersen & R. Van Kempen (Eds.), Governing European cities: Social fragmentation, social exclusion and urban governance (pp. 93–124). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
  • Foster, E. M. (1997). Instrumental variables for logistic regression: An illustration. Social Science Research, 26, 487–504.
  • Fitzpatrick, S., Hastings, A. & Kintrea, K. (2000). Youth involvement in urban regeneration: Hard lessons, future directions. Policy & Politics, 28(4), 493–509.
  • Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks: Conceptional clarification. Social Networks, 1, 215–239.
  • Fung, A., & Wright, E. O. (2001). Deepening democracy: Innovations in empowered participatory governance. Politics and Society, 29(1), 5–41.
  • Galaskiewicz, J. (1979). Exchange networks and community politics. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Gittell, M., Ortega-Mustamante, I., & Steffy, T. (2000). Social capital and social change, women’s community activism. Urban Affairs Review, 36(2), 123–147.
  • Guest, A. M., & Oropesa, R. S. (1986). Informal social ties and political activity in the metropolis. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 21(4), 550–574.
  • Hays, R. A. (2007). Community activists’ perceptions of citizenship roles in an urban community: A case study of attitudes that affect community engagement. Journal of Urban Affairs, 29(4), 401–424.
  • Hays, R. A., & Kogl, A. M. (2007). Neighborhood attachment, social capital building, and political participation: A case study of low- and moderate-income residents of Waterloo, Iowa. Journal of Urban Affairs, 29(2), 181–205.
  • Heckman, J., & Robb, R. (1986). Alternative methods for solving the problem of selection bias in evaluating the impact of treatments on outcomes. InH. Wainer (Ed.), Drawing inference from self-selected samples (pp. 63–107). New York: Springer-Verlag.
  • Hunter, A., & Staggenborg, S. (1988). Local communities and organized action. InC. Milofsky (Ed.), Community organizations: Studies in resource mobilization and exchange (pp. 243–273). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Hunter, F. (1953). Community power structure. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
  • Imrie, R., & Raco, M. (1999). How new is the new local governance? Lessons from the United Kingdom. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 24(1), 45–63.
  • Kang, N., & Kwak, N. (2003). A multilevel approach to civic participation: Individual length of residence, neighborhood residential stability, and their interactive effects with media use. Communication Research, 30(1), 80–106.
  • Knoke, D., Pappi, F. U., Broadbent, J., & Tsjujinaka, Y. (1996). Policy-making in the organizational state. InD. Knoke (Ed.), Comparing policy networks: Labor politics in the U.S., Germany, and Japan (pp. 1–76). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kriesi, H. (2007). Organizational resources. InW. Maloney & S. Roßteutscher (Eds.), Social capital and associations in European democracies: A comparative analysis (pp. 118–152). London: Routledge.
  • Laumann, E., & Knoke, D. (1987). The organizational state: Social choice in national policy domains. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.
  • Laumann, E. O., Galaskiewicz, J., & Marsden, P. V. (1978). Community structure as interorganizational linkages. Annual Review of Sociology, 4, 455–484.
  • Laumann, E. O., Marsden, P. V., & Galaskiewicz, J. (1977). Community-elite influence structures: Extension of a network approach. The American Journal of Sociology, 83(3), 594–631.
  • Laumann, E. O., & Pappi, F. U. (1976). Networks of collective action: A perspective on community influence systems. New York: Academic Press.
  • Lelieveldt, H. (2004). Helping citizens help themselves: Neighbourhood improvement programs and the impact of social networks, trust and norms on neighbourhood oriented forms of participation. Urban Affairs Review, 39(5), 531–551.
  • Lelieveldt, H., Dekker, K., Völker, B., & Torenvlied, R. (2009). Civic organizations as political actors: Mapping and predicting the involvement of civic organizations in neighborhood problem-solving and coproduction. Urban Affairs Review, 45(1), 3–24.
  • Maloney, W., Smith, G., & Stoker, G. (2000). Social capital and urban governance. Political Studies, 48(4), 802–820.
  • Maloney, W., Smith, G., & Stoker, G. (2008). Civic orientations: Does associational type matter Political Studies, 56(2), 261–287.
  • Maloney, W., Van Deth, J. W., & Roßteutscher, S. (2008). Civic orientations: Does associational type matter Political Studies, 56(2), 261–287.
  • Marschall, M. J. (2001). Does the shoe fit? Testing models of participation for African-American and Latino involvement in local politics. Urban Affairs Review, 37(2), 227–248.
  • Marsden, P. V. (1987). Core discussion networks of Americans. American Sociological Review, 51(1), 122–131.
  • McAdam, D., McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. N. (1988). Social movements. InN. Smelser (Ed.), Handbook of sociology (pp. 695–737). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Nohria, N., & Eccles, R. (1992). Networks and organizations: Structure, form and action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Oldfield, S. (2004). Urban networks, community organising and race: An analysis of racial integration in a desegregated South African neighbourhood. Geoforum, 35(2), 189–201.
  • Olson, M. (1965, 1971). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Perkins, D. D., Brown, B. B., & Taylor, R. B. (1996). The ecology of empowerment: Predicting participation in community organizations. Journal of Social Issues, 52(1), 85–110.
  • Peterson, N. A., Lowe, J. B., Aquilino, M. L., & Schneider, J. E. (2005). Linking social cohesion and gender to intrapersonal and interactional empowerment: Support and new implications for theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 33(2), 233–244.
  • Sampson, R. J., McAdam, D., MacIndoe, H., & Weffer-Elizondo, S. (2005). Civil society reconsidered: The durable nature and community structure of collective civic action. American Journal of Sociology, 111(3), 673–714.
  • Shirlow, P., & Murtagh, B. (2004). Capacity-building, representation and intracommunity conflict. Urban Studies, 41(1), 57–71.
  • Smith, G., Maloney, W., & Stoker, G. (2004). Building social capital in city politics: Scope and limitations at the inter-organizational level. Political Studies, 52, 508–530.
  • Stokman, F. (1994). Besluitvormingsmodellen Binnen Beleidsnetwerken. InL. Huberts & J. Kleinnijenhuis (Eds.), Methoden Van Invloedsanalyse (pp. 165–187). Meppel, The Netherlands: Boom.
  • Swindell, D. (2002). Issue representation in neighborhood organizations: Questing for democracy at the grassroots. Journal of Urban Affairs, 22(2), 123–137.
  • Verba, S., & Nie, N. H. (1972). Community mobilization and institutional change: The influence of the community action program in large cities. Social Science Quarterly, 32, 287–294.
  • Vidal, A. C., & Keating, W. D. (2004). Community development: Current issues and emerging challenges. Journal of Urban Affairs, 26(2), 125–137.
  • Völker, B., Flap, H., & Lindenberg, S. (2007). When are neighbourhoods communities? Community in Dutch neighbourhoods. European Sociological Review, 23(1), 99–114.
  • Wandersman, A., & Florin, P. (1990). Citizen participation, voluntary community organizations and development: Insights for empowerment through research. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18, 41–54.
  • Warren, M. E. (2001). Democracy and association. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Zimmerman, M. A. (1990). Toward a theory of learned hopefulness: A structural model analysis of participation and empowerment. Journal of Research in Personality, 24, 71–86.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.