The External Neighborhood Effects of Low-Income Housing Tax Credit Projects Built by Three Sectors

REFERENCES

• Basolo, V., & Scally, C. (2008). State innovations in affordable housing policy: Lessons from California and New Jersey. Housing Policy Debate, 19(4), 741–774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bratt, R. (2008). Nonprofit and for-profit developers of subsidized rental housing: Comparative attributes and collaborative opportunities. Housing Policy Debate, 19(2), 323–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briggs, X., Darden, J., & Aidala, A. (1999). In the wake of desegregation: Early impacts of scattered-site public housing on neighborhoods in Yonkers, New York. Journal of the American Planning Association, 65(1), 27–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabrera, O. J. (2007). Tax incentives for low-income housing. Hearing before the Committee on Ways and Means. http://www.disasterhousing.gov/offices/cir/test052407a.cfm. Accessed May 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Cervero, R., & Duncan, M. (2004). Neighborhood composition and residential land prices: Does exclusion raise or lower values Urban Studies, 41(2), 299–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, K. (2000). The challenge of affordable housing in 21st Century California: Constraints and opportunities in the nonprofit housing sector. Berkeley: Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California, Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• City of San Jose Department of Planning, Building, and Code Enforcement(2007). Transit-oriented development: Projects approved or built since 1990. http://www.sanjoseca.gov/planning/smartgrowth/tod_house.asp.
   Google Scholar
• Cummings, J. L., & DiPasquale, D. (1999). The low-income housing tax credit: An analysis of the first ten years. Housing Policy Debate, 10 (2), 251–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, L. (2005). The cost-effectiveness of the low-income housing tax credit relative to vouchers: Evidence from six metropolitan areas. Housing Policy Debate, 16 (3/4), 469–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, L. (2007). Comparing the effects of housing vouchers and low-income housing tax credits on neighborhood integration and school quality. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 27, 20–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, C., Simons, R., & Baku, E. (2000). The effect of residential investment on nearby property values: Evidence from Cleveland, Ohio. Journal of Real Estate Research 19 (1/2), 23–48.
   Google Scholar
• Ellen, I., & Voicu, I. (2006). Nonprofit housing and neighborhood spillovers. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 25(1), 31–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, L., & Botein, H. (2002). Subsidized housing and neighborhood impacts: A theoretical discussion and review of the evidence. Journal of Planning Literature, 16, 359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, L. (2006). Comment on Kirk McClure’s “The low-income housing tax credit program goes mainstream and moves to the suburbs. Housing Policy Debate, 17(3), 447–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galster, G., Tatian, P., & Accordino, J. (2006). Target investments for neighborhood revitalization. Journal of the American Planning Association, 72(4), 457–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galster, G., Tatian, P., Santiago, A., Pettit, K., & Smith, R. (2003). Why not in my backyard? Neighborhood impacts of deconcentrating assisted housing. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research.
   Google Scholar
• Galster, G., Tatian, P., & Smith, R. (1999). The impact of neighbors who use section 8 certificates on property value. Housing Policy Debate, 10(4), 879–917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galster, G. (2004). The effects of affordable housing and multifamily housing on market values of nearby homes. InGrowth management and affordable housing: Do they conflict?Anthony Downs (ed.), pp. 176–211. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goetz, E., Lam, H. K., & Heitlinger, A. (1996). There goes the neighborhood? The impacts of subsidized multi-family housing on urban neighborhoods. Minneapolis, MN: Center for Urban and Regional Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Green, R. K., Malpezzi, S., & Seah, K. (2002). Low income housing tax credit housing developments and property values. Working paper, The Center for Urban Land Economics Research, The University of Wisconsin, Madison.
   Google Scholar
• Gustafson, J., & Walker, C. (2002). Analysis of state qualified allocation plans for the low-income housing tax credit program. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
   Google Scholar
• Halvorsen, R., & Palmquist, R. (1980). The interpretation of dummy variables in semilogarithmic equations. American Economic Review 70, 474–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Housing Authority of the County of Santa Clara(2009). Real estate development activities. http://www.hacsc.org/a_activities.php.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, J., & Bednarz, B. (2002). Neighborhood effects of the low income housing tax credit program. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, B. (2004). Neighborhoods of choice and connection: The evolution of American neighborhood policy and what it means for the United Kingdom. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Kleit, R. G., & Page, S. (2008). Public housing authorities under devolution. Journal of the American Planning Association, 74 (1), 34–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koschinsky, J. (2009). Spatial heterogeneity in spillover effects of assisted and unassisted rental housing. Journal of Urban Affairs, 31(3), 319–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C., Culhane, D., & Wachter, S. (1999). The differential impacts of federally assisted housing programs on nearby property values: A Philadelphia case study. Housing Policy Debate, 10(1), 75–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClure, K. (2006). The low-income housing tax credit program goes mainstream and moves to the suburbs. Housing Policy Debate, 17 (3), 419–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nonprofit Housing Association of Northern California(2002). San Francisco Bay area housing crisis report card. http://www.greenbelt.org/downloads/resources/report_hsgreportcrd.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Quercia, R., & Galster, G. (1997). The challenges facing public housing authorities in a brave new world. Housing Policy Debate 8(3), 535–569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohe, W., & Freeman, L. (2001). Assisted housing and residential segregation: The role of race and ethnicity in the siting of assisted housing developments. Journal of the American Planning Association, 67(3), 279–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenau, P., & Linder, S. (2003). Two decades of research comparing for-profit and nonprofit health provider performance in the United States. Social Science Quarterly, 84 (2), 219–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, S. (2007). Old homes, externalities, and poor neighborhoods: A model of urban decline and renewal. Journal of Urban Economics, 63(3), 816–840.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santiago, A., Galster, G., & Tatian, P. (2001). Assessing the property value impacts of the dispersed housing subsidy program in Denver. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 20(1), 65–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schill, M. H., Ellen, I. G., Schwartz, A. E., & Voicu, I. (2002). Revitalizing inner-city neighborhoods: New York City’s ten-year plan. Housing Policy Debate, 13(3), 529–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, A. E., Ellen, I.G., Voicu, I., & Schill, M. H. (2006). The external effects of place-based subsidized housing. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 36, 679–707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons, R.A., Quercia, R.G., & Maric, I. (1998). The value impact of new residential construction and neighborhood disinvestment on residential sales price. Journal of Real Estate Research, 15(1/2), 147–161.
   Google Scholar
• Simonson, S. (2003). San Jose sticking with transit-oriented development. Silicon Valley /San Jose Business Journal. August 8. http://sanjose.bizjournals.com/sanjose/stories/2003/08/11/story3.html.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. A., & Handelman, E. (2008). How should states best use their 2009 affordability resources Recap Update 72. Dec 23. 2008. http://www.casfas.com/docs/Recap_Update_72_Using_2009_Resources_plus_MHP_paper.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Stegman, M. (1991). The excessive costs of creative finance: Growing inefficiencies in the production of low-income housing. Housing Policy Debate, 2(2), 357–373.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (2009a). About the LIHTC database. <http://www.huduser.org/datasets/lihtc.html>
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (2009b). HUD National Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) database: Projects placed in service through 2006. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates Inc.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (2009c). Income limits. Office of Policy Development and Research. http://www.huduser.org/portal/datasets/il.html.
   Google Scholar
• Varady, D. (2006). Comment on Kirk McClure’s “The low-income housing tax credit program goes mainstream and moves to the suburbs. Housing Policy Debate, 17(3), 461–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, C. (1993). Nonprofit housing development: Status, trends, and prospects. Housing Policy Debate 4(3), 369–414.
   Google Scholar
• Zielenbach, S. (2003). Catalyzing community development: HOPE VI and neighborhood revitalization. Journal of Affordable Housing and Community Development Law, 13(2), 40–80.
   Google Scholar