Social Interaction in Mixed-Income Developments: Relational Expectations and Emerging Reality

References

• Anderson, E. (1990). Streetwise. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arthurson, K. (2002). Creating inclusive communities through balancing social mix: A critical relationship or tenuous link Urban Policy and Research, 20(3), 245–261.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, R., & Kintrea, K. (2000). Owner-occupation, social mix, and neighbourhood impacts. Policy and Politics, 28(1), 93–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• August, M. (2008). Social mix and Canadian public housing redevelopment: Experiences in Toronto. Canadian Journal of Urban Research, 17(1), 82–100.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, N., Haworth, A., Manzi, T., Paranagamage, P., & Roberts, M. (2006). Creating and sustaining mixed income communities. Coventry, UK: Chartered Institute of Housing/Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Berube, A. (2005). Mixed communities in England: A U.S. perspective on evidence and policy prospects. York, UK: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Bowly, D. (1978). The poorhouse: Subsidized housing in Chicago, 1895–1976. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, X. (1998). Brown kids in white suburbs: Housing mobility and the many faces of social capital. Housing Policy Debate, 9(1), 177–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brophy, P., & Smith, R. (1997). Mixed-income housing: Factors for success. Cityscape: A Journal of Policy and Development Research, 3(2), 3–31.
   Google Scholar
• Buron, L., Popkin, S., Levy, D., Harris, L., & Khadduri, J. (2002). The HOPE VI resident tracking study: A snapshot of the current living situation of original residents from eight sites. A report prepared by Abt Associates, Inc. and the Urban Institute for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Chaskin, R. J., & Joseph, M. L. (2010a). Building “community” in mixed-income developments: Assumptions, approaches and early experiences. Urban Affairs Review, 45(3), 299–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaskin, R. J., & Joseph, M. L. (2010b, March). Social norms and social control: Uses and expectations of space and place in mixed-income public housing developments. Paper presented at the Urban Affairs Association meeting, Honolulu, Hawaii.
   Google Scholar
• Chicago Housing Authority (2008). FY2008 moving to work annual plan: Plan for transformation year 9. Chicago: Chicago Housing Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Chicago Housing Authority (2009). The plan for transformation overview: Goals and progress of the plan. The plan for transformation at 10: The symposium. Chicago: Chicago Housing Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Chicago Housing Authority (2010). FY 2009 moving to work annual report: Plan for transformation year 10. Chicago: Chicago Housing Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Cisneros, H. G., & Engdahl, L. (2009). From despair to hope: Hope VI and the new promise of public housing in America’s Cities. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(Summer), 95–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cove, E., Turner, M. A., Briggs, X., & Duarte, C. (2008). Can escaping from poor neighborhoods increase employment and earnings? Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Daly, M., & Silver, H. (2008). Social exclusion and social capital: A comparison and critique. Theory and Society, 37(6), 537–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLuca, S. (2005). The continuing relevance of the Gautreaux program for housing mobility: Recent evidence. InP. Tegeler, M. Cunningham, & M. A. Turner (Eds.), Keeping the promise: Preserving and enhancing housing mobility in the section 8 housing choice voucher program (pp. 25–42). Washington, DC: Poverty & Race Research Action Council.
   Google Scholar
• Drake, S., & Cayton, H. R. (1945). Black metropolis: A study of negro life in a northern city. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duneier, M. (1992). Slim’s table: Race, respectability, and masculinity. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, J. R. (1999). Social isolation and labor market insulation: Network and neighborhood effects on less-educated urban workers. The Sociological Quarterly, 40(2), 199–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, J. C., & Kick, E. L. (2007). The role of public, private, non-profit and community sectors in shaping mixed-income housing outcomes in the US. Urban Studies, 44(12), 2357–2377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, L. (2006). There goes the ’hood: Views of gentrification from the ground up. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freudenburg, W. R. (1986). The density of acquaintanceship: An overlooked variable in community research American Journal of Sociology, 92(1), 27–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furstenberg, F. (1993). How families manage risk and opportunity in dangerous neighborhoods. InW. J. Wilson (Ed.), Sociology and the public agenda (pp. 231–258). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Gittell, R., & Vidal, A. (1998). Community organizing: Building social capital as a development strategy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Goering, J., & Feins, J. (2003). Choosing a better life? Evaluating the Moving to Opportunity social experiment. Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goetz, E. G. (2003). Housing dispersal programs. Journal of Planning Literature, 18(1), 3–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. The American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graves, E. M. (2010). The structuring of urban life in a mixed-income housing “community.” City and Community, 9(1), 109–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan, J. (1996). Scattered-site housing: Characteristics and consequences. Seattle, Washington: Prepared for The United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Hyra, D. (2008). The new urban renewal: The economic transformation of Harlem and Bronzeville. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Imbroscio, D. (2008). [U]nited and actuated by some common impulse of passion. Journal of Urban Affairs, 30(2), 111–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph, M. L. (2008). Early resident experiences at a new mixed-income development in Chicago. Journal of Urban Affairs, 30(3), 229–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph, M. L. (2010). Creating mixed-income developments in Chicago: Developer and service provider perspectives. Housing Policy Debate, 20(1), 91–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph, M. L., & Chaskin, R. J. (2010). Life in a mixed-income development: Resident perceptions at two developments in Chicago. Urban Studies, 47(11), 2347–2366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph, M. L., Chaskin, R. J., & Webber, H. S. (2007). The theoretical basis for addressing poverty through mixed-income development. Urban Affairs Review, 42(1), 369–409.
   Google Scholar
• Kasarda, J. D. (1990). City jobs and residents on a collision course: The urban underclass dilemma. Economic Development Quarterly, 4(4), 313–319.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, M. B. (1993). The underclass debate. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kleit, R. G. (2001). The role of neighborhood social networks in scattered-site public housing residents’ search for jobs. Housing Policy Debate, 12(3), 541–573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleit, R. G. (2002). Job search networks and strategies in scattered-site public housing. Housing Studies, 17(1), 83–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleit, R. G. (2005). HOPE VI new communities: Neighborhood relationships in mixed-income housing. Environment and Planning A, 37(8), 1413–1441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kling, J., Liebman, J., Katz, L., & Sanbonmatsu, L. (2004). Moving to opportunity and tranquillity: Neighborhood effects on adult economic self-sufficiency and health from a randomized housing voucher experiment. Working Paper #481, Industrial Relations Section, Princeton University.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, O. (1966). La vida: A Puerto Rican family in the culture of poverty. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, N., & Dumin, M. (1986). Access to occupations through social ties. Social Networks, 8, 365–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, N., Vaughn, J. C., & Ensel, W. M. (1981). Social resources and occupational attainment. Social Forces, 59(4), 1164–1181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendenhall, R. (2004, October). Pathways to economic independence: Qualitative results from the Gautreaux residential mobility program. Paper presented at the Association of Public Policy Analysis and Management Conference, Atlanta, GA.
   Google Scholar
• Metropolitan Planning Council (2005). CHA plan for transformation July 2005 update. Chicago: Metropolitan Planning Council.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, C. (1984). Losing ground: American social policy 1950–1980. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Musterd S., & Andersson, R. (2005). Housing mix, social mix and social opportunities. Urban Affairs Review, 40, 761–790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, K. S. (1999). No shame in my game: The working poor and the inner city. New York: Knopf & Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Pattillo, M. (2008). Black on the block: The politics of race and class in the city. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pattillo, M. (2009). Investing in poor and black neighborhoods “as is”. InM. A. Turner, S. J. Popkin, & L. Rawlings (Eds.), Public housing transformation: Confronting the legacy of segregation (pp. 47–68). Washington DC: Urban Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polikoff, A. (2006). Waiting for Gautreaux: A story of segregation, housing and the black ghetto. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Popkin, S. J. (2007). Testimony before the U.S. Senate Subcommittee on Housing, Transportation, and Community Development, and the U.S. House Subcommittee on Housing and Community Opportunity. http://www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/901088_HOPE_VI.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Popkin, S. J., Harris, L. E., & Cunningham, M. K. (2002). Families in transition: A qualitative analysis of the MTO experience. Final report to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Office of Policy Development and Research. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Popkin, S. J., Katz, B., Cunningham, M., Brown, K. D., Gustafson, J., & Turner, M. (2004). A decade of Hope VI: Research findings and policy challenges. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute and The Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Rankin, B. H., & Quane, J. M. (2002). Social contexts and urban adolescent outcomes: The interrelated effects of neighborhoods, families, and peers on African-American youth. Social Problems, 49(1), 79–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, J. E., Stroh, L. K., & Flynn, C. (1998). Lake Parc Place: A study of mixed-income housing. Housing Policy Debate, 9(4), 703–740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubinowitz, L. S., & Rosenbaum, J. E. (2000). Crossing the class and color lines: From public housing to white suburbia. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ruming, K. J., Mee, K. J., & McGuirk, P. M. (2004). Questioning the rhetoric of social mix: Courteous community or hidden hostility Australian Geographical Studies, 42(2), 234–248.
   Google Scholar
• Sampson, R. J. (1999). What “community” supplies. InR. F. Ferguson & W. T. Dickens (Eds.), Urban problems and community development (pp. 241–292). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sampson, R. J., & Groves, B. W. (1989). Community structure and crime: Testing social disorganization theory. The American Journal of Sociology, 94(4), 774–802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson, R. J., Morenoff, J. D., & Earls, F. 1999. Beyond social capital: Spatial dynamics of collective efficacy for children. American Sociological Review, 64, 633–660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson, R. J., Morenoff, J., & Gannon-Rowley, T. (2002). Assessing neighborhood effects: Social processes and new directions in research. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 443–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277, 918–924.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sard, B., & Staub, L. (2008). House bill makes significant improvements in “HOPE VI” Public housing revitalization program: Provisions to overcome employment barriers need strengthening. Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
   Google Scholar
• Small, M. L., & Newman, K. (2001). Urban poverty after The Truly Disadvantaged: The rediscovery of the family, the neighborhood, and culture. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 23–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. J., & Stovall, D. (2008). “Coming home” to new homes and new schools: Critical race theory and the new politics of containment. Journal of Education Policy, 23(2), 135–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stack, C. B. (1974). All our kin: Strategies for survival in a black community. New York: Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Stoloff, J. A., Glanville, J. L., & Bienenstock, E. J. (1999). Women’s participation in the labor force: The role of social networks. Social Networks, 21, 91–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suttles, G. D. (1972). The social construction of communities. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tach, L. (2009). More than bricks and mortar: Neighborhood frames, social processes, and the mixed-income redevelopment of a public housing project. City and Community, 8(3), 273–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talen, E. (2002). The social goals of New Urbanism. Housing Policy Debate, 13(1), 165–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentine, C. A. (1968). Culture and poverty: Critique and counter proposals. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Varady, D., & Walker, C. (2003). Housing vouchers and residential mobility. Journal of Planning Literature, 18(1), 17–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellman, B. (1979). The community question: The intimate networks of East New Yorkers. American Journal of Sociology, 85(5), 1201–1231.
   Google Scholar
• Wilen, W. P. (2006). The Horner model: Successfully redeveloping public housing. Northwestern Journal of Law and Social Policy, 1(1), 62–95.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, W. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar