Who Benefits from Nonprofit Economic Development? Examining the Revenue Distribution of Tax-Exempt Development Organizations among U.S. Cities

REFERENCES

• Bartik, T. J. (1991). Who benefits from state and local economic development policies? Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Bauroth, N. (2008). Explanations for the proliferation of economic development corporations across North Dakota and South Dakota. Online Journal of Rural Research and Poverty, 3(5), 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Bauroth, N. (2009). Quietly, a new institution arises: The proliferation of non-profit economic development corporations across six midwestern states. Paper presented at the meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Bratt, R. G., & Rohe, W. M. (2007). Challenges and dilemmas facing community development corporations in the United States. Community Development Journal. 42(1), 63–78.
   Google Scholar
• Brody, E. (2007). The states’ growing use of a quid-pro-quo rationale for the charity property tax exemption. The Exempt Organization Review, 56(3), 269–288.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, N. (1994). The formation of American local government. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chiu, L. President’s deficit plan seeks to limit charity write-offs by the wealthy. Chronicle of Philanthropy. Available at http://philanthropy.com/article/President-s-Deficit-Plan/127116/, accessed May 17, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Clotfelter, C. (1992). Who benefits from the nonprofit sector? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, R. (2011). IRS stretched too thin—How will this affect nonprofits? The Nonprofit Quarterly, January 13, 2011. Available at http://www.nonrofitquarterly.org.
   Google Scholar
• Eisinger, P. (2000). The politics of bread and circuses: Building the city for the visitor class. Urban Affairs Review, 35(3), 316–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisinger, P. K. (1988). The rise of the entrepreneurial state: State and local economic development policy in the United States. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, R. F., & Dickens, W. T. (1999). Urban problems and community development. Harrisonburg, VA: R. R. Donnelly and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Grobman, G. M. (2007). An introduction to the nonprofit sector: A practical approach to the twenty-first century (2nd Ed.). Harrisburg, PA: Whitehat Communications.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, L. C. (2009). Statistics with Stata: Updated for version 10. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hoyt, C. (2001). Tax-exempt organizations, InJ. S. Ott (Ed.), The Nature of the nonprofit sector. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Internal Revenue Service Databook (2010). Available at http://www.irs.gov/taxstats/charitablestats/index.html, accessed September 21, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Kenyon, D. A., & Langley, A. (2010). Payments in lieu of taxes: Balancing municipal and nonprofit interests. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Krumholz, N. (1999). Equitable approaches to local economic development, Policy Studies Journal, 27(1), 83–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, M. V. (1987). Downtown redevelopment as an urban growth strategy: A critical appraisal of the Baltimore renaissance. Journal of Urban Affairs, 9(2), 103–123.
   Google Scholar
• Logan, J. R., & Molotch, H. (1988). Urban fortunes: The political economy of place. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D., England, R., & Pelissero, J. (2007). Managing urban america (6th Ed.). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mount, J. (2001). Why donors give. InJ. S. Ott (Ed.), The nature of the nonprofit sector (pp. 331–337). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Charitable Statistics (2010). Washington, DC: The Urban Institute. Available at http://www.nccsdataweb.urban.org/tablewiz/tw_bmf.php, accessed August 2, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Odendahl, T. (1989). The culture of elite philanthropy in the Reagan years. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 18, 237–248.
   Google Scholar
• Ott, J. S. (2001). The nature of the nonprofit sector. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reese, L. A. (1998). Sharing the benefits of economic development: What cities use Type II policies. Urban Affairs Review, 33(5), 686–711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reese, L. A. (2000). Should the government regulate prophets? Methodological problems with research on faith-based economic development. Economic Development Quarterly, 14(4), 376–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reese, L. A., & Shields, G. (2000). Faith based economic development. Review of Policy Research, 17(2), 84–103.
   Google Scholar
• Rosentraub, M., Swindell, D., Przybylski, M., & Mullins, D. R. (1994). Sport and downtown development strategy: If you build it will jobs come? Journal of Urban Affairs, 16(3), 221–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, H. (2000). Renewing hope within neighborhoods of despair: The community based development model. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salamon, L. M. (1995). Partners in public service: Government-nonprofit relations in the modern welfare state. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press..
   Google Scholar
• Salamon, L. M., & Sokolowski, S. W. (2005). Nonprofit organizations: New insights from QCEW data. Monthly Labor Review, 128, 19–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sbragia, A. M. (1996). Debt wish: Entrepreneurial cities, U.S. federalism, and economic development. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Squires, G. D. (1989). Unequal partnerships. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swanstrom, T., & Koschinsky, J. (2000). InR. C. Hula and C. Jackson-Elmoore (Eds.) Nonprofits in urban America. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
   Google Scholar
• Swindell, D., & Rosentraub, M. (1998). Who benefits from the presence of professional sports teams? The implications for public funding of stadiums and arenas. Public Administration Review, 58(1), 11–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teaford, J. (2000). Urban renewal and its aftermath. Housing Policy Debate, 11(2), 443–465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidal, A. C. (1992). Rebuilding communities: A national study of urban community development corporations. New York: New School for Social Research..
   Google Scholar
• Vidal, A. C. (2002). Housing and community development, InL. M. Salamon (Ed.), The state of nonprofit America, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, in collaboration with the Aspen Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Wolman, H., Ford, C. III, & Hill, E. (1994). Evaluating the success of urban success stories. Urban Studies, 31(6), 835–850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, N. (2010). Revitalizing American cities: Do community development corporations matter? Working paper, RGK Center for Philanthropy and Community Service, The University of Texas, Austin.
   Google Scholar