Shoestring Democracy: Gated Condominiums and Market-Rate Cooperatives in New York

REFERENCES

• Bagaeen, S., & Uduku, O. (2010). Gated communities: Social sustainability in contemporary and historical gated developments. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, S. E., & Silverman, C. J. (1994). Common interest communities: Private governments and the public interest. Berkeley, CA: Institute of Governmental Studies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, M. P. (1988). The moral order of a suburb. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blakely, E. J., & Snyder, M. G. (1997). Fortress America: Gated communities in the United States. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Bobo, L., Kluegel, J. R., & Smith, R. A. (1996). Laissez faire racism: The crystallization of a “kinder, gentler” anti-black ideology. InS. A. Tuch & J. K. Martin (Eds.), Racial attitudes in the l990s: Continuity and change (pp. 15–42). Westport, CT, Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Conover, M. (1959). The Rochdale principles in American co-operative associations. The Western Political Quarterly, 12(1), 111–122.
   Google Scholar
• DeFilippis, J. (2003). Unmaking Goliath: Community control in the face of global capital. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenstadt, P. (2010). Rochdale village. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fine, M. (2004). Witnessing whiteness/gathering intelligence. InM. Fine, L. Weis, L. Powell Pruitt, & A. Burns (Eds.), Off white: Readings on power, privilege, and resistance (pp. 245–56). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, J. (2002). Working class New York. New York: New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, L. (2000). The cooperative century: A historical view of residential coops. The Cooperator: Coop & Condo Monthly. Available at http://cooperator.com/articles/540/1/The-Cooperative-Century/Page1.html. Accessed April 16, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, D. C. (2011). Condominium and the city: The rise of property in Vancouver. Law & Social Inquiry, 36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayden, D. (2003). Building suburbia. New York: Pantheon.
   Google Scholar
• International Cooperative Alliance (ICA) (2006). Statement on the cooperative identity. Available at http://www.ica.coop/coop/principles.html. Accessed April 16, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Judd D. (1995). The rise of new walled cities. InH. Ligget & D. C. Perry (Eds.), Spatial practices. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Latt, P., & Haughney, C. (2011, February 1). Dakota co-op board is accused of bias. The New York Times. Available athttp://www.nytinmes.com/2011/02/02nyregion. Accessed February 3, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Leavitt, J., & Saegert, S. (1990). From abandonment to hope. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Low, S. M. (2001). The edge and the center. American Anthropologist, 103(1), 45–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Low, S. M. (2003).Behind the gates: Life, security, and the pursuit of happiness in fortress America. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Low, S. M. (2007). Towards a theory of urban fragmentation: A cross-cultural analysis of fear, privatization and the state. Cybergeo, 349(May). Available at http://cybergeo.revues.org/3207. Accessed May 2, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Low, S. M. (2008). Incorporation and gated communities in the greater metro Los Angeles region as a model of privatization of residential communities. Home Cultures 5(1), 85–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Low, S. M. (2009). Maintaining whiteness: The fear of others and niceness. Transforming Anthropology, 17(2), 79–92.
   Google Scholar
• Manalansan, M., IV (2005). Race, violence, and neoliberal spatial politics in the global city. Social Text, 23(4), 141–155.
   Google Scholar
• McKenzie, E. (1994). Privatopia: Homeowner associations and the rise of residential private government. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McKenzie, E. (1998). Homeowner associations and California politics. Urban Affairs Review, 34, 52–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenzie, E. (2003). Common-interest housing in the communities of tomorrow. Housing Policy Debate, 14, 203–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pow, C.-P. (2007). Securing the “civilised” enclaves: Gated communities and the moral geographies of exclusion in (post-)socialist Shanghai. Urban Studies 44(8), 1539–1558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pruitt, L. P. (2004). The achievement (k)not: Whiteness and “black underachievement”. InM. Fine, L. Weis, L. P. Pruitt, & A. Burns (Eds.), Off white: Readings on power, privilege, and resistance (pp. 235–244). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, G., & Grant, J. (2010). Reproducing difference: Gated communities in Canada and Israel. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 35(4), 778–793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen, G., & Razin, E. (2008). Enclosed residential neighborhoods in Israel: From landscapes of heritage and frontier enclaves to new gated communities. Environment and Planning A, 40, 2895–2913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saegert, S., Fields, D., & Libman, K. (2009). Deflating the dream: Radical risk and the neoliberalization of homeownership. Journal of Urban Affairs, 31(3), 297–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez, T. R., & Lang, E. (2002). Security versus status: The two worlds of gated communities. Census Note, 2, 2.
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez, T., Lang, R. E., & Dhavale, D. M. (2005). Security versus status? A first look at the census gated community data. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 24(3), 281–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sazama, G. (1996). A brief history of affordable housing co-operatives in the United States. Working paper, University of Connecticut.
   Google Scholar
• Schill, M. H., Voicu, I., & Miller, J. (2004). The condominium v. co-operative puzzle: An empirical analysis of housing in New York City. Law & Economics Research Paper Series, New York University.
   Google Scholar
• Sennett, R. (2001, February). New capitalism, new isolation: A flexible city of strangers. Le Monde diplomatique, 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Siegler, R., & Levy, H. J. (1986). Brief history of co-operative housing. Co-operative Housing Journal of the National Association of Housing Co-operatives, 12–20.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (USHUD) (2005). American housing survey for the United States: 2005, current housing reports. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Walks, R. A. (2010). Electoral behaviour behind the gates: Partisanship and political participation among Canadian gated community residents. Area, 42(1), 7–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar