The europeanization of regional development: local strategies and european spatial visions in northern finland

References

• Albrechts, L. (2004): ‘Strategic (spatial) planning reexamined’, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design31 (5): 743–758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L.,Healey, P. and Kunzmann, K. R. (2003): ‘Strategic spatial planning and regional governance in Europe’, Journal of the American Planning Association69 (2): 113–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BMVBS (2007): ‘Territorial Agenda of the European Union: towards a more competitive and sustainable Europe of diverse regions. Agreed at the occasion of the Informal Ministerial Meeting on Urban Development and Territorial Cohesion in Leipzig on 24/25 May 2007. Federal Ministry of Transport, Building and Urban Development, Berlin .
   Google Scholar
• Böhme, K. (2002): Nordic Echoes of European Spatial Planning: Discursive Integration in Practice. Nordregio Report 2002:8, Nordregio, Stockholm .
   Google Scholar
• Böhme, K. and Schön, P. (2006): ‘From Leipzig to Leipzig: territorial research delivers evidence for the new Territorial Agenda of the European Union’, disP – The Planning Review165: 61–70.
   Google Scholar
• Bunnell, T. (2002): ‘Multimedia Utopia? A geographical critique of high‐tech development in Malaysia's Multimedia Super Corridor’, Antipode34 (2): 265–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cairncross, F. (1997): The Death of Distance: How the Communications Revolution Will Change Our Lives. Harvard Business School Press, Boston , MA .
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (1996): The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, vol. 1: The Rise of the Network Society. Blackwell, Cambridge , MA .
   Google Scholar
• CEC (1994): Europe 2000+: Cooperation for European Territorial Development. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg .
   Google Scholar
• CEC (1999): European Spatial Development Perspective: Towards Balanced and Sustainable Development of the Territory of the European Union. Agreed at the Informal Council of Ministers Responsible for Spatial Planning in Potsdam, May 1999. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg .
   Google Scholar
• CEC (2002): eEurope 2005: An Information Society For All. An Action Plan to be Presented in View of the Sevilla European Council 21/22 June 2002. COM(2002) 263 final, Commission of the European Communities, Brussels , 28 May.
   Google Scholar
• CEC (2004): A New Partnership for Cohesion: Convergence, Competitiveness, Cooperation. Third Report on Economic and Social Cohesion. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg .
   Google Scholar
• CEC (2008): Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the Committee of the Regions and the European Economic and Social Committee. Green Paper on Territorial Cohesion: Turning Territorial Diversity into Strength. COM(2008) 616 final, Commission of the European Communities, Brussels , 6 October.
   Google Scholar
• CITY of OULU (2002): ‘Oulu 2006 Kasvusopimus’ [Oulu 2006 growth agreement]. Oulun kaupunki, Oulu .
   Google Scholar
• Clark, J. and Jones, A. (2008): ‘The spatialities of Europeanisation: territory, government and power in “EUrope”’, Transactions of the Institute of British GeographersNS 33 (3): 300–318.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, J. R. A. and Jones, A. R. (2009): ‘Europeanisation and its discontents’, Space and Polity13 (3): 193–212.
   Google Scholar
• COUNCIL of NORTHERN OSTROBOTHNIA (1998): Pohjois‐Pohjanmaan kehittämisohjelma 1997 [Regional development programme 1997]. Julkaisu A: 19, Pohjois‐Pohjanmaan liitto, Oulu .
   Google Scholar
• COUNCIL of NORTHERN OSTROBOTHNIA (2004a): Pohjois‐Pohjanmaa – alueiden ja yhteistyön maakunta. Pohjois‐Pohjanmaan maakuntasuunnitelma 2020 [Regional development plan 2020]. Julkaisu A: 33, Pohjois‐Pohjanmaan liitto, Oulu .
   Google Scholar
• COUNCIL of NORTHERN OSTROBOTHNIA (2004b): Pohjois‐Pohjanmaa – lupa menestyä ja tilaa kasvaa. Pohjois‐Pohjanmaan maakuntaohjelma 2004–2006 [Regional strategic programme 2004–2006]. Julkaisu A: 35, Pohjois‐Pohjanmaan liitto, Oulu .
   Google Scholar
• Cox, K. R. (1998): ‘Spaces of dependence, spaces of engagement and the politics of scale, or: looking for local politics’, Political Geography17 (1): 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, K. R. and Mair, A. (1991): ‘From localised social structures to localities as agents’, Environment and Planning A23 (2): 197–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S. (2006): ‘Evidence‐based planning: rhetoric and reality’, disP – The Planning Review165: 14–24.
   Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S. (2009): ‘Asymmetric development in spatial planning: positivist content and post‐modernist processes?’, In Davoudi, S. and Strange, I., (eds): Conceptions of Space and Place in Strategic Spatial Planning. Routledge, London , pp.207–243.
   Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S. and Strange, I., (eds) (2009): Conceptions of Space and Place in Strategic Spatial Planning. Routledge, London .
   Google Scholar
• EC (2000): European Council – Presidency Conclusions (Lisbon, 23 and 24 March 2000). No. 100/1/00, Councils of the European Union, Brussels , 8 June.
   Google Scholar
• Eser, T. W. and Konstadakopulos, D. (2000): ‘Power shifts in the European Union? The case of spatial planning’, European Planning Studies8 (6): 783–798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eskelinen, H.,Lapintie, K. and Kokkonen, M. (2000): ‘The Nordic legacy and the European connection: the emergence of integrated spatial planning in Finland’, Built Environment26 (1): 41–51.
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (2009): ‘A turning point in the development of European spatial planning? The “Territorial Agenda of the European Union” and the “First Action Programme”’, Progress in Planning71 (1): 1–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (2010): Cohesion, Coherence, Cooperation: European Spatial Planning Coming of Age?Routledge, London .
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. and Waterhout, B. (2002): The Making of the European Spatial Development Perspective: No Masterplan. Routledge, London .
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S. (1998): ‘The end of geography or the explosion of place? Conceptualizing space, place and information technology’, Progress in Human Geography22 (2): 165–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2004): ‘The treatment of space and place in the new strategic spatial planning in Europe’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research28 (1): 45–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2009): ‘In search of the “strategic” in spatial strategy making’, Planning Theory and Practice10 (4): 439–457.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P.,Khakee, A.,Motte, A. and Needham, B., (eds) (1997): Making Strategic Spatial Plans: Innovation in Europe. UCL Press, London .
   Google Scholar
• Jauhiainen, J. S. and Suorsa, K. (2008): ‘Triple helix in the periphery: the case of Multipolis in northern Finland’, Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society1 (2): 285–301.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, O. B. and Richardson, T. (2004): Making European Space: Mobility, Power and Territorial Identity. Routledge, London .
   Google Scholar
• Jones, A. and Clark, J. (2010): The Spatialities of Europeanization: Power, Governance and Territory in Europe. Routledge, New York .
   Google Scholar
• Kettunen, P. and Kungla, T. (2005): ‘Europeanization of sub‐national governance in unitary states: Estonia and Finland’, Regional and Federal Studies15 (3): 353–378.
   Google Scholar
• Kitson, M.,Martin, R. and Tyler, P. (2004): ‘Regional competitiveness: an elusive yet key concept?’, Regional Studies38 (9): 991–999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, R. V. (1995): ‘Knowledge‐based development: policy and planning implications for cities’, Urban Studies32 (2): 225–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KOILLIS‐SUOMEN ALUEKESKUS (2006): Koillis‐Suomen elinkeinostrategia 2005–2010 [The business strategy of Koillis‐Suomi 2005–2010]. Naturpolis, Kuusamo .
   Google Scholar
• Lawton smith, H.,Tracey, P. and Clark, G. L. (2003): ‘European policy and the regions: a review and analysis of tensions’, European Planning Studies11 (7): 859–873.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehmkuhl, D. (2008): ‘Some promises and pitfalls of Europeanization research’, In Graziano, P. and Vink, M. P., (eds): Europeanization: New Research Agendas. Palgrave Macmillan, London , pp.337–357.
   Google Scholar
• Luukkonen, J. (2010): ‘Territorial cohesion policy in the light of peripherality’, Town Planning Review81 (4): 445–466.
   Google Scholar
• Macleod, G. (1999): ‘Place, politics and “scale dependence”: exploring the structuration of Euro‐regionalism’, European Urban and Regional Studies6 (3): 231–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macleod, G. and Goodwin, M. (1999): ‘Reconstructing an urban and regional political economy: on the state, politics, scale, and explanation’, Political Geography18 (6): 697–730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madanipour, A.,Hull, A. and Healey, P., (eds) (2001): The Governance of Place: Space and Planning Processes. Ashgate, Aldershot .
   Google Scholar
• MINISTRY of TRADE and INDUSTRY (2001): ‘Käsikirja 2001’ [Handbook 2001, unpublished handbook for the Centres for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment]. Kauppa‐ ja teollisuusministeriö, Helsinki .
   Google Scholar
• Moisio, S. (2011): ‘Geographies of Europeanization: the EU's spatial planning as a politics of scale’, In Bialasiewicz, L., (ed.): Europe in the World: EU Geopolitics and the Transformation of European Space. Ashgate, Aldershot , pp.19–40.
   Google Scholar
• Moisio, S. (forthcoming): ‘Spatial pathways to success: communicating networks and proximities through state space in Finland’, In Christmann, G. B., (ed.): Towards a Communicative Construction of Spaces. Routledge, London .
   Google Scholar
• Moore, A. (2008): ‘Rethinking scale as a geographical category: from analysis to practice’, Progress in Human Geography32 (2): 203–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NIVALA‐HAAPAJÄRVEN SEUTUKUNTA (2002): ‘Kehittämisohjelma vuodelle 2003’, hyväksytty seutukuntahallituksessa 26.11.2002 ja seutukuntavaltuustossa 26.11.2002 [Development programme 2003, accepted by the Board of Nivala‐Haapajärvi Sub‐region 26 November 2002 and by the Council of Nivala‐Happajärvi Sub‐region 26 November 2002].
   Google Scholar
• Ohmae, K. (1994): The Borderless World: Power and Strategy in the Interlinked Economy. Collins, London .
   Google Scholar
• OULUNKAAREN SEUTUKUNTA (1999): ‘Kehittämisohjelma 2000–2006’, luonnos 1.11.1999 [Development programme 2000–2006, Oulunkaari Sub‐region, draft 1 November 1999].
   Google Scholar
• Paasi, A. (2004): ‘Place and region: looking through the prism of scale’, Progress in Human Geography28 (4): 536–546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paasi, A. (2009): ‘The resurgence of the “region” and “regional identity”: theoretical perspectives and empirical observations on regional dynamics in Europe’, Review of International Studies35 (S1): 121–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peet, R. (1998): Modern Geographical Thought. Blackwell, Oxford .
   Google Scholar
• RAAHEN SEUTUKUNTA (2000): ‘Kehittämisohjelma 2000–2006’, hyväksytty aluevaltuustossa 22.6.2000 [Development programme 2000–2006, accepted by the Council of Raahe Sub‐region 22 June 2000].
   Google Scholar
• RAAHEN SEUTUKUNTA (2001): ‘Aluekeskusohjelma 2001–2006. Raahen seutukunta kohti aluekeskusta’, hyväksytty aluevaltuustossa 9.4.2001 [Regional centre programme 2001–2006, accepted by the Council of Raahe Sub‐region 9 April 2001].
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, T. and Jensen, O. B. (2000): ‘Discourses of mobility and polycentric development: a contested view of European spatial planning’, European Planning Studies8 (4): 503–520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M. P. (1998): ‘Looking for the global spaces in local politics’, Political Geography17 (1): 35–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sotarauta, M. (2010): ‘Näkymä“innovaatio‐Suomen” aluekehityksen tulevaisuuteen’, In Mella, I., (ed.): Trendejä ja visioita 2010‐luvun aluekehityksestä. Työ‐ ja elinkeinoministeriön julkaisuja, Alueiden kehittäminen 18/2010, Työ‐ ja elinkeinoministeriö, Helsinki , pp.120–133.
   Google Scholar
• Sotarauta, M. and Kostiainen, J. (2008): ‘Kaupunkien kehitys verkostoyhteiskunnassa – onko yleissivistys nokkelan kaupungin perusta?’, In Tiihonen, P. and Kuusi, O., (eds): Metropolit, Aasia ja yleissivistys. Esiselvityksiä ja matkakertomuksia. Eduskunnan tulevaisuusvaliokunnan julkaisu 3/2008, Tulevaisuusvaliokunta Eduskunta, Helsinki , pp.75–128.
   Google Scholar
• STATISTICS FINLAND (2002): Toimialaluokitus TOL 2002. Tilastokeskus, Helsinki .
   Google Scholar
• STATISTICS FINLAND (2010a): Statistics Finland's PX‐Web databases, Tilastokeskus, Helsinki [on‐line database]. URLhttp://pxweb2.stat.fi/database/StatFin/databasetree_en.asp [accessed 24 November 2010].
   Google Scholar
• STATISTICS FINLAND (2010b): ‘Science, technology and information society’, Tilastokeskus, Helsinki [on‐line database]. URLhttp://www.stat.fi/til/ttt_en.html [accessed 24 November 2010].
   Google Scholar
• Sturm, R. and Dieringer, J. (2005): ‘The Europeanization of regions in Eastern and Western Europe: theoretical perspectives’, Regional and Federal Studies15 (3): 279–294.
   Google Scholar
• SUOMEN SÄÄDÖSKOKOELMA (1997): Laki yritystuen yleisistä ehdoista [Act on the general conditions for the provision of industrial subsidies], 786/1997. Edita, Helsinki , pp.2871–2873.
   Google Scholar
• SUOMEN SÄÄDÖSKOKOELMA (2000): Laki yritystoiminnan tukemisesta [Aid to business act], 1068/2000. Edita, Helsinki , pp.2793–2800.
   Google Scholar
• Waterhout, B. (2007): ‘Territorial cohesion: the underlying discourses’, In Faludi, A., (ed.): Territorial Cohesion and the European Model of Society. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge , MA , pp.37–59.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R. H. (1996): European Union Spatial Policy and Planning. Paul Chapman, London .
   Google Scholar
• YLIVIESKAN SEUTUKUNTA (1999): ‘Kehittämisohjelma 2000–2006’, hyväksytty Ylivieskan seutukuntavaltuustossa 10.12.1999 [Development programme 2000–2006, accepted by the Council of Ylivieska Sub‐region 10 December 1999].
   Google Scholar