5
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Weber and Interpretive Sociology in America

&
Pages 149-163 | Published online: 12 Dec 2016

  • Alexander, Jeffrey C. 1978. “Formal and Substantive Voluntarism in the Work of Talcott Parsons”. American Sociological Review 4:177–198.
  • Alexander, Jeffrey C. 1987. Twenty Lectures: Sociological Theory Since World War II. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Becker, Howard. 1933. “The Field and Problems of Historical Sociology.” Pp. 18–34 in The Fields and Methods of Sociology, edited by L.L. Bernard. New York: Ray Long and Richard Smith.
  • Becker, Howard. 1934. “Cultural Case Study and Ideal-Typical Methods”. Social Forces 31:224–245.
  • Becker, Howard, and Harry Elmer Barnes. 1952. Social Thought from Lore to Science. Vol. 3 New York: Dover Publications.
  • Bendix, Reinhard. 1984. “What Max Weber Means to Me?” Pp. 13–24 in Max Weber's Political Sociology, edited by Ronald Glassman and Vatro Murvar. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
  • Besnard, Philippe. 1986. “The Americanization of Anomie at Harvard.” Pp. 41–53 in Knowledge and Society, edited by Henrika Kuklick and Elizabeth Long. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Blumer, Herbert. 1969. Symbolic Interactionism. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Blumer, Herbert. 1976. Comments on Turner's “Parsons as a Symbolic Interactionist”. Sociological Inquiry 44:59–62.
  • Bourricaud, Francois. 1981. The Sociology of Talcott Parsons. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Bulmer, Martin. 1984. The Chicago School of Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Cohen, Jere, Lawrence Hazelrigg, and Whitney Pope. 1975. “De-Parsonizing Weber: A Critique of Parsons' Interpretation of Weber's Sociology”. American Sociological Review 40:229–241.
  • Coser, Lewis. 1971. Masters of Sociological Thought. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
  • Coser, Lewis. 1976. “Sociological Theory from the Chicago Dominance to 1965”. Annual Review of Sociology 2:145–160.
  • Coser, Lewis. 1988. A Handful of Thistles: Collected Papers in Moral Conviction. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
  • Dibble, Vernon. 1975. The Legacy of Albion Small. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Fine, Gary. 1988. “Macrointeractionism: Beyond the Macro-Micro Linkage.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Sociological Society, Chicago.
  • Fine, Gary. Unpublished. “Symbolic Interactionism in the Post-Blumerian Age.
  • Fitzhenry, Roy. 1986. “Parsons, Schutz, and the Problem of Verstehen.” Pp. 143–178 in Talcott Parsons on Economy and Society, by Robert J. Holton and Bryan S. Turner. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  • Forsyth, P.T. 1910. “Calvinism and Capitalism”. Contemporary Review 97:728–741; 98: 74—87.
  • Gerth, Hans. 1982. “The Reception of Max Weber's Work in American Sociology.” Pp. 208–217 in Politics, Character, and Culture: Perspectives from Hans Gerth, edited by Joseph Bensman et al. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
  • Giddens, Anthony. 1976. “Functionalism: Après la Lutte”. Social Research 43:325–366.
  • Gorman, Robert A. 1977. The Dual Vision. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  • Gouldner, Alvin. 1970. The Coming Crisis of Western Sociology. New York: Avon.
  • Graber, Edith. 1975. “Interpretive Sociology is Not Part of Psychology”. Sociological Inquiry 45:67–70.
  • Grathoff, Richard, ed. 1978. The Theory of Social Action: The Correspondence of Alfred Schutz and Talcott Parsons. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
  • Hamilton, Peter. 1983. Talcott Parsons. London: Tavistock.
  • Hammesley, Martyn. 1989. The Dilemma of Qualitative Method: Herbert Blumer and the Chicago Tradition. London: Routledge.
  • Hinkle, Roscoe. 1980. Founding Theory of American Sociology: 1881–1915. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  • Homans, George. 1984. Coming to My Senses. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
  • Honigsheim, Paul. 1968. On Max Weber. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press.
  • Hughes, H. Stuart. 1975. The Sea Change: The Migration of Social Thought, 1930–1965. New York: Harper & Row.
  • Janowitz, Morris, ed. 1966. W.I. Thomas on Social Organization and Social Personality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Käsler, Dirk. 1988. Max Weber: An Introduction to Ilis Life and Work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Kivisto, Peter. 1987. “Sociology as a Vocation: A Weberian Analysis of the Origins and Subsequent Development of American Sociology”. British Journal of Sociology 38:112–120.
  • Lal, Barbara Ballis. 1987. “Black and Blue in Chicago: Robert E. Park's Perspective on Race Relations in Urban America, 1914—44”. British Journal of Sociology 38:546–563.
  • Lassman, Peter, and Irving Velody. 1989. Max Weber's “Science as a Vocation.” Winchester, MA: Unwin Hyman.
  • Lengermann, Patricia Madoo. 1988. “Robert E. Park and the Theoretical Content of Chicago Sociology: 1920–1940.” Sociological Inquiry 58:361—377.
  • Levine, Donald N. 1985. The Flight from Ambiguity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Liebersohn, Harry. 1988. Fate and Utopia in German Sociology, 1870–1923. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Löwith, Karl. 1932. “Max Weber und Karl Marx”. Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft 67: 53–99, 175—214.
  • Lyman, Stanford M. 1972. The Black American in Sociological Thought. New York: Capricorn Books.
  • Lyman, Stanford M. 1984. “Interactionism and the Study of Race Relations at the Macro-Sociological Level: The Contribution of Herbert Blumer”. Symbolic Interactionism 7(1): 107–120.
  • Lyman, Stanford M. 1987. “Symbolic Interactionism and Macro-Sociology: A Review Essay.” Unpublished.
  • Martindale, Don. 1960. The Nature and Types of Sociological Theory. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
  • Matthews, Fred. 1977. Quest for an American Sociology: Robert E. Park and the Chicago School. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.
  • Mommsen, Wolfgang. 1987. Interview with William H. Swatos, Jr., September 6.
  • Mommsen, Wolfgang. 1989. The Political and Social Theory of Max Weber. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Mullins, Nicholas. 1973. Theories and Theory Groups in Contemporary American Sociology. New York: Harper & Row.
  • Munch, Peter. 1975. “‘Sense’ and ‘Intention’ in Max Weber's Theory of Action. Sociological Inquiry 45:59–65.
  • Münch, Richard. 1987. Theory of Action. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  • Oakes, Guy. 1988. Weber and Rickert: Concept Formation in the Cultural Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Page, Charles. 1982. Fifty Years in the Sociological Enterprise. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.
  • Park, Robert E. 1921. “Sociology and the Social Sciences”. American Journal of Sociology 26:401–424.
  • Park, Robert E. 1950. Race and Culture. New York: The Free Press.
  • Parsons, Talcott. 1937. The Structure of Social Action. Vols. 1 and 2. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Parsons, Talcott. 1976. Comments on Turner's “Parsons as a Symbolic Interactionist”. Sociological Inquiry 44:57–59.
  • Parsons, Talcott. 1980. “The Circumstances of My Encounter with Max Weber.” Pp. 31–43 in Sociological Traditions from Generation to Generation, edited by Robert K. Merton. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  • Platt, Jennifer. 1985. “Weber's Verstehen and the History of Qualitative Research: The Missing Link. British Journal of Sociology 36:448–466.
  • Pope, Whitney, Jere Cohen, and Lawrence Hazelrigg. 1975. “On the Divergence of Weber and Durkheim: A Critique of Parsons' Convergence Thesis”. American Sociological Review 40:417–427.
  • Rauschenbush, Winifred. 1979. Robert E. Park. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Rochberg-Halton, Eugene. 1986. Meaning and Modernity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Rutkoff, Peter M., and William B. Scott. 1986. New School: A History of the New School for Social Research. New York: The Free Press.
  • Scott, John Finlay. 1963. “The Changing Foundations of the Parsonian Action Scheme”. American Sociological Review 28:716–735.
  • Seidman, Steven. 1983. Liberalism and the Origins of European Social Theory. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  • Sica, Alan. 1988. Weber, Irrationality, and Social Order. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  • Smith, Dennis. 1988. The Chicago School: A Liberal Critique of Capitalism. New York: St. Martin's Press.
  • Swatos, William H., Jr. 1984. Faith of the Fathers: Science, Religion, and Reform in the Development of Early American Sociology. Bristol, IN: Wyndham Hall.
  • Thomas, W.I. 1929. “The Behavior Pattern and the Situation.” Pp. 1–15 in Personality and the Social Group, edited by Ernest W. Burgess. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Thomas, W.I. 1951. Social Behavior and Personality. New York: Social Science Research Council.
  • Thomas, W.I., and Florian Znaniecki. 1918/1920. The Polish Peasant in Europe and America. 5 vols. Boston: Richard G. Badger.
  • Tiryakian, Edward. 1966. “A Problem for the Sociology of Knowledge: The Mutual Unawareness of Emile Durkheim and Max Weber”. Archives Européennes de Sociologie 7:330–336.
  • Turner, Jonathan. 1988. A Theory of Social Interaction. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Vidich, Arthur J., and Stanford M. Lyman. 1985. American Sociology: Worldly Rejections of Religion and Their Directions. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Wagner, Helmut R. 1983. Alfred Schutz: An Intellectual Biography. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Weber, Marianne. 1975. Max Weber: A Biography. Translated and edited by Harry Zohn. New York: Wiley.
  • Wiley, Norbert. 1985. “The Current Interregnum in American Sociology”. Social Research 52:179–207.
  • Wiley, Norbert. 1986. “Early American Sociology and The Polish Peasant”. Sociological Theory 4:20–40.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.