2
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Critical Biography Without Subjects and Objects: An Encounter With Dr. Lillian Moller Gilbreth

Pages 621-643 | Published online: 12 Dec 2016

  • Abir-Am, Pnina G. and Dorinda Outram, eds. 1987. Uneasy Careers and Intimate Lives. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
  • Ashmore, Malcolm. 1989. The Reflexive Thesis: Wrighting Sociology of Scientific Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Balsamo, Anne. 1988. “Reading Cyborgs Writing Feminism”. Communication 10: 331–344.
  • Banta, Martha. 1993. Taylored Lives. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Baritz, Loren. 1960. The Servants of Power. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Barnes, Barry. 1974. Scientific Knowledge and Sociological Theory. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  • Barnes, Barry. 1977. Interests and the Growth of Knowledge. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  • Baudrillard, Jean. 19721988. “For a Critique of the Political Economy of the Sign.” Pp. 57–97 in Jean Baudrillard: Selected Writings, edited by Mark Poster. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Braverman, Harry. 1974. Labor and Monopoly Capital. New York: Monthly Review Press.
  • Bullough, Vern. 1985. “Merchandising the Sanitary Napkin: Lillian Gilbreth's 1927 Survey”. Signs, 10(3): 615–627.
  • Burchell, Graham, C. Gordon, and P. Miller, eds. 1991. The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Burks, Barbara and Frances Burks. 1925. “Motherhood Plus a Career: A Western Woman Proves She Can Excel in Both”. Sunset Magazine (February): 49–50. Gilbreth Collection, NF c.8, f. 0030–38.
  • Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender Trouble. New York: Routledge.
  • California Monthly. 1944. “Lillian Moller Gilbreth: A Profile.” June: 20–21+.
  • Callon, Michel and John Law. 1982. “On Interests and their Transformation: Enrolment”. Social Studies of Science 12: 615–625.
  • Callon, Michel and John Law. 1989. “On the Construction of Scociotechnical Networks: Content and Context Revisited.” Pp. 57–83 in Knowledge and Society: Studies in the Sociology of Science Past and Present, edited by L. Hargens, B. Jones and A. Pickering. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
  • Christian, Barbara. 1987. “The Race for Theory”. Cultural Critique, 6(Spring): 51–63.
  • Clifford, James and George Marcus, eds. 1986. Writing Culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Clough, Patricia. 1992a. The End(s) of Ethnography. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Clough, Patricia. 1992b. “A Response to Farberman's Distingushed Lecture: A Closer Encounter with Postmodernism”. Symbolic Interaction, 15(3): 359–366.
  • Clough, Patricia. 1993. “On the Brink of Deconstructing Sociology: Critical Reading of Dorothy Smith's Standpoint Epistemology”. The Sociological Quarterly, 34(1): 169–182.
  • Collins, Patricia Hill. 1986. “Learning from the Outsider Within: The Sociological Significance of Black Feminist Thought”. Social Problems, 33(6): S14–S32.
  • Collins, Randall. 1975. Conflict Sociology. New York: Academic Press.
  • Coser, Rose. 1991. In Defense of Modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Dartmouth College Conference Proceedings. 1911. Gilbreth Collection, NF c. 134, f. 0830-23.
  • Denzin, Norman. 1989. Interpretive Biography. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Denzin, Norman. 1992. Symbolic Inteactionism and Cultural Studies. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
  • Donzelot, Jacques. 1991. “Pleasure in Work.” Pp. 251–280 in The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, edited by G. Burchell, C. Gordon and P. Miller. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Ellis, Carolyn and Michael Falherty, eds. 1992. Investigating Subjectivity: Research on Lived Experience. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Fine, Gary Alan. 1993. “The Sad Demise, Mysterious Disappearance, and Glorious Triumph of Symbolic Interactionism”. Annual Review of Sociology 19: 61–87.
  • Foucault, Michel. 1977. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage Books.
  • Foucault, Michel. 1979. “On Governmentality”. I & C 6: 5–22.
  • Foucault, Michel. 1980. Power/Knowledge, edited by Colin Gordon. New York: Pantheon.
  • Forecast. 1926. “Scientific Management Liberates the Housewife,” (November) Gilbreth Collection, NF c. 8, f.0030–40.
  • Fujimura, Joan. 1991. “On Methods, Ontologies, and Representation in the Sociology of Science: Where do We Stand?” Pp. 207–248 in Social Organiziation and Social Process, edited by David Maines. New York: Aldine DeGruyter.
  • Gilbert, G. Nigel and Michael Mulkay. 1984. Opening Pandora's Box: An Analysis of Scientists' Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge Open University Press.
  • Gilbreth, Frank Jr. and Ernestine Gilbreth Carey. 1948. Cheaper by the Dozen. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.
  • Gilbreth, Frank Jr. and Ernestine Gilbreth Carey. 1950. Belles on Their Toes. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.
  • Gilbreth, Lillian M. 1918. Letter to Frank B. Gilbreth, January 17. Gilbreth Collection, NF c. 113 f. 0813-11.
  • Gilbreth, Lillian M. 1928. Living With Our Children. New York: W. W. Norton.
  • Gilbreth, Lillian M. 1941. “As I Remember.” Unpublished autobiography. Gilbreth Collection, RF.
  • Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.
  • Graham, Laurel. 1992. “Archival Research in Intertextual Analysis: Four Representations of the Life of Dr. Lillian Moller Gilbreth.” Pp. 31–52 in Investigation Subjectivity: Research on Lived Experience, edited by Carolyn Ellis and Michael Flaherty. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Hacking, Ian. 1986. “Making Up People.” Pp. 222–236 in Reconstructing Individualism, edited by T.C. Heller, M. Sosna and D.E. Wellbery. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Haraway, Donna. 1985. “A Manifesto for Cyborgs: Cyborgs: Science, Technology, and Socialist Feminism in the 1980's”. Socialist Review, 80(March-April): 65–108.
  • Haraway, Donna. 1991. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women. New York: Routledge.
  • Harding, Sandra. 1986. The Science Question in Feminism. Ithaca, New York: Cornell Univeristy Press.
  • Harding, Sandra. 1991. Whose Science; Whose Knowledge: Thinking from Women's Lives. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
  • Harding, Sandra. forthcoming. “Is Science Multicultural? Challenges, Resources, Opportunities, Uncertainties”. Mulitculturalism: A Reader, edited by David Theo Goldberg. London: Blackwell.
  • Hartsock, Nancy, ed. 1984. Money, Sex, and Power: Toward a Feminist Historical Materialism. New York: Longman.
  • Hartsock, Nancy, ed. 1990. “Foucault on Power.” In Feminism/Postmodernism, edited by Linda J. Nicholson. New York: Routledge.
  • Hooks, Bell. 1984. Feminist Theory from Margin to Center. Boston: South End Press.
  • Hughes, Everett. 1970. The Sociological Eye. Chicago: Aldine.
  • James, William. 18901950. The Principles of Psychology, Vol. 1. New York: Dover.
  • Keller, Evelyn Fox. 1983. A Feeling for the Organism: The Life and Work of Barbara McClintock. New York: Freeman.
  • LaFollette, Marcel. 1988. “Eyes on the Stars: Images of Women Scientists in Popular Magazines”. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 13(3–4): 262–275.
  • Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Law, John. 1991. “Introduction: Monsters, Machines and Sociotechnical Relation.” Pp. 1–23 in A Sociology of Monsters, edited by John Law. New York: Routledge.
  • Lifton, Robert J. 1993. The Protean Self: Human Resilience in an Age of Fragmentation. New York: Basic Books.
  • London Evening Standard. 1926. “Business Mother of Elven: Plenty of Time to Spend with her Children: How it is Done,” July 28. Gilbreth Collection, NF c. 8, f. 0030–39.
  • Lorde, Audre. 1984. Sister Outsider. Trumansburg, New York: Crossing Press.
  • Lyotard, Jean-Francois. 19791984. The Postmodern Condition. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  • MacKinnon, Catherine. 1982. “Feminism, Marxism, Method, and the State: An Agenda for Theory”. Signs, 7(Spring): 515–543.
  • Mascia-Lees, Frances E., Patricia Sharpe and Colleen Ballerino Cohen. 1989. “The Postmodernist Turn in Anthropology: Cautions from a Feminist Perspective”. Signs, 15(1): 7–33.
  • Mead, George Herbert. 19341962. Mind, Self, and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Merton, Robert. 1972. “Insiders and Outsiders: A Chapter in the Sociology of Knowledge”. American Journal of Sociology 78: 9–47.
  • Mills, C. Wright. 1940. “Situated Actions and Vocabularies Motive”. American Sociological Review 5: 904–913.
  • Mills, C. Wright. 1959. The Sociological Imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Milne, J. R. 1925. “Hub Man's Widow Business Genius—With 11 Children”. Boston Sunday Post, February 22. Gilbreth Collection, NF c. 8, f. 0030–38.
  • Mitchell, Joni. 1977. “Don Juan's Reckless Daughter”. Don Juan's Reckless Daughter (record album). Los Angeles, CA: Crazy Crow Music BMI.
  • Noble, David. 1977. America by Design. New York: Alfred Knopf.
  • Peak, Mayme Ober. 1923. “She Conquers Fatigue—Woman's Greatest Enemy”. Beautiful Womanhood, February. Gilbreth Collection, NF c. 136, f. 0830–50[1].
  • Pickering, Andrew, ed. 1992. Science as Practice and Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Pickering, Andrew, ed. 1993. “The Mangle of Practice: Agency and Emergence in the Sociology of Science”. American Journal of Sociology, 99(3): 559–589.
  • Reynolds, Nancy. 1972. “Dr. Lillian Moller Gilbreth, 1878–1972”. Industrial Engineering (February): 28–33.
  • Richardson, Laurel. 1992. “The Consequences of Poetic Representation: Writing the Other, Rewriting the Self.” Pp. 125–137 in Investigating Subjectivity: Research on Lived Experience, edited by Carolyn Ellis and Michael Flaherty. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Richardson, Laurel. 1993. “Poetics, Dramatics, and Transgressive Validity: The Case of the Skipped Line”. The Sociological Quarterly, 34(4): 695–710.
  • Richardson, Laurel. 1994. “Writing: A Method of Inquiry.” Pp. 516–529 in Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by Norman K. Denzin and Yvonna S. Lincoln. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Rose, Nikolas. 1990. Governing the Soul: The Shaping of the Private Self. New York: Routledge.
  • Sawicki, Jana. 1991. “Feminism and the Power of Foucaldian Discourse.” Pp. 161–178 in After Foucault: Humanistic Knowledge, Postmodern Challenges, edited by Jonathan Arac. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
  • Scott, Joan W. 1988. “Deconstructing Equality-Versus-Difference: Or, the Uses of Poststructuralist Theory for Feminism”. Feminist Studies, 14(1): 33–50.
  • Smith, Dorothy. 1993. “High Noon in Textland: A Critique of Clough”. The Sociological Quarterly, 34(1): 183–192.
  • Smith, Sidonie. 1993. “Who's Talking/Who's Talking Back? The Subject of Personal Narrative”. Signs, 18(2): 392–407.
  • Spender, Dale. 1982. Women of Ideas and What Men Have Done to Them. London: Pandora.
  • Star, Leigh. 1991. “Power, Technology and the Phenomenology of Conventions: On Being Allegic to Onions.” Pp. 27–57 in A Sociology of Monsters?: Power, Technology and the Modern World, edited by John Law. Sociological Review Monograph 38. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  • Strauss, Anselm. 1959. Mirrors and Masks. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
  • Strauss, Anselm. 1993. Continual Permutations of Action. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
  • Trescott, Martha Moore. 1983. “Lillian Moller Gilbreth and the Founding of Modern Industrial Engineering.” Pp. 23–37 in Machina Ex Dea, edited by Joan Rothschild. New York: Pergamon Press.
  • Trescott, Martha Moore. 1984. “Women Engineers in History: Profiles in Holism and Persistence.” Pp. 181–204 in Women in Scientific and Engineering Professions, edited by Violet B. Haas and Carolyn Perrucci. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
  • Woolgar, Steve. 1981. “Interests and Explanations in the Social Study of Science”. Social Studies of Science 11: 365–394.
  • Yost, Edna. 1949. Partners for Life: Frank and Lillian Gilbreth's Transformation of Scientific Management, 1885–1940. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.