Status Characteristics Among Older Individuals: The Diminished Significance of Gender

REFERENCES

• Berger, Joseph, Robert Z. Norman, James W. Balkwell, and Roy F. Smith. 1992. “Status Inconsistency in Task Situations: A Test of Four Status Processing Principles.” American Sociological Review 57: 843–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boehm, Christopher. 1999. Hierarchy in the Forest. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Donald E. 1991. Human Universals. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Buss, David. 1999. Evolutionary Psychology: The New Science of the Mind. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Buss, David M., Todd K. Shackelford, Lee A. Kirkpatrick, Jae C. Choe, Mariko Hasegawa, Toshikazu Hasegawa, and Kevin Bennett. 1999. “Jealousy and the Nature of Beliefs about Infidelity: Tests of Competing Hypotheses about Sex Differences in the United States, Korea, and Japan.” Personal Relationships 6: 125–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buunk, Bram P., Pieternel Dijkstra, Douglas T. Kenrick, and Astrid Warntjes. 2001. “Age Preferences for Mates as Related to Gender, Own Age, and Involvement Level.” Evolution and Human Behavior 22: 241–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buunk, Bram and Ralph B. Hupka. 1987. “Cross-Cultural Differences in the Elicitation of Sexual Jealousy.” Journal of Sex Research 23: 12–22.
   Google Scholar
• Camilleri, Santo F. and Joseph Berger. 1967. “Decision Making and Social Influence: A Model and an Experimental Test.” Sociometry 30(4): 365–78.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, Anne. 2002. A Mind of Her Own: The Evolutionary Psychology of Women. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carli, L. L. 1989. “Gender Differences in Interaction Style and Influence.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 56: 565–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carli, L. L. 1991. “Gender, Status and Influence.” Pp. 89–113 in Advances in Group Processes, vol. 8, edited by E. J. Lawler, B. Markovsky, C. Ridgeway, and H. A. Walker. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carli, L. L. 1999. “Gender, Interpersonal Power, and Social Influence.” Journal of Social Issues 55(1): 81–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chafetz, Janet Saltzman. 1984. Sex and Advantage. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allanheld.
   Google Scholar
• Cosmides, Leda, John Tooby, and Jerome H. Barkow. 1992. “Introduction: Evolutionary Psychology and Conceptual Integration.” Pp. 3–15 in The Adapted Mind, edited by J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, and J. Tooby. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Daly, Martin and Margo Wilson. 1983. Sex, Evolution and Behavior. 2d ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Driskell, James E., Beckett Olmstead, and Eduardo Salas. 1993. “Task Cues, Dominance Cues and Influence in Task Groups.” Journal of Applied Psychology 78(1): 51–60.
   Google Scholar
• Etcoff, Nancy. 1999. Survival of the Prettiest. New York: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Fisek, M. Hamit, Robert Z. Norman, and Max Nelson-Kilger. 1992. “Status Characteristics and Expectation States Theory: A Priori Model Parameters and Test.” Journal of Mathematical Sociology 16: 285–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, Helen. 1999. The First Sex. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Foddy, Margaret and Michael Smithson. 1999. “Can Gender Inequalities Be Eliminated?” Social Psychology Quarterly 62(4): 307–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foschi, Martha. 1996. “Double Standards in the Evaluation of Men and Women.” Social Psychology Quarterly 59(3): 237–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foschi, Martha, Sandra Enns, and Vanessa Lapointe. 2001. “Processing Performance: Evaluations in Homogeneous Task Groups: Feedback and Gender Effects.” Advances in Group Processes 18: 185–216.
   Google Scholar
• Foschi, Martha and S. K. Freeman. 1991. “Inferior Performance, Standards and Influence in Same-Sex Dyads.” Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science 23: 99–113.
   Google Scholar
• Foschi, Martha and Vanessa Lapointe. 2002. “On Conditional Hypotheses and Gender as a Status Characteristic.” Social Psychology Quarterly 65(2): 146–62.
   Google Scholar
• Freese, Lee and Bernard P. Cohen. 1973. “Decision-Making and Social Influence: A Model and an Experimental Test.” Sociometry 36(2): 177–93.
   Google Scholar
• Griffith, W. I., Jane Sell, and M. J. Parker. 1993. “Self-Interested versus Third-Party Allocations of Rewards.” Social Psychology Quarterly 56(2): 148–55.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, Judith Rich. 1998. The Nurture Assumption. Why Children Turn Out the Way They Do. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hopcroft, Rosemary L. 2002. “The Evolution of Sex Discrimination.” Psychology, Evolution and Gender 4(1): 43–67.
   Google Scholar
• Hrdy, Sarah. 1981. The Woman that Never Evolved. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lenski, Gerhard E. 1984. Power and Privilege: A Theory of Social Stratification. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lovaglia, Michael J., Jeffrey W. Lucas, Jeffrey A. Houser, Shane R. Thye, and Barry Markovsky. 1998. “Status Processes and Mental Ability Test Scores.” American Journal of Sociology 104: 195–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, Michael W. and Jane Sell. 1980. “The Marginal Utility of Information: Its Effects upon Decision-Making.” The Sociological Quarterly 21(2): 233–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maryanski, Alexandra and Jonathan H. Turner. 1992. The Social Cage: Human Nature and the Evolution of Society. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mithen, Steven. 1996. The Pre-History of the Mind. Lodon: Thames and Hudson.
   Google Scholar
• Pugh, M. D. and Ralph Wahrman. 1983. “Neutralizing Sexism in Mixed-Sex Groups: Do Women Have to Be Better than Men?” American Journal of Sociology 88(4): 746–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rashotte, Lisa Slattery and Lynn Smith-Lovin. 1997. “Who Benefits from Being Bold: The Interactive Effects of Task Cues and Status Characteristics on Influence in Mock Jury Groups.” Advances in Group Processes 14: 235–55.
   Google Scholar
• Ridgeway, Cecilia L. 1991. “The Social Construction of Status Value: Gender and Other Nominal Characteristics.” Social Forces 70: 367–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridgeway, Cecilia L. 1997. “Interaction and the Conservation of Gender Inequality.” American Sociological Review 62: 218–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridgeway, Cecilia L. and James W. Balkwell. 1997. “Group Processes and the Diffusion of Status-Beliefs.” Social Psychology Quarterly 60: 14–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridgeway, Cecilia L. and Kristan Glasgow Erickson. 2000. “Creating and Spreading Status Beliefs.” American Journal of Sociology 106(3): 579–615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridgeway, Cecilia L., Kathy J. Kuipers, Elizabeth Heger, and Dawn T. Robinson. 1998. “How Do Status Beliefs Develop? The Role of Resources and Interactional Experience.” American Sociological Review 63(3): 331–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridgeway, Cecilia L. and Lynn Smith-Lovin. 1999. “The Gender System and Interaction.” Annual Review of Sociology 25: 191–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridgeway, Cecilia and Henry Walker. 1995. “Status Structures.” Pp. 281–310 in Sociological Perspectives on Social Psychology, edited by Karen S. Cook, Gary A. Fine, and James S. House. Needham Heights MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Ridley, Matt. 1993. The Red Queen: Sex and the Evolution of Human Nature. New York: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Riordan, Cornelius. 1983. “Sex as a General Status Characteristic.” Social Psychology Quarterly 46(3): 261–7.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, Peter H. 1989. Down and out in America: The Origins of Homelessness. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith-Lovin, Lynn, John V. Skvoretz, and Charlotte G. Hudson. 1986. “Status and Participation in Six-Person Groups: A Test of Skvoretz's Comparative Status Model.” Social Forces 64: 992–1005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tooby, John and Leda Cosmides. 1992. “The Psychological Foundations of Culture.” Pp. 19–136 in The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture, edited by Jerome H. Barkow, Leda Cosmides, and John Tooby. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Troyer, Lisa. 2001. “Effects of Protocol Differences on the Study of Status and Social Influence.” Current Research in Social Psychology 6(13): 182–205.
   Google Scholar
• Troyer, Lisa and C. Wesley Younts. 1997. “Whose Expectations Matter? The Relative Power of First and Second Order Expectations in Determining Social Influence.” American Journal of Sociology 2: 692–732.
   Google Scholar
• Van Den Berghe, Pierre L. 1973. Age and Sex in Human Societies: A Biosocial Perspective. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Van Den Berghe, Pierre L. 1979. Human Family Systems. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, David G. and Joseph Berger. 1997. “Gender and Interpersonal Task Behaviors: Status Expectation Accounts.” Sociological Perspectives 40(1): 1–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, David G., Rebecca S. Ford, and Thomas W. Ford. 1986. “Can Gender Inequalities Be Reduced?” American Sociological Review 51: 47–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, Henry A., Barbara C. Ilardi, Anne McMahon, and Mary L. Fennell. 1996. “Gender, Interaction and Leadership.” Social Psychology Quarterly 59(3): 255–72.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, Murray, Jr. and James Driskell. 1983. “Beauty as Status.” American Journal of Sociology 89: 140–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, Murray, Jr. and Stuart J. Hysom. 1998. “Creating Status Characteristics.” American Sociological Review 63(3): 351–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitmeyer, Joseph M. 2003. “The Mathematics of Expectation States Theory.” Social Psychology Quarterly 66: 238–53.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, Wendy and Stephen J. Karten. 1986. “Sex Differences in Interaction Style as a Product of Perceived Sex Differences in Competence.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50: 341–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, James D. and Peter H. Rossi. 1985. The Armed Criminal in America: A Survey of Incarcerated Felons. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, James D., Beth A. Rubin, and Joel A. Devine. 1998. Beside the Golden Door: Policy, Politics, and the Homeless. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar