Mechanisms of Disability Discrimination in Large Bureaucratic Organizations: Ascriptive Inequalities in the Workplace

REFERENCES

• Abberley, Paul. 1987. “The Concept of Oppression and the Development of a Social Theory of Disability.” Disability, Handicap and Society 2:5–19.
   Google Scholar
• Abberley, Paul. 1995. “Disabling Ideology in Health and Welfare: The Case of Occupational Welfare.” Disability and Society 10:221–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acker, Joan. 1990. “Hierarchies, Jobs, Bodies: A Theory of Gendered Organizations.” Gender and Society 4:139–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acker, Joan. 1999. “Revisiting Class: Lessons from Theorizing Race and Gender in Organizations.” Working Paper No. 5, Center for Gender in Organizations, Simmons Graduate School of Management, Boston.
   Google Scholar
• Albertson's Inc. v. Kirkingburg. 143 F.3d 1228 (Supreme Court, June 22, 1999).
   Google Scholar
• Albrecht, Gary. 1992. The Disability Business: Rehabilitation in America. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Americans with Disabilities Act. 1990. Pub. L. No. 101-336, 42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, Marjorie L. 2000. “Estimating the Potential Benefit of the ADA on the Wages and Employment of People with Disabilities.” Pp. 201–27 in Employment, Disability, and the Americans with Disabilities Act: Issues in Law, Public Policy, and Research, edited by Peter D. Blanck. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baron, Ava. 1987. “Contested Terrain Revisited: Technology and Gender Definitions of Work in the Printing Industry.” Pp. 1850–920 in Women, Work, and Technology, edited by Barbara Drygulski Wright. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baron, James N. and William T. Bielby. 1980. “Bringing the Firm Back In: Stratification, Segmentation, and the Organization of Work.” American Sociological Review 45:737–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, Michele. 1980. Women's Oppression Today. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, Bruce L. 2004. Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences. 5th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Bielby, William T. and James N. Baron. 1984. “A Woman's Place Is with Other Women: Sex Segregation within Organizations.” Pp. 27–55 in Sex Segregation in the Workplace, edited by Barbara F. Reskin. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blanck, Peter David. 2000. “The Economics of the Employment Provision of the Americans with Disabilities Act: Workplace Accommodations.” Pp. 201–27 in Employment, Disability, and the Americans with Disabilities Act, edited by Peter David Blanck. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bridges, William P. 1980. “Industry, Marginality and Female Employment: A New Appraisal.” American Sociological Review 45:58–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, Peter J. 1991. “Identity Processes and Social Stress.” American Sociological Review 56:836–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkhauser, Richard V. and Mary C. Daly. 1994. “The Economic Consequences of Disability.” Journal of Disability Policy Studies 5(1):25–52.
   Google Scholar
• Charlton, James I. 1998. Nothing about Us without Us: Disability Oppression and Empowerment. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press, Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, Kathy. 1983. “The Grounded Theory Method: An Explication and Interpretation.” Pp. 109–26 in Contemporary Field Research: A Collection of Readings, edited by Robert Emerson. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, Kathy. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cockburn, Cynthia. 1991. In the Way of Women: Men's Resistance to Sex Equality in Organizations. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, Robert W. 1987. Gender and Power: Society, the Person, and Sexual Politics. Boston, MA: Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Deegan, Mary Jo. 1985. “Multiple Minority Groups: A Case Study of Physically Disabled Women.” Pp. 36–55 in Women and Disability: The Double Handicap, edited by Mary Jo Deegan and Nancy Brooks. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Diesing, Paul R. 1971. Patterns of Discovery in the Social Sciences. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Dobbin, Frank, John R. Sutton, John W. Meyer, and Richard Scott. 1988. “Equal Opportunity Law and the Construction of Internal Labor Markets.” The American Journal of Sociology 99(2):396–427.
   Google Scholar
• Edelman, Lauren B. 1992. “Legal Ambiguity and Symbolic Structures: Organizational Mediation of Law.” American Journal of Sociology 97:1531–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fine, Michael and Caroline Glendinning. 2005. “Dependence, Independence or Interdependence? Revisiting the Concepts of ‘Care’ and ‘Dependency.’” Ageing and Society 25(4):601–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flowers, Sandra v. Southern Regional Physician Services, Inc. 5th Circuit, March 30, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, Robert v. General Motors. 4th Circuit, April 13, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. 1973. The Birth of the Clinic. London: Tavistock.
   Google Scholar
• Frankfort-Nachmias, Chava and David Nachmias. 1999. Research Methods in the Social Sciences. 6th ed. New York: Worth Publishers and St. Martin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Galvin, Rose D. 2005. “Researching the Disabled Identity: Contextualizing the Identity Transformations which Accompany the Onset of Impairment.” Sociology of Health and Illness 27(3):393–413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gecas, Viktor and Peter J. Burke. 1995. “Self and Identity.” Pp. 41–67 in Sociological Perspectives on Social Psychology, edited by K. Cook, G. A. Fine, and J. House. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Ghaziani, Amin. 2004. “Anticipatory and Actualized Identities: A Cultural Analysis of the Transition from AIDS Disability to Work.” The Sociological Quarterly 45(2):273–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, Barney G. 1978. Theoretical Sensitivity. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, Barney G. 1992. Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, Barney G. and Anselm L. Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Glazer, Nona. 1987. “Where Are the Women? The Absence of Women as Social Agents in Theories of Occupational Sex Segregation.” Presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, August 6–10, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, Erving. 1963. Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hahn, Harlan. 1988. “The Politics of Physical Differences: Disability and Discrimination.” Journal of Social Issues 44:39–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harding, Sandra. 1991. Whose Science, Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women's Lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harlan, Sharon L. and Catherine White Berheide. 1994. “Barriers to Workplace Advancement Experienced by Women in Low-Paying Occupations.” Commissioned by the U.S. Department of Labor, Glass Ceiling Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Harlan, Sharon L. and Pamela M. Robert. 1995. Disability in Work Organizations: Barriers to Employment Opportunity. Albany, NY: State University of New York at Albany.
   Google Scholar
• Harlan, Sharon L. and Pamela M. Robert. 1998. “The Social Construction of Disability in Organizations: Why Employers Resist Reasonable Accommodation.” Work and Occupations 25:397–435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, Louis and Associates, Inc. and National Organization on Disability (NOD). 1995. 1995 Survey of Corporate Executives of the ADA. Washington, DC: Louis Harris and Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, Heidi. 1976. “Capitalism, Patriarchy and Job Segregation by Sex.” Signs 1:137–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann, Heidi. 1979. “The Unhappy Marriage of Marxism and Feminism: Towards a More Progressive Union.” Capital and Class 8:1–33.
   Google Scholar
• Hotchkiss, Julie L. 2003. The Labor Market Experience of Workers with Disabilities: The ADA and Beyond. Kalamazoo, MI: W. E. Upjohn Institute of Employment Research.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, Bill, Linda McKie, Debra Hopkins, and Nick Watson. 2005, April. “Love's Labours Lost? Feminism, the Disabled People's Movement and an Ethic of Care.” Sociology 39(2):259–75.
   Google Scholar
• Kanter, Rosabeth Moss. 1977. Men and Women of the Corporation. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, Joanne M. and Cathryn Johnson. 2004. “Stigmatized Individuals and the Process of Identity.” The Sociological Quarterly 45(4):807–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, Erin and Frank Dobbin. 1999. “Civil Rights Law at Work: Sex Discrimination and the Rise of Maternity Leave Policies.” American Journal of Sociology 105(2):455–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruse, Douglas and Lisa Schur. 2003. “Employment of People with Disabilities Following the ADA.” Industrial Relations 42(1):31–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaPlante, Mitchell P. 1988. Data on Disability from the National Health Survey 1983–1985. Washington, DC: National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research. An InfoUse Report.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Barbara A. 2003. “A Decade of the Americans with Disabilities Act: Judicial Outcomes and Unresolved Problems.” Industrial Relations 42(1):11–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Yvonna S. and Egon G. Guba. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lyson, Thomas A. 1985. “Race and Sex Segregation in the Occupational Structure of Southern Employers.” Social Science Quarterly 66:281–95.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, Catherine and Gretchen B. Rossman. 1995. Designing Qualitative Research. 2d ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, Karen Oppenheim. 1984. “Commentary: Strober's Theory of Occupational Segregation.” Pp. 157–70 in Sex Segregation in the Workplace, edited by Barbara Reskin. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, Mary Grimley. 2004. Working against Odds: Stories of Disabled Women's Work Lives. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, John W. and Brian Rowan. 1977. “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony.” American Journal of Sociology 83:340–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, John W. and W. Richard Scott, eds. 1983. Organizational Environments: Ritual and Rationality. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• McNeil, John M. 2000. “Employment, Earnings, and Disability (1991/92, 1993/94, 1994/95 and 1997): Data from the Survey of Income and Program Participation.” Presented at the 75th Conference of the Western Economic Association International, June 29–July 3, Vancouver, British Columbia.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, Paul Steven. 2000. “The Evolving ADA.” Pp. 3–18 in Employment, Disability, and the Americans with Disabilities Act: Issues in Law, Public Policy, and Research, edited by Peter D. Blanck. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morse, Janice M. 1986. “Quantitative and Qualitative Research: Issues in Sampling.” Pp. 181–93 in Nursing Research Methodology: Issues and Implementation, edited by Peggy L. Chinn. Rockville, MD: Aspen.
   Google Scholar
• Morse, Janice M. 1998. “Designing Funded Qualitative Research.” Pp. 56–85 in Strategies of Qualitative Research, edited by Norman K. Denzin and Yvonna S. Lincoln. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy v. United Parcel Service. 141 F.3d 1185 (Supreme Court, June 22, 1999).
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, Raymond. 1988. Social Closure: The Theory of Monopolization and Exclusion. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, Robert L. and William Bridges. 1999. Legalizing Gender Inequality: Courts, Markets, and Unequal Pay for Women in America. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nkomo, Stella. 1992. “The Emperor Has No Clothes: Rewriting Race in Organizations.” Academy of Management Review 17:487–513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Brien, Ruth, ed. 2004. Voices from the Edge: Narratives about the Americans with Disabilities Act. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O'Brien, Ruth. 2005. Bodies in Revolt: Gender, Disability, and a Workplace Ethic of Care. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• O'Day, Bonnie and Monroe Berkowitz. 2001. “Disability Benefit Programs: Can We Improve the Return-to-Work Record?” Pp. 546–64 in Handbook of Disability Studies, edited by Gary L. Albrecht, Katherine D. Seelman, and Michael Bury. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, Michael. 1990. The Politics of Disablement: A Sociological Approach. New York: St. Martin Press.
   Google Scholar
• President's Committee on the Employment of People with Disabilities.1994. Report to Congress on the Job Accommodation Network (July 26).
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, Charles C. 1987. The Comparative Method. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press, Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Randolph, Diane Smith and Elena M. Andresen. 2004. “Disability, Gender and Unemployment Relationships in the United States from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.” Disability and Society 19(4):403–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reskin, Barbara F. 1988. “Bringing the Men Back In.” Gender and Society 2:58–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reskin, Barbara F. 2003. “Including Mechanisms in Our Models of Ascriptive Inequality.” American Sociological Review 68:1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reskin, Barbara F. and Patricia Roos. 1992. “Jobs, Authority, and Earnings among Managers: The Continuing Significance of Sex.” Work and Occupations 19:342–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robert, Pamela. 2003. “Disability Oppression in the Capitalist Workplace.” Science and Society 67(2):136–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robert, Pamela M. and Sharon L. Harlan. 2002. “Resisting Disabling Constructions of the Self in the Workplace.” Presented at the 97th Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, August 16, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Schriner, Kay. 2001. “A Disability Studies Perspective on Employment Issues and Polices for Disabled People: An International View.” Pp. 642–62 in Handbook of Disability Studies, edited by Gary L. Albrecht, Katherine D. Seelman, and Michael Bury. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schur, Lisa A. 2003. “Barriers or Opportunities? The Causes of Contingent and Part-Time Work among People with Disabilities.” Industrial Relations 42(4):589–622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, Richard W. 1987. Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems. 2d ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, Richard W. 1995. Institutions and Organizations: Theory and Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Selznick, Philip. 1969. Law, Society, and Industrial Justice. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, Tom and Nick Watson. 1997. “Defending the Social Model.” Disability and Society 12(2):293–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, Ida Harper. 1989. “The Sociology of Work: Where Have the Workers Gone?” Social Forces 67:563–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smits, Stanley J. 2004. “Disability and Employment in the USA: The Quest for Best Practices.” Disability and Society 19(6):647–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stapleton, David C. and Richard V. Burkhauser, eds. 2003. “The Decline in Employment of People with Disabilities: A Policy Puzzle.” Kalamazoo, MI: W. E. Upjohn Institute of Employment Research.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, John H. 2005. Culture and Disability: Providing Culturally Competent Services. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, Anselm 1987. Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, Anselm and Juliet Corbin. 1990. Basics of Qualitative Research. Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Strober, Myra H. 1984. “Toward a General Theory of Occupational Sex Segregation: The Case of Public School Teaching.” Pp. 144–56 in Sex Segregation in the Workplace, edited by Barbara F. Reskin. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stryker, Robin. 2001. “Disparate Impact and the Quota Debates: Law, Labor Market Sociology, and Equal Employment Policies.” The Sociological Quarterly 42(1):13–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton and Hinton v. United Air Lines. 130 F.3d 893 (Supreme Court, June 22, 1999).
   Google Scholar
• Sutton, John R., Frank Dobbin, John W. Meyer, and W. Richard Scott. 1994. “The Legalization of the Workplace.” American Journal of Sociology 99(4):944–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swain, John, Sally French, and Colin Cameron. 2003. Controversial Issues in a Disabling Society. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tomaskovic-Devey, Donald. 1993. Gender and Racial Inequality at Work. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. Williams. 224 F.3d 840 (Supreme Court, January 8, 2002).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau. 2002. http://www.census.gov/prod/ww/statistical-abstract-03.html
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Labor, Job Accommodation Network (JAN). 1999. http://www.jan.edu/media/stats/bencosts0799.html
   Google Scholar
• U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO). 1997. “Social Security Disability Programs Lag in Promoting Return to Work.” Document No. GAO/HEHS-97-46. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO). 1998. “Social Security Disability Insurance: Multiple Factors Affect Beneficiaries' Ability to Return to Work.” Report to the Chairman, Subcommittee on Social Security, Committee on Ways and Means, House of Representatives. Document No. GAO/HEHS-98-39.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughan, Diane. 1992. “Theory Elaboration: The Heuristics of Case Analysis.” Pp. 173–202 in What Is a Case?, edited by H. Becker and C. Ragin. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wendell, Susan. 1996. The Rejected Body: Feminist Philosophical Reflections on Disability. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• West, Candace and Sarah Fenstermaker. 1995. “Doing Difference.” Gender and Society 9(1):8–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wharton, Amy S. 1991. “Structure and Agency in Socialist-Feminist Theory.” Gender and Society 5(3):373–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, Sven, Joseph Burton, and Benjamin Howell. 2005. Work and the Disability Transition in 20th Century America. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, Erik Olin. 1978. “Race, Class, and Income Inequality.” American Sociological Review 83:1368–97.
   Google Scholar
• Zola, Irving. 1982. Missing Pieces: A Chronicle of Living with Disability. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zola, Irving. 1984. “Does It Matter What You Call Us?” Disability Quarterly 4:1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Zucker, Lynne G. 1983. “Organizations as Institutions.” Pp. 1–47 in Research in the Sociology of Organizations, edited by Samuel B. Bacharach. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar